<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<export-example>
  <doc>
    <id>2016</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2022</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>220</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>240</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <volume>39</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Taylor&amp;Francis</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Critical Success Factors of Business-managed IT: It Takes Two to Tango</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This paper identifies critical success factors of Business-managed IT based on case study results. Four groups of critical success factors emerge: (1) general approach to Business-managed IT/Business-managed IT strategy, (2) Business-managed IT project prerequisites/Business-managed IT team, (3) Business-managed IT project execution and outcome, and (4) information technology management for Business-managed IT. The results suggest that bilateral responsibility between the business unit and the IT organization is the most favorable governance option for Business-managed IT.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Information Systems Management</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1080/10580530.2021.1938300</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Stefan Klotz</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Betriebliches Informationssystem</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Strategisches Management</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Erfolgsfaktor</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Fallstudie</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Business-managed IT</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Shadow IT</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>critical success factors</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>IT governance</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>application governance</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="000">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="ddc" number="658">Allgemeines Management</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16316">Produktion und Systeme</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>638</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2020</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst>849</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>865</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>4</issue>
    <volume>57</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>Springer</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-08-07</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">IT-Backsourcing</title>
    <abstract language="deu">IT-Backsourcing bezeichnet die Re-Integration vormals outgesourcter IT-Services zurück zum auslagernden Unternehmen. Die vorliegende Studie stellt die Ergebnisse einer Umfrage unter IT-Managern zu Einflussfaktoren von IT-Backsourcing-Entscheidungen vor. Es lässt sich feststellen, dass IT-Backsourcing von Unternehmen in unterschiedlichen Branchen und für eine Vielzahl an unterschiedlichen IT-Services, wie z. B. Applikationsentwicklung oder Infrastruktur-Leistungen, durchgeführt wird. Hauptgründe für die Entscheidung für ein IT-Backsourcing sind mangelnde Qualität, hohe Kosten sowie eine schlechte Beziehung zum IT-Dienstleister. Die Ergebnisse der Umfrage zeigen, dass diejenigen Unternehmen, die sich für ein Backsourcing entschieden haben, nach der Entscheidung insgesamt zufriedener waren als diejenigen, die in einer Outsourcing-Beziehung geblieben sind. Zudem werden verschiedene Handlungsempfehlungen für IT-Manager aufgezeigt. Zur Ausarbeitung einer zukunftsorientieren IT-Sourcing-Strategie empfiehlt es sich, eine service-spezifische Sourcing-Strategie zu verfolgen und entsprechend spezialisierte Dienstleister einzusetzen. Im Falle einer Entscheidung für ein IT-Backsourcing sollten verschiedene Erfolgsfaktoren beachtetet werden, wie z. B. eine frühzeitige Neubesetzung von Schlüsselstellen sowie ein lückenloser Wissenstransfer.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik</parentTitle>
    <subTitle language="deu">Empirische Erkenntnisse und Handlungsempfehlungen für eine erfolgreiche Re-Integration der IT-Serviceerbringung</subTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1365/s40702-020-00591-1</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Benedikt von Bary</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Betriebliches Informationssystem</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Insourcing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Backsourcing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Insourcing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>IT-Sourcing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Re-Integration</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>IT-Service</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16315">Information und Kommunikation</collection>
    <collection role="oaweg" number="">Hybrid Open Access - OA-Veröffentlichung in einer Subskriptionszeitschrift/-medium</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>185</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2018</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst>19</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>31</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>7</issue>
    <volume/>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>AKWI</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2020-01-21</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Erweiterung des Workflow-Moduls des ERP-Systems FactWork um Möglichkeiten zur Benutzerinteraktion</title>
    <abstract language="deu">Durch Workflow-Systeme computergestützt abgewickelte&#13;
Geschäftsprozesse benötigen neben den Aktivitäten, die sie&#13;
komplett automatisiert ausführen können, von Zeit zu Zeit&#13;
Feedback durch einen oder mehrere Benutzer. Dazu muss&#13;
es geeignete Formen der Kommunikation und Interaktion&#13;
der Workflow-Engine mit dem Benutzer geben. Der folgende&#13;
Artikel beschreibt die Erweiterung des bestehenden&#13;
Workflow-Moduls eines Enterprise Resource Planning&#13;
(ERP)-Systems, welches um solche Fähigkeiten ergänzt&#13;
wird.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">Anwendungen und Konzepte der Wirtschaftsinformatik</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-1858</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.26034/lu.akwi.2018.3212</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Creative Commons - CC BY - Namensnennung 4.0 International</licence>
    <author>Benjamin Weikmann</author>
    <author>Franz Laubmeier</author>
    <author>Frank Herrmann</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>ERP-Systeme</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Geschäftsprozesse</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Workflows</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>UI-Design</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Betriebliches Informationssystem</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Mensch-Maschine-Kommunikation</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Faktor Mensch</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="67">Industrielle Fertigung</collection>
