@misc{ScharfenbergMottokArtmannetal., author = {Scharfenberg, Georg and Mottok, J{\"u}rgen and Artmann, Christina and Hobelsberger, Martin and Paric, Ivan and Großmann, Benjamin and Pohlt, Clemens and Wackerbarth, Alena and Pausch, Uli and Heidrich, Christiane and Fadanelli, Martin and Elsner, Michael and P{\"o}cher, Daniel and Pittroff, Lenz and Beer, Stefan and Br{\"u}ckl, Oliver and Haslbeck, Matthias and Sterner, Michael and Thema, Martin and Muggenthaler, Nicole and Lenck, Thorsten and G{\"o}tz, Philipp and Eckert, Fabian and Deubzer, Michael and Stingl, Armin and Simsek, Erol and Kr{\"a}mer, Stefan and Großmann, Benjamin and Schlegl, Thomas and Niedersteiner, Sascha and Berlehner, Thomas and Joblin, Mitchell and Mauerer, Wolfgang and Apel, Sven and Siegmund, Janet and Riehle, Dirk and Weber, Joachim and Palm, Christoph and Zobel, Martin and Al-Falouji, Ghassan and Prestel, Dietmar and Scharfenberg, Georg and Mandl, Roland and Deinzer, Arnulf and Halang, W. and Margraf-Stiksrud, Jutta and Sick, Bernhard and Deinzer, Renate and Scherzinger, Stefanie and Klettke, Meike and St{\"o}rl, Uta and Wiech, Katharina and Kubata, Christoph and Sindersberger, Dirk and Monkman, Gareth J. and Dollinger, Markus and Dembianny, Sven and K{\"o}lbl, Andreas and Welker, Franz and Meier, Matthias and Thumann, Philipp and Swidergal, Krzysztof and Wagner, Marcus and Haug, Sonja and Vernim, Matthias and Seidenst{\"u}cker, Barbara and Weber, Karsten and Arsan, Christian and Schone, Reinhold and M{\"u}nder, Johannes and Schroll-Decker, Irmgard and Dillinger, Andrea Elisabeth and Fuchshofer, Rudolf and Monkman, Gareth J. and Shamonin (Chamonine), Mikhail and Geith, Markus A. and Koch, Fabian and {\"U}hlin, Christian and Schratzenstaller, Thomas and Saßmannshausen, Sean Patrick and Auchter, Eberhard and Kriz, Willy and Springer, Othmar and Thumann, Maria and Kusterle, Wolfgang and Obermeier, Andreas and Udalzow, Anton and Schmailzl, Anton and Hierl, Stefan and Langer, Christoph and Schreiner, Rupert}, title = {Forschungsbericht 2015}, editor = {Baier, Wolfgang}, address = {Regensburg}, organization = {Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg}, isbn = {978-3-00-048589-3}, doi = {10.35096/othr/pub-1386}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-13867}, language = {de} } @article{RenkawitzWeberSpringorumetal., author = {Renkawitz, Tobias and Weber, Markus and Springorum, H.-R. and Sendtner, E. and Woerner, Michael and Ulm, K. and Weber, Tim and Grifka, Joachim}, title = {Impingement-free range of motion, cup coverage and early clinical results between femur first navigation and conventional total hip arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial}, series = {Journal of Bone \& Joint Surgery}, volume = {97-B}, journal = {Journal of Bone \& Joint Surgery}, doi = {10.1302/0301-620X.97B7.34729}, pages = {890 -- 898}, abstract = {We report the kinematic and early clinical results of a patient- and observer-blinded randomised controlled trial in which CT scans were used to compare potential impingement-free range of movement (ROM) and acetabular component cover between patients treated with either the navigated 'femur-first' total hip arthroplasty (THA) method (n = 66; male/female 29/37, mean age 62.5 years; 50 to 74) or conventional THA (n = 69; male/female 35/34, mean age 62.9 years; 50 to 75). The Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the Harris hip score, the Euro-Qol-5D and the Mancuso THA patient expectations score were assessed at six weeks, six months and one year after surgery. A total of 48 of the patients (84\%) in the navigated 'femur-first' group and 43 (65\%) in the conventional group reached all the desirable potential ROM boundaries without prosthetic impingement for activities of daily living (ADL) in flexion, extension, abduction, adduction and rotation (p = 0.016). Acetabular component cover and surface contact with the host bone were > 87\% in both groups. There was a significant difference between the navigated and the conventional groups' Harris hip scores six weeks after surgery (p = 0.010). There were no significant differences with respect to any clinical outcome at six months and one year of follow-up. The navigated 'femur-first' technique improves the potential ROM for ADL without prosthetic impingement, although there was no observed clinical difference between the two treatment groups.}, subject = {H{\"u}ftgelenkprothese}, language = {en} } @article{WeberWeberWoerneretal., author = {Weber, Markus and Weber, Tim A. and Woerner, Michael and Craiovan, Benjamin and Worlicek, Michael and Winkler, Sebastian and Grifka, Joachim and Renkawitz, Tobias}, title = {The impact of standard combined anteversion definitions on gait and clinical outcome within one year after total hip arthroplasty}, series = {International Orthopaedics}, volume = {39}, journal = {International Orthopaedics}, number = {12}, doi = {10.1007/s00264-015-2777-8}, pages = {2323 -- 2333}, abstract = {Different target areas within the concept of combined cup and stem anteversion have been published for total hip arthroplasty (THA). We asked whether component positioning according to eight standard combined anteversion rules is associated with (1) more physiological gait patterns, (2) higher improvement of gait variables and (3) better clinical outcome after THA.In a prospective clinical study, 60 patients received cementless THA through an anterolateral MIS approach in a lateral decubitus position. Six weeks postoperatively, implant position was analysed using 3D-CT by an independent external institute. Preoperatively, six and 12 months postoperatively range of motion, normalized walking speed and hip flexion symmetry index were measured using 3D motion-capture gait analysis. Patient-related outcome measures (HHS, HOOS, EQ-5D) were obtained by an observer blinded to 3D-CT results. Eight combined anteversion definitions and Lewinnek's "safe zone" were evaluated regarding their impact on gait patterns and clinical outcome.Combined cup and stem anteversion according to standard combined anteversion definitions as well as cup placement within Lewinnek's "safe zone" did not influence range of motion, normalized walking speed and/or hip flexion symmetry index six and 12 months after THA. Similarly, increase of gait parameters within the first year after THA was comparable between all eight combined anteversion rules. Clinical outcome measures like HHS, HOOS and EQ-5D did not show any benefit for either of the combined anteversion definitions.Standard combined cup and stem anteversion rules do not improve postoperative outcome as measured by gait analysis and clinical scores within one year after THA.}, subject = {H{\"u}ftgelenkprothese}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{WeberDendorferGrifkaetal., author = {Weber, Tim and Dendorfer, Sebastian and Grifka, Joachim and Weber, Markus and W{\"o}rner, Michael and Dullien, Silvia and Verkerke, Gijsbertus Jacob and Renkawitz, Tobias}, title = {Verbessert die computerassistierte Femur First Operationstechnik f{\"u}r die H{\"u}ftendoprothetik den muskuloskelettalen Lastfall auf das H{\"u}ftgelenk?}, series = {DKOU 2015, Deutscher Kongress f{\"u}r Orthop{\"a}die und Unfallchirurgie 2015}, booktitle = {DKOU 2015, Deutscher Kongress f{\"u}r Orthop{\"a}die und Unfallchirurgie 2015}, language = {de} }