TY - CHAP A1 - Iturralde, Kepa A1 - Feucht, Malte A1 - Hu, Rongbo A1 - Pan, Wen A1 - Schlandt, Marcel A1 - Linner, Thomas A1 - Bock, Thomas A1 - Izard, Jean-Baptizste A1 - Eskudero, Ibon A1 - Rodriguez, Mariola A1 - Gorrotxategi, Jose A1 - Astudillo, Julen A1 - Cavalcanti Santos, João. A1 - Gouttefarde, Marc A1 - Fabritius, Marc A1 - Martin, Christoph A1 - Henninge, Tomas A1 - Stein, M. Nornes A1 - Normes, Stein M. A1 - Jacobsen, Yngve A1 - Pracucci, Alessandro A1 - Cañada, Jesus A1 - Jimenez-Vicaria, Jose David A1 - Paulotto, Carlo A1 - Alonso, Rubén A1 - Elia, Lorenzo ED - Tateyama, Kazuyoshi ED - Ishii, Kazuo ED - Inoue, Fumihiro T1 - A Cable Driven Parallel Robot with a Modular End Effector for the Installation of Curtain Wall Modules (Best Paper Award) T2 - Proceedings of the 37th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC 2020): From Demonstration to Practical Use, To New Stage of Construction Robot, October 27-28, 2020, Kitakyushu, Japan N2 - The installation of curtain wall modules (CWMs) is a risky activity carried out in the heights and often under unfavorable weather conditions. CWMs are heavy prefabricated walls that are lifted normally with bindings and cranes. High stability is needed while positioning in order not to damage the fragile CWMs. Moreover, this activity requires high precision while positioning brackets, the modules, and for that reason, intensive survey and marking are necessary. In order to avoid such inconveniences, there were experiences to install façade modules in automatic mode using robotic devices. In the research project HEPHAESTUS, a novel system has been developed in order to install CWMs automatically. The system consists of two subsystems: a cable driven parallel robot (CDPR) and a set of robotic tools named as Modular End Effector (MEE). The platform of the CDPR hosts the MEE. This MEE performs the necessary tasks of installing the curtain wall modules. There are two main tasks that the CDPR and MEE need to achieve: first is the fixation of the brackets onto the concrete slab, and second is the picking and placing of the CWMs onto the brackets. The first integration of the aforementioned system was carried out in a controlled environment that resembled a building structure. The results of this first test show that there are minor deviations when positioning the CDPR platform. In future steps, the deviations will be compensated by the tools of the MEE and the installation of the CWM will be carried out with the required accuracy automatically. KW - automation KW - Façade KW - On-site KW - Robotics Y1 - 2020 SN - 978-952-94-3634-7 U6 - https://doi.org/10.22260/ISARC2020/0204 SP - 1472 EP - 1479 PB - The International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction (I.A.A.R.C.) ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Linner, Thomas A1 - Pan, Wen A1 - Hu, Rongbo A1 - Zhao, Charlie A1 - Iturralde, Kepa A1 - Taghavi, Meysam A1 - Trummer, Julian A1 - Schlandt, Marcel A1 - Bock, Thomas T1 - A technology management system for the development of single-task construction robots JF - Construction Innovation N2 - Purpose: Because of the sharply growing interest worldwide of “hard” physical-mechanical robot systems for the execution of on-site construction tasks [i.e. single-task construction robots (STCRs)], the purpose of this study is to equip development projects with a systematic design-management system model that allows to integrate the different needs and aims of stakeholders. Design/methodology/approach: This paper proposes a STCR-technology management system (STCR-TMS) for the complete development cycle of STCR designs. The STCR-TMS is based on established principles from systems engineering and management and STCR-specific activities developed and tested by the authors as standalone elements in previous research work. Findings: The application of the STCR-TMS revealed the practicability of the method and the underlying concepts to provide practical guidance for the development process. Additional findings indicate that the method is sufficiently generic and flexible for application to different types of robots and indifferent world regions. This research has also shown that key activities need to be addressed to increase the practicability of the STCR-TMS. Originality/value:  A unique characteristic of this method is the evolution with each utilization cycle. In addition, individual elements are interchangeable and can be adapted based on external circumstances. These properties allow the TMS to be applied to other fields in construction robotics. With the progression of the verification and validation of the method, know-how and certain elements can be fed into standardization activities (e.g. establishing a management system standard). KW - Construction robotics KW - Construction technology KW - Robotics KW - Systems analysis and design KW - Systems engineering KW - Technology management Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-06-2019-0053 VL - 20 IS - 1 SP - 96 EP - 111 PB - Emerald ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Lafhaj, Zoubeir A1 - AlBalkhy, Wassim A1 - Linner, Thomas T1 - “Imagine and make”: teaching construction robotics for higher education students JF - Construction Robotics N2 - The use of robotics in construction projects is still in its infancy despite the opportunities that robots can present for the improvement of construction practices. One of the strategies to effectively increase the reliance on robots in construction is increasing the knowledge and improving