TY - CHAP A1 - Kleine, Nadine A1 - Ulbricht, Max-R. A1 - Weber, Karsten A1 - Pallas, Frank ED - Decker, Michael ED - Lindner, Ralf ED - Lingner, Stephan ED - Scherz, Constanze ED - Sotoudeh, Mahshid T1 - Participatory Sensing und Wearable Technologies als partizipative Formen der Datengenerierung im Internet of Things BT - Potenziale, Herausforderungen und erste Lösungsansätze T2 - 'Grand Challenges' meistern - der Beitrag der Technikfolgenabschätzung KW - Wearable Computer KW - Datenerhebung KW - Internet der Dinge Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845283562-245 SP - 245 EP - 257 PB - Nomos CY - Baden-Baden ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Weber, Karsten A1 - Pallas, Frank A1 - Ulbricht, Max-R. T1 - Challenges of Citizen Science: Commons, Incentives, Organizations, and Regulations JF - American Journal of Bioethics Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2019.1619862 VL - 19 IS - 8 SP - 52 EP - 54 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Weber, Karsten A1 - Pallas, Frank A1 - Ulbricht, Max-R. T1 - Quantified Self, Participatory Sensing und die Grenzen der Regulierung JF - Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik N2 - One of the aims of technology assessment is to inform policy makers about possible future developments of technology, about their likelihood, and about the most probable impacts on individuals as well as on the fabric of society. Such information could be used to plan and create adequate regulations to minimize negative and maximize positive effects of the corresponding technology. However, certain innovations, which we call bottom up-innovations in this paper, make it quite difficult if not almost impossible to provide information of the kind technology assessment shall produce. After introducing the dichotomy of top down-and bottom up-innovations and bringing these types of innovation in the context of more established notions of innovation on a theoretical level we will use the examples of the quantified self-movement and the idea of participatory sensing to describe bottom up-innovations as they take place in real life. By depicting these examples we will try to identify some of the social consequences of the technology that is used in each of the contexts mentioned above. Finally, we will try to draw some more general conclusions concerning bottom up-innovations and technology assessment and its ability to provide reliable information with regard to possible futures. We shall argue that regulation of technology resulting from bottom up-innovations must go " beyond markets and state ". Y1 - 2015 IS - 23 SP - 75 EP - 94 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Weber, Karsten A1 - Kleine, Nadine A1 - Pallas, Frank A1 - Ulbricht, Max-R. T1 - Technik zur Unterstützung von Citizen Science und Open Science BT - Technische und organisatorische Herausforderungen und mögliche Lösungsansätze JF - TATuP - Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis N2 - If citizens actively participate in the process of collecting empirical data, as a key element of empirically oriented scientific projects, this can be seen as a contribution to an open and citizen-oriented science. Such participation can be supported by providing technical tools. The paper therefore presents examples of participatory sensing as the provision of affordable sensors for measuring environmental parameters as well as wearable technologies for recording quantified vital data and physiological states. Conceptually, the provision of data collected with these tools can be understood as a commons – with all opportunities and risks associated with such goods. After describing examples of participatory sensing and wearable technologies, the authors identify potential challenges and outline technical and organizational approaches to solve them. Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.26.1-2.25 VL - 26 IS - 1/2 SP - 25 EP - 30 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Ulbricht, Max-R. A1 - Weber, Karsten ED - Friedewald, Michael ED - Lamla, Jörn ED - Roßnagel, Alexander T1 - Adieu Einwilligung? BT - Neue Herausforderungen für die informationelle Selbstbestimmung im Angesicht von Big Data-Technologien T2 - Informationelle Selbstbestimmung im digitalen Wandel N2 - Bei Nutzung neuer Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien ergeben sich Herausforderungen bezüglich informationeller Selbstbestimmung, da etablierte Prinzipien neu bewertet werden müssen. Anhand eines konkreten Szenarios werden rechtliche und technische Problemfelder bei der Nutzung von Big Data-Technologien aufgezeigt, um ein Konzept zur technisch unterstützten Verwaltung von Einwilligungen und damit zur Stärkung der informationellen Selbstbestimmung im Big Data-Kontext herzuleiten. KW - Big Data KW - Datenschutz KW - Informationelles Selbstbestimmungsrecht KW - Personenbezogene Daten Y1 - 2017 SN - 978-3-658-17662-4 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17662-4_16 SP - 265 EP - 286 PB - Springer Vieweg CY - Wiesbaden ER -