TY - CHAP A1 - Lauer, Norina A1 - Greiner, Nina A1 - Pfingsten, Andrea A1 - Kudienko, Natalie ED - Weber, Karsten ED - Haug, Sonja ED - Lauer, Norina ED - Meussling-Sentpali, Annette ED - Mohr, Christa ED - Pfingsten, Andrea ED - Raptis, Georgios ED - Bahr, Gudrun T1 - Ethisch-technische Evaluation der im Projekt DeinHaus 4.0 Oberpfalz eingesetzten Therapie-Apps für das logopädische und physiotherapeutische Eigentraining T2 - Digitale Technik für ambulante Pflege und Therapie. Herausforderungen, Lösungen, Anwendungen und Forschungsperspektiven N2 - In diesem Beitrag wird die Bewertung von Patient*innen-Apps für das logopädische bzw-. physiotherapeutische Eigentraining durch Fachpersonen anhand der MARS-G-Skala vorgestellt. KW - Digitalisierung KW - Gesundheit KW - Pflege KW - Logopädie KW - Physiotherapie KW - Ethik KW - Akzeptanz KW - Technik Y1 - 2022 SN - 978-3-8394-6235-5 U6 - https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839462355-008 SP - 155 EP - 174 PB - transcript CY - Bielefeld ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Ettl, Katrin A1 - Greiner, Nina A1 - Kudienko, Natalie A1 - Lauer, Norina A1 - Lichtenauer, Norbert A1 - Meussling-Sentpali, Annette A1 - Mohr, Christa A1 - Pfingsten, Andrea ED - Weber, Karsten ED - Haug, Sonja ED - Lauer, Norina ED - Meussling-Sentpali, Annette ED - Mohr, Christa ED - Pfingsten, Andrea ED - Raptis, Georgios ED - Bahr, Gudrun T1 - Forschungsdesign Pflege und Therapie im Projekt TePUS T2 - Digitale Technik für ambulante Pflege und Therapie: Herausforderungen, Lösungen, Anwendungen und Forschungsperspektiven N2 - Beim Projekt DeinHaus 4.0 Oberpfalz – TePUS (Telepräsenzroboter für die Pflege und Unterstützung von Schlaganfallpatientinnen und -patienten) handelt es sich um eine Längsschnittstudie im Mixed-Methods-Design zur Untersuchung telepräsenz und appgestützter Angebote aus den Bereichen Pflege, Logopädie und Physiotherapie. T3 - Schriftenreihe der OTH Regensburg - 1 KW - Pflege KW - Logopädie KW - Physiotherapie KW - Schlaganfall KW - Digitalisierung KW - Ambulante Pflege KW - Ambulante Therapie KW - Roboter Y1 - 2022 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-55448 SN - 978-3-83766235-1 SP - 59 EP - 78 PB - transcript CY - Bielefeld ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Greiner, Nina A1 - Lauer, Norina A1 - Schedel, Valentin A1 - Pfingsten, Andrea T1 - Group rehabilitation for adults with acquired neurological disorders: A systematic review of mono- and interdisciplinary interventions in physical and speech-language therapy JF - PM&R N2 - Background: Group treatments and interdisciplinary collaboration are recommended in evidence-based guidelines for neurorehabilitation, including physical and speech-language therapy. Evidence suggests that activating overlapping neural networks for upper extremity motor control and speechlanguage processing produces synergistic effects during therapy. This systematic review aims to overview and appraise the efficacy of group treatments in traditional rehabilitation and telerehabilitation. In addition to summarizing evidence on monodisciplinary approaches in physical and speech-language therapy, it seeks data on integrative approaches involving one or both disciplines to inform further interdisciplinary collaboration. Methods: The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021288012) and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality using AMSTAR 2, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale, or the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Checklist, as appropriate. The evidence was summarized in a systematic narrative synthesis and its certainty rated based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: A total of 29 studies were included: 16 on speech-language therapy (861 participants) and 13 on physical therapy (1757 participants). No studies addressed interdisciplinary group interventions, and only two evaluated group telerehabilitation. Outcome domains and measures varied across studies and the certainty of evidence was predominantly low. However, moderate-certainty evidence supports that group speech-language therapy improves quality of life, communication, and language in stroke survivors, especially when interventions emphasize verbal production in communicative settings with multimodal materials and cueing. In physical therapy, circuit class training may be more effective than other group approaches for enhancing quality of life and mobility. Conclusion: Group treatments in neurorehabilitation show some benefits, but further research is needed – especially regarding interdisciplinary approaches and telerehabilitation. KW - Gruppentherapie KW - Logopädie KW - Physiotherapie KW - Neurologie KW - systematic review KW - group treatment KW - interdisciplinary collaboration KW - speech-language therapy KW - physical therapy Y1 - 2025 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.70006 N1 - Corresponding author der OTH Regensburg: Nina Greiner PB - Wiley ER -