TY - CHAP A1 - Grabinger, Lisa A1 - Mottok, Jürgen T1 - On selecting hypothesis tests for group differences T2 - ICERI2024 Proceedings: 17th Annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, 11th-13th November 2024, Seville, Spain N2 - Deciding on the right method of analyzing empirical research data can be difficult – especially when it comes to choosing specific methods of inferential statistics, where there is often not one right way, but a variety of valid options (e.g., using an ANOVA or its non-parametric alternative for data that is not perfectly normally distributed). Novice researchers not only lack the experience to know when a particular hypothesis test is appropriate, but struggle to find suitable literature to familiarize themselves (i.e., literature that is not too superficial, yet comprehensible). With the present article we provide a remedy following the didactic method of scaffolding: We present a systematization of the most elementary inferential statistical methods, namely hypothesis tests for group differences. We start by explaining basic terms (e.g., independent variable) and then give step-by-step instructions for choosing a proper hypothesis test based on data properties, implementing it from scratch, and reporting or interpreting its results. With these practical cookbook-like guidelines, this article serves as a concise starting point for young researchers entering the field of empirical research, as a valuable resource for their instructors, and as a basis for automating statistical procedures in a software system. KW - empirical research KW - data analysis KW - inferential statistics KW - guidelines Y1 - 2024 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-78200 SP - 702 EP - 712 PB - IATED ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Grabinger, Lisa A1 - Ezer, Timur A1 - Hauser, Florian A1 - Mottok, Jürgen T1 - The impact of eyenalyzer T2 - ICERI2024 Proceedings: 17th Annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, 11th-13th November 2024, Seville, Spain N2 - Empirical research poses numerous challenges for beginners. This is especially true for data analysis – a task that usually requires knowledge from two distinct areas: statistics and programming. To support prospective researchers with that task, we developed a web-based tool called eyenalyzer. It supports common activities in the data analysis phase of empirical studies in a way that is suitable for novices in both, statistics and programming. The present article describes a controlled experiment investigating the impact of this tool with a total of 20 participants. All of them are given a set of common data analysis tasks. Half of the participants complete the tasks using eyenalyzer, the other half can use anything except for eyenalyzer. For each task and participant, we record the time in minutes, the task score, and the perceived difficulty. The results confirm that our tool is a valuable support for novice researchers: With eyenalyzer, the participants are significantly faster, achieve higher scores, and perceive the tasks to be less difficult. KW - tool evaluation KW - data analysis KW - eye tracking KW - empirical research Y1 - 2024 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-78215 SN - 978-84-09-63010-3 SN - 2340-1095 SP - 695 EP - 701 PB - IATED ER -