<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>2584</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2022</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>226</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>238</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>14</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Elsevier</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">At risk of reproductive disadvantage? Exploring fertility awareness among migrant women in Germany</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This study examined awareness about fertility among immigrant women and non-migrants in Germany. The social relevance of infertility and fertility treatment is increasing in Western countries due to continually low overall birth rates, a high rate of childlessness, and a gap between the desired and actual numbers of children. While there is growing interest in infertility and reproductive medicine in general, previous studies have rarely included immigrant or ethnic minorities in Europe. This study investigated whether knowledge on the age-related fertility decline (ARFD) varies between migrant groups and the majority group, and the role of education. Working hypotheses were drawn from theoretical considerations on frameworks of migrant assimilation. The analysis was based on data collected in a social science pilot study on reproductive medicine, representative of the general population (‘NeWiRe’ 2014–2015). The sample included 962 women aged 18–50 years living in Germany. Approximately 81% of the sample were immigrants who originated from Turkey, Poland, the Balkan countries or countries of the (post-Soviet) Commonwealth of Independent States. While rather poor overall, knowledge on ARFD was found to be significantly lower in the migrant groups compared with the majority group. This minority-group disadvantage cannot be explained by sociodemographic or cultural variables. Future research should include minority groups in empirical studies on awareness about fertility in order to better understand the causes of this disadvantage, and the potential reproductive needs of migrants.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Reproductive Biomedicine &amp; Society Online</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1016/j.rbms.2021.11.007</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.date">2022-01-27T15:33:58+00:00</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">sword</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.user">importuser</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Nadja Milewski</author>
    <author>Sonja Haug</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Age-related fertility decline</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Fertility knowledge</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Migrant assimilation</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Minority groups</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Non-patient sample</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakANK">Fakultät Angewandte Natur- und Kulturwissenschaften</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="oaweg" number="">Hybrid Open Access - OA-Veröffentlichung in einer Subskriptionszeitschrift/-medium</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Institut für Sozialforschung und Technikfolgenabschätzung (IST)</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Empirische Sozialforschung</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="hauglasofo">Haug, Sonja (Prof. Dr.) - Labor Empirische Sozialforschung</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>3239</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2018</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>343</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>370</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>43</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Bundesinstitut Bevölkerungsforschung (BIB)</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Women's Attitudes toward Assisted Reproductive Technologies - A Pilot Study among Migrant Minorities and Non-migrants in Germany</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This study examines attitudes toward assisted reproductive technologies (ART) among immigrant women and non-migrants in Germany. The social relevance of ART is increasing in Western countries due to overall low birth rates, a high rate of childlessness, and a gap between the desired and the actual numbers of children. Previous literature has been scarce, however, on attitudes toward ART, and immigrant minorities have rarely been included in studies on ART.&#13;
Our working hypotheses are drawn from theoretical considerations on political socialisation and cultural integration. The analysis is based on data collected in a pilot study in 2014 and 2015. The sample includes 960 women aged 18 to 50 living in Germany. About 81 percent of the sample are immigrants who originate from Turkey, Poland, the Balkan countries, or countries of the (Russian) Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). We study the social norm to use ART to have a child, the personal attitude of whether a woman would use ART herself, and the methods that they would consider for their own use.&#13;
Our results show that ART is overall socially acceptable, and the majority of women said that they would use it if necessary. There is significant variation between the origin groups, however. Non-migrants show the lowest acceptance rates and migrants from Poland and Turkey the highest approval. There is also variation in the ART procedures considered for use with the migrants more approving of heterologous methods than non-migrants. The differences between the origin groups diminish only partly when controlling for further explanatory variables, i.e. gender-role attitudes, religiosity, and socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents.&#13;
We conclude that attitudes toward ART are shaped less by socio-demographic characteristics, but rather by cultural factors and the socialization in the migrants' countries of origin. The diversity in attitudes toward ART by cultural background should be acknowledged in research and public discourses on ART as well as in regulating policies.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Comparative population studies</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.12765/CPoS-2019-06en</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.date">2022-03-17T07:14:43+00:00</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">sword</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.user">importuser</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY-SA - Namensnennung - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Sonja Haug</author>
