<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>791</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2021</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>6285</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>6294</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2021-01-05</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">IaaS, PaaS, or SaaS? The Why of Cloud Computing Delivery Model Selection</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Most large-scale organizations adopted Cloud Computing (CC) on a company level in recent years. Managers now face the challenge to appropriately implement CC "operationally", i.e., for information systems (ISs). We refer to this as post-adoption, addressing the extent of technology usage after adoption. Specifically, managers need to choose among the CC delivery models Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS), Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS), and Software-asa-Service (SaaS). We differentiate the determinants of this post-adoption decision for IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS. Based on this analysis, we derive criteria that guide managers' delivery model selection: Adopt 1) IaaS for ISs requiring flexibility and reduced time to market, 2) PaaS to access specialized resources, and 3) SaaS to focus on core competencies. Moreover, we analyze the impact on the CC strategy and postulate them as recommendations: I) acknowledge the interplay between governance and time-to-market, II) realize cost savings on company level, and III) consider strategically important ISs for CC.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2021</parentTitle>
    <subTitle language="eng">Vignettes on the Post-Adoption of Cloud Computing</subTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-0-9981331-4-0</identifier>
    <identifier type="url">https://aisel.aisnet.org/hicss-54/os/practice-based_research/5/</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-7913</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY-NC-ND - Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Frederik Wulf</author>
    <author>Tobias Lindner</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Cloud Computing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>IT Sourcing</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16315">Information und Kommunikation</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-oth-regensburg/files/791/0614.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2015</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2021</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>111</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>123</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Linking IT assets and competitive advantage - IT capabilities of servitized business models</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This paper connects research from business model innovation and information systems by exploring critical IT capabilities for servitized business models. The adoption of servitized business models is a major business model innovation strategy. At the same time, digitalization drives the evolution of IT capabilities at these business models. Scholars argue that it remains unclear how IT capabilities enable servitized business models to build a competitive advantage by achieving cost advantages or differentiation. This paper explores IT capabilities that enable building a competitive advantage for servitized business models based on a qualitative analysis of multiple published case studies. The authors identify configurations of IT capabilities among servitized business models. The findings contribute to servitization research by exploring IT capabilities&#13;
and how they are combined among servitized business models.&#13;
The insights help practitioners deploy digital technologies and IT&#13;
assets effectively as building blocks of IT capabilities to advance&#13;
their servitized business model.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">34th Bled eConference Digital Support from Crisis to Progressive Change: June 27 - 30, 2021, Online: Conference Proceedings</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-961-286-485-9</identifier>
    <identifier type="url">https://press.um.si/index.php/ump/catalog/book/581</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-20158</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Christoph Brosig</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>resource-based view</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>IT capability</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>digital servitization</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>competitive advantage</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Geschäftsmodell</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Innovation</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Hybrides Leistungsbündel</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Informationstechnik</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="000">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="ddc" number="658">Allgemeines Management</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16315">Information und Kommunikation</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-oth-regensburg/files/2015/581-Ostalo-1594-1-10-20210623.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>41</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>1</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>16</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Preparing for a Digital Future: Cloud Strategy at Continental AG</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This paper is directed towards IT executives aiming to promote the  adoption of cloud computing (CC) with in their company. We conducted  a longitudinal case study on the evolving CC strategy and its implementation at the multinational company Continental, based on a  previous case study by Loebbecke et al. (2012). We narrate Continental's  pathway towards CC adoption, which comprised the  experimentation, professionalization, and utilization of CC, and  discuss current and previous barriers encountered during the implementation. We derive five lessons learned that can serve as practical guidance for executives aiming to accelerate CC adoption within their own organization: (1) differentiate the CC strategy by delivery model; (2)drive proof of concepts to generate reusable blueprints; (3) preinvest in the integration of IaaS and PaaS  providers; (4) implement CC gradually, transforming applications  during the transition to the cloud; and (5) disseminate knowledge  within the organization to enable change.