    <collection role="ddc" number="004">Datenverarbeitung; Informatik</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16316">Produktion und Systeme</collection>
    <thesisPublisher>Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg</thesisPublisher>
    <file>https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-oth-regensburg/files/185/AKWI_201807_Herrmann.pdf</file>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>60</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2018</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>40</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>49</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue/>
    <volume/>
    <type>conferenceobject</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Do researchers investigate what practitioners deem relevant?</title>
    <abstract language="eng">There is a common understanding amongst academics that information systems (IS) research sometimes has limited relevance for practitioners. This can be explained by the fact that research lags behind the fast moving IS environment, has limited practical applicability and is hard to access. We have focused on the research area of IS backsourcing, and analyzed practitioner literature to increase our understanding of topics of interest for practitioners, to determine a potential gap between academic and practitioner literature, and to identify future research directions in this field. We observed that most publications are either news or background articles, focusing on describing backsourcing cases. Additionally, we identified four recurring themes, namely reasons for backsourcing, presentation of survey results, discussion of industry trends, and backsourcing success stories. The main reasons identified to trigger backsourcing decisions are cost savings, quality improvements, and increasing control and flexibility. By comparing our findings with academic literature on IS backsourcing, we conclude that generally both literature types cover similar topics. However, researchers have a more formulative or interpretive focus than the often descriptive practitioner literature. Academic literature also examines a broader range of topics, while practitioner literature has a narrower focus. Additionally, we observe one difference regarding applied terminology: while researchers employ the term backsourcing, practitioners mostly use back in-house or insourcing. Our paper contributes to facilitating the exchange between academics and practitioners, presents topics to consider when aiming to increase practical relevance and provides researchers with concrete directions for future research within the field of IS backsourcing.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Proceedings of the 20th IEEE International Conference on Business Informatics (IEEE CBI 2018): Vienna, Austria, 11-14 July</parentTitle>
    <subTitle language="eng">Gaps between research and practice in the field of information systems backsourcing</subTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1109/CBI.2018.00014</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <author>Benedikt von Bary</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Betriebliches Informationssystem</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Backsourcing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Anwendung</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Literaturbericht</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Information systems</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Backsourcing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Practical applicability</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>38</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2016</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>deu</language>
    <pageFirst>879</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>893</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>6</issue>
    <volume>53</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="deu">Einführung von Lean Management in IT-Organisationen</title>
    <abstract language="deu">In der Produktion gilt „Lean Management“ als einer der de-facto Standardmanagementansätze. Lean Management in IT-Organisationen (Lean IT) ist dahingegen in der Praxis weniger verbreitet und in der Wissenschaft kaum erforscht. Dieser Beitrag aggregiert und erweitert die Ergebnisse mehrerer Forschungsarbeiten. Dabei werden vorrangig zwei Aspekte diskutiert: (1) Ein mögliches Einführungsmodell für Lean IT. Dieses verknüpft fünf Rollen (Sponsor, Programmleiter, Navigator, Linienführungskraft und Linienexperte) mit vier Phasen (Vorbereitung, Analyse, Gestaltung und Implementierung). (2) Besondere Herausforderungen für Linienführungskräfte, die aufgrund der „bottom up“-Ausrichtung bei Lean-IT-Einführungen stark gefordert werden. Neben einer klaren Vision für die Organisationseinheit und dem Verständnis, an welcher Stelle Lean IT die Organisationseinheit konkret unterstützen kann, benötigen sie Offenheit, Veränderungswillen und die Bereitschaft Verantwortung an Mitarbeiter zu delegieren. Außerdem sollten sie über ein ausreichendes Zeitbudget für die Einführung verfügen, um ihrer gestaltenden und qualitätssichernden Funktion nachkommen zu können.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="deu">HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://link.springer.com/article/10.1365/s40702-016-0266-1</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <author>Jörn Kobus</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Betriebliches Informationssystem</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Lean Management</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Lean IT</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>IT-Industrialisierung</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Lean Management</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>IT-Effizienzprogramme</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Einführungsmodell</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="ddc" number="6">Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>35</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2017</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>47</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>60</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <volume>5</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Change management lessons learned for Lean IT implementations</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Lean Management is a standard production mode that has been familiar to production organizations for several decades. To  date,  however,  academic  literature  has  presented  surprisingly  little  information  about  the  application  of  Lean Management  in  Information  Technology  (IT)  organizations,  or  what  is  called Lean  IT.  Drawing  upon  an  empirical qualitative  case  study  of  the  IT  departments  of  two  multinational  companies,  in  this  paper  we  identify  change management  lessons  learned  for  Lean  IT  implementations,  as  well  as  seven  characteristics  of  a  corresponding  change management  approach.  