<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>7281</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2024</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>641</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>649</pageLast>
    <pageNumber>9</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>56</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Georg Thieme Verlag</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Stuttgart</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2024-05-05</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Influence of artificial intelligence on the diagnostic performance of endoscopists in the assessment of Barrett’s esophagus: a tandem randomized and video trial</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Background &#13;
This study evaluated the effect of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based clinical decision support system on the performance and diagnostic confidence of endoscopists in their assessment of Barrett’s esophagus (BE).&#13;
&#13;
Methods &#13;
96 standardized endoscopy videos were assessed by 22 endoscopists with varying degrees of BE experience from 12 centers. Assessment was randomized into two video sets: group A (review first without AI and second with AI) and group B (review first with AI and second without AI). Endoscopists were required to evaluate each video for the presence of Barrett’s esophagus-related neoplasia (BERN) and then decide on a spot for a targeted biopsy. After the second assessment, they were allowed to change their clinical decision and confidence level.&#13;
&#13;
Results &#13;
AI had a stand-alone sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 92.2%, 68.9%, and 81.3%, respectively. Without AI, BE experts had an overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 83.3%, 58.1%, and 71.5%, respectively. With AI, BE nonexperts showed a significant improvement in sensitivity and specificity when videos were assessed a second time with AI (sensitivity 69.8% [95%CI 65.2%–74.2%] to 78.0% [95%CI 74.0%–82.0%]; specificity 67.3% [95%CI 62.5%–72.2%] to 72.7% [95%CI 68.2%–77.3%]). In addition, the diagnostic confidence of BE nonexperts improved significantly with AI.&#13;
&#13;
Conclusion &#13;
BE nonexperts benefitted significantly from additional AI. BE experts and nonexperts remained significantly below the stand-alone performance of AI, suggesting that there may be other factors influencing endoscopists’ decisions to follow or discard AI advice.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Endoscopy</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1055/a-2296-5696</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-72818</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY-NC-ND - Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Michael Meinikheim</author>
    <author>Robert Mendel</author>
    <author>Christoph Palm</author>
    <author>Andreas Probst</author>
    <author>Anna Muzalyova</author>
    <author>Markus W. Scheppach</author>
    <author>Sandra Nagl</author>
    <author>Elisabeth Schnoy</author>
    <author>Christoph Römmele</author>
    <author>Dominik Andreas Helmut Otto Schulz</author>
    <author>Jakob Schlottmann</author>
    <author>Friederike Prinz</author>
    <author>David Rauber</author>
    <author>Tobias Rückert</author>
    <author>Tomoaki Matsumura</author>
    <author>Glòria Fernández-Esparrach</author>
    <author>Nasim Parsa</author>
    <author>Michael F. Byrne</author>
    <author>Helmut Messmann</author>
    <author>Alanna Ebigbo</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Artificial Intelligence</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Endoscopy</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Medical Image Computing</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="palmremic">Palm, Christoph (Prof. Dr.) - ReMIC</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="palmbarrett">Palm, Christoph (Prof. Dr.) - Projekt Barrett</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="oaweg" number="">Hybrid Open Access - OA-Veröffentlichung in einer Subskriptionszeitschrift/-medium</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Medical Image Computing (ReMIC)</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-oth-regensburg/files/7281/Meinikheim_Mendel_Endoscopy_2024.pdf</file>
  </doc>
</export-example>
