@misc{ScharfenbergMottokArtmannetal., author = {Scharfenberg, Georg and Mottok, J{\"u}rgen and Artmann, Christina and Hobelsberger, Martin and Paric, Ivan and Großmann, Benjamin and Pohlt, Clemens and Wackerbarth, Alena and Pausch, Uli and Heidrich, Christiane and Fadanelli, Martin and Elsner, Michael and P{\"o}cher, Daniel and Pittroff, Lenz and Beer, Stefan and Br{\"u}ckl, Oliver and Haslbeck, Matthias and Sterner, Michael and Thema, Martin and Muggenthaler, Nicole and Lenck, Thorsten and G{\"o}tz, Philipp and Eckert, Fabian and Deubzer, Michael and Stingl, Armin and Simsek, Erol and Kr{\"a}mer, Stefan and Großmann, Benjamin and Schlegl, Thomas and Niedersteiner, Sascha and Berlehner, Thomas and Joblin, Mitchell and Mauerer, Wolfgang and Apel, Sven and Siegmund, Janet and Riehle, Dirk and Weber, Joachim and Palm, Christoph and Zobel, Martin and Al-Falouji, Ghassan and Prestel, Dietmar and Scharfenberg, Georg and Mandl, Roland and Deinzer, Arnulf and Halang, W. and Margraf-Stiksrud, Jutta and Sick, Bernhard and Deinzer, Renate and Scherzinger, Stefanie and Klettke, Meike and St{\"o}rl, Uta and Wiech, Katharina and Kubata, Christoph and Sindersberger, Dirk and Monkman, Gareth J. and Dollinger, Markus and Dembianny, Sven and K{\"o}lbl, Andreas and Welker, Franz and Meier, Matthias and Thumann, Philipp and Swidergal, Krzysztof and Wagner, Marcus and Haug, Sonja and Vernim, Matthias and Seidenst{\"u}cker, Barbara and Weber, Karsten and Arsan, Christian and Schone, Reinhold and M{\"u}nder, Johannes and Schroll-Decker, Irmgard and Dillinger, Andrea Elisabeth and Fuchshofer, Rudolf and Monkman, Gareth J. and Shamonin (Chamonine), Mikhail and Geith, Markus A. and Koch, Fabian and {\"U}hlin, Christian and Schratzenstaller, Thomas and Saßmannshausen, Sean Patrick and Auchter, Eberhard and Kriz, Willy and Springer, Othmar and Thumann, Maria and Kusterle, Wolfgang and Obermeier, Andreas and Udalzow, Anton and Schmailzl, Anton and Hierl, Stefan and Langer, Christoph and Schreiner, Rupert}, title = {Forschungsbericht / Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg}, editor = {Baier, Wolfgang}, address = {Regensburg}, organization = {Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg}, isbn = {978-3-00-048589-3}, doi = {10.35096/othr/pub-1386}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-13867}, language = {de} } @misc{MauererRexhepajMonkmanetal., author = {Mauerer, Wolfgang and Rexhepaj, Tanja and Monkman, Gareth J. and Sindersberger, Dirk and Diermeier, Andreas and Neidhart, Thomas and Wolfrum, Dominik and Sterner, Michael and Heberl, Michael and Nusko, Robert and Maier, Georg and Nagl, Klaus and Reuter, Monika and Hofrichter, Andreas and Lex, Thomas and Lesch, Florian and Kieninger, B{\"a}rbel and Szalo, Alexander Eduard and Zehner, Alexander and Palm, Christoph and Joblin, Mitchell and Apel, Sven and Ramsauer, Ralf and Lohmann, Daniel and Westner, Markus and Strasser, Artur and Munndi, Maximilian and Ebner, Lena and Elsner, Michael and Weiß, Nils and Segerer, Matthias and Hackenberg, Rudolf and Steger, Sebastian and Schmailzl, Anton and Dostalek, Michael and Armbruster, Dominik and Koch, Fabian and Hierl, Stefan and Thumann, Philipp and Swidergal, Krzysztof and Wagner, Marcus and Briem, Ulrich and Diermeier, Andreas and Spreitzer, Stefan and Beiderbeck, Sabrina and Hook, Christian and Zobel, Martin and Weber, Tim and Groß, Simon and Penzkofer, Rainer and Dendorfer, Sebastian and Schillitz, Ingo and Bauer, Thomas and Rudolph, Clarissa and Schmidt, Katja and Liebetruth, Thomas and Hamer, Markus and Haug, Sonja and Vernim, Matthias and Weber, Karsten and Saßmannshausen, Sean Patrick and Books, Sebastian and Neuleitner, Nikolaus and Rechenauer, Christian and Steffens, Oliver and Kusterle, Wolfgang and G{\"o}mmel, Roland and Wellnitz, Felix and Stierstorfer, Johannes and Stadler, Dominik and Hofmann, Matthias J. and Motschmann, Hubert and Shamonin (Chamonine), Mikhail and Bleicher, Veronika and Fischer, Sebastian and Hackenberg, Rudolf and Horn, Anton and Kawasch, Raphael and Petzenhauser, Michael and Probst, Tobias and Udalzow, Anton and Dams, Florian and Schreiner, Rupert and Langer, Christoph and Prommesberger, Christian and Ławrowski, Robert Damian}, title = {Forschungsbericht 2016}, editor = {Baier, Wolfgang}, address = {Regensburg}, organization = {Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg}, doi = {10.35096/othr/pub-1384}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-13840}, language = {de} } @misc{BroserFalterŁawrowskietal., author = {Broser, Christian and Falter, Thomas and Ławrowski, Robert Damian and Altenbuchner, Amelie and V{\"o}gele, Daniel and Koss, Claus and Schlampp, Matthias and Dunnweber, Jan and Steffens, Oliver and Heckner, Markus and Jaritz, Sabine and Schiegl, Thomas and Corsten, Sabine and Lauer, Norina and Guertler, Katherine and Koenig, Eric and Haug, Sonja and Huber, Dominik and Birkenmaier, Clemens and Krenkel, Lars and Wagner, Thomas and Justus, Xenia and Saßmannshausen, Sean Patrick and Kleine, Nadine and Weber, Karsten and Braun, Carina N. and Giacoppo, Giuliano and Heinrich, Michael and Just, Tobias and Schreck, Thomas and Schnabl, Andreas and Gilmore, Amador T{\´e}ran and Roeslin, Samuel and Schmid, Sandra and Wellnitz, Felix and Malz, Sebastian and Maurial, Andreas and Hauser, Florian and Mottok, J{\"u}rgen and Klettke, Meike and Scherzinger, Stefanie and St{\"o}rl, Uta and Heckner, Markus and Bazo, Alexander and Wolff, Christian and Kopper, Andreas and Westner, Markus and Pongratz, Christian and Ehrlich, Ingo and Briem, Ulrich and Hederer, Sebastian and Wagner, Marcus and Schillinger, Moritz and G{\"o}rlach, Julien and Hierl, Stefan and Siegl, Marco and Langer, Christoph and Hausladen, Matthias and Schreiner, Rupert and Haslbeck, Matthias and Kreuzer, Reinhard and Br{\"u}ckl, Oliver and Dawoud, Belal and Rabl, Hans-Peter and Gamisch, Bernd and Schmidt, Ottfried and Heberl, Michael and G{\"a}nsbauer, Bianca and Bick, Werner and Ellermeier, Andreas and Monkman, Gareth J. and Prem, Nina and Sindersberger, Dirk and Tschurtschenthaler, Karl and Aurbach, Maximilian and Dendorfer, Sebastian and Betz, Michael A. and Szecsey, Tamara and Mauerer, Wolfgang and Murr, Florian}, title = {Forschung 2018}, editor = {Baier, Wolfgang}, address = {Regensburg}, organization = {Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg}, isbn = {978-3-9818209-5-9}, doi = {10.35096/othr/pub-1382}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-13826}, pages = {98}, subject = {Forschung}, language = {de} } @article{RenkawitzWeberDullienetal., author = {Renkawitz, Tobias and Weber, Tim A. and Dullien, Silvia and Woerner, Michael and Dendorfer, Sebastian and Grifka, Joachim and Weber, Markus}, title = {Leg length and offset differences above 5 mm after total hip arthroplasty are associated with altered gait kinematics}, series = {Gait \& Posture}, volume = {vol. 49}, journal = {Gait \& Posture}, doi = {10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.07.011}, pages = {196 -- 201}, abstract = {We aimed to investigate the relationship between postoperative leg length/offset (LL/OS) reconstruction and gait performance after total hip arthroplasty (THA). In the course of a prospective randomized controlled trial, 60 patients with unilateral hip arthrosis received cementless THA through a minimally-invasive anterolateral surgical approach. One year post-operatively, LL and global OS restoration were analyzed and compared to the contralateral hip on AP pelvic radiographs. The combined postoperative limb length/OS reconstruction of the operated hip was categorized as restored (within 5 mm) or non-restored (more than 5 mm reduction or more than 5 mm increment). The acetabular component inclination, anteversion and femoral component anteversion were evaluated using CT scans of the pelvis and the femur. 3D gait analysis of the lower extremity and patient related outcome measures (HHS, HOOS, EQ-5D) were obtained pre-operatively, six months and twelve months post-operatively by an observer blinded to radiographic results. Component position of cup and stem was comparable between the restored and non-restored group. Combined LL and OS restoration within 5 mm resulted in higher Froude number (p < 0.001), normalized walking speed (p < 0.001) and hip range-of-motion (ROM) (p = 0.004) during gait twelve months postoperatively, whereas gait symmetry was comparable regardless of LL and OS reconstruction at both examinations. Clinical scores did not show any relevant association between the accuracy of LL or OS reconstruction and gait six/twelve months after THA. In summary, postoperative LL/OS discrepancies larger than 5 mm relate to unphysiological gait kinematics within the first year after THA. DRKS00000739, German Clinical Trials Register.}, language = {en} } @article{RenkawitzWeberSpringorumetal., author = {Renkawitz, Tobias and Weber, Markus and Springorum, H.