As  an  extension  of  our  work,  researchers  should  validate  and  expand  our  initial  findings, preferably in a quantitative setting.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm050103</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <author>Jörn Kobus</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Betriebliches Informationssystem</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Lean Management</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Fallstudiensammlung</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Lean Management</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Lean IT</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Implementation</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Case study</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Lessons learned</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="oaweg" number="">Diamond Open Access - OA-Veröffentlichung ohne Publikationskosten (Sponsoring)</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>34</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2018</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>62</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>78</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <volume>29</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>University of Tehran</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Information Systems Backsourcing</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Information  systems  backsourcing describes  the transferof  previously  outsourced  activities,  assets,  or  personnel back to the originating companyto  regain  ownership  and  control.  While  there  is much  research on  information  systems outsourcing,  the topic  of  backsourcing information  systemsis  still  an  emerging  research  area. Therefore,  ourpaper aims to explore and synthesizethe existing literature  on information  systemsbacksourcing,  since  there  is  no  exhaustiveliteraturereview  of  the  state  of  the  research to  our  knowledge available yet. In  this  paper,  wecreate a  framework  to  structure  the existing  research  along  the overallbacksourcing  process.  We identifydifferent  motivators, such  asexpectation  gaps, orinternal  and  external  organizational  changes, leading  towards  a  backsourcing  decision,  and  factors  positively  or  negatively influencing  this  decision.  Additionally,  we  derive  implementation  success  factors based  on  the  existing  literature to  guide companies  through  the  backsourcing  process.We  also  differentiate  the  term  backsourcing  from  related,  sometimes synonymously  used  terms,  by  emphasizing  the  change  of  ownership  back  to  the  company  of  originas the main  criterion.Additionally, we discuss opportunities for future research in the field of information systems backsourcing.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Journal of Information Technology Management</parentTitle>
    <subTitle language="eng">A Literature Review</subTitle>
    <identifier type="url">http://jitm.ubalt.edu/XXIX-1/article4.pdf</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <author>Benedikt von Bary</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Betriebliches Informationssystem</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Insourcing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Literaturbericht</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Backsourcing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Backshoring</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Reshoring</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Inshoring</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Information systems</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Information technology</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Literature review</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>28</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>15</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>43</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <volume>7</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2019-11-21</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Causing factors, outcomes, and governance of Shadow IT and business-managed IT</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Shadow IT and Business-managed IT describe the autonomous deployment/procurement or management of Information Technology (IT) instances, i.e., software, hardware, or IT services, by business entities. For Shadow IT, this happens covertly, i.e., without alignment with the IT organization; for Business-managed IT this happens overtly, i.e., in alignment with the IT organization or in a split responsibility model. We conduct a systematic literature review and structure the identified research themes in a framework of causing factors, outcomes, and governance. As causing factors, we identify enablers, motivators, and missing barriers. Outcomes can be benefits as well as risks/shortcomings of Shadow IT and Business-managed IT. Concerning governance, we distinguish two subcategories: general governance for Shadow IT and Business-managed IT and instance governance for overt Business-managed IT. Thus, a specific set of governance approaches exists for Business-managed IT that cannot be applied to Shadow IT due to its covert nature. Hence, we extend the existing conceptual understanding and allocate research themes to Shadow IT, Business-managed IT, or both concepts and particularly distinguish the governance of the two concepts. Besides, we find that governance themes have been the primary research focus since 2016, whereas older publications (until 2015) focused on causing factors.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management</parentTitle>
    <subTitle language="eng">A systematic literature review</subTitle>
    <identifier type="url">http://www.sciencesphere.org/ijispm/archive/ijispm-070102.pdf</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.12821/ijispm070102</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">2182-7796</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">2182-7788</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">2182-780X</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <author>Stefan Klotz</author>
    <author>Andreas Kopper</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Shadow IT</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Business-managed IT</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>IT governance</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>literature review</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>outcomes</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Betriebliches Informationssystem</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Datensicherung</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Literaturbericht</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="oaweg" number="">Diamond Open Access - OA-Veröffentlichung ohne Publikationskosten (Sponsoring)</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>29</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2019</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>36</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>62</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>1</issue>
