@inproceedings{SeligBauerFrikeletal., author = {Selig, Tim and Bauer, Patrick and Frikel, J{\"u}rgen and M{\"a}rz, Thomas and Storath, Martin and Weinmann, Andreas}, title = {Two-stage Approach for Low-dose and Sparse-angle CT Reconstruction using Backprojection}, series = {Bildverarbeitung f{\"u}r die Medizin 2025 (BVM 2025): Proceedings, German Conference on Medical Image Computing, Regensburg March 09-11, 2025}, booktitle = {Bildverarbeitung f{\"u}r die Medizin 2025 (BVM 2025): Proceedings, German Conference on Medical Image Computing, Regensburg March 09-11, 2025}, editor = {Palm, Christoph and Breininger, Katharina and Deserno, Thomas M. and Handels, Heinz and Maier, Andreas and Maier-Hein, Klaus H. and Tolxdorff, Thomas M.}, publisher = {Springer VS}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {978-3-658-47421-8}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-658-47422-5_67}, pages = {286 -- 291}, abstract = {This paper presents a novel two-stage approach for computed tomography (CT) reconstruction, focusing on sparse-angle and low-dose setups to minimize radiation exposure while maintaining high image quality. Two-stage approaches consist of an initial reconstruction followed by a neural network for image refinement. In the initial reconstruction, we apply the backprojection (BP) instead of the traditional filtered backprojection (FBP). This enhances computational speed and offers potential advantages for more complex geometries, such as fan-beam and cone-beam CT. Additionally, BP addresses noise and artifacts in sparse-angle CT by leveraging its inherent noise-smoothing effect, which reduces streaking artifacts common in FBP reconstructions. For the second stage, we fine-tune the DRUNet proposed by Zhang et al. to further improve reconstruction quality. We call our method BP-DRUNet and evaluate its performance on a synthetically generated ellipsoid dataset alongside thewell-established LoDoPaBCT dataset. Our results show that BP-DRUNet produces competetive results in terms of PSNR and SSIM metrics compared to the FBP-based counterpart, FBPDRUNet, and delivers visually competitive results across all tested angular setups.}, language = {en} } @misc{ScheppachWeberNunesArizietal., author = {Scheppach, Markus W. and Weber Nunes, Danilo and Arizi, X. and Rauber, David and Probst, Andreas and Nagl, Sandra and R{\"o}mmele, Christoph and Palm, Christoph and Messmann, Helmut and Ebigbo, Alanna}, title = {Single frame workflow recognition during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) using artificial intelligence (AI)}, series = {Endoscopy}, volume = {57}, journal = {Endoscopy}, number = {S 02}, publisher = {Thieme}, address = {Stuttgart}, doi = {10.1055/s-0045-1806324}, pages = {S511}, abstract = {Aims Precise surgical phase recognition and evaluation may improve our understanding of complex endoscopic procedures. Furthermore, quality control measurements and endoscopy training could benefit from objective descriptions of surgical phase distributions. Therefore, we aimed to develop an artificial intelligence algorithm for frame-by-frame operational phase recognition during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Methods Full length ESD-videos from 31 patients comprising 6.297.782 single images were collected retrospectively. Videos were annotated on a frame-by-frame basis for the operational macro-phases diagnostics, marking, injection, dissection and bleeding. Further subphases were the application of electrical current, visible injection of fluid into the submucosal space and scope manipulation, leading to 11 phases in total. 4.975.699 frames (21 patients) were used for training of a video swin transformer using uniform frame sampling for temporal information. Hyperparameter tuning was performed with 897.325 further frames (6 patients), while 424.758 frames (4 patients) were used for validation. Results The overall F1 scores on the test dataset for the macro-phases and all 11 phases were 0.96 and 0.90, respectively. The recall values for diagnostics, marking, injection, dissection and bleeding were 1.00, 1.00, 0.95, 0.96 and 0.93, respectively. Conclusions The algorithm classified operational phases during ESD with high accuracy. A precise evaluation of phase distribution may allow for the development of objective quality metrics for quality control and training.}, language = {en} } @misc{ZellmerRauberProbstetal., author = {Zellmer, Stephan and Rauber, David and Probst, Andreas and Weber, Tobias and Braun, Georg and Nagl, Sandra and R{\"o}mmele, Christoph and Schnoy, Elisabeth and Birzle, Lisa and Aehling, Niklas and Schulz, Dominik Andreas Helmut Otto and Palm, Christoph and Messmann, Helmut and Ebigbo, Alanna}, title = {K{\"u}nstliche Intelligenz als Hilfsmittel zur Detektion der Papilla duodeni major und des papill{\"a}ren Ostiums w{\"a}hrend der ERCP}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Gastroenterologie}, volume = {63}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Gastroenterologie}, number = {5}, publisher = {Thieme}, address = {Stuttgart}, doi = {10.1055/s-0045-1806882}, pages = {e295}, abstract = {Einleitung Die Endoskopische Retrograde Cholangiopankreatikographie (ERCP) ist der Goldstandard in der endoskopischen Therapie von Erkrankungen des pankreatobili{\"a}ren Trakts. Allerdings ist sie technisch anspruchsvoll, schwer zu erlernen und mit einer relativ hohen Komplikationsrate assoziiert. Daher soll in der vorliegenden Machbarkeitsstudie gepr{\"u}ft werden, ob mithilfe eines Deeplearning- Algorithmus die Papille und das Ostium zuverl{\"a}ssig detektiert werden k{\"o}nnen und dieser f{\"u}r Endoskopiker, insbesondere