<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>293</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>1</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>8</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>9</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Nature</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-02-12</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">A simple method for determining ligament stiffness during total knee arthroplasty in vivo</title>
    <abstract language="eng">A key requirement in both native knee joints and total knee arthroplasty is a stable capsular ligament complex. However, knee stability is highly individual and ranges from clinically loose to tight. So far, hardly any in vivo data on the intrinsic mechanical of the knee are available. This study investigated if stiffness of the native ligament complex may be determined in vivo using a standard knee balancer. Measurements were obtained with a commercially available knee balancer, which was initially calibrated in vitro. 5 patients underwent reconstruction of the force-displacement curves of the ligament complex. Stiffness of the medial and lateral compartments were calculated to measure the stability of the capsular ligament complex. All force-displacement curves consisted of a non-linear section at the beginning and of a linear section from about 80 N onwards. The medial compartment showed values of 28.4 ± 1.2 N/mm for minimum stiffness and of 39.9 ± 1.1 N/mm for maximum stiffness; the respective values for the lateral compartment were 19.9 ± 0.9 N/mm and 46.6 ± 0.8 N/mm. A commercially available knee balancer may be calibrated for measuring stiffness of knee ligament complex in vivo, which may contribute to a better understanding of the intrinsic mechanical behaviour of knee joints.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Scientific Reports</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1038/s41598-019-41732-x</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Florian Völlner</author>
    <author>Tim A. Weber</author>
    <author>Markus Weber</author>
    <author>Tobias Renkawitz</author>
    <author>Sebastian Dendorfer</author>
    <author>Joachim Grifka</author>
    <author>Benjamin Craiovan</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Biomechanische Analyse</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Kniegelenkband</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Steifigkeit</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="617">Chirurgie und verwandte medizinische Fachrichtungen</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FAKMB">Fakultät Maschinenbau</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="RCBE">Regensburg Center of Biomedical Engineering - RCBE</collection>
    <collection role="oaweg" number="">Gold Open Access- Erstveröffentlichung in einem/als Open-Access-Medium</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="dendorferlbm">Dendorfer, Sebastian (Prof. Dr.), Zeitschriftenbeiträge - Labor Biomechanik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Biomechanik (LBM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>295</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2018</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>1905</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>1910</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>8</issue>
    <volume>27</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Springer-Verlag</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-02-12</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Regarding loads after spinal fusion, every level should be seen separately: a musculoskeletal analysis</title>
    <abstract language="eng">The number of spinal fusion surgeries is steadily increasing and biomechanical consequences are still in debate. The aim of this study is to provide biomechanical insights into the sagittal balance of the spine and to compare spinal load before and after spinal fusion.&#13;
METHOD:&#13;
&#13;
The joint reaction forces of 52 patients were analyzed in proximo-distal and antero-posterior direction from the levels T12-L1 to L5-S1 using musculoskeletal simulations.&#13;
RESULTS:&#13;
&#13;
In 104 simulations, pre-surgical forces were equal to post-surgical. The levels L4-L5 and T12-L1, however, showed increased spinal forces compression forces with higher sagittal displacement. Improved restauration of sagittal balance was accompanied by lower spinal load. AP shear stress, interestingly decreased with sagittal imbalance.&#13;
CONCLUSION:&#13;
&#13;
Imbalanced spines have a risk of increased compression forces at Th12-L1. L4-L5 always has increased spinal loads. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">European Spine Journal</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1007/s00586-018-5476-5</identifier>
    <author>Achim Benditz</author>
    <author>Simon Auer</author>
    <author>J.F. Spörrer</author>
    <author>S. Wolkerstorfer</author>
    <author>Joachim Grifka</author>
    <author>Franz Süß</author>
    <author>Sebastian Dendorfer</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>AnyBody Modeling System</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Musculoskeletal analysis</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Sagittal balance</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Spinal fusion</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Spine biomechanics</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Biomechanische Analyse</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Wirbelsäulenversteifung</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Vergleichende Anatomie</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="617">Chirurgie und verwandte medizinische Fachrichtungen</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FAKMB">Fakultät Maschinenbau</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="RCBE">Regensburg Center of Biomedical Engineering - RCBE</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="dendorferlbm">Dendorfer, Sebastian (Prof. Dr.), Zeitschriftenbeiträge - Labor Biomechanik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Biomechanik (LBM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>302</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2016</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>196</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>201</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>vol. 49</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-02-13</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Leg length and offset differences above 5 mm after total hip arthroplasty are associated with altered gait kinematics</title>
