TY - JOUR A1 - Käss, Sebastian A1 - Strahringer, Susanne A1 - Westner, Markus T1 - Archetypes, Situations, and Practices : a Guide to Successful Low-Code Adoption JF - Information Resources Management Journal N2 - This paper extends prior work on low-code by explaining when adoption archetypes occur and how to use them. Motivated by information technology (IT) talent shortages and uneven low-code development platform (LCDP) outcomes, the paper seeks practical guidance for post-adoption choices in work systems. Using a multiple mini case study of 36 cases in large German organizations, this study analyzes interviews and context questionnaires with within-/cross-case coding and pattern matching against a 13-factor model. This analysis identifies situations that trigger three adoption archetypes—application development democratizers, synergy realizers, and IT resource shortage mitigators—and one non-adoption archetype, intricacy adversaries. The analysis also maps advantages and disadvantages and distills 12 good practices. Across adoption cases, efficiency is the dominant goal, whereas non-adoption stems from high application sophistication. The results give actionable guidance: align goals to an archetype, stick to LCDP standards, involve IT and foster an open culture, invest in skilling, reuse platform components, and reserve LCDPs for less-complex apps while planning architecture early. KW - Business-managed IT KW - Low-Code Development KW - Citizen Development KW - Shadow IT KW - Multiple Mini Case Studies KW - Work Systems Theory KW - Good Practices Y1 - 2025 U6 - https://doi.org/10.4018/IRMJ.396005 SN - 1040-1628 VL - 38 IS - 1 PB - IGI Global ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Kopper, Andreas A1 - Furstenau, Daniel A1 - Zimmermann, Stephan A1 - Rentrop, Christopher A1 - Rothe, Hannes A1 - Strahringer, Susanne A1 - Westner, Markus T1 - Business-managed IT: A conceptual framework and empirical illustration T2 - 26. European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2018), Protsmouth, UK N2 - Research on Shadow IT is facing a conceptual dilemma in cases where previously “covert” systems developed by business entities (individual users, business workgroups, or business units) are integrated in the organizational IT management. These systems become visible, are therefore not “in the shadows” anymore, and subsequently do not fit to existing definitions of Shadow IT. Practice shows that some information systems share characteristics of Shadow IT, but are created openly in alignment with the IT department. This paper therefore proposes the term “Business- managed IT” to describe “overt” information systems developed or managed by business entities. We distinguish Business- managed IT from Shadow IT by illustrating case vignettes. Accordingly, our contribution is to suggest a concept and its delineation against other concepts. In this way, IS researchers interested in IT originated from or maintained by business entities can construct theories with a wider scope of application that are at the same time more specific to practical problems. In addition, value-laden terminology is complemented by a vocabulary that values potentially innovative developments by business entities more adequately. From a practical point of view, the distinction can be used to discuss the distribution of task responsibilities for information systems. KW - Business-managed IT KW - IT Governance. KW - Shadow IT Y1 - 2018 UR - https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2018_rp/77/ ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Klotz, Stefan A1 - Westner, Markus A1 - Strahringer, Susanne T1 - Critical Success Factors of Business-managed IT: It Takes Two to Tango JF - Information Systems Management N2 - This paper identifies critical success factors of Business-managed IT based on case study results. Four groups of critical success factors emerge: (1) general approach to Business-managed IT/Business-managed IT strategy, (2) Business-managed IT project prerequisites/Business-managed IT team, (3) Business-managed IT project execution and outcome, and (4) information technology management for Business-managed IT. The results suggest that bilateral responsibility between the business unit and the IT organization is the most favorable governance option for Business-managed IT. KW - Betriebliches Informationssystem KW - Strategisches Management KW - Erfolgsfaktor KW - Fallstudie KW - Business-managed IT KW - Shadow IT KW - critical success factors KW - IT governance KW - application governance Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2021.1938300 VL - 39 IS - 3 SP - 220 EP - 240 PB - Taylor&Francis ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Klotz, Stefan A1 - Kopper, Andreas A1 - Westner, Markus A1 - Strahringer, Susanne T1 - Von Schatten-IT zu Business-managed IT: Fachbereichs-IT gezielt gestalten JF - Wirtschaftsinformatik & Management N2 - Fachbereichs-IT, Schatten-IT, Business-managed IT. All diese Begriffe beschreiben IT, die neben den eigentlichen, regulären IT-Systemen oder -Prozessen in Unternehmen existieren und von Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeitern der Fachbereiche genutzt werden. Im Fall von„Schatten-IT“ handelt es sich um IT-Systeme und -Prozesse (IT-Instanzen), die sich ohne Kenntnis der IT-Verantwortlichen etabliert haben; im Fall von„Business-managed IT“ entstehen die IT-Systeme und -Prozesse in Kenntnis der bzw. in Abstimmung mit den IT-Verantwortlichen im Unternehmen.