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2019): Munich, Germany, December 15-18</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2019/practice_is_research/practice_is_research/1/</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Frederik Wulf</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <author>Maximilian Schön</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <author>Claudia Loebbecke</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Cloud Computing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Strategy</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Implementation</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Adoption</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Knowledge transfer</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Cloud Computing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Implementierung</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16315">Information und Kommunikation</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>43</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>258</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>267</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Information security risks, benefits, and mitigation measures in cloud sourcing</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This paper develops a categorization of cloud security risks, elaborates how they impact information security, and discusses potential security benefits from cloud sourcing. This review integrates the literature on information systems and computer science to summarize managerial and technological mitigation measures that enhance cloud security. The analysis uncovers gaps regarding the empirical investigation of security considerations in the corporate decision-making process. Specifically, the micro level of how security comes into play in the decision-making process and whether mitigation measures proposed by scholars are practically feasible requires further investigation. Furthermore, the macro level, how stakeholders perceive cloud sourcing, is not yet well understood.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Proceedings of the IEEE 21th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI): 2019, Moscow, Russia</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">10.1109/CBI.2019.00036</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <author>Frederik Wulf</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Cloud Computing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Security</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Risks</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Mitigation</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Cloud Computing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Datensicherheit</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>60</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2018</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>40</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>49</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Do researchers investigate what practitioners deem relevant?</title>
    <abstract language="eng">There is a common understanding amongst academics that information systems (IS) research sometimes has limited relevance for practitioners. This can be explained by the fact that research lags behind the fast moving IS environment, has limited practical applicability and is hard to access. We have focused on the research area of IS backsourcing, and analyzed practitioner literature to increase our understanding of topics of interest for practitioners, to determine a potential gap between academic and practitioner literature, and to identify future research directions in this field. We observed that most publications are either news or background articles, focusing on describing backsourcing cases. Additionally, we identified four recurring themes, namely reasons for backsourcing, presentation of survey results, discussion of industry trends, and backsourcing success stories. The main reasons identified to trigger backsourcing decisions are cost savings, quality improvements, and increasing control and flexibility. By comparing our findings with academic literature on IS backsourcing, we conclude that generally both literature types cover similar topics. However, researchers have a more formulative or interpretive focus than the often descriptive practitioner literature. Academic literature also examines a broader range of topics, while practitioner literature has a narrower focus. Additionally, we observe one difference regarding applied terminology: while researchers employ the term backsourcing, practitioners mostly use back in-house or insourcing. Our paper contributes to facilitating the exchange between academics and practitioners, presents topics to consider when aiming to increase practical relevance and provides researchers with concrete directions for future research within the field of IS backsourcing.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Proceedings of the 20th IEEE International Conference on Business Informatics (IEEE CBI 2018): Vienna, Austria, 11-14 July</parentTitle>
    <subTitle language="eng">Gaps between research and practice in the field of information systems backsourcing</subTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1109/CBI.2018.00014</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <author>Benedikt von Bary</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Betriebliches Informationssystem</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Backsourcing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Anwendung</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Literaturbericht</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Information systems</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Backsourcing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Practical applicability</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>74</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2018</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>1813</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>1824</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>Band V</issue>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName>Leuphana, Universität Lüneburg</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Lüneburg</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Multisourcing on the Rise: Results from an Analysis of more than 1,000 IT Outsourcing Deals in the ASG Region</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Information technology outsourcing (ITO) has long been recognized for its numerous potential advantages such as lowering costs, accessing external skills, and improving efficiency, flexibility, and quality. However, it also exposes client companies to various risks, including  vendor lock-in, poor agility, or insufficient vendor expertisein  individual domains, especially inincreasingly dynamic market environments. Consequently, companies increasingly implement multisourcing by composing a “best of breed” set of vendors for their various IT services. In this paper,we use a dataset of 1,016 ITO deals closed with Austrian, Swiss, and German client companies between 2006 and 2017 to analyze the  development of the ITO market in general and multisourcing in particular. Our results show decreasing services run rates, shorter contract lengths, an increasing number of concurrent service providers per client,and a distribution of the total number of contracts to a larger set of vendors, all pointing towards an increasing popularity of multisourcing.