-R. and Sendtner, E. and Woerner, Michael and Ulm, K. and Weber, Tim and Grifka, Joachim}, title = {Impingement-free range of motion, cup coverage and early clinical results between femur first navigation and conventional total hip arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial}, series = {Journal of Bone \& Joint Surgery}, volume = {97-B}, journal = {Journal of Bone \& Joint Surgery}, doi = {10.1302/0301-620X.97B7.34729}, pages = {890 -- 898}, abstract = {We report the kinematic and early clinical results of a patient- and observer-blinded randomised controlled trial in which CT scans were used to compare potential impingement-free range of movement (ROM) and acetabular component cover between patients treated with either the navigated 'femur-first' total hip arthroplasty (THA) method (n = 66; male/female 29/37, mean age 62.5 years; 50 to 74) or conventional THA (n = 69; male/female 35/34, mean age 62.9 years; 50 to 75). The Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the Harris hip score, the Euro-Qol-5D and the Mancuso THA patient expectations score were assessed at six weeks, six months and one year after surgery. A total of 48 of the patients (84\%) in the navigated 'femur-first' group and 43 (65\%) in the conventional group reached all the desirable potential ROM boundaries without prosthetic impingement for activities of daily living (ADL) in flexion, extension, abduction, adduction and rotation (p = 0.016). Acetabular component cover and surface contact with the host bone were > 87\% in both groups. There was a significant difference between the navigated and the conventional groups' Harris hip scores six weeks after surgery (p = 0.010). There were no significant differences with respect to any clinical outcome at six months and one year of follow-up. The navigated 'femur-first' technique improves the potential ROM for ADL without prosthetic impingement, although there was no observed clinical difference between the two treatment groups.}, subject = {H{\"u}ftgelenkprothese}, language = {en} } @article{WeberWeberWoerneretal., author = {Weber, Markus and Weber, Tim A. and Woerner, Michael and Craiovan, Benjamin and Worlicek, Michael and Winkler, Sebastian and Grifka, Joachim and Renkawitz, Tobias}, title = {The impact of standard combined anteversion definitions on gait and clinical outcome within one year after total hip arthroplasty}, series = {International Orthopaedics}, volume = {39}, journal = {International Orthopaedics}, number = {12}, doi = {10.1007/s00264-015-2777-8}, pages = {2323 -- 2333}, abstract = {Different target areas within the concept of combined cup and stem anteversion have been published for total hip arthroplasty (THA). We asked whether component positioning according to eight standard combined anteversion rules is associated with (1) more physiological gait patterns, (2) higher improvement of gait variables and (3) better clinical outcome after THA.In a prospective clinical study, 60 patients received cementless THA through an anterolateral MIS approach in a lateral decubitus position. Six weeks postoperatively, implant position was analysed using 3D-CT by an independent external institute. Preoperatively, six and 12 months postoperatively range of motion, normalized walking speed and hip flexion symmetry index were measured using 3D motion-capture gait analysis. Patient-related outcome measures (HHS, HOOS, EQ-5D) were obtained by an observer blinded to 3D-CT results. Eight combined anteversion definitions and Lewinnek's "safe zone" were evaluated regarding their impact on gait patterns and clinical outcome.Combined cup and stem anteversion according to standard combined anteversion definitions as well as cup placement within Lewinnek's "safe zone" did not influence range of motion, normalized walking speed and/or hip flexion symmetry index six and 12 months after THA. Similarly, increase of gait parameters within the first year after THA was comparable between all eight combined anteversion rules. Clinical outcome measures like HHS, HOOS and EQ-5D did not show any benefit for either of the combined anteversion definitions.Standard combined cup and stem anteversion rules do not improve postoperative outcome as measured by gait analysis and clinical scores within one year after THA.