    <abstract language="eng">We aimed to investigate the relationship between postoperative leg length/offset (LL/OS) reconstruction and gait performance after total hip arthroplasty (THA). In the course of a prospective randomized controlled trial, 60 patients with unilateral hip arthrosis received cementless THA through a minimally-invasive anterolateral surgical approach. One year post-operatively, LL and global OS restoration were analyzed and compared to the contralateral hip on AP pelvic radiographs. The combined postoperative limb length/OS reconstruction of the operated hip was categorized as restored (within 5 mm) or non-restored (more than 5 mm reduction or more than 5 mm increment). The acetabular component inclination, anteversion and femoral component anteversion were evaluated using CT scans of the pelvis and the femur. 3D gait analysis of the lower extremity and patient related outcome measures (HHS, HOOS, EQ-5D) were obtained pre-operatively, six months and twelve months post-operatively by an observer blinded to radiographic results. Component position of cup and stem was comparable between the restored and non-restored group. Combined LL and OS restoration within 5 mm resulted in higher Froude number (p &lt; 0.001), normalized walking speed (p &lt; 0.001) and hip range-of-motion (ROM) (p = 0.004) during gait twelve months postoperatively, whereas gait symmetry was comparable regardless of LL and OS reconstruction at both examinations. Clinical scores did not show any relevant association between the accuracy of LL or OS reconstruction and gait six/twelve months after THA. In summary, postoperative LL/OS discrepancies larger than 5 mm relate to unphysiological gait kinematics within the first year after THA. DRKS00000739, German Clinical Trials Register.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Gait &amp; Posture</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.07.011</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <author>Tobias Renkawitz</author>
    <author>Tim A. Weber</author>
    <author>Silvia Dullien</author>
    <author>Michael Woerner</author>
    <author>Sebastian Dendorfer</author>
    <author>Joachim Grifka</author>
    <author>Markus Weber</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>THA</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Leg length</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Offset</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Gait analysis</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Biomechanics</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FAKMB">Fakultät Maschinenbau</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="RCBE">Regensburg Center of Biomedical Engineering - RCBE</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="dendorferlbm">Dendorfer, Sebastian (Prof. Dr.), Zeitschriftenbeiträge - Labor Biomechanik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Biomechanik (LBM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>301</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2016</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>418</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>425</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>vol. 49</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-02-13</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Gait six month and one-year after computer assisted Femur First THR vs. conventional THR. Results of a patient- and observer- blinded randomized controlled trial</title>
    <abstract language="eng">A prospective randomized controlled trial is presented that is used to compare gait performance between the computer assisted Femur First (CAS FF) operation method and conventional THR (CON). 60 patients underwent a 3D gait analysis of the lower extremity at pre-operative, 6 months post-operative and twelve months post-operative. Detailed verification experiments were facilitated to ensure the quality of data as well as to avoid over-interpreting of the data. The results confirm a similar data-quality as reported in the literature. Walking speed, range of motion and symmetry thereof improved over the follow-up period, without significant differences between the groups. While all parameters do significantly increase over the follow-up period for both groups, there were no significant differences between them at any given time-point. Patients undergoing CAS FF showed a trend to improved hip flexion angle indicating a possible long-term benefit.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Gait &amp; Posture</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.06.035</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <author>Tim A. Weber</author>
    <author>Sebastian Dendorfer</author>
    <author>Sjoerd K. Bulstra</author>
    <author>Joachim Grifka</author>
    <author>Gijsbertus Jacob Verkerke</author>