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Tagungsband Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2018 (MKWI 2018): data driven X - turning data into value, Leuphana Unversität Lüneburg, 6.-9. März 2018</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">http://mkwi2018.leuphana.de/programm/tagungsband/</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Michael Könning</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Multisourcing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>IT-Outsourcing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Sourcing strategy</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Outsourcing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Strategie</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16316">Produktion und Systeme</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>76</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2016</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>1</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>12</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Lean Management of IT Organizations</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Lean Management has been successfully implemented in production organizations since several decades. The study at hand investigates the implementation of Lean Management to IT organizations (Lean IT). The study offers three contributions: First, it explains on a conceptual level how Lean Management can be transferred from production to IT  organizations (philosophy, principles, tools). Second, it provides a theoretical perspective on why Lean IT can be beneficial for IT organizations (IT Slack theory). Third, it provides insights to the  stated research questions (three benefits and three propositions) from an initial case study of an internal IT service provider for a large international insurance company (&gt; US$25 Billion revenue; &gt;20,000 employees; active in &gt;120 countries) and lays out the research methodology and potential focus areas for further studies.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2016), Dublin,</parentTitle>
    <subTitle language="eng">a Perspective of IT Slack Theory</subTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2016/ManagingIS/Presentations/1/</identifier>
    <author>Jörn Kobus</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Lean Management</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Lean IT</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>IT Slack theory</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Implementation</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Application development and maintenance</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Lean Management</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Informationstechnik</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>85</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2007</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>7</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>22</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Current state of IS offshoring research</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This paper empirically examines the current state of the IS offshoring phenomenon in Germany regarding project characteristics and success patterns. Relying on a sample of 304 projects conducted at various industry sectors and companies, results show that IS offshoring primarily occurs in sectors Telecommunications and IT at large corporations. Cost reduction is the main reason for going offshore and offshore projects are executed as part of a larger program at companies. Noticeably, most projects are delivered from India. Additionally, neither captive offshoring nor offshore outsourcing dominates as a de-livery option. Comparing different project subgroups regarding project success, the results reveal that projects delivered by an internal or partially owned service provider are more successful. Other project characteristics such as a project’s embedded-ness in a larger offshoring program, a project’s size, or a project’s offshoring degree in terms of relatively offshored labor hours show few significant differences. The paper addresses the paucity of empirical research on the current state of the IS offshoring phenomenon in Germany.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Mäkiö, Juho; Betz, Stefanie; Stephan, Rolf (Eds.): Offshoring of software development. Methods and tools for risk management. Karlsruhe: Universitätsverlag Karlsruhe</parentTitle>
    <subTitle language="eng">A descriptive meta-analysis</subTitle>
    <identifier type="url">http://jitm.ubalt.edu/XXI-1/article4.pdf</identifier>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Informationsmanagement</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Offshoring</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Erfolgsfaktor</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Offshoring</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Nearshoring</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Informations systems sourcing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Outcome</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Project success</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Success factors</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othpublikationsherkunft" number="">Externe Publikationen</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>640</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2020</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>84</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>93</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName>IEEE</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-08-19</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Revisiting the Concept of IT Capabilities in the Era of Digitalization</title>
