<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>6391</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2023</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>37</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>74</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <volume>54</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>ACM</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Four Decades of Chief Information Officer Research</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Despite the relevance and maturity of the Chief Information Officer (CIO) research field, no studies exist that exhaustively summarize the current body of knowledge, focusing on the development of the field over its entire timespan. The paper at hand addresses this research gap and presents an exhaustive literature review on the CIO research field using main path analysis. We identify the central papers in CIO research and eight main research streams by quantitatively and qualitatively analyzing 466 papers. We find that established research streams, e.g., 'Evolving role of the CIO' and 'CIO hierarchical position and relationships' as well as recently emerging research streams, e.g., 'CIO as business enabler' and 'CIOs and IT security,' draw growing attention. Based on our findings, we develop promising further avenues for research in the CIO field.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems</parentTitle>
    <subTitle language="eng">A Literature Review and Research Agenda Based on Main Path Analysis</subTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1145/3614178.3614182</identifier>
    <note>Preprint unter: https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-oth-regensburg/frontdoor/index/index/docId/5420</note>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Simon Kratzer</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Applied computing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Enterprise computing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>IT governance</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Informationsmanager</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Literaturbericht</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Chief Information Officer</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Literature review</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Research agenda</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Main Path Analysis</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Bibliometric Analysis</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="000">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16315">Information und Kommunikation</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>5420</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2022</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>preprint</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation>Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)</creatingCorporation>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2022-04-13</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Four Decades of Chief Information Officer Research</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Despite the relevance and maturity of the Chief Information Officer (CIO) research field, no studies exist that exhaustively summarize the current body of knowledge, focusing on the development of the field over its entire timespan. The paper at hand addresses this research gap and presents an exhaustive literature review on the CIO research field using main path analysis. We identify the central papers in CIO research and eight main research streams by quantitatively and qualitatively analyzing 466 papers. We find that established research streams, e.g., ‘Evolving role of the CIO’ and ‘CIO hierarchical position and relationships’ as well as recently emerging research streams, e.g., ‘CIO as business enabler’ and ‘CIOs and IT security,’ draw growing attention. Based on our findings, we develop promising further avenues for research in the CIO field.</abstract>
    <subTitle language="eng">A Literature Review and Research Agenda Based on Main Path Analysis</subTitle>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-54208</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1145/3614178.3614182</identifier>
    <note>Der Aufsatz wurde peer-reviewed veröffentlicht: https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-oth-regensburg/frontdoor/index/index/docId/6391</note>
    <enrichment key="opus.source">publish</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Simon Kratzer</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Chief Information Officer</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Literature Review</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Research Agenda</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Main Path Analysis</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Bibliometric Analysis</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Informationsmanager</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Literaturbericht</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16315">Information und Kommunikation</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-oth-regensburg/files/5420/Kratzer_et_al_-_Four_Decades_of_CIO.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>2014</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2021</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>523</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>561</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <volume>48</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Association for Information Systems, AIS</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Cloud Computing Adoption: A Literature Review on What Is New and What We Still Need to Address</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Research on cloud computing (CC) recently emerged congruently with the technology’s importance for organizations at a fast pace. This makes it difficult for practitioners to obtain a consolidated overview of what determines CC adoption based on the numerous papers in this regard. Moreover, for further research in the field to add value, it is necessary to identify what still needs to be addressed. In this vein, we conducted a descriptive review of 39 papers, integrating the results of a previous review on 23 papers from 2014, to compare findings across studies. We identify 44 determinant factors that exhibit consistent directional influence on the dependent meta-variable “CC adoption”, extending previous literature reviews with regard to asset, client, and environmental characteristics. We then critically reviewed the research landscape to identify what is there, and what is not yet covered: Future research should specifically regard the adoption of Infrastructure-, Platform-, and Everything-as-a-Service, private, hybrid, and multi-cloud deployment, investigate vendor, solution, and individual characteristics, analyzing information systems, or the decision-maker.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Communications of the Association for Information Systems</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.17705/1CAIS.04843</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">1529-3181</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Frederik Wulf</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Cloud Computing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Literaturbericht</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="000">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16315">Information und Kommunikation</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>548</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2018</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>67</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>92</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>bookpart</type>
