<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>7347</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2024</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>9089</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>9098</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName>IATED</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">EVALUATION OF THE LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PYTHIA</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Learning management systems gain importance due to the Corona pandemic. To personalize such a learning management system, a Moodle adaption named Pythia was created. Pythia is implemented as a Moodle plugin solution. The possibility of generating learning paths with various algorithms and the change of the graphical user interface is significant. Learning paths are generated with two different algorithms. Nestor algorithm generates learning paths with a Bayesian network, while Tyche algorithm uses a Markov model. The graphical user interface is adapted to the generated learning paths where learning element symbols are customized and the individual learning paths are depicted.&#13;
&#13;
This paper presents the results of a qualitative survey among German students with the aim of evaluating the first version of the learning management system Pythia. 25 students took the subject “Software Engineering for Safe and Secure Systems” in the winter term of 2023/24. The 68 asked questions focus on usage behavior, graphical user interface, usability, preferences, volume, and quality of learning elements, and learning paths. Our Moodle course for the lecture contains seven sections, each section has minimum one subsection on which the learning path is calculated. Last three sections are designed by presenting minimum one learning element of each learning element category except the collaboration tool. In a previous work, ten learning element categories were designed and evaluated comprising manuscript, brief overview, learning goal, quiz, exercise, summary, three types of additional material, and collaboration tool. The first sections are left as they are initially designed by the lecturer (normal section). The survey considers the difference between normal sections and diverse sections. Furthermore, the generated learning paths are evaluated. 13 students undertook Nestor learning paths, whereas 12 undertook Tyche learning paths.&#13;
&#13;
The results suggest that for the majority of students, the learning element symbols are well-chosen. Moreover, all students wish the elements relevant to the exam to be labelled. 23 students are overwhelmed by the number of learning elements in the last sections of the Moodle course. In the future, some suggestions will be implemented such as the labelling of exam relevant learning elements. To overcome the overload of learning elements, a strategy could be developed like hiding learning elements not preferred by the learning path algorithm.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">EDULEARN Proceedings: 16th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Palma, Spain. 1-3 July, 2024</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="issn">2340-1117</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.21125/edulearn.2024.2189</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-73474</identifier>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Susanne Staufer</author>
    <author>Florian Hauser</author>
    <author>Timur Ezer</author>
    <author>Lisa Grabinger</author>
    <author>Vamsi Krishna Nadimpalli</author>
    <author>Simon Röhrl</author>
    <author>Flemming Bugert</author>
    <author>Dominik Bittner</author>
    <author>Jürgen Mottok</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Learning management system (LMS)</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>questionnaire (study)</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>learning elements</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>learning paths</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>usability</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>graphical user interface (GUI)</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Moodle</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>higher education area (HEA)</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakEI">Fakultät Elektro- und Informationstechnik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Laboratory for Safe and Secure Systems (LAS3)</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-oth-regensburg/files/7347/STAUFER2024EVA.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>6297</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2023</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Wiley</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">On the perception of graph layouts</title>
    <abstract language="eng">In the field of software engineering, graph-based models are used for a variety of applications. Usually, the layout of those graphs is determined at the discretion of the user. This article empirically investigates whether different layouts affect the comprehensibility or popularity of a graph and whether one can predict the perception of certain aspects in the graph using basic graphical laws from psychology (i.e., Gestalt principles). Data on three distinct layouts of one causal graph is collected from 29 subjects using eye tracking and a print questionnaire. The evaluation of the collected data suggests that the layout of a graph does matter and that the Gestalt principles are a valuable tool for assessing partial aspects of a layout.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Journal of Software: Evolution and Process</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1002/smr.2599</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-62973</identifier>
    <note>Corresponding author: Lisa Grabinger</note>
    <enrichment key="CorrespondingAuthor">Lisa Grabinger</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.doi.autoCreate">false</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.urn.autoCreate">true</enrichment>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Lisa Grabinger</author>
    <author>Florian Hauser</author>
    <author>Jürgen Mottok</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>causal graphs</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>eye tracking</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>gestalt principles</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>graph layouts</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>modeling languages</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakEI">Fakultät Elektro- und Informationstechnik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="oaweg" number="">Hybrid Open Access - OA-Veröffentlichung in einer Subskriptionszeitschrift/-medium</collection>
    <collection role="funding" number="">DEAL Wiley</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Laboratory for Safe and Secure Systems (LAS3)</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-oth-regensburg/files/6297/Grabinger_Journal_Software.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>3389</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferencepresentation</type>
    <publisherName>RWTH Aachen</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Heuristics in Software Modelling: An Eyetracking Study</title>
    <abstract language="eng">To investigate the role of heuristics in the domain of software engineering, an eye tracking study was conducted in which experts and novices were compared. The study focused on one of the most challenging parts in this domain: the generation of an object model for a software product based on a requirements specification. During their training, software engineers are taught different techniques to solve this task. One of these techniques is the noun/verb analysis.&#13;