    <abstract language="eng">In the era of digitalization, companies review how to build competitive advantage drawing on their capabilities. In this context, the paper revisits the concept of IT capabilities. We summarize the “canonical” body of literature to characterize how leading scholars conceptualized and differentiated IT capabilities and then we show how new types of IT capabilities (for example, rising from SMACIT technologies) relate to this. We find that the resource-based view is still leading in how to conceptualize IT capabilities. However, an alternative perspective on IT assets is emerging, looking at it from the angle of digital technologies as stacks. Digital technologies form the foundation for a new technology-driven perspective on IT capabilities. This new view complements the established differentiation of IT capabilities considering IT infrastructure flexibility, IT management, and IT personnel capability. Both perspectives describe the explorative and exploitative nature of IT capabilities. This paper helps scholars and practitioners to clearly distinguish different perspectives of IT capabilities on how to build a competitive advantage from IT today.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">2020 IEEE 22nd Conference on Business Informatics (CBI 2020): Antwerp, Belgium, 22-24 June 2020, proceedings</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1109/CBI49978.2020.00017</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Christoph Brosig</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Digital technologies</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>IT capabilities</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Resource-based view</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Informationstechnik</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Digitalisierung</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Fähigkeit</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Kompetenz</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Ressourcenorientierter Ansatz</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Wettbewerbsvorteil</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>4165</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2018</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>40</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>49</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName>IEEE</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Do Researchers Investigate what Practitioners Deem Relevant? Gaps Between Research and Practice in the Field of Information Systems Backsourcing</title>
    <abstract language="eng">There is a common understanding amongst academics that information systems (IS) research sometimes has limited relevance for practitioners. This can be explained by the fact that research lags behind the fast moving IS environment, has limited practical applicability and is hard to access. We have focused on the research area of IS backsourcing, and analyzed practitioner literature to increase our understanding of topics of interest for practitioners, to determine a potential gap between academic and practitioner literature, and to identify future research directions in this field. We observed that most publications are either news or background articles, focusing on describing backsourcing cases. Additionally, we identified four recurring themes, namely reasons for backsourcing, presentation of survey results, discussion of industry trends, and backsourcing success stories. The main reasons identified to trigger backsourcing decisions are cost savings, quality improvements, and increasing control and flexibility. By comparing our findings with academic literature on IS backsourcing, we conclude that generally both literature types cover similar topics. However, researchers have a more formulative or interpretive focus than the often descriptive practitioner literature. Academic literature also examines a broader range of topics, while practitioner literature has a narrower focus. Additionally, we observe one difference regarding applied terminology: while researchers employ the term backsourcing, practitioners mostly use back in-house or insourcing. Our paper contributes to facilitating the exchange between academics and practitioners, presents topics to consider when aiming to increase practical relevance and provides researchers with concrete directions for future research within the field of IS backsourcing.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">20th IEEE International Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1109/CBI.2018.00014</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.date">2022-06-08T12:38:13+00:00</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">sword</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.user">importuser</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <author>Benedikt von Bary</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>business data processing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>globalisation</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>information systems</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>outsourcing</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16315">Information und Kommunikation</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>4163</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2018</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Business-managed IT: A conceptual framework and empirical illustration</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Research on Shadow IT is facing a conceptual dilemma in cases where previously “covert” systems developed by business entities (individual users, business workgroups, or business units) are integrated in the organizational IT management. These systems become visible, are therefore not “in the shadows” anymore, and subsequently do not fit to existing definitions of Shadow IT. Practice shows that some information systems share characteristics of Shadow IT, but are created openly in alignment with the IT department. This paper therefore proposes the term “Business- managed IT” to describe “overt” information systems developed or managed by business entities. We distinguish Business- managed IT from Shadow IT by illustrating case vignettes. Accordingly, our contribution is to suggest a concept and its delineation against other concepts. In this way, IS researchers interested in IT originated from or maintained by business entities can construct theories with a wider scope of application that are at the same time more specific to practical problems. In addition, value-laden terminology is complemented by a vocabulary that values potentially innovative developments by business entities more adequately. From a practical point of view, the distinction can be used to discuss the distribution of task responsibilities for information systems.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">26. European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2018), Protsmouth, UK</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2018_rp/77/</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.date">2022-06-08T12:38:13+00:00</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">sword</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.user">importuser</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Andreas Kopper</author>
