<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>7261</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2024</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>79</pageFirst>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>S 02</issue>
    <volume>56</volume>
    <type>conferencepresentation</type>
    <publisherName>Georg Thieme Verlag</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Human-Computer Interaction: Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the diagnostic confidence of endoscopists assessing videos of Barrett’s esophagus</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Aims &#13;
Human-computer interactions (HCI) may have a relevant impact on the performance of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Studies show that although endoscopists assessing Barrett’s esophagus (BE) with AI improve their performance significantly, they do not achieve the level of the stand-alone performance of AI. One aspect of HCI is the impact of AI on the degree of certainty and confidence displayed by the endoscopist. Indirectly, diagnostic confidence when using AI may be linked to trust and acceptance of AI. In a BE video study, we aimed to understand the impact of AI on the diagnostic confidence of endoscopists and the possible correlation with diagnostic performance.&#13;
&#13;
Methods &#13;
22 endoscopists from 12 centers with varying levels of BE experience reviewed ninety-six standardized endoscopy videos. Endoscopists were categorized into experts and non-experts and randomly assigned to assess the videos with and without AI. Participants were randomized in two arms: Arm A assessed videos first without AI and then with AI, while Arm B assessed videos in the opposite order. Evaluators were tasked with identifying BE-related neoplasia and rating their confidence with and without AI on a scale from 0 to 9.&#13;
&#13;
Results &#13;
The utilization of AI in Arm A (without AI first, with AI second) significantly elevated confidence levels for experts and non-experts (7.1 to 8.0 and 6.1 to 6.6, respectively). Only non-experts benefitted from AI with a significant increase in accuracy (68.6% to 75.5%). Interestingly, while the confidence levels of experts without AI were higher than those of non-experts with AI, there was no significant difference in accuracy between these two groups (71.3% vs. 75.5%). In Arm B (with AI first, without AI second), experts and non-experts experienced a significant reduction in confidence (7.6 to 7.1 and 6.4 to 6.2, respectively), while maintaining consistent accuracy levels (71.8% to 71.8% and 67.5% to 67.1%, respectively).&#13;
&#13;
Conclusions &#13;
AI significantly enhanced confidence levels for both expert and non-expert endoscopists. Endoscopists felt significantly more uncertain in their assessments without AI. Furthermore, experts with or without AI consistently displayed higher confidence levels than non-experts with AI, irrespective of comparable outcomes. These findings underscore the possible role of AI in improving diagnostic confidence during endoscopic assessment.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Endoscopy</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="issn">1438-8812</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1055/s-0044-1782859</identifier>
    <enrichment key="ConferenceStatement">ESGE Days 2024, Berlin, 25.–27.04.2024</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>David Roser</author>
    <author>Michael Meinikheim</author>
    <author>Robert Mendel</author>
    <author>Christoph Palm</author>
    <author>Andreas Probst</author>
    <author>Anna Muzalyova</author>
    <author>Markus W. Scheppach</author>
    <author>Sandra Nagl</author>
    <author>Elisabeth Schnoy</author>
    <author>Christoph Römmele</author>
    <author>Dominik Andreas Helmut Otto Schulz</author>
    <author>Jakob Schlottmann</author>
    <author>Friederike Prinz</author>
    <author>David Rauber</author>
    <author>Tobias Rückert</author>
    <author>Tomoaki Matsumura</author>
    <author>G. Fernandez-Esparrach</author>
    <author>Nasim Parsa</author>
    <author>Michael F. Byrne</author>
    <author>Helmut Messmann</author>
    <author>Alanna Ebigbo</author>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="palmremic">Palm, Christoph (Prof. Dr.) - ReMIC</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="palmbarrett">Palm, Christoph (Prof. Dr.) - Projekt Barrett</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Medical Image Computing (ReMIC)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2024</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2021</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>S 01</issue>
    <volume>53</volume>
    <type>conferencepresentation</type>
    <publisherName>Georg Thieme Verlag</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Stuttgart</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2021-07-30</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Endoscopic Diagnosis of Eosinophilic Esophagitis Using a deep Learning Algorithm</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Aims &#13;
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is easily missed during endoscopy, either because physicians are not familiar with its endoscopic features or the morphologic changes are too subtle. In this preliminary paper, we present the first attempt to detect EoE in endoscopic white light (WL) images using a deep learning network (EoE-AI).&#13;
&#13;
Methods &#13;
401 WL images of eosinophilic esophagitis and 871 WL images of normal esophageal mucosa were evaluated. All images were assessed for the Endoscopic Reference score (EREFS) (edema, rings, exudates, furrows, strictures). Images with strictures were excluded. EoE was defined as the presence of at least 15 eosinophils per high power field on biopsy. A convolutional neural network based on the ResNet architecture with several five-fold cross-validation runs was used. Adding auxiliary EREFS-classification branches to the neural network allowed the inclusion of the scores as optimization criteria during training. EoE-AI was evaluated for sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score. In addition, two human endoscopists evaluated the images.&#13;