    <author>Tobias Renkawitz</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Biomechanics</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Combined anteversion</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Computer-assisted surgery</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Femur first</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Gait analysis</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FAKMB">Fakultät Maschinenbau</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="RCBE">Regensburg Center of Biomedical Engineering - RCBE</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="dendorferlbm">Dendorfer, Sebastian (Prof. Dr.), Zeitschriftenbeiträge - Labor Biomechanik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Biomechanik (LBM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>309</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2015</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>890</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>898</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>97-B</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-02-18</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Impingement-free range of motion, cup coverage and early clinical results between femur first navigation and conventional total hip arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial</title>
    <abstract language="eng">We report the kinematic and early clinical results of a patient- and observer-blinded randomised controlled trial in which CT scans were used to compare potential impingement-free range of movement (ROM) and acetabular component cover between patients treated with either the navigated 'femur-first' total hip arthroplasty (THA) method (n = 66; male/female 29/37, mean age 62.5 years; 50 to 74) or conventional THA (n = 69; male/female 35/34, mean age 62.9 years; 50 to 75). The Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the Harris hip score, the Euro-Qol-5D and the Mancuso THA patient expectations score were assessed at six weeks, six months and one year after surgery. A total of 48 of the patients (84%) in the navigated 'femur-first' group and 43 (65%) in the conventional group reached all the desirable potential ROM boundaries without prosthetic impingement for activities of daily living (ADL) in flexion, extension, abduction, adduction and rotation (p = 0.016). Acetabular component cover and surface contact with the host bone were &gt; 87% in both groups. There was a significant difference between the navigated and the conventional groups' Harris hip scores six weeks after surgery (p = 0.010). There were no significant differences with respect to any clinical outcome at six months and one year of follow-up. The navigated 'femur-first' technique improves the potential ROM for ADL without prosthetic impingement, although there was no observed clinical difference between the two treatment groups.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Journal of Bone &amp; Joint Surgery</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1302/0301-620X.97B7.34729</identifier>
    <author>Tobias Renkawitz</author>
    <author>Markus Weber</author>
    <author>H.-R. Springorum</author>
    <author>E. Sendtner</author>
    <author>Michael Woerner</author>
    <author>K. Ulm</author>
    <author>Tim Weber</author>
    <author>Joachim Grifka</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>combined anteversion</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>THA</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Hüftgelenkprothese</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Operationstechnik</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Computerunterstütztes Verfahren</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Beweglichkeit</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="617">Chirurgie und verwandte medizinische Fachrichtungen</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FAKMB">Fakultät Maschinenbau</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="RCBE">Regensburg Center of Biomedical Engineering - RCBE</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="dendorferlbm">Dendorfer, Sebastian (Prof. Dr.), Zeitschriftenbeiträge - Labor Biomechanik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>310</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2015</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>2323</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>2333</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>12</issue>
    <volume>39</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-02-18</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">The impact of standard combined anteversion definitions on gait and clinical outcome within one year after total hip arthroplasty</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Different target areas within the concept of combined cup and stem anteversion have been published for total hip arthroplasty (THA). We asked whether component positioning according to eight standard combined anteversion rules is associated with (1) more physiological gait patterns, (2) higher improvement of gait variables and (3) better clinical outcome after THA.In a prospective clinical study, 60 patients received cementless THA through an anterolateral MIS approach in a lateral decubitus position. Six weeks postoperatively, implant position was analysed using 3D-CT by an independent external institute. Preoperatively, six and 12 months postoperatively range of motion, normalized walking speed and hip flexion symmetry index were measured using 3D motion-capture gait analysis. Patient-related outcome measures (HHS, HOOS, EQ-5D) were obtained by an observer blinded to 3D-CT results. Eight combined anteversion definitions and Lewinnek's "safe zone" were evaluated regarding their impact on gait patterns and clinical outcome.Combined cup and stem anteversion according to standard combined anteversion definitions as well as cup placement within Lewinnek's "safe zone" did not influence range of motion, normalized walking speed and/or hip flexion symmetry index six and 12 months after THA. Similarly, increase of gait parameters within the first year after THA was comparable between all eight combined anteversion rules. Clinical outcome measures like HHS, HOOS and EQ-5D did not show any benefit for either of the combined anteversion definitions.Standard combined cup and stem anteversion rules do not improve postoperative outcome as measured by gait analysis and clinical scores within one year after THA.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">International Orthopaedics</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1007/s00264-015-2777-8</identifier>