„Fachbereichs-IT“ subsumiert Schatten-IT und Business-managed IT. Welche Ursachen führen zu solchen IT-Instanzen, welche Potenziale und Risiken haben diese IT-Instanzen und wie lassen sie sich steuern? KW - Business-managed IT KW - Fachbereichs IT KW - IT Governance KW - Schatten IT KW - Shadow IT Y1 - 2022 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1365/s35764-022-00421-7 SN - 1867-5913 SN - 1867-5905 VL - 14 IS - 4 SP - 282 EP - 287 PB - Springer Nature ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kopper, Andreas A1 - Westner, Markus A1 - Strahringer, Susanne T1 - From Shadow IT to Business-managed IT: A qualitative comparative analysis to determine configurations for successful management of IT by business entities JF - Information Systems and e-Business Management N2 - Shadow IT describes covert/hidden IT systems that are managed by business entities themselves. Additionally, there are also overt forms in practice, so-called Business-managed IT, which share most of the characteristics of Shadow IT. To better understand this phenomenon, we interviewed 29 executive IT managers about positive and negative cases of Shadow IT and Business-managed IT. By applying qualitative comparative analysis (QCA), we derived four conditions that characterize these cases: Aligned, local, simple, and volatile. The results show that there are three sufficient configurations of conditions that lead to a positive outcome; one of them even encompasses Shadow IT. The most important solution indicates that IT systems managed by business entities are viewed as being positive if they are aligned with the IT department and limited to local requirements. This allows to balance local responsiveness to changing requirements and global standardization. In contrast, IT systems that are not aligned and permanent (and either organization-wide or simple) are consistently considered as negative. Our study is the first empirical quantitative–qualitative study to shed light on the success and failure of Shadow IT and Business-managed IT. KW - Informationsmanagement KW - Wirtschaftsinformatik KW - Business-managed IT KW - Shadow IT KW - IT governance KW - Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) Y1 - 2020 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-020-00472-6 VL - 18 IS - 2 SP - 209 EP - 257 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Klotz, Stefan A1 - Westner, Markus A1 - Strahringer, Susanne T1 - From Shadow IT to Business-managed IT and Back Again BT - How Responsibility for IT Instances Evolves Over Time T2 - Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS): 2020, Dubai N2 - Today, information technology (IT) is not anymore solely deployed and maintained by the IT organization, but also by business units. IT deployed or managed by business units is called Shadow IT (without alignment with the IT organization) or Business-managed IT (in alignment or a split responsibility model with the IT organization), contrasting “classical” IT. However, the responsibility for deployed IT might change over time. Therefore, this paper conceptualizes the progression of the responsibility for IT as a trajectory through initialization, potential transitions, and discontinuance. The paper illustrates this conceptual framework using four exemplary case vignettes of IT instances. Empirical findings of the case vignettes determine indications when employees initialize an IT instance as Shadow IT, Business-managed IT, or IT-managed systems and reasons why the responsibility for an IT instance changes over time. The results suggest that scholars and practitioners should add a temporal dimension to the governance of IT instances. KW - IT-Governance KW - Shadow IT KW - Business-managed IT KW - Shadow IT KW - Business-managed IT KW - IT governance KW - trajectory KW - application governance Y1 - 2020 UR - https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2020/94/ ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kopper, Andreas A1 - Klotz, Stefan A1 - Westner, Markus A1 - Strahringer, Susanne T1 - Shadow IT and Business-managed IT BT - Practitioner Perceptions and Their Comparison to Literature JF - Journal of Information Technology Management (JITM) N2 - Two concepts describe the autonomous deployment of IT by business entities: Shadow IT and Business-managed IT. Shadow IT is deployed covertly, that is, software, hardware, or IT services created/procured or managed by business entities without alignment with the IT organization. In contrast, Business-managed IT describes the overt deployment of IT, that is, in alignment with the IT organization or in a split responsibility model. The purpose of this paper is to extend the conceptual understanding of Shadow IT and Business-managed IT, comparing the perceptions of 29 CIOs and senior IT managers with the results of a systematic literature review. By doing so, this paper presents a structured and comprehensive view of causing factors, outcomes, and governance of Shadow IT and Business-managed IT in practice. A comparison of academic literature and practitioner perceptions reveals the limitations and gaps of the current research and highlights avenues for future research. The authors find three category-spanning themes occurring as causing factors, outcomes, and—as part of governance measures—factors to improve the IT organization: (1) (Poor) business-IT alignment (2) (lack of) agility, and (3) (lack of) policies. This study is innovative with its comprehensive qualitative interview data that the authors compare to the existing literature. Therefore, the paper brings together theoretical and practical insights into Shadow IT and Businessmanaged IT, which should aid practitioners and scholars in decision making and future research. KW - Corporate