<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>7948</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2025</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Thieme</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Stuttgart</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2025-02-15</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Artificial intelligence improves submucosal vessel detection during third space endoscopy</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Background and study aims: While artificial intelligence (AI) shows high potential in decision support for diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopy, its role in therapeutic endoscopy remains unclear. Third space endoscopic procedures pose the risk of intraprocedural bleeding. Therefore, we aimed to develop an AI algorithm for intraprocedural blood vessel detection. Patients and Methods: Using a test dataset with 101 standardized video clips containing 200 predefined submucosal blood vessels, 19 endoscopists were evaluated for the vessel detection rate (VDR) and time (VDT) with and without support of an AI algorithm. Test subjects were grouped according to experience in ESD. Results: With AI support, endoscopists VDR increased from 56.4% [CI 54.1–58.6] to 72.4% [CI 70.3–74.4]. Endoscopists‘ VDT dropped from 6.7sec [CI 6.2-7.1] to 5.2sec [CI 4.8-5.7]. False positive (FP) readings appeared in 4.5% of frames and were marked significantly shorter than true positives (6.0sec [CI 5.28-6.70] vs. 0.7sec [CI 0.55-0.87]). Conclusions: AI improved the vessel detection rate and time of endoscopists during third space endoscopy. While these data need to be corroborated by clinical trials, AI may prove to be an invaluable tool for the improvement of endoscopic interventions.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Endoscopy</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1055/a-2534-1164</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Markus W. Scheppach</author>
    <author>Robert Mendel</author>
    <author>Anna Muzalyova</author>
    <author>David Rauber</author>
    <author>Andreas Probst</author>
    <author>Sandra Nagl</author>
    <author>Christoph Römmele</author>
    <author>Hon Chi Yip</author>
    <author>Louis Ho Shing Lau</author>
    <author>Stefan Karl Gölder</author>
    <author>Arthur Schmidt</author>
    <author>Konstantinos Kouladouros</author>
    <author>Mohamed Abdelhafez</author>
    <author>Benjamin M. Walter</author>
    <author>Michael Meinikheim</author>
    <author>Philip Wai Yan Chiu</author>
    <author>Christoph Palm</author>
    <author>Helmut Messmann</author>
    <author>Alanna Ebigbo</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Artificial Intelligence</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Third Space Endoscopy</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="RCHST">Regensburg Center of Health Sciences and Technology - RCHST</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="palmremic">Palm, Christoph (Prof. Dr.) - ReMIC</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="palmbarrett">Palm, Christoph (Prof. Dr.) - Projekt Barrett</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Medical Image Computing (ReMIC)</collection>
    <collection role="DFGFachsystematik" number="1">Ingenieurwissenschaften</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>3507</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2022</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst>251</pageFirst>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>4</issue>
    <volume>60</volume>
    <type>conferencepresentation</type>
    <publisherName>Thieme</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Stuttgart</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2022-04-10</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Einsatz von künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) als Entscheidungsunterstützungssystem für nicht-Experten bei der Beurteilung von Barrett-Ösophagus assoziierten Neoplasien (BERN)</title>
    <abstract language="deu">Einleitung&#13;
Die sichere Detektion und Charakterisierung von Barrett-Ösophagus assoziierten Neoplasien (BERN) stellt selbst für erfahrene Endoskopiker eine Herausforderung dar.&#13;
&#13;
Ziel&#13;
Ziel dieser Studie ist es, den Add-on Effekt eines künstlichen Intelligenz (KI) Systems (Barrett-Ampel) als Entscheidungsunterstüzungssystem für Endoskopiker ohne Expertise bei der Untersuchung von BERN zu evaluieren.&#13;
&#13;
Material und Methodik&#13;
Zwölf Videos in „Weißlicht“ (WL), „narrow-band imaging“ (NBI) und „texture and color enhanced imaging“ (TXI) von histologisch bestätigten Barrett-Metaplasien oder BERN wurden von Experten und Untersuchern ohne Barrett-Expertise evaluiert. Die Probanden wurden dazu aufgefordert in den Videos auftauchende BERN zu identifizieren und gegebenenfalls die optimale Biopsiestelle zu markieren. Unser KI-System wurde demselben Test unterzogen, wobei dieses BERN in Echtzeit segmentierte und farblich von umliegendem Epithel differenzierte. Anschließend wurden den Probanden die Videos mit zusätzlicher KI-Unterstützung gezeigt. Basierend auf dieser neuen Information, wurden die Probanden zu einer Reevaluation ihrer initialen Beurteilung aufgefordert.&#13;
&#13;
Ergebnisse&#13;
Die „Barrett-Ampel“ identifizierte unabhängig von den verwendeten Darstellungsmodi (WL, NBI, TXI) alle BERN. Zwei entzündlich veränderte Läsionen wurden fehlinterpretiert (Genauigkeit=75%). Während Experten vergleichbare Ergebnisse erzielten (Genauigkeit=70,8%), hatten Endoskopiker ohne Expertise bei der Beurteilung von Barrett-Metaplasien eine Genauigkeit von lediglich 58,3%. Wurden die nicht-Experten allerdings von unserem KI-System unterstützt, erreichten diese eine Genauigkeit von 75%.&#13;