    <author>Nadja Milewski</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>EUROPE</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Family norms</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Germany</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>IMMIGRANTS</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Migrant women</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>RELIGIOSITY</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>TURKISH MIGRANTS</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Women's social status</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakSoz">Fakultät Sozial- und Gesundheitswissenschaften</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="oaweg" number="">Diamond Open Access - OA-Veröffentlichung ohne Publikationskosten (Sponsoring)</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Empirische Sozialforschung</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="hauglasofo">Haug, Sonja (Prof. Dr.) - Labor Empirische Sozialforschung</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1645</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>4</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue>Quartal 3</issue>
    <volume>16</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace>Rostock</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation>Rostocker Zentrum zur Erforschung des Demografischen Wandels</contributingCorporation>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2021-04-13</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Kinderwunsch: darf man mithelfen?</title>
    <abstract language="deu">Wer ungewollt kinderlos bleibt, kann versuchen der Natur auf die  Sprünge zu helfen: Das Methodenspektrum der modernen  Reproduktionsmedizin reicht von Hormonbehandlungen oder künstlicher  Befruchtung über Samen- und Eizellspende bis zur Leihmutterschaft. Eine Studie der Universität Rostock untersucht erstmals, wie akzeptiert solche Methoden bei einheimischen Frauen und in verschiedenen Migrantengruppen sind.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Demografische Forschung aus erster Hand</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://www.demografische-forschung.org/archiv/defo1903.pdf</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <author>Sonja Haug</author>
    <author>Nadja Milewski</author>
    <author>Tomma Schröder</author>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakSoz">Fakultät Sozial- und Gesundheitswissenschaften</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Institut für Sozialforschung und Technikfolgenabschätzung (IST)</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Empirische Sozialforschung</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="hauglasofo">Haug, Sonja (Prof. Dr.) - Labor Empirische Sozialforschung</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2007</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2020</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst>150</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>168</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <volume>7</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Brill</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2021-06-16</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Religious Diversity and Women’s Attitudes Toward Using Assisted Reproductive Technologies</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This study examines women’s attitudes toward the own use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) by their religious affiliation in Germany. The social relevance of ART is increasing in Western countries due to overall low birth rates, a high rate of childlessness, and a gap between the desired and the actual numbers of children.&#13;
Previous literature has been scarce, however, on attitudes toward ART, and religious diversity has not been included in studies on ART. Our analysis is based on data collected in a pilot study in 2014 and 2015. The sample includes 944 women aged 18 to 50 living in Germany. The results show that Muslim women were significantly more likely than&#13;
Christian women to say they would consider using ART; having no religious affiliation was associated with the least open attitude toward ART usage.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Journal of Religion and Demography</parentTitle>
    <subTitle language="eng">Insights from a Pilot Study in Germany</subTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1163/2589742X-12347104</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">2589-742X</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Nadja Milewski</author>
    <author>Sonja Haug</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Reproduktionsmedizin</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Frau</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Religion</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Deutschland</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>social attitudes</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>fertility</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>ART</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>reproductive health</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Germany</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="300">Sozialwissenschaften</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakSoz">Fakultät Sozial- und Gesundheitswissenschaften</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="RCHST">Regensburg Center of Health Sciences and Technology - RCHST</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Institut für Sozialforschung und Technikfolgenabschätzung (IST)</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Empirische Sozialforschung</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="hauglasofo">Haug, Sonja (Prof. Dr.) - Labor Empirische Sozialforschung</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1585</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2018</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>343</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>370</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>Vol. 43</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation>Federal Institute for Population Research     </creatingCorporation>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2021-04-11</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Women’s attitudes towards assisted reproductive technologies</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This study examines attitudes toward assisted reproductive technologies (ART) among immigrant women and non-migrants in Germany. The social relevance of ART is increasing in Western countries due to overall low birth rates, a high rate of childlessness, and a gap between the desired and the actual numbers of children. Previous literature has been scarce, however, on attitudes toward ART, and immigrant minorities have rarely been included in studies on ART.&#13;