    <publisherName>Rambler Press</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace>Warszawa</publisherPlace>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-06-27</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">A review of value-conflicts in cybersecurity</title>
    <abstract language="eng">The growing complexity of the digital ecosystem in combination with increasing global risks has created the following dilemma. Overemphasizing cybersecurity may violate fundamental values &#13;
like equality, fairness, freedom, or privacy but neglecting cybersecurity could undermine citizens’ trust and confidence in the digital infrastructure as well as in policy makers and state authorities. In order to increase our understanding of this dilemma, this contribution aims to provide an overview on value conflicts in cybersecurity based on a systematic review on the ethical, legal and &#13;
technological literature on cybersecurity. It shall be emphasized that a focus on the opposition of cybersecurity vs. privacy is insufficient for understanding the ethical complexity of cybersecurity.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Bezpieczeństwo informacyjne w wymiarze systemowym</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327646764_A_review_of_value-conflicts_in_cybersecurity</identifier>
    <author>Markus Christen</author>
    <author>Bert Gordijn</author>
    <author>Karsten Weber</author>
    <author>Ibo van de Poel</author>
    <author>Emad Yaghmaei</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Computersicherheit</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Rechnernetz</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Literaturbericht</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="persons" number="weberlate">Weber, Karsten (Prof. Dr.) - Labor für Technikfolgenabschätzung und Angewandte Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Institut für Sozialforschung und Technikfolgenabschätzung (IST)</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor für Technikfolgenabschätzung und Angewandte Ethik (LaTe)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>175</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>303</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>309</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>33,1</volume>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-01-10</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Sustainable Production Planning and Control: A Systematic Literature Review</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This article reviews the state of the art in research regarding sustainable extensions of hierarchical production planning. Sustainability is currently of considerable importance due to various interest groups. Hierarchical operational production planning and control is the state of the art in research as well as in industrial practice for planning of stations and their aggregations to production systems. Thus, it might be highly relevant to improve sustainability. In the literature mainly the scheduling level as well as the ecological dimension are considered. So the current research is limited to selected partial planning problems and incomplete with regard to sustainable aspects that emerge.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Proceedings of the 33th European Conference on Modelling and Simulation 2019 (ECMS), Caserta, Italy</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.7148/2019</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <author>Marco Trost</author>
    <author>Robert Forstner</author>
    <author>Thorsten Claus</author>
    <author>Frank Herrmann</author>
    <author>Ingo Frank</author>
    <author>Hajo Terbrack</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Produktionsplanung</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Nachhaltigkeit</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Literaturbericht</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Sustainability</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Production Planning and Control</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Review</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="ddc" number="67">Industrielle Fertigung</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16316">Produktion und Systeme</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>118</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2014</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst/>
    <pageLast/>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Fusion of Serial 2D Section Images and MRI Reference</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Serial 2D section images with high resolution, resulting from innovative imaging methods become even more valuable, if they are fused with in vivo volumes. Achieving this goal, the 3D context of the sections would be restored, the deformations would be corrected and the artefacts would be eliminated. However, the registration in this field faces big challenges and is not solved in general. On the other hand, several approaches have been introduced dealing at least with some of these difficulties. Here, a brief overview of the topic is given and some of the solutions are presented. It does not constitute the claim to be a complete review, but could be a starting point for those who are interested in this field.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Workshop Innovative Verarbeitung bioelektrischer und biomagnetischer Signale (bbs2014), Berlin, 10.04.2014</parentTitle>
    <subTitle language="eng">an Overview</subTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.13140/RG.2.1.1358.3449</identifier>