However, it is still unclear to what extent novice and expert programmers are making use of it. Ideally, the noun/verb analysis works as a heuristic and helps programmers to make fast and accurate decisions. Participants in the study were 40 software programmers at four levels of expertise (novices, intermediates, experienced rogrammers, experts). They were presented with ten decision tasks. In each task, participants read a requirement specification and then had to choose one out of three presented class diagrams that they considered the best solution. During the task, their eye movements were recorded. Results show that all participants used the noun/verb analysis as a heuristic. Programmers with higher levels of expertise, however, outperformed programmers with lower levels of expertise. Interestingly, the more experienced programmers were not following the noun/verb analysis in a blindfolded way. They realised that the noun/verb analysis would produce diagrams, but a skilled software architect would not model them in this way. Instead they created their models in a way that they perceived as more logical and realistic</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Earli Book of Abstracts</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://earli.org/sites/default/files/2019-09/BOA-2019.pdf</identifier>
    <author>Florian Hauser</author>
    <author>Rebecca Reuter</author>
    <author>Andreas Gegenfurtner</author>
    <author>Hans Gruber</author>
    <author>Jürgen Mottok</author>
    <author>Ivonne Hutzler</author>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakEI">Fakultät Elektro- und Informationstechnik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1022</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2020</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2021-02-03</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Tutorial on Software Engineering Education in Co-Located Multi-User Eye-Tracking-Environments</title>
    <abstract language="eng">We briefly describe a tutorial on the application of Eye-Tracking technology for Software Engineering Education. We will showcase our setup of a large-scale Eye-Tracking-Classroom and its usage for real-time improvement of traditional learning scenarios in Software Engineering Education. We will focus on the integration of gaze data into modern integrated development environments (IDEs) and demonstrate a complete workflow for its usage in co-located multi-user Eye-Tracking-Environments.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Proceedings of the 32nd IEEE Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training: Munich, November 2020</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1109/CSEET49119.2020.9206170</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Hans Gruber</author>
    <author>Christian Wolff</author>
    <author>Jürgen Mottok</author>
    <author>Alexander Bazo</author>
    <author>Florian Hauser</author>
    <author>Stefan Schreistetter</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>eye-tracking</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>software engineering education</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>multi-user eye tracking</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>real-time learning scenarios</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakEI">Fakultät Elektro- und Informationstechnik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Laboratory for Safe and Secure Systems (LAS3)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1029</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2020</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>1</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>5</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2021-02-03</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Code reviews in C++: Preliminary results from an eye tracking study</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Code reviews are an essential part of quality assurance in modern software projects. But despite their great importance, they are still carried out in a way that relies on human skills and decisions. During the last decade, there have been several publications on code reviews using eye tracking as a method, but only a few studies have focused on the performance differences between experts and novices. To get a deeper understanding of these differences, the following experiment was developed: This study surveys expertise-related differences in experts’, advanced programmers’, and novices’ eye movements during the review of eight short C++ code examples, including correct and erroneous codes. A sample of 35 participants (21 novices, 14 advanced and expert programmers) were recruited. A Tobii Spectrum 600 was used for the data collection. Measures included participants’ eye movements during the code review, demographic background data, and cued retrospective verbal comments on replays of their own eye movement recordings. Preliminary results give proof for experience-related differences between participants. Advanced and expert programmers performed significantly better in case of error detection and the eye tracking data implies a more efficient reviewing strategy.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">ETRA '20 Short Papers: ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and ApplicationsJune 2020</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">ISBN 9781450371346</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1145/3379156.3391980</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <author>Florian Hauser</author>
    <author>Stefan Schreistetter</author>
    <author>Rebecca Reuter</author>
    <author>Jürgen Mottok</author>
    <author>Hans Gruber</author>
    <author>Kenneth Holmqvist</author>
    <author>Nick Schorr</author>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakEI">Fakultät Elektro- und Informationstechnik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Laboratory for Safe and Secure Systems (LAS3)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1028</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2020</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>42</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>46</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2021-02-03</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Deliberate Practice in Programming: How is it carried out by programmers?</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This work in progress study examines through which activities programmers perform deliberate practice to improve their own skills in coding and programming. For this reason, a qualitative questionnaire was developed and conducted with a sample of 22 participants. The results indicate that programmers perform formal and informal forms of training and learning. Typically, a classical programming training in the context of a university course or for work-related reasons is a first step in the acquisition of expertise. Building on these basic skills, non-formal and informal learning activities are carried out by the learners. Especially the social interaction and the collaborative work with other programmers is of great importance in this context. The activities mentioned by the test persons fulfil the characteristics of deliberate practice and will be examined more closely in a further study.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">ECSEE '20: Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Software Engineering Education, Seeon, Germany, June 2020</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">ISBN 9781450377522</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1145/3396802.3396815</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <author>Florian Hauser</author>
    <author>Theresa Stark</author>
    <author>Jürgen Mottok</author>
    <author>Hans Gruber</author>
