<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>2007</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2020</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst>150</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>168</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <volume>7</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Brill</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2021-06-16</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Religious Diversity and Women’s Attitudes Toward Using Assisted Reproductive Technologies</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This study examines women’s attitudes toward the own use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) by their religious affiliation in Germany. The social relevance of ART is increasing in Western countries due to overall low birth rates, a high rate of childlessness, and a gap between the desired and the actual numbers of children.&#13;
Previous literature has been scarce, however, on attitudes toward ART, and religious diversity has not been included in studies on ART. Our analysis is based on data collected in a pilot study in 2014 and 2015. The sample includes 944 women aged 18 to 50 living in Germany. The results show that Muslim women were significantly more likely than&#13;
Christian women to say they would consider using ART; having no religious affiliation was associated with the least open attitude toward ART usage.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Journal of Religion and Demography</parentTitle>
    <subTitle language="eng">Insights from a Pilot Study in Germany</subTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1163/2589742X-12347104</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">2589-742X</identifier>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Nadja Milewski</author>
    <author>Sonja Haug</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Reproduktionsmedizin</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Frau</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Religion</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Deutschland</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>social attitudes</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>fertility</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>ART</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>reproductive health</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Germany</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="300">Sozialwissenschaften</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakSoz">Fakultät Sozial- und Gesundheitswissenschaften</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="RCHST">Regensburg Center of Health Sciences and Technology - RCHST</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Institut für Sozialforschung und Technikfolgenabschätzung (IST)</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Empirische Sozialforschung</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="hauglasofo">Haug, Sonja (Prof. Dr.) - Labor Empirische Sozialforschung</collection>
  </doc>
</export-example>
