<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>7281</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2024</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>641</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>649</pageLast>
    <pageNumber>9</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>56</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Georg Thieme Verlag</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Stuttgart</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2024-05-05</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Influence of artificial intelligence on the diagnostic performance of endoscopists in the assessment of Barrett’s esophagus: a tandem randomized and video trial</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Background &#13;
This study evaluated the effect of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based clinical decision support system on the performance and diagnostic confidence of endoscopists in their assessment of Barrett’s esophagus (BE).&#13;
&#13;
Methods &#13;
96 standardized endoscopy videos were assessed by 22 endoscopists with varying degrees of BE experience from 12 centers. Assessment was randomized into two video sets: group A (review first without AI and second with AI) and group B (review first with AI and second without AI). Endoscopists were required to evaluate each video for the presence of Barrett’s esophagus-related neoplasia (BERN) and then decide on a spot for a targeted biopsy. After the second assessment, they were allowed to change their clinical decision and confidence level.&#13;
&#13;
Results &#13;
AI had a stand-alone sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 92.2%, 68.9%, and 81.3%, respectively. Without AI, BE experts had an overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 83.3%, 58.1%, and 71.5%, respectively. With AI, BE nonexperts showed a significant improvement in sensitivity and specificity when videos were assessed a second time with AI (sensitivity 69.8% [95%CI 65.2%–74.2%] to 78.0% [95%CI 74.0%–82.0%]; specificity 67.3% [95%CI 62.5%–72.2%] to 72.7% [95%CI 68.2%–77.3%]). In addition, the diagnostic confidence of BE nonexperts improved significantly with AI.&#13;
&#13;
Conclusion &#13;
BE nonexperts benefitted significantly from additional AI. BE experts and nonexperts remained significantly below the stand-alone performance of AI, suggesting that there may be other factors influencing endoscopists’ decisions to follow or discard AI advice.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Endoscopy</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1055/a-2296-5696</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-72818</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY-NC-ND - Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Michael Meinikheim</author>
    <author>Robert Mendel</author>
    <author>Christoph Palm</author>
    <author>Andreas Probst</author>
    <author>Anna Muzalyova</author>
    <author>Markus W. Scheppach</author>
    <author>Sandra Nagl</author>
    <author>Elisabeth Schnoy</author>
    <author>Christoph Römmele</author>
    <author>Dominik Andreas Helmut Otto Schulz</author>
    <author>Jakob Schlottmann</author>
    <author>Friederike Prinz</author>
    <author>David Rauber</author>
    <author>Tobias Rückert</author>
    <author>Tomoaki Matsumura</author>
    <author>Glòria Fernández-Esparrach</author>
    <author>Nasim Parsa</author>
    <author>Michael F. Byrne</author>
    <author>Helmut Messmann</author>
    <author>Alanna Ebigbo</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Artificial Intelligence</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Endoscopy</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Medical Image Computing</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="palmremic">Palm, Christoph (Prof. Dr.) - ReMIC</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="palmbarrett">Palm, Christoph (Prof. Dr.) - Projekt Barrett</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="oaweg" number="">Hybrid Open Access - OA-Veröffentlichung in einer Subskriptionszeitschrift/-medium</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Medical Image Computing (ReMIC)</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-oth-regensburg/files/7281/Meinikheim_Mendel_Endoscopy_2024.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>7261</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2024</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>79</pageFirst>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>S 02</issue>
    <volume>56</volume>
    <type>conferencepresentation</type>
    <publisherName>Georg Thieme Verlag</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Human-Computer Interaction: Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the diagnostic confidence of endoscopists assessing videos of Barrett’s esophagus</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Aims &#13;
Human-computer interactions (HCI) may have a relevant impact on the performance of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Studies show that although endoscopists assessing Barrett’s esophagus (BE) with AI improve their performance significantly, they do not achieve the level of the stand-alone performance of AI. One aspect of HCI is the impact of AI on the degree of certainty and confidence displayed by the endoscopist. Indirectly, diagnostic confidence when using AI may be linked to trust and acceptance of AI. In a BE video study, we aimed to understand the impact of AI on the diagnostic confidence of endoscopists and the possible correlation with diagnostic performance.&#13;
&#13;
Methods &#13;
22 endoscopists from 12 centers with varying levels of BE experience reviewed ninety-six standardized endoscopy videos. Endoscopists were categorized into experts and non-experts and randomly assigned to assess the videos with and without AI. Participants were randomized in two arms: Arm A assessed videos first without AI and then with AI, while Arm B assessed videos in the opposite order. Evaluators were tasked with identifying BE-related neoplasia and rating their confidence with and without AI on a scale from 0 to 9.&#13;