in der Ausbildungssituation, ein geeignetes Hilfsmittel darstellen k{\"o}nnte. Material und Methodik Insgesamt wurden 1534 ERCP-Bilder von 134 Patienten analysiert, wobei sowohl die Papilla duodeni major als auch das Ostium segmentiert wurden. Anschließend erfolgte das Training eines neuronalen Netzes unter Verwendung eines Deep-Learning-Algorithmus. F{\"u}r den Test des Algorithmus erfolgte eine f{\"u}nffache Kreuzvalidierung. Ergebnisse Auf den 1534 gelabelten Bildern wurden f{\"u}r die Klasse Papille ein F1-Wert von 0,7996, eine Sensitivit{\"a}t von 0,8488 und eine Spezifit{\"a}t von 0,9822 erzielt. F{\"u}r die Klasse Ostium ergaben sich ein F1-Wert von 0,5198, eine Sensitivit{\"a}t von 0,5945 und eine Spezifit{\"a}t von 0,9974. Klassen{\"u}bergreifend (Klasse Papille und Klasse Ostium) betrug der F1-Wert 0,6593, die Sensitivit{\"a}t 0,7216 und f{\"u}r die Spezifit{\"a}t 0,9898. Zusammenfassung In der vorliegenden Machbarkeitsstudie zeigte das neuronale Netz eine hohe Sensitivit{\"a}t und eine sehr hohe Spezifit{\"a}t bei der Identifikation der Papilla duodeni major. Die Detektion des Ostiums erfolgte hingegen mit einer deutlich geringeren Sensitivit{\"a}t. Zuk{\"u}nftig ist eine Erweiterung des Trainingsdatensatzes um Videos und klinische Daten vorgesehen, um die Leistungsf{\"a}higkeit des Netzwerks zu verbessern. Hierdurch k{\"o}nnte langfristig ein geeignetes Assistenzsystem f{\"u}r die ERCP, insbesondere in der Ausbildungssituation etabliert werden.}, language = {de} } @article{HartmannWeihererNieberleetal., author = {Hartmann, Robin and Weiherer, Maximilian and Nieberle, Felix and Palm, Christoph and Br{\´e}bant, Vanessa and Prantl, Lukas and Lamby, Philipp and Reichert, Torsten E. and Taxis, J{\"u}rgen and Ettl, Tobias}, title = {Evaluating smartphone-based 3D imaging techniques for clinical application in oral and maxillofacial surgery: A comparative study with the vectra M5}, series = {Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery}, volume = {29}, journal = {Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery}, publisher = {Springer Nature}, doi = {10.1007/s10006-024-01322-2}, pages = {17}, abstract = {PURPOSE This study aimed to clarify the applicability of smartphone-based three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging for clinical use in oral and maxillofacial surgery, comparing two smartphone-based approaches to the gold standard. METHODS Facial surface models (SMs) were generated for 30 volunteers (15 men, 15 women) using the Vectra M5 (Canfield Scientific, USA), the TrueDepth camera of the iPhone 14 Pro (Apple Inc., USA), and the iPhone 14 Pro with photogrammetry. Smartphone-based SMs were superimposed onto Vectra-based SMs. Linear measurements and volumetric evaluations were performed to evaluate surface-to-surface deviation. To assess inter-observer reliability, all measurements were performed independently by a second observer. Statistical analyses included Bland-Altman analyses, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired samples, and Intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS Photogrammetry-based SMs exhibited an overall landmark-to-landmark deviation of M = 0.8 mm (SD =  ± 0.58 mm, n = 450), while TrueDepth-based SMs displayed a deviation of M = 1.1 mm (SD =  ± 0.72 mm, n = 450). The mean volumetric difference for photogrammetry-based SMs was M = 1.8 cc (SD =  ± 2.12 cc, n = 90), and M = 3.1 cc (SD =  ± 2.64 cc, n = 90) for TrueDepth-based SMs. When comparing the two approaches, most landmark-to-landmark measurements demonstrated 95\% Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LoA) of ≤ 2 mm. Volumetric measurements revealed LoA > 2 cc. Photogrammetry-based measurements demonstrated higher inter-observer reliability for overall landmark-to-landmark deviation. CONCLUSION Both approaches for smartphone-based 3D surface imaging exhibit potential in capturing the face. Photogrammetry-based SMs demonstrated superior alignment and volumetric accuracy with Vectra-based SMs than TrueDepth-based SMs.}, language = {en} } @article{RoserMeinikheimMuzalyovaetal., author = {Roser, David and Meinikheim, Michael and Muzalyova, Anna and Mendel, Robert and Palm, Christoph and Probst, Andreas and Nagl, Sandra and Scheppach, Markus W. and R{\"o}mmele, Christoph and Schnoy, Elisabeth and Parsa, Nasim and Byrne, Michael F. and Messmann, Helmut and Ebigbo, Alanna}, title = {Artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopy and examiner confidence : a study on human-artificial intelligence interaction in Barrett's Esophagus (With Video)}, series = {DEN Open}, volume = {6}, journal = {DEN Open}, number = {1}, publisher = {Wiley}, doi = {10.1002/deo2.70150}, pages = {8}, abstract = {Objective Despite high stand-alone performance, studies demonstrate that artificial intelligence (AI)-supported endoscopic diagnostics often fall short in clinical applications due to human-AI interaction factors. This video-based trial on Barrett's esophagus aimed to investigate how examiner behavior, their levels of confidence, and system usability influence the diagnostic outcomes of AI-assisted endoscopy. Methods The present analysis employed data from a multicenter randomized controlled tandem video trial involving 22 endoscopists with varying degrees of expertise. Participants were tasked with evaluating a set of 96 endoscopic videos of Barrett's esophagus in two distinct rounds, with and without AI assistance. Diagnostic confidence levels were recorded, and decision changes were categorized according to the AI prediction. Additional surveys assessed user experience and system usability ratings. Results AI assistance significantly