    <author>Rebecca Reuter</author>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakEI">Fakultät Elektro- und Informationstechnik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16315">Information und Kommunikation</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Laboratory for Safe and Secure Systems (LAS3)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1288</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>7798</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>7807</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2021-02-07</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Using augmented reality in software engineering education? First insights to a comparative study of 2D and AR UML modeling</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Although there has been much speculation about the potential of Augmented Reality (AR) in teaching for learning material, there is a significant lack of empirical proof about its effectiveness and implementation in higher education. We describe a software to integrate AR using the Microsoft Hololens into UML (Unified Modeling Language) teaching. Its user interface is laid out to overcome problems of existing software. We discuss the design of the tool and report a first evaluation study. The study is based upon effectiveness as a metric for students performance and components of motivation. The study was designed as control group experiment with two groups. The experimental group had to solve tasks with the help of the AR modeling tool and the control group used a classic PC software. We identified tendencies that participants of the experimental group showed more motivation than the control group. Both groups performed equally well</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) and 31st Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&amp;T), January 8 - 11, 2019 Grand Wailea, Hawaii</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.24251/HICSS.2019.938</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <author>Rebecca Reuter</author>
    <author>Florian Hauser</author>
    <author>Daniel Muckelbauer</author>
    <author>Theresa Stark</author>
    <author>Erika Antoni</author>
    <author>Jürgen Mottok</author>
    <author>Christian Wolff</author>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakEI">Fakultät Elektro- und Informationstechnik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Laboratory for Safe and Secure Systems (LAS3)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1310</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2021-02-07</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Supporting Abstraction Skills Using Augmented Reality?</title>
    <abstract language="eng">We investigated the potential of augmented reality (AR) to enable visualization of abstract concepts and present the first iteration of a teaching experiment that evaluates the use of AR as support for abstraction skills. Students were confronted with the task to present and explain information to different groups of stakeholders at the example of a coffee machine. Results show that students find it helpful to have a visual app-prototype and especially one that can be disassembled in different levels. The main goal was to sensitize students for the need to think about and to abstract information for certain roles and perspectives.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">ITiCSE '19, Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, July 2019, Aberdeen Scotland UK</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1145/3304221.3325562</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <author>Rebecca Reuter</author>
    <author>Marco Knietzsch</author>
    <author>Florian Hauser</author>
    <author>Jürgen Mottok</author>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakEI">Fakultät Elektro- und Informationstechnik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Laboratory for Safe and Secure Systems (LAS3)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1376</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>6087</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>6096</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2021-02-08</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Using Eye Tracking Data to analyze students’ tasks solving behavior in classroom contexts</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">12th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (ICERI 2019), Conference Proceedings, 2019, Seville (Spain)</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-84-09-14755-7</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">2340-1095</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.21125/iceri.2019.1473</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <author>Stefan Schreistetter</author>
    <author>Florian Hauser</author>
    <author>Rebecca Reuter</author>
    <author>Sabrina Jahn</author>
    <author>Jürgen Mottok</author>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakEI">Fakultät Elektro- und Informationstechnik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Laboratory for Safe and Secure Systems (LAS3)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1322</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>6064</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>6070</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2021-02-07</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Eye movements in software modelling – what do they tell us about heuristics</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">12th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (ICERI 2019), Conference Proceedings, 2019, Seville (Spain)</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="isbn">978-84-09-14755-7</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.21125/iceri.2019.1469</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <author>Florian Hauser</author>
    <author>Rebecca Reuter</author>
    <author>Andreas Gegenfurtner</author>
    <author>Hans Gruber</author>
    <author>Jürgen Mottok</author>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakEI">Fakultät Elektro- und Informationstechnik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Laboratory for Safe and Secure Systems (LAS3)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>1264</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2016</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>613</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>620</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2021-02-07</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Developing visual expertise in software engineering: An eye tracking study</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Program comprehension and the ability to find program errors are key skills of software engineering. The aim of this pilot study was to examine the visual processes of novice and advanced programmers in authentic tasks. Fifteen novices and eight advanced programmers were given eight short pieces of code. Their task was to either identify an error or give the output of the code. Eye movements and keyboard activity were recorded. On average, the novices spent more time reading the code than composing the response, whereas the more advanced programmers started composing the response sooner and spent more time on it. In general, the advanced programmers had shorter fixations and saccades. The results suggest that the advanced programmers are quicker to grasp the essence of the code and able to see more details in it. The advanced programmers had shorter fixations and saccade lengths during the second phase which might indicate the process of chunking.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 10-13 April 2016, Abu Dhabi, UAE</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1109/EDUCON.2016.7474614</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <author>Markus Nivala</author>
    <author>Florian Hauser</author>
    <author>Jürgen Mottok</author>
    <author>Hans Gruber</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>program comprehension</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>debugging</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>software engineering</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>visual expertise</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>eye tracking</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakEI">Fakultät Elektro- und Informationstechnik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Laboratory for Safe and Secure Systems (LAS3)</collection>
  </doc>
</export-example>
