<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>4719</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2014</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>601</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>603</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>10</issue>
    <volume>108</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Elsevier</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">When Choosing Wisely meets clinical practice guidelines</title>
    <abstract language="eng">The American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) Foundation launched the Choosing Wisely campaign in 2012 and until today convinced more than 50 US specialist societies to develop lists of interventions that may not improve people’s health but are potentially harmful. We suggest combining these new efforts with the already existing efforts in clinical practice guideline development. Existing clinical practice guidelines facilitate a more participatory and evidence-based approach to the development of top 5 lists. In return, adding top 5 lists (for overuse and underuse) to existing clinical practice guidelines nicely addresses a neglected dimension to clinical practice guideline development, namely explicit information on which Do or Don’t do recommendations are frequently disregarded in practice.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen : ZEFQ = The journal of evidence and quality in health care</parentTitle>
    <additionalTitle language="eng">Wenn "Choosing Wisely" auf Leitlinien trifft</additionalTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1016/j.zefq.2014.10.014</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">1865-9217</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">2212-0289</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.date">2022-07-04T20:29:15+00:00</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">sword</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.import.user">importuser</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Daniel Strech</author>
    <author>Markus Follmann</author>
    <author>David Klemperer</author>
    <author>Monika Lelgemann</author>
    <author>Günter Ollenschläger</author>
    <author>Heiner Raspe</author>
    <author>Monika Nothacker</author>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakSoz">Fakultät Sozial- und Gesundheitswissenschaften</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
  </doc>
</export-example>
