@inproceedings{SzaloZehnerPalm, author = {Szalo, Alexander Eduard and Zehner, Alexander and Palm, Christoph}, title = {GraphMIC: Medizinische Bildverarbeitung in der Lehre}, series = {Bildverarbeitung f{\"u}r die Medizin 2015; Algorithmen - Systeme - Anwendungen; Proceedings des Workshops vom 15. bis 17. M{\"a}rz 2015 in L{\"u}beck}, booktitle = {Bildverarbeitung f{\"u}r die Medizin 2015; Algorithmen - Systeme - Anwendungen; Proceedings des Workshops vom 15. bis 17. M{\"a}rz 2015 in L{\"u}beck}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Berlin}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-662-46224-9_68}, pages = {395 -- 400}, abstract = {Die Lehre der medizinischen Bildverarbeitung vermittelt Kenntnisse mit einem breiten Methodenspektrum. Neben den Grundlagen der Verfahren soll ein Gef{\"u}hl f{\"u}r eine geeignete Ausf{\"u}hrungsreihenfolge und ihrer Wirkung auf medizinische Bilddaten entwickelt werden. Die Komplexit{\"a}t der Methoden erfordert vertiefte Programmierkenntnisse, sodass bereits einfache Operationen mit großem Programmieraufwand verbunden sind. Die Software GraphMIC stellt Bildverarbeitungsoperationen in Form interaktiver Knoten zur Verf{\"u}gung und erlaubt das Arrangieren, Parametrisieren und Ausf{\"u}hren komplexer Verarbeitungssequenzen in einem Graphen. Durch den Fokus auf das Design einer Pipeline, weg von sprach- und frameworkspezifischen Implementierungsdetails, lassen sich grundlegende Prinzipien der Bildverarbeitung anschaulich erlernen. In diesem Beitrag stellen wir die visuelle Programmierung mit GraphMIC der nativen Implementierung {\"a}quivalenter Funktionen gegen{\"u}ber. Die in C++ entwickelte Applikation basiert auf Qt, ITK, OpenCV, VTK und MITK.}, subject = {Bildverarbeitung}, language = {de} } @incollection{Palm, author = {Palm, Christoph}, title = {History, Core Concepts, and Role of AI in Clinical Medicine}, series = {AI in Clinical Medicine: A Practical Guide for Healthcare Professionals}, booktitle = {AI in Clinical Medicine: A Practical Guide for Healthcare Professionals}, editor = {Byrne, Michael F. and Parsa, Nasim and Greenhill, Alexandra T. and Chahal, Daljeet and Ahmad, Omer and Bargci, Ulas}, edition = {1. Aufl.}, publisher = {Wiley}, isbn = {978-1-119-79064-8}, doi = {10.1002/9781119790686.ch5}, pages = {49 -- 55}, abstract = {The field of AI is characterized by robust promises, astonishing successes, and remarkable breakthroughs. AI will play a major role in all domains of clinical medicine, but the role of AI in relation to the physician is not yet completely determined. The term artificial intelligence or AI is broad, and several different terms are used in this context that must be organized and demystified. This chapter will review the key concepts and methods of AI, and will introduce some of the different roles for AI in relation to the physician.}, language = {en} } @article{RoemmeleMendelBarrettetal., author = {R{\"o}mmele, Christoph and Mendel, Robert and Barrett, Caroline and Kiesl, Hans and Rauber, David and R{\"u}ckert, Tobias and Kraus, Lisa and Heinkele, Jakob and Dhillon, Christine and Grosser, Bianca and Prinz, Friederike and Wanzl, Julia and Fleischmann, Carola and Nagl, Sandra and Schnoy, Elisabeth and Schlottmann, Jakob and Dellon, Evan S. and Messmann, Helmut and Palm, Christoph and Ebigbo, Alanna}, title = {An artificial intelligence algorithm is highly accurate for detecting endoscopic features of eosinophilic esophagitis}, series = {Scientific Reports}, volume = {12}, journal = {Scientific Reports}, publisher = {Nature Portfolio}, address = {London}, doi = {10.1038/s41598-022-14605-z}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-46928}, pages = {10}, abstract = {The endoscopic features associated with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) may be missed during routine endoscopy. We aimed to develop and evaluate an Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithm for detecting and quantifying the endoscopic features of EoE in white light images, supplemented by the EoE Endoscopic Reference Score (EREFS). An AI algorithm (AI-EoE) was constructed and trained to differentiate between EoE and normal esophagus using endoscopic white light images extracted from the database of the University Hospital Augsburg. In addition to binary classification, a second algorithm was trained with specific auxiliary branches for each EREFS feature (AI-EoE-EREFS). The AI algorithms were evaluated on an external data set from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (UNC), and compared with the performance of human endoscopists with varying levels of experience. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of AI-EoE were 0.93 for all measures, while the AUC was 0.986. With additional auxiliary branches for the EREFS categories, the AI algorithm (AI-EoEEREFS) performance improved to 0.96, 0.94, 0.95, and 0.992 for sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC, respectively. AI-EoE and AI-EoE-EREFS performed significantly better than endoscopy beginners and senior fellows on the same set of images. An AI algorithm can be trained to detect and quantify endoscopic features of EoE with excellent performance scores. The addition of the EREFS criteria improved the performance of the AI algorithm, which performed significantly better than endoscopists with a lower or medium experience level.}, language = {en} }