    <author>Daniel Furstenau</author>
    <author>Stephan Zimmermann</author>
    <author>Christopher Rentrop</author>
    <author>Hannes Rothe</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Business-managed IT</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>IT Governance.</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Shadow IT</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16315">Information und Kommunikation</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2699</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2021</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Towards a taxonomy of concepts describing IT outside the IT department</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Due to technological advances, IT is increasingly introduced and managed outside of (or even hidden from) an organisation's IT department. As a result, researchers and practitioners have created multiple concepts describing different facets and trends of this development. While the individual concepts typically focus on different aspects, there are overlaps between these concepts. This effect hampers research progress as it creates redundancies and separate streams of knowledge development. We propose a taxonomy of the concepts Lightweight IT, IT Consumerisation, Bring Your Own Device, Shadow IT, and Business-Managed IT to solve this research problem based on a systematic literature review. For this purpose, we derive characterising dimensions of each concept from existing studies and analyse literature according to the usage of terms. As a result, we can describe and delineate the concepts. Thus, we contribute a taxonomy of IT outside the IT department to improve the transfer of research results between research streams.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Australasian Conference on Information Systems 2021, Sydney</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2021/9/</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.date">2022-02-04T08:58:18+00:00</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">sword</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.user">importuser</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Sebastian Käss</author>
    <author>Marie Godefroid</author>
    <author>Vincent Borghoff</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <author>Ralf Plattfaut</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>IT outside the IT</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Shadow IT</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Taxonomy</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Lightweight IT</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>IT Consumerisation</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16315">Information und Kommunikation</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>4994</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2022</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>1</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>16</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName>Association for Information Systems</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">The Missing Piece – Calibration of Qualitative Data for Qualitative Comparative Analyses in IS Research</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Over the last years, configurational research has become increasingly popular in the Information Systems (IS) discipline. Researchers value configurational methods like Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) as their application contributes to a better understanding of complex phenomena. QCA helps to uncover interrelations of conditions that lead to an outcome, building on the principles of equifinality, conjunctural causation, and asymmetry. More recently, IS researchers have started to analyze qualitative data, like case study data, with QCA. However, there is a lack of methodological guidance on how to calibrate qualitative data into set membership values for QCA. Therefore, this paper structures methodological steps and the associated options to calibrate qualitative data from an interdisciplinary perspective and critically reviews the observed methodological choices in IS research. This paper also gives recommendations for calibrating qualitative data to support informed methodological choices for future research.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Thirtieth European Conference on Information Systems, New Horizons in Digitally United Societies (ECIS 2022): 18. - 24.06.2022, Timisoara, Romania</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2022_rp/37/</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.date">2022-07-21T22:59:47+00:00</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">sword</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.user">importuser</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="OtherSeries">ECIS 2022 Research Papers ; 37</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Christoph Brosig</author>
    <author>Katja Bley</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Qualitative Comparative Analysis</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Qualitative Data</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Methodology</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Data Calibration</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>4995</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2022</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>196</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>205</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName>IEEE</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Drivers and Inhibitors of Low Code Development Platform Adoption</title>
