TY - JOUR A1 - Yaghmaei, Emad A1 - van de Poel, Ibo A1 - Christen, Markus A1 - Gordijn, Bert A1 - Kleine, Nadine A1 - Loi, Michele A1 - Morgan, Gwenyth A1 - Weber, Karsten T1 - Canvas White Paper 1 Cybersecurity and Ethics JF - SSRN Electronic Journal N2 - This White Paper outlines how the ethical discourse on cybersecurity has developed in the scientific literature, which ethical issues gained interest, which value conflicts are discussed, and where the “blind spots” in the current ethical discourse on cybersecurity are located. The White Paper is based on an extensive literature with a focus on three reference domains with unique types of value conflicts: health, business/finance and national security. For each domain, a systematic literature search has been performed and the identified papers have been analysed using qualitative and quantitative methods. An important observation is that the ethics of cybersecurity not an established subject. In all domains, cybersecurity is recognized as being an instrumental value, not an end in itself, which opens up the possibility of trade-offs with different values in different spheres. The most prominent common theme is the existence of trade-offs and even conflicts between reasonable goals, for example between usability and security, accessibility and security, privacy and convenience. Other prominent common themes are the importance of cybersecurity to sustain trust (in institutions), and the harmful effect of any loss of control over data. Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3091909 VL - 18 IS - 4 PB - SSRN ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Wenger, Florent A1 - Jaquet-Chiffelle, David-Olivier A1 - Kleine, Nadine A1 - Weber, Karsten A1 - Morgan, Gwenyth A1 - Gordijn, Bert A1 - Inversini, Reto A1 - Bangerter, Endre A1 - Schlehahn, Eva T1 - Canvas White Paper 3 Attitudes and Opinions Regarding Cybersecurity JF - SSRN Electronic Journal Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3091920 SN - 1556-5068 VL - 10 IS - 5 PB - Elsevier ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Weber, Karsten A1 - Kleine, Nadine A1 - Pallas, Frank A1 - Ulbricht, Max-R. T1 - Technik zur Unterstützung von Citizen Science und Open Science BT - Technische und organisatorische Herausforderungen und mögliche Lösungsansätze JF - TATuP - Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis N2 - If citizens actively participate in the process of collecting empirical data, as a key element of empirically oriented scientific projects, this can be seen as a contribution to an open and citizen-oriented science. Such participation can be supported by providing technical tools. The paper therefore presents examples of participatory sensing as the provision of affordable sensors for measuring environmental parameters as well as wearable technologies for recording quantified vital data and physiological states. Conceptually, the provision of data collected with these tools can be understood as a commons – with all opportunities and risks associated with such goods. After describing examples of participatory sensing and wearable technologies, the authors identify potential challenges and outline technical and organizational approaches to solve them. Y1 - 2017 U6 - https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.26.1-2.25 VL - 26 IS - 1/2 SP - 25 EP - 30 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Loi, Michele A1 - Christen, Markus A1 - Kleine, Nadine A1 - Weber, Karsten T1 - Cybersecurity in health BT - Disentangling value tensions JF - Journal of Information, Communication & Ethics in Society N2 - Purpose Cybersecurity in healthcare has become an urgent matter in recent years due to various malicious attacks on hospitals and other parts of the healthcare infrastructure. The purpose of this paper is to provide an outline of how core values of the health systems, such as the principles of biomedical ethics, are in a supportive or conflicting relation to cybersecurity. Design/methodology/approach This paper claims that it is possible to map the desiderata relevant to cybersecurity onto the four principles of medical ethics, i.e. beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy and justice, and explore value conflicts in that way. Findings With respect to the question of how these principles should be balanced, there are reasons to think that the priority of autonomy relative to beneficence and non-maleficence in contemporary medical ethics could be extended to value conflicts in health-related cybersecurity. Research limitations/implications However, the tension between autonomy and justice, which relates to the desideratum of usability of information and communication technology systems, cannot be ignored even if one assumes that respect for autonomy should take priority over other moral concerns. Originality/value In terms of value conflicts, most discussions in healthcare deal with the conflict of balancing efficiency and privacy given the sensible nature of health information. In this paper, the authors provide a broader and more detailed outline. KW - Healthcare KW - Cybersecurity KW - Computer ethics KW - Bioethics KW - E-Health Y1 - 2019 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-12-2018-0095 VL - 17 IS - 2 SP - 229 EP - 245 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Weber, Karsten A1 - Loi, Michele A1 - Christen, Markus A1 - Kleine, Nadine T1 - Digital Medicine, Cybersecurity, and Ethics BT - An Uneasy Relationship JF - American Journal of Bioethics Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2018.1498935 VL - 18 IS - 9 SP - 52 EP - 53 PB - Taylor&Francis ER -