    <author>Markus Weber</author>
    <author>Tim A. Weber</author>
    <author>Michael Woerner</author>
    <author>Benjamin Craiovan</author>
    <author>Michael Worlicek</author>
    <author>Sebastian Winkler</author>
    <author>Joachim Grifka</author>
    <author>Tobias Renkawitz</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Total hip athroplasty</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Combined anteversion</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Outcome</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Gait analysis</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Hüftgelenkprothese</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Bewegungsanalyse</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Gehen</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Funktionelle Anatomie</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="617">Chirurgie und verwandte medizinische Fachrichtungen</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FAKMB">Fakultät Maschinenbau</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="RCBE">Regensburg Center of Biomedical Engineering - RCBE</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="dendorferlbm">Dendorfer, Sebastian (Prof. Dr.), Zeitschriftenbeiträge - Labor Biomechanik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>308</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2015</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>ID 625317</pageFirst>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>16 Seiten</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>2015</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-02-18</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Does Computer-Assisted Femur First THR Improve Musculoskeletal Loading Conditions?</title>
    <abstract language="eng">We have developed a novel, computer-assisted operation method for minimal-invasive total hip replacement (THR) following the concept of “femur first/combined anteversion,” which incorporates various aspects of performing a functional optimization of the prosthetic stem and cup position (CAS FF). The purpose of this study is to assess whether the hip joint reaction forces and patient’s gait parameters are being improved by CAS FF in relation to conventional THR (CON). We enrolled 60 patients (28 CAS FF/32 CON) and invited them for gait analysis at three time points (preoperatively, postop six months, and postop 12 months). Data retrieved from gait analysis was processed using patient-specific musculoskeletal models. The target parameters were hip reaction force magnitude (hrf), symmetries, and orientation with respect to the cup. Hrf in the CAS FF group were closer to a young healthy normal. Phase-shift symmetry showed an increase in the CAS FF group. Hrf orientation in the CAS FF group was closer to optimum, though no edge or rim-loading occurred in the CON group as well. The CAS FF group showed an improved hrf orientation in an early stage and a trend to an improved long-term outcome.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">BioMed Research International</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1155/2015/625317</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <author>Tim A. Weber</author>
    <author>Sebastian Dendorfer</author>
    <author>Joachim Grifka</author>
    <author>Gijsbertus Jacob Verkerke</author>
    <author>Tobias Renkawitz</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Hüftgelenkprothese</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Operationstechnik</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Computerunterstütztes Verfahren</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Bewegungsapparat</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Mechanische Belastung</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="000">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FAKMB">Fakultät Maschinenbau</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="RCBE">Regensburg Center of Biomedical Engineering - RCBE</collection>
    <collection role="oaweg" number="">Gold Open Access- Erstveröffentlichung in einem/als Open-Access-Medium</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="dendorferlbm">Dendorfer, Sebastian (Prof. Dr.), Zeitschriftenbeiträge - Labor Biomechanik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Biomechanik (LBM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>315</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2012</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>939</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>946</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>12</issue>
    <volume>226</volume>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-02-18</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Measuring functional outcome after total hip replacement with subject-specific hip joint loading</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Total hip replacement is an often-performed orthopedic surgical procedure; the amount of procedures undertaken will increase since our life expectancy is growing. In order to optimize function, hip biomechanics should be restored to as near normal as possible. The goal of this pilot study was to determine whether or not it is feasible to compute the vectorial hip reaction force pathways on the head of the prosthesis and the force angles relative to the cup of the prosthesis that occur during gait in total hip replacement patients, serving as an objective measurement of the functional outcome following hip replacement. A three-dimensional gait analysis, measuring ground reaction forces and kinematics, was performed. The data retrieved from the gait analysis was used as the input for the musculoskeletal model to compute vectorial joint reaction forces