&#13;
Our working hypotheses are drawn from theoretical considerations on political socialisation and cultural integration. The analysis is based on data collected in a pilot study in 2014 and 2015. The sample includes 960 women aged 18 to 50 living in Germany. About 81 percent of the sample are immigrants who originate from Turkey, Poland, the Balkan countries, or countries of the (Russian) Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). We study the social norm to use ART to have a child, the personal attitude of whether a woman would use ART herself, and the methods that they would consider for their own use.&#13;
&#13;
Our results show that ART is overall socially acceptable, and the majority of women said that they would use it if necessary. There is significant variation between the origin groups, however. Non-migrants show the lowest acceptance rates and migrants from Poland and Turkey the highest approval. There is also variation in the ART procedures considered for use with the migrants more approving of heterologous methods than non-migrants. The differences between the origin groups diminish only partly when controlling for further explanatory variables, i.e. gender-role attitudes, religiosity, and socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents.&#13;
&#13;
We conclude that attitudes toward ART are shaped less by socio-demographic characteristics, but rather by cultural factors and the socialization in the migrants’ countries of origin. The diversity in attitudes toward ART by cultural background should be acknowledged in research and public discourses on ART as well as in regulating policies.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Comparative Population Studies. Special Collection on "New aspects in fertility of migrant and minority populations in Europe: The role of attitudes and intentions in family planning"</parentTitle>
    <subTitle language="eng">a pilot study among migrant minorities and non-migrants in Germany</subTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.12765/CPoS-2019-06</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY-SA - Namensnennung - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Sonja Haug</author>
    <author>Nadja Milewski</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>ART</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Family norms</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Women’s social status</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Migrant women</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Germany</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="305">Soziale Gruppen</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakSoz">Fakultät Sozial- und Gesundheitswissenschaften</collection>
    <collection role="oaweg" number="">Gold Open Access- Erstveröffentlichung in einem/als Open-Access-Medium</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Institut für Sozialforschung und Technikfolgenabschätzung (IST)</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Empirische Sozialforschung</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="hauglasofo">Haug, Sonja (Prof. Dr.) - Labor Empirische Sozialforschung</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2244</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2021</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>lecture</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation>Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerungswissenschaft (BiB)</contributingCorporation>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Stratified reproduction? Exploring fertility awareness and information on ARTs in a pilot study on migrant women in Germany</title>
    <note>Vortrag (virtuell), 03.02.2021</note>
    <author>Nadja Milewski</author>
    <author>Sonja Haug</author>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakSoz">Fakultät Sozial- und Gesundheitswissenschaften</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Institut für Sozialforschung und Technikfolgenabschätzung (IST)</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Empirische Sozialforschung</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="hauglasofo">Haug, Sonja (Prof. Dr.) - Labor Empirische Sozialforschung</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>8517</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2025</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst>47</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>74</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>Springer</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Wiesbaden</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2025-10-10</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Soziostrukturelle und -kulturelle Einflussfaktoren auf Einstellungsmuster zu assistierter Reproduktion</title>
    <abstract language="deu">Zu den bereits klinisch implementierten reproduktionsmedizinischen Verfahren wie der In-vitro-Fertilisation oder Eizell-Kryokonservierung, die Menschen mit Fertilitätseinschränkungen dabei helfen sollen, Kinder zu bekommen, kommen immer mehr Verfahren hinzu, welche sich zwar noch im experimentellen Stadium befinden, jedoch bereits auf die Möglichkeit der klinischen Anwendung hindeuten. Ein erstes relevantes Verfahren ist die In-vitro-Gametogenese, die Generierung von artifiziellen Gameten. Ein zweites ist die extrakorporale Schwangerschaft, mit der die Hoffnung verbunden ist, schwere Komplikationen oder sogar den Tod bei Frühgeburten zu vermeiden. Diese medizinischen Innovationen können weitreichende rechtliche, gesellschaftliche und ethische Konsequenzen im Kontext der menschlichen Reproduktion nach sich ziehen – diese werden im vorliegenden Sammelband kritisch diskutiert.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Reproduktionszukünfte : ethische, rechtliche und soziale Perspektiven neuer Reproduktionstechniken</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-3-658-46299-4</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1007/978-3-658-46300-7</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Sonja Haug</author>
    <author>Nadja Milewski</author>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakSoz">Fakultät Sozial- und Gesundheitswissenschaften</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="hauglasofo">Haug, Sonja (Prof. Dr.) - Labor Empirische Sozialforschung</collection>
    <collection role="DFGFachsystematik" number="2">Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="">Gesundheit und Soziales</collection>
  </doc>
</export-example>