Governance KW - Strategisches Management KW - Shadow IT KW - Business-managed IT KW - IT governance KW - Agility KW - Business-IT alignment KW - Informationsmanagement Y1 - 2019 UR - http://home.thejitm.org/XXX-4/contents.html SN - 1042-1319 VL - 30 IS - 4 ER - TY - CHAP A1 - Klotz, Stefan A1 - Westner, Markus A1 - Strahringer, Susanne A1 - Schieder, Christian T1 - Transformed Knowledge Sharing Through Business-managed IT and Shadow IT T2 - Proceedings of the 25th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2019), Cancún, Mexiko, August 15-17 N2 - Business-managed IT and Shadow IT describe the autonomous deployment/management of IT instances by business units. For the former, this happens in alignment with the IT organization of the enterprise, for the latter, without alignment. We analyze why and how Business-managed IT and Shadow IT transform knowledge sharing with two case studies drawing on the theoretical lens of the knowledge-based view. Several motivators lead to the autonomous implementation of knowledge management systems (KMSs), for example, shortcomings of existing systems. The implemented KMSs have multiple benefits for knowledge sharing, such as a reduction of knowledge sharing barriers. However, we notice that the Shadow IT KMS leads to challenges for cross-unit knowledge sharing due to the covert nature of Shadow IT. Based on the findings of our case studies, we develop a mid-range theory to explain the transformation of knowledge sharing in enterprises supported by Business-managed IT and Shadow IT. KW - Business-managed IT KW - Shadow IT KW - knowledge sharing KW - knowledge management system Y1 - 2019 UR - https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2019/org_transformation_is/org_transformation_is/5/ SP - 1 EP - 10 PB - AIS ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Klotz, Stefan A1 - Kopper, Andreas A1 - Westner, Markus A1 - Strahringer, Susanne T1 - Causing factors, outcomes, and governance of Shadow IT and business-managed IT BT - A systematic literature review JF - International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management N2 - Shadow IT and Business-managed IT describe the autonomous deployment/procurement or management of Information Technology (IT) instances, i.e., software, hardware, or IT services, by business entities. For Shadow IT, this happens covertly, i.e., without alignment with the IT organization; for Business-managed IT this happens overtly, i.e., in alignment with the IT organization or in a split responsibility model. We conduct a systematic literature review and structure the identified research themes in a framework of causing factors, outcomes, and governance. As causing factors, we identify enablers, motivators, and missing barriers. Outcomes can be benefits as well as risks/shortcomings of Shadow IT and Business-managed IT. Concerning governance, we distinguish two subcategories: general governance for Shadow IT and Business-managed IT and instance governance for overt Business-managed IT. Thus, a specific set of governance approaches exists for Business-managed IT that cannot be applied to Shadow IT due to its covert nature. Hence, we extend the existing conceptual understanding and allocate research themes to Shadow IT, Business-managed IT, or both concepts and particularly distinguish the governance of the two concepts. Besides, we find that governance themes have been the primary research focus since 2016, whereas older publications (until 2015) focused on causing factors. KW - Shadow IT KW - Business-managed IT KW - IT governance KW - literature review KW - outcomes KW - Betriebliches Informationssystem KW - Datensicherung KW - Literaturbericht Y1 - 2019 UR - http://www.sciencesphere.org/ijispm/archive/ijispm-070102.pdf U6 - https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm070102 SN - 2182-7796 SN - 2182-7788 SN - 2182-780X VL - 7 IS - 1 SP - 15 EP - 43 ER - TY - JOUR A1 - Kopper, Andreas A1 - Fürstenau, Daniel A1 - Zimmermann, Stephan A1 - Klotz, Stefan A1 - Rentrop, Christopher A1 - Rothe, Hannes A1 - Strahringer, Susanne A1 - Westner, Markus T1 - Shadow IT and Business-Managed IT: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Illustration JF - International Journal of IT/Business Alignment and Governance (IJITBAG) N2 - Research on Shadow IT is facing a conceptual dilemma in cases where previously “covert” systems developed by business entities are integrated in the organizational IT management. These systems become visible, are thus not “in the shadows” anymore, and subsequently do not fit to existing definitions of Shadow IT. Practice shows that some information systems share characteristics of Shadow IT but are created openly in alignment with the IT organization. This paper proposes the term “Business-managed IT” to describe “overt” information systems developed or managed by business entities and distinguishes it from Shadow IT by illustrating case vignettes. Accordingly,our contribution is to suggest a concept and its delineation against other concepts. In this way, IS researchers interested in IT originated from or maintained by business entities can construct theories with a wider scope of application that are at the same time more specific to practical problems. In addition, the terminology allows to value potentially innovative developments by business entities more adequately. KW - Alignment KW - Business-managed IT KW - IT governance KW - Shadow IT KW - Unternehmen KW - Informationstechnik KW - Datensicherung KW - Organizational IT management Y1 - 2018 U6 - https://doi.org/10.4018/IJITBAG.2018070104 VL - 9 IS - 2 SP - 53 EP - 71 PB - IGI Global ER -