increased examiner confidence levels (p < 0.001) and accuracy. Withdrawing AI assistance decreased confidence (p < 0.001), but not accuracy. Experts consistently reported higher confidence than non-experts (p < 0.001), regardless of performance. Despite improved confidence, correct AI guidance was disregarded in 16\% of all cases, and 9\% of initially correct diagnoses were changed to incorrect ones. Overreliance on AI, algorithm aversion, and uncertainty in AI predictions were identified as key factors influencing outcomes. The System Usability Scale questionnaire scores indicated good to excellent usability, with non-experts scoring 73.5 and experts 85.6. Conclusions Our findings highlight the pivotal function of examiner behavior in AI-assisted endoscopy. To fully realize the benefits of AI, implementing explainable AI, improving user interfaces, and providing targeted training are essential. Addressing these factors could enhance diagnostic accuracy and confidence in clinical practice.}, language = {en} } @article{ScheppachMendelMuzalyovaetal., author = {Scheppach, Markus W. and Mendel, Robert and Muzalyova, Anna and Rauber, David and Probst, Andreas and Nagl, Sandra and R{\"o}mmele, Christoph and Yip, Hon Chi and Lau, Louis Ho Shing and G{\"o}lder, Stefan Karl and Schmidt, Arthur and Kouladouros, Konstantinos and Abdelhafez, Mohamed and Walter, Benjamin M. and Meinikheim, Michael and Chiu, Philip Wai Yan and Palm, Christoph and Messmann, Helmut and Ebigbo, Alanna}, title = {Artificial intelligence improves submucosal vessel detection during third space endoscopy}, series = {Endoscopy}, journal = {Endoscopy}, publisher = {Thieme}, address = {Stuttgart}, doi = {10.1055/a-2534-1164}, abstract = {Background and study aims: While artificial intelligence (AI) shows high potential in decision support for diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopy, its role in therapeutic endoscopy remains unclear. Third space endoscopic procedures pose the risk of intraprocedural bleeding. Therefore, we aimed to develop an AI algorithm for intraprocedural blood vessel detection. Patients and Methods: Using a test dataset with 101 standardized video clips containing 200 predefined submucosal blood vessels, 19 endoscopists were evaluated for the vessel detection rate (VDR) and time (VDT) with and without support of an AI algorithm. Test subjects were grouped according to experience in ESD. Results: With AI support, endoscopists VDR increased from 56.4\% [CI 54.1-58.6] to 72.4\% [CI 70.3-74.4]. Endoscopists' VDT dropped from 6.7sec [CI 6.2-7.1] to 5.2sec [CI 4.8-5.7]. False positive (FP) readings appeared in 4.5\% of frames and were marked significantly shorter than true positives (6.0sec [CI 5.28-6.70] vs. 0.7sec [CI 0.55-0.87]). Conclusions: AI improved the vessel detection rate and time of endoscopists during third space endoscopy. While these data need to be corroborated by clinical trials, AI may prove to be an invaluable tool for the improvement of endoscopic interventions.}, language = {en} } @article{MaerklRueckertRauberetal., author = {Maerkl, Raphaela and Rueckert, Tobias and Rauber, David and Gutbrod, Max and Weber Nunes, Danilo and Palm, Christoph}, title = {Enhancing generalization in zero-shot multi-label endoscopic instrument classification}, series = {International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery}, volume = {20}, journal = {International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery}, publisher = {Springer Nature}, doi = {10.1007/s11548-025-03439-5}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-85674}, pages = {1577 -- 1587}, abstract = {Purpose Recognizing previously unseen classes with neural networks is a significant challenge due to their limited generalization capabilities. This issue is particularly critical in safety-critical domains such as medical applications, where accurate classification is essential for reliability and patient safety. Zero-shot learning methods address this challenge by utilizing additional semantic data, with their performance relying heavily on the quality of the generated embeddings. Methods This work investigates the use of full descriptive sentences, generated by a Sentence-BERT model, as class representations, compared to simpler category-based word embeddings derived from a BERT model. Additionally, the impact of z-score normalization as a post-processing step on these embeddings is explored. The proposed approach is evaluated on a multi-label generalized zero-shot learning task, focusing on the recognition of surgical instruments in endoscopic images from minimally invasive cholecystectomies. Results The results demonstrate that combining sentence embeddings and z-score normalization significantly improves model performance. For unseen classes, the AUROC improves from 43.9\% to 64.9\%, and the multi-label accuracy from 26.1\% to 79.5\%. Overall performance measured across both seen and unseen classes improves from 49.3\% to 64.9\% in AUROC and from 37.3\% to 65.1\% in multi-label accuracy, highlighting the effectiveness of our approach. Conclusion These findings demonstrate that sentence embeddings and z-score normalization can substantially enhance the generalization performance of zero-shot learning models. However, as the study is based on a single dataset, future work should validate the method across diverse datasets and application domains to establish its robustness and broader applicability.