&#13;
Results &#13;
The utilization of AI in Arm A (without AI first, with AI second) significantly elevated confidence levels for experts and non-experts (7.1 to 8.0 and 6.1 to 6.6, respectively). Only non-experts benefitted from AI with a significant increase in accuracy (68.6% to 75.5%). Interestingly, while the confidence levels of experts without AI were higher than those of non-experts with AI, there was no significant difference in accuracy between these two groups (71.3% vs. 75.5%). In Arm B (with AI first, without AI second), experts and non-experts experienced a significant reduction in confidence (7.6 to 7.1 and 6.4 to 6.2, respectively), while maintaining consistent accuracy levels (71.8% to 71.8% and 67.5% to 67.1%, respectively).&#13;
&#13;
Conclusions &#13;
AI significantly enhanced confidence levels for both expert and non-expert endoscopists. Endoscopists felt significantly more uncertain in their assessments without AI. Furthermore, experts with or without AI consistently displayed higher confidence levels than non-experts with AI, irrespective of comparable outcomes. These findings underscore the possible role of AI in improving diagnostic confidence during endoscopic assessment.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Endoscopy</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="issn">1438-8812</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1055/s-0044-1782859</identifier>
    <enrichment key="ConferenceStatement">ESGE Days 2024, Berlin, 25.–27.04.2024</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>David Roser</author>
    <author>Michael Meinikheim</author>
    <author>Robert Mendel</author>
    <author>Christoph Palm</author>
    <author>Andreas Probst</author>
    <author>Anna Muzalyova</author>
    <author>Markus W. Scheppach</author>
    <author>Sandra Nagl</author>
    <author>Elisabeth Schnoy</author>
    <author>Christoph Römmele</author>
    <author>Dominik Andreas Helmut Otto Schulz</author>
    <author>Jakob Schlottmann</author>
    <author>Friederike Prinz</author>
    <author>David Rauber</author>
    <author>Tobias Rückert</author>
    <author>Tomoaki Matsumura</author>
    <author>G. Fernandez-Esparrach</author>
    <author>Nasim Parsa</author>
    <author>Michael F. Byrne</author>
    <author>Helmut Messmann</author>
    <author>Alanna Ebigbo</author>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="palmremic">Palm, Christoph (Prof. Dr.) - ReMIC</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="palmbarrett">Palm, Christoph (Prof. Dr.) - Projekt Barrett</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Medical Image Computing (ReMIC)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>7801</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2024</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst>e575</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>e576</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>09</issue>
    <volume>62</volume>
    <type>conferencepresentation</type>
    <publisherName>Georg Thieme Verlag KG</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion: Einfluss künstlicher Intelligenz auf das diagnostische Vertrauen von Endoskopikern bei der Beurteilung des Barrett-Ösophagus</title>
    <abstract language="deu">Ziele: &#13;
Das Ziel der Studie war es, den Einfluss von KI auf die diagnostische Sicherheit (Konfidenzniveau) von Endoskopikern anhand von BÖ-Videos zu untersuchen und mögliche Korrelationen mit der Untersuchungsqualität zu erforschen.&#13;
Methodik: &#13;
22 Endoskopiker aus zwölf Zentren mit unterschiedlicher Barrett-Erfahrung untersuchten 96 standardisierte Endoskopievideos. Die Untersucher wurden in Experten und Nicht-Experten eingeteilt und nach dem Zufallsprinzip für die Bewertung der Videos mit oder ohne KI eingeteilt. Die Teilnehmer wurden in zwei Gruppen aufgeteilt: Arm A bewertete zunächst Videos ohne KI und dann mit KI, während Arm B die umgekehrte Reihenfolge einhielt. Die Untersucher hatten die Aufgabe, BÖ-assoziierte Neoplasien zu erkennen und ihr Konfidenzniveau sowohl mit als auch ohne KI auf einer Skala von 0 bis 9 anzugeben.&#13;
Ergebnis: &#13;
In Arm A erhöhte der Einsatz von KI das Konfidenzniveau bei beiden signifikant (p&lt;0.001). Bemerkenswert ist, dass jedoch nur Nicht-Experten durch die KI eine signifikante Verbesserung der Sensitivität und Spezifität (p&lt;0.001 bzw. p&lt;0.05) erfuhren. Während Experten ohne KI im Vergleich zu Nicht-Experten mit KI ein höheres Konfidenzniveau aufwiesen, gab es keinen signifikanten Unterschied in der Genauigkeit. In Arm B zeigten beide Gruppen eine signifikante Abnahme des Konfidenzniveaus (p&lt;0.001) bei gleichbleibender Genauigkeit. Darüber hinaus wurden in 9% der Entscheidungen trotz korrekter KI eine falsche Wahl getroffen.&#13;
Schlussfolgerung: &#13;
Der Einsatz künstlicher Intelligenz steigerte das Konfidenzniveau sowohl bei Experten als auch bei Nicht-Experten signifikant – ein Effekt, der im Studienmodell reversibel war. Darüber hinaus wiesen Experten mit oder ohne KI durchweg höhere Konfidenzniveaus auf als Nicht-Experten mit KI, trotz vergleichbarer Ergebnisse. Zudem konnte beobachtet werden, dass die Untersucher in 9% der Fälle die KI zuungunsten des Patienten ignorierten.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1055/s-0044-1789656</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.date">2024-11-18T10:16:05+00:00</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">sword</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.user">importuser</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="ConferenceStatement">78. Jahrestagung der DGVS mit Sektion Endoskopie Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie mit den Arbeitsgemeinschaften der DGAV und Jahrestagung der CACP. - Viszeralmedizin 2024. - 9/30/2024 - 10/5/2024</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>David Roser</author>
    <author>Michael Meinikheim</author>
    <author>Robert Mendel</author>
    <author>Christoph Palm</author>
    <author>Anna Muzalyova</author>