    <abstract language="eng">When done right, the use of low code development promises a significant competitive advantage in the software development process for organizations. Thus, multiple vendors have created low code development platforms to ease the use of low code development. However, current research on low code development platforms mainly focuses on the technological aspects of the platforms but not on their adoption. Hence, it remains unclear what drives and inhibits the adoption of low code development platforms. We conducted a literature review and identified thirteen factors that inhibit the adoption and seven factors that drive it. We structure these factors along with the diffusion of innovation framework that helps to disentangle drivers and inhibitors. As a result, we provide an initial explanation of the adoption of low code development platforms. Nevertheless, we conclude that existing research on the adoption of low code development platforms is not specific enough to understand the phenomenon substantially. Further, for some factors (e.g., cost), there is a disagreement in the academic literature on whether they are drivers or inhibitors. Hence, we identify gaps and derive avenues for future research.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">2022 IEEE 24th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI): 15.06. - 17.06.2022, Amsterdam</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1109/CBI54897.2022.00028</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.date">2022-07-21T22:59:47+00:00</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">sword</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.user">importuser</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Sebastian Käss</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>low code</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>no code</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>adoption</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>driver</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>inhibitor</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>427</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2020</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>14</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-06-08</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">From Shadow IT to Business-managed IT and Back Again</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Today, information technology (IT) is not anymore solely deployed and maintained by the IT organization, but also by business units. IT deployed or managed by business units is called Shadow IT (without alignment with the IT organization) or Business-managed IT (in alignment or a split responsibility model with the IT organization), contrasting “classical” IT. However, the responsibility for deployed IT might change over time. Therefore, this paper conceptualizes the progression of the responsibility for IT as a trajectory through initialization, potential transitions, and discontinuance. The paper illustrates this conceptual framework using four exemplary case vignettes of IT instances. Empirical findings of the case vignettes determine indications when employees initialize an IT instance as Shadow IT, Business-managed IT, or IT-managed systems and reasons why the responsibility for an IT instance changes over time. The results suggest that scholars and practitioners should add a temporal dimension to the governance of IT instances.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS): 2020, Dubai</parentTitle>
    <subTitle language="eng">How Responsibility for IT Instances Evolves Over Time</subTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2020/94/</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Stefan Klotz</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>IT-Governance</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Shadow IT</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Business-managed IT</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Shadow IT</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Business-managed IT</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>IT governance</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>trajectory</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>application governance</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16315">Information und Kommunikation</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>39</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>1</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>10</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName>AIS</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Transformed Knowledge Sharing Through Business-managed IT and Shadow IT</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Business-managed IT and Shadow IT describe the autonomous deployment/management of IT instances by business units. For the former, this happens in alignment with the IT organization of the enterprise, for the latter, without alignment. We analyze why and how Business-managed IT and Shadow IT transform knowledge sharing with two case studies drawing on the theoretical lens of the knowledge-based view. Several motivators lead to the autonomous implementation of knowledge management systems (KMSs), for example, shortcomings of existing systems. The implemented KMSs have multiple benefits for knowledge sharing, such as a reduction of knowledge sharing barriers. However, we notice that the Shadow IT KMS leads to challenges for cross-unit knowledge sharing due to the covert nature of Shadow IT. Based on the findings of our case studies, we develop a mid-range theory to explain the transformation of knowledge sharing in enterprises supported by Business-managed IT and Shadow IT.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Proceedings of the 25th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2019), Cancún, Mexiko, August 15-17</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2019/org_transformation_is/org_transformation_is/5/</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <author>Stefan Klotz</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <author>Christian Schieder</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>psyndex</type>
      <value>Betriebliches Informationssystem</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>psyndex</type>
      <value>Datensicherung</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>psyndex</type>