    <author>Christoph Palm</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Kernspintomografie</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Optimierung</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>MRI</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Literaturbericht</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="RCBE">Regensburg Center of Biomedical Engineering - RCBE</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="palmremic">Palm, Christoph (Prof. Dr.) - ReMIC</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="oaweg" number="">Diamond Open Access - OA-Veröffentlichung ohne Publikationskosten (Sponsoring)</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Medical Image Computing (ReMIC)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>102</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2018</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>203</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>213</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume>96</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Elsevier</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2019-12-18</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">A survey on Barrett's esophagus analysis using machine learning</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This work presents a systematic review concerning recent studies and technologies of machine learning for Barrett's esophagus (BE) diagnosis and treatment. The use of artificial intelligence is a brand new and promising way to evaluate such disease. We compile some works published at some well-established databases, such as Science Direct, IEEEXplore, PubMed, Plos One, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), Springer, and Hindawi Publishing Corporation. Each selected work has been analyzed to present its objective, methodology, and results. The BE progression to dysplasia or adenocarcinoma shows a complex pattern to be detected during endoscopic surveillance. Therefore, it is valuable to assist its diagnosis and automatic identification using computer analysis. The evaluation of the BE dysplasia can be performed through manual or automated segmentation through machine learning techniques. Finally, in this survey, we reviewed recent studies focused on the automatic detection of the neoplastic region for classification purposes using machine learning methods.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Computers in Biology and Medicine</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.03.014</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Luis Antonio de Souza Jr.</author>
    <author>Christoph Palm</author>
    <author>Robert Mendel</author>
    <author>Christian Hook</author>
    <author>Alanna Ebigbo</author>
    <author>Andreas Probst</author>
    <author>Helmut Messmann</author>
    <author>Silke A. T. Weber</author>
    <author>João Paulo Papa</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Speiseröhrenkrankheit</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Diagnose</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Mustererkennung</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Maschinelles Lernen</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Literaturbericht</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Barrett's esophagus</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Machine learning</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Adenocarcinoma</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Image processing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Pattern recognition</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Computer-aided diagnosis</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="RCBE">Regensburg Center of Biomedical Engineering - RCBE</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="palmremic">Palm, Christoph (Prof. Dr.) - ReMIC</collection>
    <collection role="persons" number="palmbarrett">Palm, Christoph (Prof. Dr.) - Projekt Barrett</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16314">Lebenswissenschaften und Ethik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Medical Image Computing (ReMIC)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>80</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2016</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>1687</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>1698</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Deriving a Framework for Causes, Consequences, and Governance of Shadow IT from Literature</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Shadow IT is a widespread phenomenon which includes systems, services, and processes that are not part of the "official" corporate IT. The topic is still an emerging research area and slowly gaining traction in recent years but a state of the art analysis is missing to date. We therefore conduct a structured literature review to derive a framework for causes, consequences, and governance of Shadow IT. We identify motivators, enablers, and missing barriers as causes for Shadow IT, both positive and negative consequences on an organizational and a technical level and governance approaches which focus on clearance of existing or prevention of future Shadow IT. Our review reveals that constructivist, qualitative design using a case study approach dominates existing research. There are no dominant theories yet to explain Shadow IT. We also highlight possibilities for future research to focus on the less explored governance aspect.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Proceedings zur Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2016 (MKWI 2016), Technische Universität Ilmenau, Thüringen, 09.-11. März 2016</parentTitle>
    <author>Andreas Kopper</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Schatten-IT</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>IT-Governance</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Informationsmanagement</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Corporate Governance</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Literaturbericht</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>78</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2016</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>1</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>10</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Towards a Taxonomy for Shadow IT</title>
    <abstract language="eng">In a comprehensive literature review, we identified 21 different terms used for Shadow IT related concepts. This variety makes it difficult to identify related research and build upon it. To address this ambiguity, we reduce the different terms to six distinct concepts by developing a taxonomy and examining their relation¬ships. We do so by using a rigorous iterative methodology to identify common characteristics and to classify terms along them. By clustering the results, we derive and visualize the taxonomy. The identified concepts are Feral Practices, Workarounds, Shadow IT, Shadow Systems, Un-enacted Projects, and Shadow Sourcing. We elaborate on the concepts along their characteristics and clearly define and delimit them. As a result, we create a guide for their usage, increase search- and comparability, and unify existing knowledge.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Proceedings of the 22nd Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2016), San Diego, August 11-14</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2016/EndUser/Presentations/3/</identifier>
