TY - JOUR A1 - Hartmann, Robin A1 - Weiherer, Maximilian A1 - Nieberle, Felix A1 - Palm, Christoph A1 - Brébant, Vanessa A1 - Prantl, Lukas A1 - Lamby, Philipp A1 - Reichert, Torsten E. A1 - Taxis, Jürgen A1 - Ettl, Tobias T1 - Evaluating smartphone-based 3D imaging techniques for clinical application in oral and maxillofacial surgery: A comparative study with the vectra M5 JF - Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery N2 - PURPOSE This study aimed to clarify the applicability of smartphone-based three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging for clinical use in oral and maxillofacial surgery, comparing two smartphone-based approaches to the gold standard. METHODS Facial surface models (SMs) were generated for 30 volunteers (15 men, 15 women) using the Vectra M5 (Canfield Scientific, USA), the TrueDepth camera of the iPhone 14 Pro (Apple Inc., USA), and the iPhone 14 Pro with photogrammetry. Smartphone-based SMs were superimposed onto Vectra-based SMs. Linear measurements and volumetric evaluations were performed to evaluate surface-to-surface deviation. To assess inter-observer reliability, all measurements were performed independently by a second observer. Statistical analyses included Bland-Altman analyses, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired samples, and Intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS Photogrammetry-based SMs exhibited an overall landmark-to-landmark deviation of M = 0.8 mm (SD =  ± 0.58 mm, n = 450), while TrueDepth-based SMs displayed a deviation of M = 1.1 mm (SD =  ± 0.72 mm, n = 450). The mean volumetric difference for photogrammetry-based SMs was M = 1.8 cc (SD =  ± 2.12 cc, n = 90), and M = 3.1 cc (SD =  ± 2.64 cc, n = 90) for TrueDepth-based SMs. When comparing the two approaches, most landmark-to-landmark measurements demonstrated 95% Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LoA) of ≤ 2 mm. Volumetric measurements revealed LoA > 2 cc. Photogrammetry-based measurements demonstrated higher inter-observer reliability for overall landmark-to-landmark deviation. CONCLUSION Both approaches for smartphone-based 3D surface imaging exhibit potential in capturing the face. Photogrammetry-based SMs demonstrated superior alignment and volumetric accuracy with Vectra-based SMs than TrueDepth-based SMs. KW - Three-dimensional Surface Imaging KW - Smartphone-based Surface Imaging TrueDepth Stereophotogrammetry Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery KW - TrueDepth KW - Stereophotogrammetry KW - Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Y1 - 2025 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-024-01322-2 VL - 29 PB - Springer Nature ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Hartmann, Robin A1 - Nieberle, Felix A1 - Palm, Christoph A1 - Brébant, Vanessa A1 - Prantl, Lukas A1 - Kuehle, Reinald A1 - Reichert, Torsten E. A1 - Taxis, Juergen A1 - Ettl, Tobias T1 - Utility of Smartphone-based Three-dimensional Surface Imaging for Digital Facial Anthropometry JF - JPRAS Open N2 - Background The utilization of three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging for facial anthropometry is a significant asset for patients undergoing maxillofacial surgery. Notably, there have been recent advancements in smartphone technology that enable 3D surface imaging. In this study, anthropometric assessments of the face were performed using a smartphone and a sophisticated 3D surface imaging system. Methods 30 healthy volunteers (15 females and 15 males) were included in the study. An iPhone 14 Pro (Apple Inc., USA) using the application 3D Scanner App (Laan Consulting Corp., USA) and the Vectra M5 (Canfield Scientific, USA) were employed to create 3D surface models. For each participant, 19 anthropometric measurements were conducted on the 3D surface models. Subsequently, the anthropometric measurements generated by the two approaches were compared. The statistical techniques employed included the paired t-test, paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Bland–Altman analysis, and calculation of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results All measurements showed excellent agreement between smartphone-based and Vectra M5-based measurements (ICC between 0.85 and 0.97). Statistical analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in the central tendencies for 17 of the 19 linear measurements. Despite the excellent agreement found, Bland–Altman analysis revealed that the 95% limits of agreement between the two methods exceeded ±3 mm for the majority of measurements. Conclusion Digital facial anthropometry using smartphones can serve as a valuable supplementary tool for surgeons, enhancing their communication with patients. However, the proposed data suggest that digital facial anthropometry using smartphones may not yet be suitable for certain diagnostic purposes that require high accuracy. KW - Three-dimensional surface imaging KW - Stereophotogrammetry KW - Smartphone-based surface imaging KW - Digital anthropometry KW - Facial anthropometry Y1 - 2024 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-70348 VL - 39 SP - 330 EP - 343 PB - Elsevier ER -