    <author>David Rauber</author>
    <author>Tobias Rückert</author>
    <author>Nasim Parsa</author>
    <author>Michael F. Byrne</author>
    <author>Helmut Messmann</author>
    <author>Alanna Ebigbo</author>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="palmremic">Palm, Christoph (Prof. Dr.) - ReMIC</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="palmbarrett">Palm, Christoph (Prof. Dr.) - Projekt Barrett</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Medical Image Computing (ReMIC)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>5429</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2022</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>2388</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>2390</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>12</issue>
    <volume>71</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>BMJ</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>London</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2022-09-16</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Vessel and tissue recognition during third-space endoscopy using a deep learning algorithm</title>
    <abstract language="eng">In this study, we aimed to develop an artificial intelligence clinical decision support solution to mitigate operator-dependent limitations during complex endoscopic procedures such as endoscopic submucosal dissection and peroral endoscopic myotomy, for example, bleeding and perforation. A DeepLabv3-based model was trained to delineate vessels, tissue structures and instruments on endoscopic still images from such procedures. The mean cross-validated Intersection over Union and Dice Score were 63% and 76%, respectively. Applied to standardised video clips from third-space endoscopic procedures, the algorithm showed a mean vessel detection rate of 85% with a false-positive rate of 0.75/min. These performance statistics suggest a potential clinical benefit for procedure safety, time and also training.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Gut</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1136/gutjnl-2021-326470</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-54293</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY-NC - Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Alanna Ebigbo</author>
    <author>Robert Mendel</author>
    <author>Markus W. Scheppach</author>
    <author>Andreas Probst</author>
    <author>Neal Shahidi</author>
    <author>Friederike Prinz</author>
    <author>Carola Fleischmann</author>
    <author>Christoph Römmele</author>
    <author>Stefan Karl Gölder</author>
    <author>Georg Braun</author>
    <author>David Rauber</author>
    <author>Tobias Rückert</author>
    <author>Luis Antonio de Souza Jr.</author>
    <author>João Paulo Papa</author>
    <author>Michael F. Byrne</author>
    <author>Christoph Palm</author>
    <author>Helmut Messmann</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Artificial Intelligence</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Endoscopy</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Medical Image Computing</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="004">Datenverarbeitung; Informatik</collection>
    <collection role="ddc" number="617">Chirurgie und verwandte medizinische Fachrichtungen</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="palmremic">Palm, Christoph (Prof. Dr.) - ReMIC</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="oaweg" number="">Hybrid Open Access - OA-Veröffentlichung in einer Subskriptionszeitschrift/-medium</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Medical Image Computing (ReMIC)</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-oth-regensburg/files/5429/gutjnl-2021-326470.full_supp.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>680</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2021</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>878</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>883</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>09</issue>
    <volume>53</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Thieme</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Stuttgart</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-11-28</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Endoscopic prediction of submucosal invasion in Barrett’s cancer with the use of Artificial Intelligence: A pilot Study</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Background and aims: The accurate differentiation between T1a and T1b Barrett’s cancer has both therapeutic and prognostic implications but is challenging even for experienced physicians. We trained an Artificial Intelligence (AI) system on the basis of deep artificial neural networks (deep learning) to differentiate between T1a and T1b Barrett’s cancer white-light images. &#13;
&#13;
Methods: Endoscopic images from three tertiary care centres in Germany were collected retrospectively. A deep learning system was trained and tested using the principles of cross-validation. A total of 230 white-light endoscopic images (108 T1a and 122 T1b) was evaluated with the AI-system. For comparison, the images were also classified by experts specialized in endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of Barrett’s cancer. &#13;
&#13;
Results: The sensitivity, specificity, F1 and accuracy of the AI-system in the differentiation between T1a and T1b cancer lesions was 0.77, 0.64, 0.73 and 0.71, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the performance of the AI-system and that of human experts with sensitivity, specificity, F1 and accuracy of 0.63, 0.78, 0.67 and 0.70 respectively. &#13;
&#13;
Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrates the first multicenter application of an AI-based system in the prediction of submucosal invasion in endoscopic images of Barrett’s cancer. AI scored equal to international experts in the field, but more work is necessary to improve the system and apply it to video sequences and in a real-life setting. Nevertheless, the correct prediction of submucosal invasion in Barret´s cancer remains challenging for both experts and AI.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Endoscopy</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1055/a-1311-8570</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Alanna Ebigbo</author>
