TY - JOUR A1 - Rogge, Alize A. A1 - Baur, Isabel A1 - Blettner, Gabriele A1 - Holtkamp, Ulrike A1 - Horneber, Markus A1 - Jahn, Patrick A1 - Joos, Stefanie A1 - Keberle, Silva A1 - Kettelgerdes, Anita A1 - Klemperer, David A1 - Laengler, Alfred A1 - Voiss, Petra A1 - Weis, Joachim A1 - Witt, Claudia M. T1 - Defining Criteria for Guiding Cancer Patients to Find a Reputable Complementary Medicine Provider BT - Results of a Literature Review and a Consensus Procedure JF - Patient Preference and Adherence N2 - Purpose: Even in cases of positive evidence for complementary medicine (CM) therapies, it is still difficult for cancer patients to identify reputable providers. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a criteria list to provide guidance to cancer patients seeking a reputable CM provider. Methods: The design combined a literature review, an expert consensus procedure (n=15) and an assessment from three stakeholder perspectives (patients (n=18), CM providers (n=26) and oncology physicians (n=20)). Results: A total of 30 existing CM criteria were extracted from the literature, and 12 more were added by the experts. The main challenge was to define criteria that could easily be applied by the patients. A final comprehensive list of 8 criteria guiding cancer patients to find a reputable CM provider was developed. Conclusion: Health professionals and cancer information services might find the criteria list helpful when aiming to strengthen patients' awareness of quality-related factors associated with CM providers. The criteria developed might be helpful when standards are established for quality assurance in CM in oncology. KW - complementary medicine KW - healthcare quality assurance KW - neoplasms KW - patient-centered care KW - standards Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S230705 VL - 14 SP - 747 EP - 755 PB - DOVE MEDICAL PRESS ER -