the educational programs about robotics for university students. This paper contributes to the ongoing efforts worldwide to improve the teaching methods about construction robotics through the presentation of a novel method called “Imagine and Make”, in which students learn how to integrate robotics in different aspects and practices in construction projects. The method has been applied at Centrale Lille in France since 2018. The results of the application of “Imagine and Make” in the first semester of 2021–2022, evaluation by students, and teaching outcomes are reported in this paper. KW - Robotics KW - Construction management techniques KW - Construction 4.0 KW - Robotics teaching KW - France Y1 - 2023 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s41693-023-00092-9 SN - 2509-8780 SN - 2509-811X IS - 7 SP - 65 EP - 75 PB - Springer ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Chen, Tianxi A1 - Pan, Mi A1 - Linner, Thomas A1 - Zhong, Honghao ED - Gonzalez-Moret, Vicente ED - Zhang, Jiansong ED - García de Soto, Borja ED - Brilakis, Ioannis T1 - Development of Robotics for Building Exterior Inspection: A Literature Review T2 - Proceedings of the 41st International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Lille, France, June 3-5, 2024 N2 - The aging of buildings is a global concern, with potential risks to human safety and property. Building inspection and maintenance are crucial for ensuring structural integrity and safety. However, traditional manual methods are time-consuming and pose safety risks, especially for exterior inspection at height. Robotics offer a promising alternative to enhance building inspection efficiency and cost- effectiveness, but still in the early development stage. This paper aims to review and analyze the state-of-the-art design and development of robotics for building exterior inspection, referring to the literature published in the last two decades. Firstly, the review classifies different types of robots for building exterior inspection in terms of locomotion and adhesion modes, and discusses the capability of robots from navigation, obstacle surmounting, wall-to-wall/floor transition, curved wall climbing, grasping, barrier avoidance, and self-protection. Secondly, the paper examines the applicability of robots to various building materials for inspections and summarizes the most typical applications (i.e. glass curtain walls, tile walls, and concrete walls). Thirdly, the paper discusses the typical data collection and analysis methods for building exterior inspection using robots. The paper also explored potential enhancements for robotic inspection through the integration of building information modeling, augmented reality/virtual reality, and the involvement of human-in-the-loop. Finally, the paper summarizes the typical application of robotics in building exterior inspection regarding robot types, inspection applications, data collection and analysis methods, discusses the challenges, and outlines the future directions. KW - Non-destructive testing KW - Adhesion KW - Locomotion KW - Robotics KW - Building exterior inspection KW - Wall inspection Y1 - 2024 U6 - https://doi.org/10.22260/ISARC2024/0139 PB - IAARC ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Schmailzl, Marc A1 - Saffert, Anne-Sophie A1 - Karamara, Merve A1 - Linner, Thomas A1 - Eder, Friedrich A1 - Hoeng, Simon Konrad A1 - Obergriesser, Mathias T1 - Enhancing Decision-Making for Human-Centered Construction Robotics: A Methodological Framework T2 - Proceedings of the 41st International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC), Lille, France N2 - While the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) industry is increasingly aware of the rising demands for productivity and human-centered construction improvements, the holistic adoption of robotics as a fundamental strategy to address these challenges has not yet reached comprehensive fruition. This paper therefore introduces a methodological framework aiming to address the industry's pressing need for a systematic approach for assessing the feasibility of integrating robotics into human-centered construction processes. It aims to enhance decision-making regarding the degree of automation in human-centered construction processes, ranging from partial to full robotization or non-robotization. The framework is characterized by a more holistic end-to-end data-/workflow and therefore adopts a multifaceted approach, leveraging BIM-based planning methodologies and integrating new technologies [e.g., Motion Capturing (MoCap), work process simulation software incorporating Digital Human Models (DHM), self-developed conversion/interfacing software and more] that have not been widely used in the industry to date. Subsequently, the framework is evaluated in a real-life bricklaying construction process to ensure a more application-based approach. Overall, the framework advances current construction processes with a more inclusive and conscious technology infill to empower construction professionals with the workflow and corresponding tools necessary for the practical integration of robotics into human-centered construction processes. KW - Decision-Making KW - Framework KW - Workflow KW - AEC Industry KW - Robotics KW - Building Information Modeling (BIM) KW - Human-Centered KW - Motion Capturing Y1 - 2024 SN - 978-0-6458322-1-1 U6 - https://doi.org/10.22260/ISARC2024/0083 SN - 2413-5844 SP - 637 EP - 644 PB - International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction (IAARC) ER -