for data processing. To evaluate the position and orientation of the joint reaction forces, the force path, as well as the force angles for the operated and non-operated joint, has been calculated during the stance phase of the specific leg. The force path for subject 2 on the non-operated side is only located in the posterior-lateral quarter, as is the force path for subject 1. In contrast to this subject, the force path for subject 2 at the operated hip joint can be found only within the anterior quarter of the head of the implant, where it is nearly equally distributed in the medio-lateral half of the prosthesis head. The force-inclination angles on the cup of subject 1, with respect to the plane of the socket face, indicates that the force vector is mainly positioned in the same quadrant when compared with subject 2 (in a cup-fixed coordinate system). The force-anteversion angle behaves similarly to the force-inclination angle, even when the effects are not as pronounced. The proposed methods in this article are aiming to define two functional outcomes of total hip replacement that are related to wear and rim loading. It is accepted that wear is not only a function of time, but a function of use. Owing to the methods listed in this article, we are able to determine a) the applied force and b) the sliding distance (force pathway) in a subject-specific manner. The computed hip-reaction force angles and the distance to the rim cup are a measurement for cup or rim loading, and occurs in the so-called safe-zones. This method may well give us insight into the biomechanical situation during gait, after receiving total hip replacement, that we need to fully understand the mechanisms acting on a hip joint and to prove a possible increase of functional outcome after receiving total hip replacement.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1177/0954411912447728</identifier>
    <author>Tim A. Weber</author>
    <author>Sebastian Dendorfer</author>
    <author>Silvia Dullien</author>
    <author>Joachim Grifka</author>
    <author>Gijsbertus Jacob Verkerke</author>
    <author>Tobias Renkawitz</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>total hip replacement</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>subject-specific musculoskeletal modeling</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>functional outcome</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>force pathways</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>force angles</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>critical hip joint loading</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>rim loading</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>cup loading</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Hüftgelenkprothese</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Biomechanik</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Lastverteilung &lt;Statik&gt;</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Ganganalyse</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Simulation</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="617">Chirurgie und verwandte medizinische Fachrichtungen</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FAKMB">Fakultät Maschinenbau</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="dendorferlbm">Dendorfer, Sebastian (Prof. Dr.), Zeitschriftenbeiträge - Labor Biomechanik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Biomechanik (LBM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2004</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2021</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>846</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>853</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>4</issue>
    <volume>40</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Wiley</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2021-06-15</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Kinematic pelvic tilt during gait alters functional cup position in total hip arthroplasty</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Static pelvic tilt impacts functional cup position in total hip arthroplasty (THA). In the current study we investigated the effect of kinematic pelvic changes on cup position. In the course of a prospective controlled trial postoperative 3D-computed tomography (CT) and gait analysis before and 6 and 12 months after THA were obtained in 60 patients. Kinematic pelvic motion during gait was measured using Anybody Modeling System. By fusion with 3D-CT, the impact of kinematic pelvic tilt alterations on cup anteversion and inclination was calculated. Furthermore, risk factors correlating with high pelvic mobility were evaluated. During gait a high pelvic range of motion up to 15.6° exceeding 5° in 61.7% (37/60) of patients before THA was found. After surgery, the pelvis tilted posteriorly by a mean of 4.0 ± 6.6° (p &lt; .001). The pelvic anteflexion led to a mean decrease of −1.9 ± 2.2° (p &lt; .001) for cup inclination and −15.1 ± 6.1° (p &lt; .001) for anteversion in relation to the anterior pelvic plane (APP). Kinematic pelvic changes resulted in a further change up to 2.3° for inclination and up to 12.3° for anteversion. In relation to the preoperative situation differences in postoperative cup position ranged from −4.4 to 4.6° for inclination and from −7.8 to 17.9° for anteversion, respectively. Female sex (p &lt; .001) and normal body weight (p &lt; .001) correlated with high alterations in pelvic tilt. Kinematic pelvic changes highly impact cup anteversion in THA. Surgeons using the APP as reference should aim for a higher anteversion of about 15° due to the functional anteflexion of the pelvis during gait.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Journal of Orthopaedic Research</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1002/jor.25106</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">1554-527X</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY-NC-ND - Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Markus Weber</author>