&#13;
Results &#13;
EoE-AI showed a mean sensitivity, specificity, and F1 of 0.759, 0.976, and 0.834 respectively, averaged over the five distinct cross-validation runs. With the EREFS-augmented architecture, a mean sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score of 0.848, 0.945, and 0.861 could be demonstrated respectively. In comparison, the two human endoscopists had an average sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score of 0.718, 0.958, and 0.793.&#13;
&#13;
Conclusions &#13;
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first application of deep learning to endoscopic images of EoE which were also assessed after augmentation with the EREFS-score. The next step is the evaluation of EoE-AI using an external dataset. We then plan to assess the EoE-AI tool on endoscopic videos, and also in real-time. This preliminary work is encouraging regarding the ability for AI to enhance physician detection of EoE, and potentially to do a true “optical biopsy” but more work is needed.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Endoscopy</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1055/s-0041-1724274</identifier>
    <enrichment key="ConferenceStatement">ESGE Days 2021</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Christoph Römmele</author>
    <author>Robert Mendel</author>
    <author>David Rauber</author>
    <author>Tobias Rückert</author>
    <author>Michael F. Byrne</author>
    <author>Christoph Palm</author>
    <author>Helmut Messmann</author>
    <author>Alanna Ebigbo</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Eosinophilic Esophagitis</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Endoscopy</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Deep Learning</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="000">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="ddc" number="610">Medizin und Gesundheit</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="RCHST">Regensburg Center of Health Sciences and Technology - RCHST</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="palmremic">Palm, Christoph (Prof. Dr.) - ReMIC</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Medical Image Computing (ReMIC)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>6080</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2023</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>S54</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>S56</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>Suppl 1</issue>
    <volume>18</volume>
    <type>conferencepresentation</type>
    <publisherName>Springer Nature</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2023-06-25</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Augmenting instrument segmentation in video sequences of minimally invasive surgery by synthetic smoky frames</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1007/s11548-023-02878-2</identifier>
    <enrichment key="ConferenceStatement">CARS 2023—Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Proceedings of the 37th International Congress and Exhibition Munich, Germany, June 20–23, 2023</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="Kostentraeger">2027701</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Tobias Rückert</author>
    <author>Maximilian Rieder</author>
    <author>David Rauber</author>
    <author>Michel Xiao</author>
    <author>Eg Humolli</author>
    <author>Hubertus Feussner</author>
    <author>Dirk Wilhelm</author>
    <author>Christoph Palm</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Surgical instrument segmentation</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>smoke simulation</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>unpaired image-to-image translation</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>robot-assisted surgery</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="000">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="ddc" number="617">Chirurgie und verwandte medizinische Fachrichtungen</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="RCHST">Regensburg Center of Health Sciences and Technology - RCHST</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="palmremic">Palm, Christoph (Prof. Dr.) - ReMIC</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Medical Image Computing (ReMIC)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>6041</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2023</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>S53</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>S54</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>S02</issue>
    <volume>55</volume>
    <type>conferencepresentation</type>
    <publisherName>Thieme</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2023-05-04</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Real-time detection and delineation of tissue during third-space endoscopy using artificial intelligence (AI)</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Aims &#13;
AI has proven great potential in assisting endoscopists in diagnostics, however its role in therapeutic endoscopy remains unclear. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technically demanding intervention with a slow learning curve and relevant risks like bleeding and perforation. Therefore, we aimed to develop an algorithm for the real-time detection and delineation of relevant structures during third-space endoscopy.&#13;
&#13;
Methods &#13;
5470 still images from 59 full length videos (47 ESD, 12 POEM) were annotated. 179681 additional unlabeled images were added to the training dataset. Consequently, a DeepLabv3+ neural network architecture was trained with the ECMT semi-supervised algorithm (under review elsewhere). Evaluation of vessel detection was performed on a dataset of 101 standardized video clips from 15 separate third-space endoscopy videos with 200 predefined blood vessels.&#13;