&#13;
Zusammenfassung&#13;
Unser KI-System hat das Potential als Entscheidungsunterstützungssystem bei der Differenzierung zwischen Barrett-Metaplasie und BERN zu fungieren und so Endoskopiker ohne entsprechende Expertise zu assistieren. Eine Limitation dieser Studie ist die niedrige Anzahl an eingeschlossenen Videos. Um die Ergebnisse dieser Studie zu bestätigen, müssen randomisierte kontrollierte klinische Studien durchgeführt werden.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1055/s-0042-1745653</identifier>
    <enrichment key="ConferenceStatement">49. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie in Bayern e.V., Freising</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Michael Meinikheim</author>
    <author>Robert Mendel</author>
    <author>Markus W. Scheppach</author>
    <author>Andreas Probst</author>
    <author>Friederike Prinz</author>
    <author>Tanja Schwamberger</author>
    <author>Jakob Schlottmann</author>
    <author>Stefan Karl Gölder</author>
    <author>Benjamin Walter</author>
    <author>Ingo Steinbrück</author>
    <author>Christoph Palm</author>
    <author>Helmut Messmann</author>
    <author>Alanna Ebigbo</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Barrett-Ösophagus</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Künstliche Intelligenz</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>psyndex</type>
      <value>Speiseröhrenkrankheit</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="ddc" number="6">Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="palmremic">Palm, Christoph (Prof. Dr.) - ReMIC</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="palmbarrett">Palm, Christoph (Prof. Dr.) - Projekt Barrett</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Medical Image Computing (ReMIC)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>3540</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2022</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>S39</pageFirst>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>S 01</issue>
    <volume>54</volume>
    <type>conferencepresentation</type>
    <publisherName>Thieme</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2022-04-19</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">INFLUENCE OF AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) BASED DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM (DSS) ON THE DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF NON-EXPERTS IN BARRETT´S ESOPHAGUS RELATED NEOPLASIA (BERN)</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Aims&#13;
Barrett´s esophagus related neoplasia (BERN) is difficult to detect and characterize during endoscopy, even for expert endoscopists. We aimed to assess the add-on effect of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithm (Barrett-Ampel) as a decision support system (DSS) for non-expert endoscopists in the evaluation of Barrett’s esophagus (BE) and BERN.&#13;
&#13;
Methods&#13;
Twelve videos with multimodal imaging white light (WL), narrow-band imaging (NBI), texture and color enhanced imaging (TXI) of histologically confirmed BE and BERN were assessed by expert and non-expert endoscopists. For each video, endoscopists were asked to identify the area of BERN and decide on the biopsy spot. Videos were assessed by the AI algorithm and regions of BERN were highlighted in real-time by a transparent overlay. Finally, endoscopists were shown the AI videos and asked to either confirm or change their initial decision based on the AI support.&#13;
&#13;
Results&#13;
Barrett-Ampel correctly identified all areas of BERN, irrespective of the imaging modality (WL, NBI, TXI), but misinterpreted two inflammatory lesions (Accuracy=75%). Expert endoscopists had a similar performance (Accuracy=70,8%), while non-experts had an accuracy of 58.3%. When AI was implemented as a DSS, non-expert endoscopists improved their diagnostic accuracy to 75%.&#13;
&#13;
Conclusions&#13;
AI may have the potential to support non-expert endoscopists in the assessment of videos of BE and BERN. Limitations of this study include the low number of videos used. Randomized clinical trials in a real-life setting should be performed to confirm these results.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Endoscopy</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1055/s-00000012</identifier>
    <enrichment key="ConferenceStatement">ESGE Days 2022</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Michael Meinikheim</author>
    <author>Robert Mendel</author>
    <author>Markus W. Scheppach</author>
    <author>Andreas Probst</author>
    <author>Friederike Prinz</author>
    <author>Tanja Schwamberger</author>
    <author>Jakob Schlottmann</author>
    <author>Stefan Karl Gölder</author>
    <author>Benjamin Walter</author>
    <author>Ingo Steinbrück</author>
    <author>Christoph Palm</author>
    <author>Helmut Messmann</author>
    <author>Alanna Ebigbo</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Artificial Intelligence</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Barrett's Esophagus</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Speiseröhrenkrankheit</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Künstliche Intelligenz</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Diagnose</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="ddc" number="6">Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="palmremic">Palm, Christoph (Prof. Dr.) - ReMIC</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Medical Image Computing (ReMIC)</collection>
  </doc>
</export-example>