    <author>Franz Suess</author>
    <author>Seth Jerabek</author>
    <author>Matthias Meyer</author>
    <author>Joachim Grifka</author>
    <author>Tobias Renkawitz</author>
    <author>Sebastian Dendorfer</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>component position</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>gait analysis</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>kinematics</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>pelvic tilt</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>total hip arthroplasty</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Hüftgelenkprothese</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Haltungsfehler</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Hüftgelenkpfanne</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="6">Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FAKMB">Fakultät Maschinenbau</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="RCBE">Regensburg Center of Biomedical Engineering - RCBE</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="dendorferlbm">Dendorfer, Sebastian (Prof. Dr.), Zeitschriftenbeiträge - Labor Biomechanik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="oaweg" number="">Hybrid Open Access - OA-Veröffentlichung in einer Subskriptionszeitschrift/-medium</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Biomechanik (LBM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>684</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2020</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>9</pageFirst>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber>1</pageNumber>
    <edition/>
    <issue>13208</issue>
    <volume>10</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Nature</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-08-06</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Inaccurate offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty results in reduced range of motion</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with postoperative range of motion (ROM) and gait kinematics. We aimed to research into the impact of high offset (HO) and standard stems on postoperative ROM. 121 patients received cementless THA through a minimally-invasive anterolateral approach. A 360° hip ROM analysis software calculated impingement-free hip movement based on postoperative 3D-CTs compared to ROM values necessary for activities of daily living (ADL). The same model was then run a second time after changing the stem geometry between standard and HO configuration with the implants in the same position. HO stems showed higher ROM for all directions between 4.6 and 8.9° (p &lt; 0.001) compared with standard stems but with high interindividual variability. In the subgroup with HO stems for intraoperative offset restoration, the increase in ROM was even higher for all ROM directions with values between 6.1 and 14.4° (p &lt; 0.001) compared to offset underrestoration with standard stems. Avoiding offset underrestoration resulted in a higher amount of patients of over 20% for each ROM direction that fulfilled the criteria for ADL (p &lt; 0.001). In contrast, in patients with standard stems for offset restoration ROM did increase but not clinically relevant by offset overcorrection for all directions between 3.1 and 6.1° (p &lt; 0.001). Offset overcorrection by replacing standard with HO stems improved ROM for ADL in a low number of patients below 10% (p &gt; 0.03). Patient-individual restoration of offset is crucial for free ROM in THA. Both over and underrestoration of offset should be avoided.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Scientific Reports</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1038/s41598-020-70059-1</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Markus Weber</author>
    <author>Christian Merle</author>
    <author>Danyal H. Nawabi</author>
    <author>Sebastian Dendorfer</author>
    <author>Joachim Grifka</author>
    <author>Tobias Renkawitz</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Adaptive clinical trial</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Bone imaging</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FAKMB">Fakultät Maschinenbau</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="RCBE">Regensburg Center of Biomedical Engineering - RCBE</collection>
    <collection role="oaweg" number="">Gold Open Access- Erstveröffentlichung in einem/als Open-Access-Medium</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="dendorferlbm">Dendorfer, Sebastian (Prof. Dr.), Zeitschriftenbeiträge - Labor Biomechanik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Biomechanik (LBM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>733</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2015</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Verbessert die computerassistierte Femur First Operationstechnik für die Hüftendoprothetik den muskuloskelettalen Lastfall auf das Hüftgelenk?</title>
    <parentTitle language="deu">DKOU 2015, Deutscher Kongress für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie 2015</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283259007_Verbessert_die_computerassistierte_Femur_First_Operationstechnik_fur_die_Huftendoprothetik_den_muskuloskelettalen_Lastfall_auf_das_Huftgelenk</identifier>
    <author>Tim Weber</author>
    <author>Sebastian Dendorfer</author>
    <author>Joachim Grifka</author>
    <author>Markus Weber</author>
    <author>Michael Wörner</author>
    <author>Silvia Dullien</author>
    <author>Gijsbertus Jacob Verkerke</author>
    <author>Tobias Renkawitz</author>