    <author>Robert Mendel</author>
    <author>Tobias Rückert</author>
    <author>Laurin Schuster</author>
    <author>Andreas Probst</author>
    <author>Johannes Manzeneder</author>
    <author>Friederike Prinz</author>
    <author>Matthias Mende</author>
    <author>Ingo Steinbrück</author>
    <author>Siegbert Faiss</author>
    <author>David Rauber</author>
    <author>Luis Antonio de Souza Jr.</author>
    <author>João Paulo Papa</author>
    <author>Pierre Deprez</author>
    <author>Tsuneo Oyama</author>
    <author>Akiko Takahashi</author>
    <author>Stefan Seewald</author>
    <author>Prateek Sharma</author>
    <author>Michael F. Byrne</author>
    <author>Christoph Palm</author>
    <author>Helmut Messmann</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Maschinelles Lernen</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Neuronales Netz</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Speiseröhrenkrebs</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Diagnose</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Artificial Intelligence</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Machine learning</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Adenocarcinoma</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Barrett’s cancer</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>submucosal invasion</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="ddc" number="6">Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="RCHST">Regensburg Center of Health Sciences and Technology - RCHST</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="palmremic">Palm, Christoph (Prof. Dr.) - ReMIC</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="palmbarrett">Palm, Christoph (Prof. Dr.) - Projekt Barrett</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Medical Image Computing (ReMIC)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2024</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2021</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>S 01</issue>
    <volume>53</volume>
    <type>conferencepresentation</type>
    <publisherName>Georg Thieme Verlag</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Stuttgart</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2021-07-30</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Endoscopic Diagnosis of Eosinophilic Esophagitis Using a deep Learning Algorithm</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Aims &#13;
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is easily missed during endoscopy, either because physicians are not familiar with its endoscopic features or the morphologic changes are too subtle. In this preliminary paper, we present the first attempt to detect EoE in endoscopic white light (WL) images using a deep learning network (EoE-AI).&#13;
&#13;
Methods &#13;
401 WL images of eosinophilic esophagitis and 871 WL images of normal esophageal mucosa were evaluated. All images were assessed for the Endoscopic Reference score (EREFS) (edema, rings, exudates, furrows, strictures). Images with strictures were excluded. EoE was defined as the presence of at least 15 eosinophils per high power field on biopsy. A convolutional neural network based on the ResNet architecture with several five-fold cross-validation runs was used. Adding auxiliary EREFS-classification branches to the neural network allowed the inclusion of the scores as optimization criteria during training. EoE-AI was evaluated for sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score. In addition, two human endoscopists evaluated the images.&#13;
&#13;
Results &#13;
EoE-AI showed a mean sensitivity, specificity, and F1 of 0.759, 0.976, and 0.834 respectively, averaged over the five distinct cross-validation runs. With the EREFS-augmented architecture, a mean sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score of 0.848, 0.945, and 0.861 could be demonstrated respectively. In comparison, the two human endoscopists had an average sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score of 0.718, 0.958, and 0.793.&#13;
&#13;
Conclusions &#13;
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first application of deep learning to endoscopic images of EoE which were also assessed after augmentation with the EREFS-score. The next step is the evaluation of EoE-AI using an external dataset. We then plan to assess the EoE-AI tool on endoscopic videos, and also in real-time. This preliminary work is encouraging regarding the ability for AI to enhance physician detection of EoE, and potentially to do a true “optical biopsy” but more work is needed.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Endoscopy</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1055/s-0041-1724274</identifier>
    <enrichment key="ConferenceStatement">ESGE Days 2021</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Christoph Römmele</author>
    <author>Robert Mendel</author>
    <author>David Rauber</author>
    <author>Tobias Rückert</author>
    <author>Michael F. Byrne</author>
    <author>Christoph Palm</author>
    <author>Helmut Messmann</author>
    <author>Alanna Ebigbo</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Eosinophilic Esophagitis</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Endoscopy</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Deep Learning</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="000">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="ddc" number="610">Medizin und Gesundheit</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="RCHST">Regensburg Center of Health Sciences and Technology - RCHST</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="palmremic">Palm, Christoph (Prof. Dr.) - ReMIC</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Medical Image Computing (ReMIC)</collection>
  </doc>
</export-example>
