TY - CHAP A1 - Ezer, Timur A1 - Grabinger, Lisa A1 - Hauser, Florian A1 - Staufer, Susanne A1 - Mottok, Jürgen T1 - EYE TRACKING AS TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION: FURTHER INVESTIGATION OF DATA QUALITY AND IMPROVEMENTS T2 - INTED2024 Proceedings: 18th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, Valencia, Spain. 4-6 March, 2024 N2 - Eye tracking serves as a powerful tool across a variety of empirical research areas: From usability research over cognitive research to educational research and applications in classrooms. However, data noise in eye tracking data poses a challenge to researchers and educators, as it leads to gaze positions being measured imprecisely under unfavorable conditions. In our previous study, we systematically investigated factors that influence data quality and are easily controllable in a classroom or laboratory environment, such as illumination, sampling frequency, and head orientation. However, no recommendations regarding the light source and light orientation could be provided, as these influences could not be analyzed in sufficient detail. Yet, a further examination of these factors, eliminating human influences by using an artificial head, revealed significant differences between individual settings. Hence, in this empirical study of eye tracking as an educational technology, we delve deeper into examining the impact of both light source and light orientation on data quality. This is investigated with an artificial head together with the Tobii Pro Spectrum eye tracking device. To measure data quality, we use the metrics precision and standard deviation as indicators of data noise. The obtained results derive practical advice for educators and researchers, such as not to illuminate the subject from the rear, in order to gather useful data for research and future classroom applications. Thereby, this study serves as a complement to our previous research, answering open questions regarding best practices for researchers and educators when using eye trackers. It aims to provide valuable insights into producing data of the highest quality possible when using eye trackers, both in laboratory settings and in future classrooms applications. KW - Eye tracking KW - data quality KW - best practices KW - lighting conditions KW - standard deviation KW - precision Y1 - 2024 SN - 978-84-09-59215-9 U6 - https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2024.0802 SN - 2340-1079 SP - 2955 EP - 2961 PB - IATED Academy ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Ezer, Timur A1 - Grabinger, Lisa A1 - Hauser, Florian A1 - Staufer, Susanne A1 - Mottok, Jürgen T1 - EYE TRACKING METRICS FOR DISTINGUISHING GLOBAL AND FOCAL GAZE PATTERNS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW T2 - INTED2024 Proceedings: 18th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, Valencia, Spain. 4-6 March, 2024 N2 - Global and focal eye tracking gaze patterns are distinguished in a variety of domains, such as radiology research, empirical software engineering, behavioral psychology, and cartography research. A global gaze pattern is present if a participant in an eye tracking study gains an overview of the stimulus, whereas a focal pattern emerges during a more detailed evaluation of a specific part of the stimulus. With this higher-level measure of global and focal gaze patterns, cognitive effort, expertise levels, and even neurological characteristics - such as autism - can be quantified. Furthermore, with this measure, cognitive efforts of students in certain tasks can be investigated and clues for targeted support can be provided. These properties in particular make this eye tracking measure valuable for the education domain. In the field of eye tracking research, many researchers have established distinct criteria for differentiating global and focal gaze patterns. Moreover, it is rarely quantitatively measured which of these patterns is present, but rather determined based on qualitative considerations. However, some studies explicitly use quantitative metrics like saccade-length or fixation-duration to distinguish between global and focal gaze patterns. This is the focus of the present systematic literature review: It searches for and compiles the eye tracking metrics used in the literature to distinguish global from focal gaze patterns in a quantitative way. In doing so, this study fills the yawning gap in quantitative metrics for determining global and focal gaze patterns. In the long run, this can be used to answer questions about cognitive load and problems in processing tasks during eye tracking studies and to provide further insights into the cognitive processes of students. The present paper first discusses definitions of global and focal gaze patterns and presents examples in which this metric has already been applied. Then, the research questions together with search strings and search engines used for the systematic literature review are described. Finally, the results are summarized, presenting a compilation of and connections between quantitative metrics utilized in the literature to distinguish between global and focal viewing patterns. KW - Eye tracking KW - cognitive load KW - expertise KW - global KW - focal KW - ambient KW - local KW - metrics Y1 - 2024 SN - 978-84-09-59215-9 U6 - https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2024.0814 SN - 2340-1079 SP - 3005 EP - 3014 PB - IATED Academy ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Ezer, Timur A1 - Röhrl, Simon A1 - Mottok, Jürgen ED - Gómez Chova, Luis ED - González Martínez, Chelo ED - Lees, Joanna T1 - Towards accurate eye tracking: quantifying error in linear pixel-to-degree conversion T2 - ICERI2025 Proceedings N2 - Eye tracking has become a powerful tool for analyzing cognitive processes in educational research. Educators and researchers can utilize eye tracking to model learners by determining their gaze patterns. In addition, eye tracking can be used directly for teaching by extracting experts' gaze behavior in certain areas and learning from it. However, eye tracking data is captured in a variety of coordinate systems, which can differ across individual studies. Consequently, algorithms, such as eye movement classifiers, must frequently convert gaze data between different coordinate systems. In particular, the conversion from screen pixels into visual degrees is typically approximated by a linear conversion in current literature and standard practice. However, this approximation introduces inaccuracies, thus potentially obscuring eye movements relevant to educational research. This paper provides a detailed geometric and analytical examination of the commonly applied linear approximation, quantifying its error in comparison to the exact coordinate conversion from screen pixels to angular degrees. For this purpose, the exact conversion formulas are mathematically derived from geometric optics, enabling researchers and educators to use them in their work. Utilizing these derived transformations can improve the robustness of analyses, for example, when detecting subtle eye movements. The present work supports educational research using eye tracking to achieve more insightful findings that may have previously been obscured by measurement inaccuracies. Thereby, we provide an important contribution toward more reliable and valid research and educational practices in eye tracking. KW - Eye tracking KW - coordinate system KW - conversion KW - angular degree KW - pixel Y1 - 2025 U6 - https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2025.1841 SP - 6709 EP - 6717 PB - IATED ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Grabinger, Lisa A1 - Hauser, Florian A1 - Wolff, Christian A1 - Mottok, Jürgen T1 - On Eye Tracking in Software Engineering JF - SN Computer Science N2 - Eye tracking is becoming more and more important as a research method within the field of software engineering (SE). Existing meta-analyses focus on the design or conduct of SE eye tracking studies rather than the analysis phase. This article attempts to fill this gap; it presents a systematic literature review of eye tracking studies in the field of SE—focusing mainly on the data analysis methods used. From the IEEE Xplore and ACM digital libraries we gather 125 papers up to the first quarter of 2024. Detailed evaluation provides information on the number of papers that use specific methods of analysis (i.e., descriptive or inferential statistics, and gaze visualization) or settings (e.g., sample size, technical setup, and selected aspects of research design). With the data obtained we can infer the popularity of specific analysis methods in the field. Those results enable efficient work on data analysis tools or education of aspiring researchers and can serve as basis for standardization or guidelines within the community—providing for methods to include as well as current inconsistencies. KW - Eye tracking KW - Software engineering KW - Empirical KW - Systematic literature review Y1 - 2024 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-03045-3 SN - 2661-8907 N1 - Zugehöriges Datenset: doi:10.5281/zenodo.11279180 VL - 5 IS - 6 PB - Springer CY - Singapore ER -