}, language = {en} } @misc{ScheppachWeberNunesRauberetal., author = {Scheppach, Markus W. and Weber Nunes, Danilo and Rauber, David and Arizi, X. and Probst, Andreas and Nagl, Sandra and R{\"o}mmele, Christoph and Ebigbo, Alanna and Palm, Christoph and Messmann, Helmut}, title = {K{\"u}nstliche Intelligenz-basierte Erkennung von interventionellen Phasen bei der endoskopischen Submukosadissektion}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Gastroenterologie}, volume = {63}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Gastroenterologie}, number = {08}, publisher = {Thieme}, address = {Stuttgart}, doi = {10.1055/s-0045-1811093}, pages = {e612 -- e613}, abstract = {Einleitung: Die endoskopische Submukosadissektion (ESD) ist ein komplexes endoskopisches Verfahren, das technische Expertise erfordert. Objektive Methoden zur Analyse von interventionellen Abl{\"a}ufen bei ESD k{\"o}nnten f{\"u}r Qualit{\"a}tssicherung und Ausbildung, wie auch eine automatische Befunderstellung von Nutzen sein. Ziele: In dieser Studie wurde ein KI-Algorithmus f{\"u}r die Erkennung und Klassifizierung der interventionellen Phasen der ESD entwickelt, um die technische Basis f{\"u}r eine standardisierte Leistungsbewertung und automatische Befunderstellung zu schaffen. Methodik: Vollst{\"a}ndige ESD-Videoaufnahmen von 49 Patienten wurden retrospektiv zusammengestellt. Der Datensatz umfasste 6.390.151 Einzelbilder, die alle f{\"u}r die folgenden interventionellen Phasen annotiert wurden: Diagnostik, Markierung, Injektion, Dissektion und H{\"a}mostase. 3.973.712 Bilder (28 Patienten) wurden f{\"u}r das Training eines Video-Swin-Transformers genutzt. Dabei wurde temporale Information durch standardisierte BIldextraktion in festgelegten zeitlichen Abst{\"a}nden zum analysierten Bild inkorporiert. 2.416.439 separate Bilder (21 Patienten) wurden f{\"u}r eine interne Validierung genutzt. Ergebnis: Bei der internen Evaluation erreichte das System insgesamt einen F1-Wert von 0,88. Es wurden F1-Werte von 0,99, 0,89, 0,89, 0,91 und 0,52 f{\"u}r Diagnostik, Markierung, Injektion, Dissektion bzw. Blutungsmanagement gemessen. Die Sensitivit{\"a}ten f{\"u}r dieselben Parameter betrugen 1,00, 0,80, 0,94, 0,89 und 0,67, die Spezifit{\"a}ten lagen bei 1,00, 1,00, 0,98, 0,88 und 0,93. Positive pr{\"a}diktive Werte wurden mit 0,98, 1,00, 0,85, 0,94 und 0,43 gemessen. Schlussfolgerung: In dieser vorl{\"a}ufigen Studie zeigte ein KI-Algorithmus eine hohe Leistungsf{\"a}higkeit f{\"u}r die Einzelbild-Erkennung von Verfahrensphasen w{\"a}hrend der ESD. Die vergleichsweise niedrige Leistung f{\"u}r die Blutungsphase wurde auf das seltene Auftreten von Blutungsepisoden im Trainingsdatensatz zur{\"u}ckgef{\"u}hrt, der zu diesem Zeitpunkt nur Videos in voller L{\"a}nge umfasste. Die zuk{\"u}nftige Entwicklung des Algorithmus wird sich auf die Reduzierung von Klassenungleichgewichten durch selektive Annotationsprotokolle konzentrieren.}, language = {de} } @misc{ScheppachRauberZingleretal., author = {Scheppach, Markus W. and Rauber, David and Zingler, C. and Weber Nunes, Danilo and Probst, Andreas and R{\"o}mmele, Christoph and Nagl, Sandra and Ebigbo, Alanna and Palm, Christoph and Messmann, Helmut}, title = {Instrumentenerkennung w{\"a}hrend der endoskopischen Submukosadissektion mittels k{\"u}nstlicher Intelligenz}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Gastroenterologie}, volume = {63}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Gastroenterologie}, number = {8}, publisher = {Thieme}, doi = {10.1055/s-0045-1811092}, abstract = {Einleitung: Die endoskopische Submukosadissektion (ESD) ist eine komplexe Technik zur Resektion gastrointestinaler Fr{\"u}hneoplasien. Dabei werden f{\"u}r die verschiedenen Schritte der Intervention spezifische endoskopische Instrumente verwendet. Die pr{\"a}zise und automatische Erkennung und Abgrenzung der verwendeten Instrumente (Injektionsnadeln, elektrochirurgische Messer mit unterschiedlichen Konfigurationen, h{\"a}mostatische Zangen) k{\"o}nnte wertvolle Informationen {\"u}ber den Fortschritt und die Verfahrensmerkmale der ESD liefern und eine automatische standardisierte Berichterstattung erm{\"o}glichen. Ziele: Ziel dieser Studie war die Entwicklung eines KI-Algorithmus zur Erkennung und Delineation von endoskopischen Instrumenten bei der ESD. Methodik: 17 ESD-Videos (9×rektal, 5×{\"o}sophageal, 3×gastrisch) wurden retrospektiv zusammengestellt. Auf 8530 Einzelbilder dieser Videos wurden durch 2 Studienmitarbeiter die folgenden Klassen eingezeichnet: Hakenmesser - Spitze, Hakenmesser - Katheter, Nadelmesser - Spitze und - Katheter, Injektionsnadel -Spitze und - Katheter sowie h{\"a}mostatische Zange - Spitze und - Katheter. Der annotierte Datensatz wurde zum Training eines DeepLabV3+-Deep-Learning-Algorithmus mit ConvNeXt-Backbone zur Erkennung und Abgrenzung der genannten Klassen verwendet. Die Evaluation erfolgte durch 5-fache interne Kreuzvalidierung. Ergebnis: Die Validierung auf Einzelpixelbasis ergab insgesamt einen F1-Score von 0,80, eine Sensitivit{\"a}t von 0,81 und eine Spezifit{\"a}t von 1,00. Es wurden F1-Scores von 1,00, 0,97, 0,80, 0,98, 0,85, 0,97, 0,80, 0,51 bzw. 0,85 f{\"u}r die Klassen Hakenmesser - Katheter und - Spitze, Nadelmesser - Katheter und - Spitze, Injektionsnadel - Katheter und - Spitze, h{\"a}mostatische Zange - Katheter und - Spitze gemessen. Schlussfolgerung: In dieser Studie wurden die wichtigsten endoskopischen Instrumente, die w{\"a}hrend der ESD verwendet werden, mit hoher Genauigkeit erkannt. Die geringere Leistung bei der h{\"a}mostatische Zange - Katheter kann auf die Unterrepr{\"a}sentation dieser Klassen in den Trainingsdaten zur{\"u}ckgef{\"u}hrt werden. Zuk{\"u}nftige Studien werden sich auf die Erweiterung der Instrumentenklassen sowie auf die Ausbalancierung der Trainingsdaten konzentrieren.