    <author>Andreas Kopper</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Shadow IT</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Shadow systems</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Shadow sourcing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Feral practices</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Workarounds</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Taxonomy</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Terminology</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Informationstechnik</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Datensicherung</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Taxonomie</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Literaturbericht</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>60</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2018</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>40</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>49</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Do researchers investigate what practitioners deem relevant?</title>
    <abstract language="eng">There is a common understanding amongst academics that information systems (IS) research sometimes has limited relevance for practitioners. This can be explained by the fact that research lags behind the fast moving IS environment, has limited practical applicability and is hard to access. We have focused on the research area of IS backsourcing, and analyzed practitioner literature to increase our understanding of topics of interest for practitioners, to determine a potential gap between academic and practitioner literature, and to identify future research directions in this field. We observed that most publications are either news or background articles, focusing on describing backsourcing cases. Additionally, we identified four recurring themes, namely reasons for backsourcing, presentation of survey results, discussion of industry trends, and backsourcing success stories. The main reasons identified to trigger backsourcing decisions are cost savings, quality improvements, and increasing control and flexibility. By comparing our findings with academic literature on IS backsourcing, we conclude that generally both literature types cover similar topics. However, researchers have a more formulative or interpretive focus than the often descriptive practitioner literature. Academic literature also examines a broader range of topics, while practitioner literature has a narrower focus. Additionally, we observe one difference regarding applied terminology: while researchers employ the term backsourcing, practitioners mostly use back in-house or insourcing. Our paper contributes to facilitating the exchange between academics and practitioners, presents topics to consider when aiming to increase practical relevance and provides researchers with concrete directions for future research within the field of IS backsourcing.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Proceedings of the 20th IEEE International Conference on Business Informatics (IEEE CBI 2018): Vienna, Austria, 11-14 July</parentTitle>
    <subTitle language="eng">Gaps between research and practice in the field of information systems backsourcing</subTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1109/CBI.2018.00014</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <author>Benedikt von Bary</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Betriebliches Informationssystem</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Backsourcing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Anwendung</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Literaturbericht</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Information systems</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Backsourcing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Practical applicability</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>36</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2015</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>70</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>142</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>2</issue>
    <volume>26</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Information systems offshoring</title>
    <abstract language="eng">An increasing amount of IS offshoring research has been published during the last four years. This paper presents a comprehensive view of the field of study from a managerial point of view. It provides a consolidated view of the field of study between 2010 and 2013 based on a manual search comprising 69 selected journals and 9 conferences, as well as a search using 6 journal databases. The literature review ensures continuity of research by connecting to a comprehensive literature analysis covering the  years 1999 to 2009. This way it  consolidates and critically reflects the state of the research of the  last 14 years. Overall, we compiled 95 relevant publications originating from leading IS journals and IS conference proceedings. The results indicate that IS offshoring research is largely non-theory  based, using almost entirely empirical data and interpretive research methods and -to a smaller extent -positivist research designs. The ISO research of the last 14 years focuses on the implementation stages "how" and "outcome" while the pre-implementation-stages “why”, “what”, and “which” are comparatively sparsely researched. Future studies  should apply a more theory-driven approach with a greater attention  on  pre-implementation aspects of information systems offshoring. In addition, future research should investigate the special nature of near- and onshoring, captive offshoring as well asagile (project) management techniques suitable for ISO.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Journal of Information Technology Management</parentTitle>
    <subTitle language="eng">Results of a systematic literature review</subTitle>
    <identifier type="url">http://jitm.ubalt.edu/XXVI-2/article5.pdf</identifier>
    <author>Artur Strasser</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Betriebliches Informationssystem</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Offshoring</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Literaturbericht</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Offshoring</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Nearshoring</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Information systems</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Information technology</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Literature review</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>34</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2018</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>62</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>78</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <volume>29</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>University of Tehran</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Information Systems Backsourcing</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Information  systems  backsourcing describes  the transferof  previously  outsourced  activities,  assets,  or  personnel back to the originating companyto  regain  ownership  and  control.  