&#13;
Results &#13;
Internal validation yielded an overall mean Dice score of 85% (68% for blood vessels, 86% for submucosal layer, 88% for muscle layer). On the video test data, the overall vessel detection rate (VDR) was 94% (96% for ESD, 74% for POEM). The median overall vessel detection time (VDT) was 0.32 sec (0.3 sec for ESD, 0.62 sec for POEM).&#13;
&#13;
Conclusions &#13;
Evaluation of the developed algorithm on a video test dataset showed high VDR and quick VDT, especially for ESD. Further research will focus on a possible clinical benefit of the AI application for VDR and VDT during third-space endoscopy.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Endoscopy</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1055/s-0043-1765128</identifier>
    <enrichment key="ConferenceStatement">ESGE Days 2023</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Markus W. Scheppach</author>
    <author>Robert Mendel</author>
    <author>Andreas Probst</author>
    <author>David Rauber</author>
    <author>Tobias Rückert</author>
    <author>Michael Meinikheim</author>
    <author>Christoph Palm</author>
    <author>Helmut Messmann</author>
    <author>Alanna Ebigbo</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Speiseröhrenkrankheit</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Künstliche Intelligenz</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Artificial Intelligence</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="61">Medizin und Gesundheit</collection>
    <collection role="ddc" number="000">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="RCHST">Regensburg Center of Health Sciences and Technology - RCHST</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="palmremic">Palm, Christoph (Prof. Dr.) - ReMIC</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Medical Image Computing (ReMIC)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>7801</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2024</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst>e575</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>e576</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>09</issue>
    <volume>62</volume>
    <type>conferencepresentation</type>
    <publisherName>Georg Thieme Verlag KG</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion: Einfluss künstlicher Intelligenz auf das diagnostische Vertrauen von Endoskopikern bei der Beurteilung des Barrett-Ösophagus</title>
    <abstract language="deu">Ziele: &#13;
Das Ziel der Studie war es, den Einfluss von KI auf die diagnostische Sicherheit (Konfidenzniveau) von Endoskopikern anhand von BÖ-Videos zu untersuchen und mögliche Korrelationen mit der Untersuchungsqualität zu erforschen.&#13;
Methodik: &#13;
22 Endoskopiker aus zwölf Zentren mit unterschiedlicher Barrett-Erfahrung untersuchten 96 standardisierte Endoskopievideos. Die Untersucher wurden in Experten und Nicht-Experten eingeteilt und nach dem Zufallsprinzip für die Bewertung der Videos mit oder ohne KI eingeteilt. Die Teilnehmer wurden in zwei Gruppen aufgeteilt: Arm A bewertete zunächst Videos ohne KI und dann mit KI, während Arm B die umgekehrte Reihenfolge einhielt. Die Untersucher hatten die Aufgabe, BÖ-assoziierte Neoplasien zu erkennen und ihr Konfidenzniveau sowohl mit als auch ohne KI auf einer Skala von 0 bis 9 anzugeben.&#13;
Ergebnis: &#13;
In Arm A erhöhte der Einsatz von KI das Konfidenzniveau bei beiden signifikant (p&lt;0.001). Bemerkenswert ist, dass jedoch nur Nicht-Experten durch die KI eine signifikante Verbesserung der Sensitivität und Spezifität (p&lt;0.001 bzw. p&lt;0.05) erfuhren. Während Experten ohne KI im Vergleich zu Nicht-Experten mit KI ein höheres Konfidenzniveau aufwiesen, gab es keinen signifikanten Unterschied in der Genauigkeit. In Arm B zeigten beide Gruppen eine signifikante Abnahme des Konfidenzniveaus (p&lt;0.001) bei gleichbleibender Genauigkeit. Darüber hinaus wurden in 9% der Entscheidungen trotz korrekter KI eine falsche Wahl getroffen.&#13;
Schlussfolgerung: &#13;
Der Einsatz künstlicher Intelligenz steigerte das Konfidenzniveau sowohl bei Experten als auch bei Nicht-Experten signifikant – ein Effekt, der im Studienmodell reversibel war. Darüber hinaus wiesen Experten mit oder ohne KI durchweg höhere Konfidenzniveaus auf als Nicht-Experten mit KI, trotz vergleichbarer Ergebnisse. Zudem konnte beobachtet werden, dass die Untersucher in 9% der Fälle die KI zuungunsten des Patienten ignorierten.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1055/s-0044-1789656</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.date">2024-11-18T10:16:05+00:00</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">sword</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.user">importuser</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="ConferenceStatement">78. Jahrestagung der DGVS mit Sektion Endoskopie Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie mit den Arbeitsgemeinschaften der DGAV und Jahrestagung der CACP. - Viszeralmedizin 2024. - 9/30/2024 - 10/5/2024</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>David Roser</author>
    <author>Michael Meinikheim</author>
    <author>Robert Mendel</author>
    <author>Christoph Palm</author>
    <author>Anna Muzalyova</author>
    <author>David Rauber</author>
    <author>Tobias Rückert</author>
    <author>Nasim Parsa</author>
    <author>Michael F. Byrne</author>
    <author>Helmut Messmann</author>
    <author>Alanna Ebigbo</author>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="palmremic">Palm, Christoph (Prof. Dr.) - ReMIC</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="palmbarrett">Palm, Christoph (Prof. Dr.) - Projekt Barrett</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Medical Image Computing (ReMIC)</collection>
  </doc>
</export-example>
