@unpublished{FoerstlAdlerSuessetal., author = {F{\"o}rstl, Nikolas and Adler, Ina and S{\"u}ß, Franz and Dendorfer, Sebastian}, title = {Technologies for Evaluation of Pelvic Floor Functionality: A Systematic Review}, publisher = {Center for Open Science}, doi = {10.31219/osf.io/dcqyg}, abstract = {Pelvic floor dysfunction is a common problem in women and has a negative impact ontheir quality of life. The aim of this review was to provide a general overview of the current state oftechnology used to assess pelvic floor functionality. It also provides literature research of the phys-iological and anatomical factors that correlate with pelvic floor health. The systematic review wasconducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library andIEEE databases were searched for publications on sensor technology for the assessment of pelvicfloor functionality. Anatomical and physiological parameters were identified through a manualsearch. In the systematic review 115 publications were included. 12 different sensor technologieswere identified. Information on the obtained parameters, sensor position, test activities and subjectcharacteristics were prepared in tabular form from each publication. 16 anatomical and physiologi- cal parameters influencing pelvic floor health were identified in 17 published studies and rankedfor their statistical significance. Taken together, this review could serve as a basis for the develop-ment of novel sensors which could allow for quantifiable prevention and diagnosis, as well as par-ticularized documentation of rehabilitation processes related to pelvic floor dysfunctions.}, language = {en} } @article{AuerSuessDendorfer, author = {Auer, Simon and S{\"u}ß, Franz and Dendorfer, Sebastian}, title = {Using markerless motion capture and musculoskeletal models: An evaluation of joint kinematics}, series = {Technology and Health Care}, journal = {Technology and Health Care}, publisher = {IOS Press}, issn = {0928-7329}, doi = {10.3233/THC-240202}, pages = {1 -- 10}, abstract = {BACKGROUND: This study presents a comprehensive comparison between a marker-based motion capture system (MMC) and a video-based motion capture system (VMC) in the context of kinematic analysis using musculoskeletal models. OBJECTIVE: Focusing on joint angles, the study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of VMC as a viable alternative for biomechanical research. METHODS: Eighteen healthy subjects performed isolated movements with 17 joint degrees of freedom, and their kinematic data were collected using both an MMC and a VMC setup. The kinematic data were entered into the AnyBody Modelling System, which enables the calculation of joint angles. The mean absolute error (MAE) was calculated to quantify the deviations between the two systems. RESULTS: The results showed good agreement between VMC and MMC at several joint angles. In particular, the shoulder, hip and knee joints showed small deviations in kinematics with MAE values of 4.8∘, 6.8∘ and 3.5∘, respectively. However, the study revealed problems in tracking hand and elbow movements, resulting in higher MAE values of 13.7∘ and 27.7∘. Deviations were also higher for head and thoracic movements. CONCLUSION: Overall, VMC showed promising results for lower body and shoulder kinematics. However, the tracking of the wrist and pelvis still needs to be refined. The research results provide a basis for further investigations that promote the fusion of VMC and musculoskeletal models.}, language = {en} } @article{FoerstlAdlerSuessetal., author = {F{\"o}rstl, Nikolas and Adler, Ina and S{\"u}ß, Franz and Dendorfer, Sebastian}, title = {Technologies for Evaluation of Pelvic Floor Functionality: A Systematic Review}, series = {Sensors}, volume = {24}, journal = {Sensors}, number = {12}, publisher = {MDPI}, doi = {10.3390/s24124001}, abstract = {Pelvic floor dysfunction is a common problem in women and has a negative impact on their quality of life. The aim of this review was to provide a general overview of the current state of technology used to assess pelvic floor functionality. It also provides literature research of the physiological and anatomical factors that correlate with pelvic floor health. This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and IEEE databases were searched for publications on sensor technology for the assessment of pelvic floor functionality. Anatomical and physiological parameters were identified through a manual search. In the systematic review, 114 publications were included. Twelve different sensor technologies were identified. Information on the obtained parameters, sensor position, test activities, and subject characteristics was prepared in tabular form from each publication. A total of 16 anatomical and physiological parameters influencing pelvic floor health were identified in 17 published studies and ranked for their statistical significance. Taken together, this review could serve as a basis for the development of novel sensors which could allow for quantifiable prevention and diagnosis, as well as particularized documentation of rehabilitation processes related to pelvic floor dysfunctions.}, language = {en} } @misc{Dendorfer, author = {Dendorfer, Sebastian}, title = {Diagnostische Genauigkeit und klinische Anwendungen tragbarer Bewegungssensoren f{\"u}r die Kniegelenksrehabilitation}, address = {N{\"u}rnberg}, language = {de} } @article{MuehlingSandriesserDendorferetal., author = {M{\"u}hling, Mischa and Sandriesser, Sabrina and Dendorfer, Sebastian and Augat, Peter}, title = {Assessment of implant internal stresses under physiological femoral loading: Translation to a simplified bending load model}, series = {Journal of Biomechanics}, journal = {Journal of Biomechanics}, number = {112229}, publisher = {Elsevier}, issn = {1873-2380}, doi = {10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112229}, pages = {17}, abstract = {The success of surgical treatment for fractures hinges on various factors, notably accurate surgical indication. The process of developing and certifying a new osteosynthesis device is a lengthy and costly process that requires multiple cycles of review and validation. Current methods, however, often rely on predecessor standards rather than physiological loads in specific anatomical locations. This study aimed to determine actual loads experienced by an osteosynthesis plate, exemplified by a standard locking plate for the femoral shaft, utilizing finite elements analysis (FEA) and to obtain the bending moments for implant development standard tests. A protocol was developed, involving the creation and validation of a fractured femur model fixed with a locking plate, mechanical testing, and FEA. The model's validation demonstrated exceptional accuracy in predicting deformations, and the FEA revealed peak stresses in the fracture bridging zone. Results of a parametric analysis indicate that larger fracture gaps significantly impact implant mechanical behavior, potentially compromising stability. This study underscores the critical need for realistic physiological conditions in implant evaluations, providing an innovative translational approach to identify internal loads and optimize implant designs. In conclusion, this research contributes to enhancing the understanding of implant performance under physiological conditions, promoting improved designs and evaluations in fracture treatments.}, language = {en} }