      <value>Wissensmanagement</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Business-managed IT</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Shadow IT</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>knowledge sharing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>knowledge management system</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>8759</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2025</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>11</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName>IEEE</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Can AI be a Scholar? A Systematic Review on the Role of Generative AI in Systematic Literature Reviews</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Systematic literature reviews (SLRs) are foundational for research but resource-intensive to conduct. With the rise of large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, generative AI (GenAI) tools are being increasingly explored for their potential to support and transform the SLR process. This study presents a systematic review of peerreviewed articles that examine how LLM-based GenAI tools are used in different SLR phases. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we screened 1,846 publications published since January 2021 until April 2025 and selected 54 for in-depth analysis. Each study was coded by review phase, prompting approach, automation level, validation type and challenges. Our findings show that GenAI is most often used to support in the screening, search, and writing phases, typically through Basic Prompting and under human oversight. While many studies report efficiency gains, concerns remain regarding validity, transparency, and methodological rigor. Moreover, GenAI is frequently applied to isolated tasks but is rarely embedded in a structured, methodologically guided review processhighlighting the need for clearer phase-specific guidance and standards. We offer a structured, phase-specific synthesis that highlights both the promise and the current limitations of GenAI in literature reviews and thereby offer practical recommendations for the responsible use of GenAI in literature reviews.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">2025 27th International Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), 09-12. September 2025, Lisbon, Portugal</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1109/CBI68102.2025.00012</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus_doi_flag">true</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus_import_data">{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,25]],"date-time":"2025-12-25T18:26:20Z","timestamp":1766687180398,"version":"3.48.0"},"reference-count":83,"publisher":"IEEE","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,9]],"date-time":"2025-09-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1757376000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,9]],"date-time":"2025-09-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1757376000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,9]]},"DOI":"10.1109\/cbi68102.2025.00012","type":"proceedings-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,24]],"date-time":"2025-12-24T18:43:12Z","timestamp":1766601792000},"page":"1-11","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Can AI be a Scholar? A Systematic Review on the Role of Generative AI in Systematic Literature Reviews"],"prefix":"10.1109","author":[{"given":"Jessica","family":"K\u00f6hler","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"TU Dresden,Dresden,Germany"}]},{"given":"Maximilian Victor","family":"Harl","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"TU Munchen,Munich,Germany"}]},{"given":"Markus","family":"Westner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"OTH Regensburg,Regensburg,Germany"}]},{"given":"Susanne","family":"Strahringer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"TU Dresden,Dresden,Germany"}]}],"member":"263","reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbusres.2019.07.039"},{"issue":"2","key":"ref2","first-page":"13","article-title":"Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review","volume":"26","author":"Webster","year":"2002","journal-title":"MIS Q."},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/js9.0000000000001049"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/BMJ.N71"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/access.2025.3554504"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jrsm.1553"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41415-023-6132-y"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jcv2.12234"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/aict61888.2024.10740404"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cmpbup.2024.100145"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mtener.2025.101818"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2025.111746"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/healthcare11060887"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/02683962241304105"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/56780"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/rapm-2024-106358"},{"key":"ref17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.techfore.2023.122579"},{"key":"ref18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/56537"},{"key":"ref19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13750-025-00360-x"},{"key":"ref20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jrsm.1715"},{"key":"ref21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-024-02575-4"},{"key":"ref22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10462-024-10902-3"},{"issue":"16","key":"ref23","article-title":"A day in the life of ChatGPT as an academic reviewer: Investigating the potential of large language model for scientific literature review","author":"Srivastava","year":"2023","journal-title":"Open Science Framework"},{"key":"ref24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/info15020099"},{"key":"ref25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/acm.0000000000005439"},{"key":"ref26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/09540091.2024.2353630"},{"key":"ref27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/fi15110367"},{"key":"ref28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.iotcps.2023.04.003"},{"key":"ref29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dim.2024.100076"},{"issue":"7","key":"ref30","first-page":"8","article-title":"Using large language model to improve efficiency in literature review for undergraduate research","volume-title":"Proceedings of the Workshop on Empowering Education with LLMs - the Next-Gen Interface and Content Generation 2023 co-located with 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2023)","author":"Antu","year":"2023"},{"journal-title":"Optimizing the literature review process: Evaluating generative AI models on summarizing undergraduate data science research papers","year":"2024","author":"Saunders","key":"ref31"},{"key":"ref32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13040-024-00371-3"},{"key":"ref33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.30935\/ojcmt\/15832"},{"journal-title":"System for systematic literature review using multiple AI agents: Concept and an empirical evaluation","year":"2024","author":"Sami","key":"ref34"},{"key":"ref35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.29303\/jppipa.v9i11.5559"},{"volume-title":"Publish or Perish","year":"2007","author":"Harzing","key":"ref36"},{"key":"ref37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.techfore.2017.05.027"},{"key":"ref38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470712184"},{"key":"ref39","first-page":"1","article-title":"Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering","author":"Keele","year":"2007","journal-title":"EBSE Tech. Rep."