While  there  is much  research on  information  systems outsourcing,  the topic  of  backsourcing information  systemsis  still  an  emerging  research  area. Therefore,  ourpaper aims to explore and synthesizethe existing literature  on information  systemsbacksourcing,  since  there  is  no  exhaustiveliteraturereview  of  the  state  of  the  research to  our  knowledge available yet. In  this  paper,  wecreate a  framework  to  structure  the existing  research  along  the overallbacksourcing  process.  We identifydifferent  motivators, such  asexpectation  gaps, orinternal  and  external  organizational  changes, leading  towards  a  backsourcing  decision,  and  factors  positively  or  negatively influencing  this  decision.  Additionally,  we  derive  implementation  success  factors based  on  the  existing  literature to  guide companies  through  the  backsourcing  process.We  also  differentiate  the  term  backsourcing  from  related,  sometimes synonymously  used  terms,  by  emphasizing  the  change  of  ownership  back  to  the  company  of  originas the main  criterion.Additionally, we discuss opportunities for future research in the field of information systems backsourcing.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Journal of Information Technology Management</parentTitle>
    <subTitle language="eng">A Literature Review</subTitle>
    <identifier type="url">http://jitm.ubalt.edu/XXIX-1/article4.pdf</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <author>Benedikt von Bary</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Betriebliches Informationssystem</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Insourcing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Literaturbericht</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Backsourcing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Backshoring</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Reshoring</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Inshoring</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Information systems</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Information technology</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Literature review</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>28</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>15</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>43</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <volume>7</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2019-11-21</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Causing factors, outcomes, and governance of Shadow IT and business-managed IT</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Shadow IT and Business-managed IT describe the autonomous deployment/procurement or management of Information Technology (IT) instances, i.e., software, hardware, or IT services, by business entities. For Shadow IT, this happens covertly, i.e., without alignment with the IT organization; for Business-managed IT this happens overtly, i.e., in alignment with the IT organization or in a split responsibility model. We conduct a systematic literature review and structure the identified research themes in a framework of causing factors, outcomes, and governance. As causing factors, we identify enablers, motivators, and missing barriers. Outcomes can be benefits as well as risks/shortcomings of Shadow IT and Business-managed IT. Concerning governance, we distinguish two subcategories: general governance for Shadow IT and Business-managed IT and instance governance for overt Business-managed IT. Thus, a specific set of governance approaches exists for Business-managed IT that cannot be applied to Shadow IT due to its covert nature. Hence, we extend the existing conceptual understanding and allocate research themes to Shadow IT, Business-managed IT, or both concepts and particularly distinguish the governance of the two concepts. Besides, we find that governance themes have been the primary research focus since 2016, whereas older publications (until 2015) focused on causing factors.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management</parentTitle>
    <subTitle language="eng">A systematic literature review</subTitle>
    <identifier type="url">http://www.sciencesphere.org/ijispm/archive/ijispm-070102.pdf</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.12821/ijispm070102</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">2182-7796</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">2182-7788</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">2182-780X</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <author>Stefan Klotz</author>
    <author>Andreas Kopper</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Shadow IT</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Business-managed IT</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>IT governance</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>literature review</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>outcomes</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Betriebliches Informationssystem</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Datensicherung</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Literaturbericht</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="oaweg" number="">Diamond Open Access - OA-Veröffentlichung ohne Publikationskosten (Sponsoring)</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>24</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>78</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>96</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <volume>36</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Taylor &amp; Francis</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2019-04-08</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">A Systematic Review of Recent Developments in IT Outsourcing Research</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Incomplete conceptualization of the information technology outsourcing (ITO) literature represents a challenge for navigating extant research and engaging into purposeful academic discourse. We extend the analysis of empirical findings on determinants of ITO decisions, outcomes, and governance. We identify increasing levels of research maturity, analyze effects of 38 new independent variables, highlight contradictory findings, and observe increasing interest in emerging topics such as innovation through ITO and multisourcing.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Information Systems Management</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2018.1553650</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Michael Könning</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Outsourcing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Informationstechnik</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Literaturbericht</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Information Technology</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Outsourcing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Literature Review</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Sourcing outcomes</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Sourcing decisions</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
</export-example>