}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{KlausmannRueckertRauberetal., author = {Klausmann, Leonard and Rueckert, Tobias and Rauber, David and Maerkl, Raphaela and Yildiran, Suemeyye R. and Gutbrod, Max and Palm, Christoph}, title = {DIY challenge blueprint: from organization to technical realization in biomedical image analysis}, series = {Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2025 ; Proceedings Part XI}, booktitle = {Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2025 ; Proceedings Part XI}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Cham}, isbn = {978-3-032-05141-7}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-032-05141-7_9}, pages = {85 -- 95}, abstract = {Biomedical image analysis challenges have become the de facto standard for publishing new datasets and benchmarking different state-of-the-art algorithms. Most challenges use commercial cloud-based platforms, which can limit custom options and involve disadvantages such as reduced data control and increased costs for extended functionalities. In contrast, Do-It-Yourself (DIY) approaches have the capability to emphasize reliability, compliance, and custom features, providing a solid basis for low-cost, custom designs in self-hosted systems. Our approach emphasizes cost efficiency, improved data sovereignty, and strong compliance with regulatory frameworks, such as the GDPR. This paper presents a blueprint for DIY biomedical imaging challenges, designed to provide institutions with greater autonomy over their challenge infrastructure. Our approach comprehensively addresses both organizational and technical dimensions, including key user roles, data management strategies, and secure, efficient workflows. Key technical contributions include a modular, containerized infrastructure based on Docker, integration of open-source identity management, and automated solution evaluation workflows. Practical deployment guidelines are provided to facilitate implementation and operational stability. The feasibility and adaptability of the proposed framework are demonstrated through the MICCAI 2024 PhaKIR challenge with multiple international teams submitting and validating their solutions through our self-hosted platform. This work can be used as a baseline for future self-hosted DIY implementations and our results encourage further studies in the area of biomedical image analysis challenges.}, language = {en} } @unpublished{GutbrodRauberWeberNunesetal., author = {Gutbrod, Max and Rauber, David and Weber Nunes, Danilo and Palm, Christoph}, title = {OpenMIBOOD: Open Medical Imaging Benchmarks for Out-Of-Distribution Detection}, doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2503.16247}, pages = {18}, abstract = {The growing reliance on Artificial Intelligence (AI) in critical domains such as healthcare demands robust mechanisms to ensure the trustworthiness of these systems, especially when faced with unexpected or anomalous inputs. This paper introduces the Open Medical Imaging Benchmarks for Out-Of-Distribution Detection (OpenMIBOOD), a comprehensive framework for evaluating out-of-distribution (OOD) detection methods specifically in medical imaging contexts. OpenMIBOOD includes three benchmarks from diverse medical domains, encompassing 14 datasets divided into covariate-shifted in-distribution, near-OOD, and far-OOD categories. We evaluate 24 post-hoc methods across these benchmarks, providing a standardized reference to advance the development and fair comparison of OOD detection methods. Results reveal that findings from broad-scale OOD benchmarks in natural image domains do not translate to medical applications, underscoring the critical need for such benchmarks in the medical field. By mitigating the risk of exposing AI models to inputs outside their training distribution, OpenMIBOOD aims to support the advancement of reliable and trustworthy AI systems in healthcare. The repository is available at this https URL.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{WeberNunesRauberPalm, author = {Weber Nunes, Danilo and Rauber, David and Palm, Christoph}, title = {Self-supervised 3D Vision Transformer Pre-training for Robust Brain Tumor Classification}, series = {Bildverarbeitung f{\"u}r die Medizin 2025: Proceedings, German Conference on Medical Image Computing, Regensburg March 09-11, 2025}, booktitle = {Bildverarbeitung f{\"u}r die Medizin 2025: Proceedings, German Conference on Medical Image Computing, Regensburg March 09-11, 2025}, editor = {Palm, Christoph and Breininger, Katharina and Deserno, Thomas M. and Handels, Heinz and Maier, Andreas and Maier-Hein, Klaus H. and Tolxdorff, Thomas}, publisher = {Springer Vieweg}, address = {Wiesbaden}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-658-47422-5_69}, pages = {298 -- 303}, abstract = {Brain tumors pose significant challenges in neurology, making precise classification crucial for prognosis and treatment planning. This work investigates the effectiveness of a self-supervised learning approach-masked autoencoding (MAE)-to pre-train a vision transformer (ViT) model for brain tumor classification. Our method uses non-domain specific data, leveraging the ADNI and OASIS-3 MRI datasets, which primarily focus on degenerative diseases, for pretraining. The model is subsequently fine-tuned and evaluated on the BraTS glioma and meningioma datasets, representing a novel use of these datasets for tumor classification. The pre-trained MAE ViT model achieves an average F1 score of 0.91 in a 5-fold cross-validation setting, outperforming the nnU-Net encoder trained from scratch, particularly under limited data conditions. These findings highlight the potential of self-supervised MAE in enhancing brain tumor classification accuracy, even with restricted labeled data.