@article{YaghmaeivandePoelChristenetal., author = {Yaghmaei, Emad and van de Poel, Ibo and Christen, Markus and Gordijn, Bert and Kleine, Nadine and Loi, Michele and Morgan, Gwenyth and Weber, Karsten}, title = {Canvas White Paper 1 Cybersecurity and Ethics}, series = {SSRN Electronic Journal}, volume = {18}, journal = {SSRN Electronic Journal}, number = {4}, publisher = {SSRN}, doi = {10.2139/ssrn.3091909}, pages = {1431}, abstract = {This White Paper outlines how the ethical discourse on cybersecurity has developed in the scientific literature, which ethical issues gained interest, which value conflicts are discussed, and where the "blind spots" in the current ethical discourse on cybersecurity are located. The White Paper is based on an extensive literature with a focus on three reference domains with unique types of value conflicts: health, business/finance and national security. For each domain, a systematic literature search has been performed and the identified papers have been analysed using qualitative and quantitative methods. An important observation is that the ethics of cybersecurity not an established subject. In all domains, cybersecurity is recognized as being an instrumental value, not an end in itself, which opens up the possibility of trade-offs with different values in different spheres. The most prominent common theme is the existence of trade-offs and even conflicts between reasonable goals, for example between usability and security, accessibility and security, privacy and convenience. Other prominent common themes are the importance of cybersecurity to sustain trust (in institutions), and the harmful effect of any loss of control over data.}, language = {en} } @article{ChristenGordijnWeberetal., author = {Christen, Markus and Gordijn, Bert and Weber, Karsten and van de Poel, Ibo and Yaghmaei, Emad}, title = {A Review of Value-Conflicts in Cybersecurity}, series = {Orbit Journal - An Online Journal for Responsible Research and Innovation in ICT}, volume = {1}, journal = {Orbit Journal - An Online Journal for Responsible Research and Innovation in ICT}, number = {1}, doi = {10.29297/orbit.v1i1.28}, pages = {1 -- 19}, abstract = {Cybersecurity is of capital importance in a world where economic and social processes increasingly rely on digital technology. Although the primary ethical motivation of cybersecurity is prevention of informational or physical harm, its enforcement can also entail conflicts with other moral values. This contribution provides an outline of value conflicts in cybersecurity based on a quantitative literature analysis and qualitative case studies. The aim is to demonstrate that the security-privacy-dichotomy—that still seems to dominate the ethics discourse based on our bibliometric analysis—is insufficient when discussing the ethical challenges of cybersecurity. Furthermore, we want to sketch how the notion of contextual integrity could help to better understand and mitigate such value conflicts.}, language = {en} } @incollection{ChristenGordijnWeberetal., author = {Christen, Markus and Gordijn, Bert and Weber, Karsten and van de Poel, Ibo and Yaghmaei, Emad}, title = {A review of value-conflicts in cybersecurity}, series = {Bezpieczeństwo informacyjne w wymiarze systemowym}, booktitle = {Bezpieczeństwo informacyjne w wymiarze systemowym}, editor = {Oleksiewicz, Izabela}, publisher = {Rambler Press}, address = {Warszawa}, pages = {67 -- 92}, abstract = {The growing complexity of the digital ecosystem in combination with increasing global risks has created the following dilemma. Overemphasizing cybersecurity may violate fundamental values like equality, fairness, freedom, or privacy but neglecting cybersecurity could undermine citizens' trust and confidence in the digital infrastructure as well as in policy makers and state authorities. In order to increase our understanding of this dilemma, this contribution aims to provide an overview on value conflicts in cybersecurity based on a systematic review on the ethical, legal and technological literature on cybersecurity. It shall be emphasized that a focus on the opposition of cybersecurity vs. privacy is insufficient for understanding the ethical complexity of cybersecurity.}, subject = {Computersicherheit}, language = {en} }