    <collection role="ddc" number="610">Medizin und Gesundheit</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FAKMB">Fakultät Maschinenbau</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="RCBE">Regensburg Center of Biomedical Engineering - RCBE</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="dendorferlbmconf">Dendorfer, Sebastian (Prof. Dr.), Konferenzbeiträge - Labor Biomechanik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Biomechanik (LBM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>734</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2015</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">The musculoskeletal load scenario of computer-assisted Femur-First THR up to one year after surgery</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">VI International Conference on Computational Bioengineering, Barcelona, Sept. 2015</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281745827_The_musculoskeletal_load_scenario_of_computer-assisted_Femur-First_THR_up_to_one_year_after_surgery</identifier>
    <author>Tim Weber</author>
    <author>Tobias Renkawitz</author>
    <author>Joachim Grifka</author>
    <author>Sjoerd K. Bulstra</author>
    <author>Gijsbertus Jacob Verkerke</author>
    <author>Sebastian Dendorfer</author>
    <collection role="ddc" number="610">Medizin und Gesundheit</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FAKMB">Fakultät Maschinenbau</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="RCBE">Regensburg Center of Biomedical Engineering - RCBE</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="dendorferlbmconf">Dendorfer, Sebastian (Prof. Dr.), Konferenzbeiträge - Labor Biomechanik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Biomechanik (LBM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>736</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2015</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Biomechanics of computer-assisted vs. conventional THR after one year follow up</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">XXV Congress of the International Society of Biomechanics, Glasgow, UK, 12th-16th July 2015</parentTitle>
    <author>Tim Weber</author>
    <author>Tobias Renkawitz</author>
    <author>Sjoerd K. Bulstra</author>
    <author>Joachim Grifka</author>
    <author>Gijsbertus Jacob Verkerke</author>
    <author>Sebastian Dendorfer</author>
    <collection role="ddc" number="610">Medizin und Gesundheit</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FAKMB">Fakultät Maschinenbau</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="RCBE">Regensburg Center of Biomedical Engineering - RCBE</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="dendorferlbmconf">Dendorfer, Sebastian (Prof. Dr.), Konferenzbeiträge - Labor Biomechanik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Biomechanik (LBM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>741</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2015</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Navigated Femur First Total Hip Arthroplasty leads to improved Biomechanical Outcome after surgery</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">ORS annual meeting, Las Vegas, USA, 2015</parentTitle>
    <author>Tim Weber</author>
    <author>Sebastian Dendorfer</author>
    <author>Sjoerd K. Bulstra</author>
    <author>Joachim Grifka</author>
    <author>Gijsbertus Jacob Verkerke</author>
    <author>Tim Renkawitz</author>
    <collection role="ddc" number="610">Medizin und Gesundheit</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FAKMB">Fakultät Maschinenbau</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="RCBE">Regensburg Center of Biomedical Engineering - RCBE</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="dendorferlbmconf">Dendorfer, Sebastian (Prof. Dr.), Konferenzbeiträge - Labor Biomechanik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Biomechanik (LBM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>757</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2013</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>113</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>114</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>Suppl. 1</issue>
    <volume>38</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Validation of a Motion Capture Laboratory and a new marker-placement protcol for clinical applications</title>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Gait &amp; Posture</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.07.229</identifier>
    <enrichment key="ConferenceStatement">ESMAC annual meeting, Stockholm, 2012</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <author>Tim Weber</author>
    <author>Silvia Dullien</author>
    <author>Joachim Grifka</author>
    <author>Tobias Renkawitz</author>
    <author>Sebastian Dendorfer</author>
    <collection role="ddc" number="610">Medizin und Gesundheit</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FAKMB">Fakultät Maschinenbau</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="RCBE">Regensburg Center of Biomedical Engineering - RCBE</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="dendorferlbmconf">Dendorfer, Sebastian (Prof. Dr.), Konferenzbeiträge - Labor Biomechanik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Biomechanik (LBM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>762</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2011</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Clinical gait analysis combined with musculoskeletal modelling – coding a new generation of evaluation instruments</title>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Deutsche Gesellschaft für Biomechanik, Murnau, 2011</parentTitle>
    <author>Tim Weber</author>
    <author>Sebastian Dendorfer</author>
    <author>Tobias Renkawitz</author>
    <author>Silvia Dullien</author>
    <author>Joachim Grifka</author>
    <collection role="ddc" number="610">Medizin und Gesundheit</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FAKMB">Fakultät Maschinenbau</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="RCBE">Regensburg Center of Biomedical Engineering - RCBE</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="dendorferlbmconf">Dendorfer, Sebastian (Prof. Dr.), Konferenzbeiträge - Labor Biomechanik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Biomechanik (LBM)</collection>
  </doc>
</export-example>