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{WeiherervonRiedheimBrebantetal., author = {Weiherer, Maximilian and von Riedheim, Antonia and Br{\´e}bant, Vanessa and Egger, Bernhard and Palm, Christoph}, title = {iRBSM: A Deep Implicit 3D Breast Shape Model}, series = {Bildverarbeitung f{\"u}r die Medizin 2025: Proceedings, German Conference on Medical Image Computing, Regensburg March 09-11, 2025}, booktitle = {Bildverarbeitung f{\"u}r die Medizin 2025: Proceedings, German Conference on Medical Image Computing, Regensburg March 09-11, 2025}, editor = {Palm, Christoph and Breininger, Katharina and Deserno, Thomas M. and Handels, Heinz and Maier, Andreas and Maier-Hein, Klaus H. and Tolxdorff, Thomas}, publisher = {Springer Vieweg}, address = {Wiesbaden}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-658-47422-5_11}, pages = {38 -- 43}, abstract = {We present the first deep implicit 3D shape model of the female breast, building upon and improving the recently proposed Regensburg Breast Shape Model (RBSM). Compared to its PCA-based predecessor, our model employs implicit neural representations; hence, it can be trained on raw 3D breast scans and eliminates the need for computationally demanding non-rigid registration, a task that is particularly difficult for feature-less breast shapes. The resulting model, dubbed iRBSM, captures detailed surface geometry including fine structures such as nipples and belly buttons, is highly expressive, and outperforms the RBSM on different surface reconstruction tasks. Finally, leveraging the iRBSM, we present a prototype application to 3D reconstruct breast shapes from just a single image. Model and code publicly available at https://rbsm.re-mic.de/implicit.}, language = {en} } @misc{OPUS4-7967, title = {Bildverarbeitung f{\"u}r die Medizin 2025}, editor = {Palm, Christoph and Breininger, Katharina and Deserno, Thomas M. and Handels, Heinz and Maier, Andreas and Maier-Hein, Klaus H. and Tolxdorff, Thomas M.}, publisher = {Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {978-3-658-47421-8}, issn = {1431-472X}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-658-47422-5}, pages = {XXIII, 354}, abstract = {Die Konferenz "BVM - Bildverarbeitung f{\"u}r die Medizin" ist seit vielen Jahren als die nationale Plattform f{\"u}r den Austausch von Ideen und die Diskussion der neuesten Forschungsergebnisse im Bereich der Medizinischen Bildverarbeitung und der K{\"u}nstlichen Intelligenz (KI) etabliert. Auch 2025 werden wir aktuelle Forschungsergebnisse vorstellen und Gespr{\"a}che zwischen (jungen) Wissenschaftler*innen, Industrie und Anwender*innen vertiefen. Die Beitr{\"a}ge dieses Bandes - die meisten davon in englischer Sprache - umfassen alle Bereiche der medizinischen Bildverarbeitung, insbesondere die Bildgebung und -akquisition, Segmentierung und Analyse, Registrierung, Visualisierung und Animation, computerunterst{\"u}tzte Diagnose sowie bildgest{\"u}tzte Therapieplanung und Therapie. Hierbei kommen Methoden des maschinellen Lernens, der biomechanischen Modellierung sowie der Validierung und Qualit{\"a}tssicherung zum Einsatz. Das Kapitel "Leveraging multiple total body segmentators and anatomy-informed post-processing for segmenting bones in Lung CTs" ist unter einer Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License {\"u}ber link.springer.com frei verf{\"u}gbar (Open Access). Die Herausgebenden Prof. Palm forscht im Bereich KI f{\"u}r die Medizin mit einem Schwerpunkt in der Analyse endoskopischer Bilddaten zur computerunterst{\"u}tzten Diagnose und Therapie. Prof. Breininger entwickelt robuste Ans{\"a}tze des maschinellen Lernens in verschiedenen interdisziplin{\"a}ren Bereichen, mit einem Schwerpunkt auf medizinischen Bilddaten. Prof. Deserno forscht in Biosignal- und Bilderzeugung und -verarbeitung, insbesondere in der videobasierten Vitaldatenmessung. Prof. Handels entwickelt problemoptimierte, lernf{\"a}hige Bildverarbeitungsmethoden und integriert diese in hybride Bildverarbeitungssysteme zur Unterst{\"u}tzung der medizinischen Diagnostik und Therapie. Prof. Maier entwickelt Anwendungen in der medizinischen Bildverarbeitung zur Diagnoseunterst{\"u}tzung bis hin zur Schichtbildberechnung durch k{\"u}nstliche Intelligenz. Prof. Maier-Hein forscht im Bereich maschinelles Lernen und entwickelt Open-Source-L{\"o}sungen wie das Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit (MITK), Kaapana oder das nnU-Net. Prof. em. Tolxdorff ist Experte f{\"u}r maschinelles Lernen, biomedizinisches Datenmanagement, Datenvisualisierung und -analyse sowie Medizinproduktentwicklung in klinischen Workflows.}, subject = {Bildverarbeitung}, language = {de} } @article{SouzaPachecodeSouzaetal., author = {Souza, Luis A. and Pacheco, Andr{\´e} G.C. and de Souza, Alberto F. and Oliveira-Santos, Thiago and Badue, Claudine and Palm, Christoph and Papa, Jo{\~a}o Paulo}, title = {TransConv: a lightweight architecture based on transformers and convolutional neural networks for adenocarcinoma and Barrett's esophagus identification}, series = {Neural Computing and Applications}, journal = {Neural Computing and Applications}, number = {37}, publisher = {Springer}, doi = {10.1007/s00521-025-11299-y}, pages = {15535 -- 15546}, abstract = {Barrett's esophagus, also known as BE, is commonly associated with repeated exposure to stomach acid. If not treated properly, it may evolve into esophageal adenocarcinoma, aka esophageal cancer. This paper proposes TransConv, a hybrid architecture that benefits from features learned by pre-trained vision transformers (ViTs) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs), followed by a shallow neural network composed of three normalizations, ReLU activations, and fully connected layers, and a SoftMax head to distinguish between BE and esophageal cancer. TransConv is designed to be training-lightweight, and for the ViT and CNN backbone models, weights are kept frozen during training, i.e., the primary goal of TransConv is to learn the weights of the fully connected layer from both backbones only, avoiding the burden of updating their weights but still learning their final descriptions for the lightweight convolutional model. We report promising results with low computational training costs in two datasets, one public and another private. From our achievements, TransConv was able to deliver balanced accuracy results around 85\% and 86\% for each evaluated dataset, respectively, in a design that required only 50 epochs of model training, a very reduced number compared to state-of-the-art conducted studies in the same domain.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{GutbrodRauberWeberNunesetal., author = {Gutbrod, Max and Rauber, David and Weber Nunes, Danilo and Palm, Christoph}, title = {OpenMIBOOD: Open Medical Imaging Benchmarks for Out-Of-Distribution Detection}, series = {2025 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 10.-17. June 2025, Nashville}, booktitle = {2025 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 10.-17. June 2025, Nashville}, publisher = {IEEE}, isbn = {979-8-3315-4364-8}, doi = {10.1109/CVPR52734.2025.02410}, pages = {25874 -- 25886}, abstract = {The growing reliance on Artificial Intelligence (AI) in critical domains such as healthcare demands robust mechanisms to ensure the trustworthiness of these systems, especially when faced with unexpected or anomalous inputs. This paper introduces the Open Medical Imaging Benchmarks for Out-Of-Distribution Detection (OpenMIBOOD), a comprehensive framework for evaluating out-of-distribution (OOD) detection methods specifically in medical imaging contexts. OpenMIBOOD includes three benchmarks from diverse medical domains, encompassing 14 datasets divided into covariate-shifted in-distribution, nearOOD, and far-OOD categories. We evaluate 24 post-hoc methods across these benchmarks, providing a standardized reference to advance the development and fair comparison of OODdetection methods. Results reveal that findings from broad-scale OOD benchmarks in natural image domains do not translate to medical applications, underscoring the critical need for such benchmarks in the medical field. By mitigating the risk of exposing AI models to inputs outside their training distribution, OpenMIBOOD aims to support the advancement of reliable and trustworthy AI systems in healthcare. The repository is available at https://github.com/remic-othr/OpenMIBOOD.}, language = {en} } @unpublished{RueckertRauberMaerkletal., author = {R{\"u}ckert, Tobias and Rauber, David and Maerkl, Raphaela and Klausmann, Leonard and Yildiran, Suemeyye R. and Gutbrod, Max and Nunes, Danilo Weber and Moreno, Alvaro Fernandez and Luengo, Imanol and Stoyanov, Danail and Toussaint, Nicolas and Cho, Enki and Kim, Hyeon Bae and Choo, Oh Sung and Kim, Ka Young and Kim, Seong Tae and Arantes, Gon{\c{c}}alo and Song, Kehan and Zhu, Jianjun and Xiong, Junchen and Lin, Tingyi and Kikuchi, Shunsuke and Matsuzaki, Hiroki and Kouno, Atsushi and Manesco, Jo{\~a}o Renato Ribeiro and Papa, Jo{\~a}o Paulo and Choi, Tae-Min and Jeong, Tae Kyeong and Park, Juyoun and Alabi, Oluwatosin and Wei, Meng and Vercauteren, Tom and Wu, Runzhi and Xu, Mengya and an Wang, and Bai, Long and Ren, Hongliang and Yamlahi, Amine and Hennighausen, Jakob and Maier-Hein, Lena and Kondo, Satoshi and Kasai, Satoshi and Hirasawa, Kousuke and Yang, Shu and Wang, Yihui and Chen, Hao and Rodr{\´i}guez, Santiago and Aparicio, Nicol{\´a}s and Manrique, Leonardo and Lyons, Juan Camilo and Hosie, Olivia and Ayobi, Nicol{\´a}s and Arbel{\´a}ez, Pablo and Li, Yiping and Khalil, Yasmina Al and Nasirihaghighi, Sahar and Speidel, Stefanie and R{\"u}ckert, Daniel and Feussner, Hubertus and Wilhelm, Dirk and Palm, Christoph}, title = {Comparative validation of surgical phase recognition, instrument keypoint estimation, and instrument instance segmentation in endoscopy: Results of the PhaKIR 2024 challenge}, pages = {36}, abstract = {Reliable recognition and localization of surgical instruments in endoscopic video recordings are foundational for a wide range of applications in computer- and robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (RAMIS), including surgical training, skill assessment, and autonomous assistance. However, robust performance under real-world conditions remains a significant challenge. Incorporating surgical context - such as the current procedural phase - has emerged as a promising strategy to improve robustness and interpretability. To address these challenges, we organized the Surgical Procedure Phase, Keypoint, and Instrument Recognition (PhaKIR) sub-challenge as part of the Endoscopic Vision (EndoVis) challenge at MICCAI 2024. We introduced a novel, multi-center dataset comprising thirteen full-length laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos collected from three distinct medical institutions, with unified annotations for three interrelated tasks: surgical phase recognition, instrument keypoint estimation, and instrument instance segmentation. Unlike existing datasets, ours enables joint investigation of instrument localization and procedural context within the same data while supporting the integration of temporal information across entire procedures. We report results and findings in accordance with the BIAS guidelines for biomedical image analysis challenges. The PhaKIR sub-challenge advances the field by providing a unique benchmark for developing temporally aware, context-driven methods in RAMIS and offers a high-quality resource to support future research in surgical scene understanding.