TY - JOUR A1 - Renkawitz, Tobias A1 - Weber, Tim A. A1 - Dullien, Silvia A1 - Woerner, Michael A1 - Dendorfer, Sebastian A1 - Grifka, Joachim A1 - Weber, Markus T1 - Leg length and offset differences above 5 mm after total hip arthroplasty are associated with altered gait kinematics JF - Gait & Posture N2 - We aimed to investigate the relationship between postoperative leg length/offset (LL/OS) reconstruction and gait performance after total hip arthroplasty (THA). In the course of a prospective randomized controlled trial, 60 patients with unilateral hip arthrosis received cementless THA through a minimally-invasive anterolateral surgical approach. One year post-operatively, LL and global OS restoration were analyzed and compared to the contralateral hip on AP pelvic radiographs. The combined postoperative limb length/OS reconstruction of the operated hip was categorized as restored (within 5 mm) or non-restored (more than 5 mm reduction or more than 5 mm increment). The acetabular component inclination, anteversion and femoral component anteversion were evaluated using CT scans of the pelvis and the femur. 3D gait analysis of the lower extremity and patient related outcome measures (HHS, HOOS, EQ-5D) were obtained pre-operatively, six months and twelve months post-operatively by an observer blinded to radiographic results. Component position of cup and stem was comparable between the restored and non-restored group. Combined LL and OS restoration within 5 mm resulted in higher Froude number (p < 0.001), normalized walking speed (p < 0.001) and hip range-of-motion (ROM) (p = 0.004) during gait twelve months postoperatively, whereas gait symmetry was comparable regardless of LL and OS reconstruction at both examinations. Clinical scores did not show any relevant association between the accuracy of LL or OS reconstruction and gait six/twelve months after THA. In summary, postoperative LL/OS discrepancies larger than 5 mm relate to unphysiological gait kinematics within the first year after THA. DRKS00000739, German Clinical Trials Register. KW - THA KW - Leg length KW - Offset KW - Gait analysis KW - Biomechanics Y1 - 2016 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.07.011 VL - vol. 49 SP - 196 EP - 201 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Renkawitz, Tobias A1 - Weber, Markus A1 - Springorum, H.-R. A1 - Sendtner, E. A1 - Woerner, Michael A1 - Ulm, K. A1 - Weber, Tim A1 - Grifka, Joachim T1 - Impingement-free range of motion, cup coverage and early clinical results between femur first navigation and conventional total hip arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial JF - Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery N2 - We report the kinematic and early clinical results of a patient- and observer-blinded randomised controlled trial in which CT scans were used to compare potential impingement-free range of movement (ROM) and acetabular component cover between patients treated with either the navigated 'femur-first' total hip arthroplasty (THA) method (n = 66; male/female 29/37, mean age 62.5 years; 50 to 74) or conventional THA (n = 69; male/female 35/34, mean age 62.9 years; 50 to 75). The Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the Harris hip score, the Euro-Qol-5D and the Mancuso THA patient expectations score were assessed at six weeks, six months and one year after surgery. A total of 48 of the patients (84%) in the navigated 'femur-first' group and 43 (65%) in the conventional group reached all the desirable potential ROM boundaries without prosthetic impingement for activities of daily living (ADL) in flexion, extension, abduction, adduction and rotation (p = 0.016). Acetabular component cover and surface contact with the host bone were > 87% in both groups. There was a significant difference between the navigated and the conventional groups' Harris hip scores six weeks after surgery (p = 0.010). There were no significant differences with respect to any clinical outcome at six months and one year of follow-up. The navigated 'femur-first' technique improves the potential ROM for ADL without prosthetic impingement, although there was no observed clinical difference between the two treatment groups. KW - combined anteversion KW - computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery KW - THA KW - Hüftgelenkprothese KW - Operationstechnik KW - Computerunterstütztes Verfahren KW - Beweglichkeit Y1 - 2015 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B7.34729 VL - 97-B SP - 890 EP - 898 ER -