},{"key":"ref40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0018720816681350"},{"key":"ref41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4018\/jdm.2019010104"},{"key":"ref42","article-title":"LitLLMs, LLMs for literature review: Are we there yet?","volume-title":"Trans. Mach. Learn. Res.","author":"Agarwal","year":"2024"},{"key":"ref43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/iciset62123.2024.10939517"},{"key":"ref44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/systems11070351"},{"key":"ref45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/biomedicines11061623"},{"key":"ref46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.61969\/jai.1311271"},{"key":"ref47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.4308687"},{"key":"ref48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jormas.2024.101979"},{"key":"ref49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/WEEF-GEDC59520.2023.10344098"},{"key":"ref50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo-2024-326254"},{"key":"ref51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/03400352241263532"},{"key":"ref52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5114\/biolsport.2023.125623"},{"key":"ref53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjebm-2024-113199"},{"key":"ref54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/48996"},{"key":"ref55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/51187"},{"key":"ref56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1370\/afm.3075"},{"key":"ref57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.22554\/ijtel.v7i2.152"},{"key":"ref58","first-page":"1078","article-title":"The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles","volume":"9","author":"Huang","year":"2023","journal-title":"J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA"},{"key":"ref59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-024-02203-8"},{"key":"ref60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surge.2023.12.005"},{"key":"ref61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/47049"},{"key":"ref62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijmedinf.2024.105531"},{"key":"ref63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-024-02609-x"},{"key":"ref64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/52758"},{"key":"ref65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/64682"},{"key":"ref66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/rew57809.2023.00071"},{"key":"ref67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-023-02243-z"},{"key":"ref68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.52631\/jemds.v3i1.175"},{"key":"ref69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjhci-2023-100830"},{"key":"ref70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dead207"},{"key":"ref71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/icarc64760.2025.10963273"},{"key":"ref72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5220\/0012467700003636"},{"key":"ref73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3673791.3698432"},{"key":"ref74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cola.2024.101287"},{"key":"ref75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.23736\/S2724-5683.24.06568-2"},{"key":"ref76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ecoinf.2024.102819"},{"key":"ref77","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3539618.3591703"},{"key":"ref78","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-56027-9_25"},{"key":"ref79","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.37074\/jalt.2023.6.1.20"},{"key":"ref80","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/fi16050167"},{"key":"ref81","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1088\/1674-1056\/ad625c"},{"key":"ref82","first-page":"1189","article-title":"The missing piece: Calibration of qualitative data for qualitative comparative analyses in IS research","volume-title":"ECIS 2022 Research Papers","author":"Brosig","year":"2022"},{"key":"ref83","first-page":"28","article-title":"Ranking-type delphi studies in IS research: step-by-step guide and analytical extension","volume-title":"presented at the IADIS International Conference Information Systems 2016","author":"Kobus","year":"2016"}],"event":{"name":"2025 27th International Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)","start":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,9]]},"location":"Lisbon, Portugal","end":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,12]]}},"container-title":["2025 27th International Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/xplorestaging.ieee.org\/ielx8\/11300337\/11300338\/11301041.pdf?arnumber=11301041","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,25]],"date-time":"2025-12-25T18:24:51Z","timestamp":1766687091000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/ieeexplore.ieee.org\/document\/11301041\/"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,9]]},"references-count":83,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/cbi68102.2025.00012","relation":{},"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,9]]}}}</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="local_crossrefDocumentType">proceedings-article</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="local_crossrefLicence">https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-029</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="local_import_origin">crossref</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="local_doiImportPopulated">PersonAuthorFirstName_1,PersonAuthorLastName_1,PersonAuthorFirstName_2,PersonAuthorLastName_2,PersonAuthorFirstName_3,PersonAuthorLastName_3,PersonAuthorFirstName_4,PersonAuthorLastName_4,Enrichmentconference_title,Enrichmentconference_place,PublisherName,TitleMain_1,TitleParent_1,PageNumber,PageFirst,PageLast,CompletedYear,Enrichmentlocal_crossrefLicence</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">doi-import</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Jessica Köhler</author>
    <author>Maximilian Victor Harl</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Generative AI</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Large Language Models</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>ChatGPT</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Systematic Literature Review</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Evidence Synthesis</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>AI-assisted Literature Review</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
    <collection role="DFGFachsystematik" number="1">Ingenieurwissenschaften</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="">Digitale Transformation</collection>
  </doc>
</export-example>