}, language = {en} } @misc{RueckertRauberKlausmannetal., author = {Rueckert, Tobias and Rauber, David and Klausmann, Leonard and Gutbrod, Max and Rueckert, Daniel and Feussner, Hubertus and Wilhelm, Dirk and Palm, Christoph}, title = {PhaKIR Dataset - Surgical Procedure Phase, Keypoint, and Instrument Recognition [Data set]}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.15740620}, abstract = {Note: A script for extracting the individual frames from the video files while preserving the challenge-compliant directory structure and frame-to-mask naming conventions is available on GitHub and can be accessed here: https://github.com/remic-othr/PhaKIR_Dataset. The dataset is described in the following publications: Rueckert, Tobias et al.: Comparative validation of surgical phase recognition, instrument keypoint estimation, and instrument instance segmentation in endoscopy: Results of the PhaKIR 2024 challenge. arXiv preprint, https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.16559. 2025. Rueckert, Tobias et al.: Video Dataset for Surgical Phase, Keypoint, and Instrument Recognition in Laparoscopic Surgery (PhaKIR). arXiv preprint, https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.06549. 2025. The proposed dataset was used as the training dataset in the PhaKIR challenge (https://phakir.re-mic.de/) as part of EndoVis-2024 at MICCAI 2024 and consists of eight real-world videos of human cholecystectomies ranging from 23 to 60 minutes in duration. The procedures were performed by experienced physicians, and the videos were recorded in three hospitals. In addition to existing datasets, our annotations provide pixel-wise instance segmentation masks of surgical instruments for a total of 19 categories, coordinates of relevant instrument keypoints (instrument tip(s), shaft-tip transition, shaft), both at an interval of one frame per second, and specifications regarding the intervention phases for a total of eight different phase categories for each individual frame in one dataset and thus comprehensively cover instrument localization and the context of the operation. Furthermore, the provision of the complete video sequences offers the opportunity to include the temporal information regarding the respective tasks and thus further optimize the resulting methods and outcomes.}, language = {en} } @misc{GutbrodRauberWeberNunesetal., author = {Gutbrod, Max and Rauber, David and Weber Nunes, Danilo and Palm, Christoph}, title = {A cleaned subset of the first five CATARACTS test videos [Data set]}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.14924735}, abstract = {This dataset is a subset of the original CATARACTS test dataset and is used by the OpenMIBOOD framework to evaluate a specific out-of-distribution setting. When using this dataset, it is mandatory to cite the corresponding publication (OpenMIBOOD (10.1109/CVPR52734.2025.02410)) and follow the acknowledgement and citation requirements of the original dataset (CATARACTS). The original CATARACTS dataset (associated publication,Homepage) consists of 50 videos of cataract surgeries, split into 25 train and 25 test videos. This subset contains the frames of the first 5 test videos. Further, black frames at the beginning of each video were removed.}, language = {en} } @misc{GutbrodRauberWeberNunesetal., author = {Gutbrod, Max and Rauber, David and Weber Nunes, Danilo and Palm, Christoph}, title = {Cropped single instrument frames subset from Cholec80 [Data set]}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.14921670}, abstract = {This dataset is a subset of the original Cholec80 dataset and is used by the OpenMIBOOD framework to evaluate a specific out-of-distribution setting. When using this dataset, it is mandatory to cite the corresponding publication (OpenMIBOOD) and to follow the acknowledgement and citation requirements of the original dataset (Cholec80). The original Cholec80 dataset (associated paper,Homepage) consists of 80 cholecystectomy surgery videos recorded at 25 fps, performed by 13 surgeons. It includes phase annotations (25 fps) and tool presence labels (1 fps), with phase definitions provided by a senior surgeon. A tool is considered present if at least half of its tip is visible. The dataset categorizes tools into seven types: Grasper, Bipolar, Hook, Scissors, Clipper, Irrigator, and Specimen bag. Multiple tools may be present in each frame. Additionally, 76 of the 80 videos exhibit a strong black vignette. For this dataset subset, frames were extracted based on tool presence labels, selecting only those containing Grasper, Bipolar, Hook, or Clipper while ensuring that only a single tool appears per frame. To enhance visual consistency, the black vignette was removed by extracting an inner rectangular region, where applicable.}, language = {en} } @misc{GutbrodRauberWeberNunesetal., author = {Gutbrod, Max and Rauber, David and Weber Nunes, Danilo and Palm, Christoph}, title = {OpenMIBOOD's classification models for the MIDOG, PhaKIR, and OASIS-3 benchmarks [Data set]}, doi = {10.5281/zenodo.14982267}, abstract = {These models are provided for evaluating post-hoc out-of-distribution methods on the three OpenMIBOOD benchmarks: MIDOG, PhaKIR, and OASIS-3. When using these models, make sure to give appropriate credit and cite the OpenMIBOOD publication.}, language = {en} }