    <volume>21</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName/>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>--</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Knowledge transfer in IS offshoring</title>
    <abstract language="eng">Purpose&#13;
This paper aims to investigate the main tasks, necessary skills, and the implementation of the offshore coordinator’s role to facilitate knowledge transfer in information systems (IS) offshoring.&#13;
&#13;
Design/methodology/approach&#13;
This empirical exploratory study uses the classical Delphi method that includes one qualitative and two quantitative rounds to collect data on IS experts’ perceptions to seek a consensus among them.&#13;
&#13;
Findings&#13;
The participants agreed, with strong consensus, for a set of 16 tasks and 15 skills. The tasks focused primarily on relationship management and facilitating knowledge transfer on different levels. The set of skills consists of approximately 25 per cent “hard” skills, e.g. professional language skills and project management skills, and approximately 75 per cent “soft” skills, e.g. interpersonal and communication skills and the ability to deal with conflict. Two factors mainly influence implementing the offshore coordinator role: project size and the number of projects to be supported simultaneously.&#13;
&#13;
Practical implications&#13;
The findings provide indications of how to define and fulfill this crucial role in practice to facilitate the knowledge transfer process in a positive way.&#13;
&#13;
Originality/value&#13;
Similarities in previous research findings are aggregated to examine the intermediate role in detail from a consolidated perspective. This results in the first comprehensive set of critical tasks and skills assigned to the competency dimensions of the universal competency framework, demonstrating which and how many competency dimensions are critical.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">Journal of Systems and Information Technology</parentTitle>
    <subTitle language="eng">A Delphi study of the offshore coordinator role</subTitle>
    <identifier type="url">https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-01-2018-0008</identifier>
    <identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-294</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">1328-7265</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <licence>Keine Lizenz - Es gilt das deutsche Urheberrecht: § 53 UrhG</licence>
    <author>Artur Strasser</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Knowledge transfer</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Delphi</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>IS offshoring</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>Offshoring coordinator</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>universal competency framework</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Betriebliches Informationssystem</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Offshoring</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>DV-Koordinator</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Wissensmanagement</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="oaweg" number="">Green Open Access - Zweitveröffentlichung</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16311">Digitalisierung</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
  <doc>
    <id>31</id>
    <completedYear/>
    <publishedYear>2018</publishedYear>
    <thesisYearAccepted/>
    <language>eng</language>
    <pageFirst>17</pageFirst>
    <pageLast>35</pageLast>
    <pageNumber/>
    <edition/>
    <issue>4</issue>
    <volume>6</volume>
    <type>article</type>
    <publisherName>SciKA</publisherName>
    <publisherPlace/>
    <creatingCorporation/>
    <contributingCorporation/>
    <belongsToBibliography>0</belongsToBibliography>
    <completedDate>2019-11-21</completedDate>
    <publishedDate>--</publishedDate>
    <thesisDateAccepted>--</thesisDateAccepted>
    <title language="eng">Adding experts’ perceptions to complement existing research on information systems backsourcing</title>
    <abstract language="eng">This paper extends the existing literature on information systems (IS) backsourcing by the perception of practitioners.&#13;
For this purpose, we conducted a series of qualitative, semistructured interviews with IS sourcing experts. The interview questions focused on the participants’ perceptions and experiences with the topic, on identifying reasons for and against IS backsourcing, and on revealing relevant trends pertinent to IS backsourcing. We then compared those&#13;
findings with two previously conducted comprehensive literature reviews on academic and practitioner literature on IS backsourcing. By following this approach, we contribute to the existing research by verifying previous findings, for example, the most important reasons why companies decide in favor of IS backsourcing. Additionally, we were able to enhance previous contributions as we highlight the significance of differentiating between the scope of IS backsourcing&#13;
by looking at the underlying services which are potentially backsourced. Further, we identified the importance of managers’ personal preferences as an additional reason for IS backsourcing, for example, based on personal experiences or a perceived need for change. Based on our findings, we created a comprehensive overview of all aspects connected to the IS backsourcing process and derived opportunities for further research to contribute to the IS backsourcing research agenda.</abstract>
    <parentTitle language="eng">International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management</parentTitle>
    <identifier type="doi">10.12821/ijispm060402</identifier>
    <identifier type="issn">2182-7788</identifier>
    <enrichment key="BegutachtungStatus">peer-reviewed</enrichment>
    <author>Benedikt von Bary</author>
    <author>Markus Westner</author>
    <author>Susanne Strahringer</author>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>backsourcing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>insourcing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>back in-house</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>information systems</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>eng</language>
      <type>uncontrolled</type>
      <value>expert interviews</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Betriebliches Informationssystem</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Insourcing</value>
    </subject>
    <subject>
      <language>deu</language>
      <type>swd</type>
      <value>Umfrage</value>
    </subject>
    <collection role="ddc" number="0">Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="FakIM">Fakultät Informatik und Mathematik</collection>
    <collection role="othforschungsschwerpunkt" number="16315">Information und Kommunikation</collection>
    <collection role="oaweg" number="">Diamond Open Access - OA-Veröffentlichung ohne Publikationskosten (Sponsoring)</collection>
    <collection role="institutes" number="">Labor Regensburg Strategic IT Management (ReSITM)</collection>
  </doc>
</export-example>