}, subject = {H{\"u}ftgelenkprothese}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{WeberDendorferGrifkaetal., author = {Weber, Tim and Dendorfer, Sebastian and Grifka, Joachim and Weber, Markus and W{\"o}rner, Michael and Dullien, Silvia and Verkerke, Gijsbertus Jacob and Renkawitz, Tobias}, title = {Verbessert die computerassistierte Femur First Operationstechnik f{\"u}r die H{\"u}ftendoprothetik den muskuloskelettalen Lastfall auf das H{\"u}ftgelenk?}, series = {DKOU 2015, Deutscher Kongress f{\"u}r Orthop{\"a}die und Unfallchirurgie 2015}, booktitle = {DKOU 2015, Deutscher Kongress f{\"u}r Orthop{\"a}die und Unfallchirurgie 2015}, language = {de} } @article{VoellnerWeberWeberetal., author = {V{\"o}llner, Florian and Weber, Tim A. and Weber, Markus and Renkawitz, Tobias and Dendorfer, Sebastian and Grifka, Joachim and Craiovan, Benjamin}, title = {A simple method for determining ligament stiffness during total knee arthroplasty in vivo}, series = {Scientific Reports}, volume = {9}, journal = {Scientific Reports}, publisher = {Nature}, doi = {10.1038/s41598-019-41732-x}, pages = {1 -- 8}, abstract = {A key requirement in both native knee joints and total knee arthroplasty is a stable capsular ligament complex. However, knee stability is highly individual and ranges from clinically loose to tight. So far, hardly any in vivo data on the intrinsic mechanical of the knee are available. This study investigated if stiffness of the native ligament complex may be determined in vivo using a standard knee balancer. Measurements were obtained with a commercially available knee balancer, which was initially calibrated in vitro. 5 patients underwent reconstruction of the force-displacement curves of the ligament complex. Stiffness of the medial and lateral compartments were calculated to measure the stability of the capsular ligament complex. All force-displacement curves consisted of a non-linear section at the beginning and of a linear section from about 80 N onwards. The medial compartment showed values of 28.4 ± 1.2 N/mm for minimum stiffness and of 39.9 ± 1.1 N/mm for maximum stiffness; the respective values for the lateral compartment were 19.9 ± 0.9 N/mm and 46.6 ± 0.8 N/mm. A commercially available knee balancer may be calibrated for measuring stiffness of knee ligament complex in vivo, which may contribute to a better understanding of the intrinsic mechanical behaviour of knee joints.}, subject = {Biomechanische Analyse}, language = {en} } @misc{AuerReinkerSuessetal., author = {Auer, Simon and Reinker, Lukas and S{\"u}ß, Franz and Kubowitsch, Simone and Krutsch, Werner and Weber, Markus and Renkawitz, Tobias and Dendorfer, Sebastian}, title = {Webcast: Effect of mental demand on leg loading in highly dynamic motion}, abstract = {Football players have a high risk of leg muscle injuries, especially when exposed to mental stress. Injuries to muscles of the thigh are common in amateur and professional football, representing almost a third of all injuries. These injuries occur primarily in non-contact situations and from overuse. They can lead to a range of costs, including financial costs associated with treatment as well as those associated with long-term recovery, and absence from training and/or competition. Further, there is a high risk of injury recurrence and subsequent injury.}, language = {en} } @incollection{ChristenGordijnWeberetal., author = {Christen, Markus and Gordijn, Bert and Weber, Karsten and van de Poel, Ibo and Yaghmaei, Emad}, title = {A review of value-conflicts in cybersecurity}, series = {Bezpieczeństwo informacyjne w wymiarze systemowym}, booktitle = {Bezpieczeństwo informacyjne w wymiarze systemowym}, editor = {Oleksiewicz, I.}, publisher = {Rambler Press}, address = {Warszawa}, pages = {67 -- 92}, abstract = {The growing complexity of the digital ecosystem in combination with increasing global risks has created the following dilemma. Overemphasizing cybersecurity may violate fundamental values like equality, fairness, freedom, or privacy but neglecting cybersecurity could undermine citizens' trust and confidence in the digital infrastructure as well as in policy makers and state authorities. In order to increase our understanding of this dilemma, this contribution aims to provide an overview on value conflicts in cybersecurity based on a systematic review on the ethical, legal and technological literature on cybersecurity. It shall be emphasized that a focus on the opposition of cybersecurity vs. privacy is insufficient for understanding the ethical complexity of cybersecurity.}, subject = {Computersicherheit}, language = {en} } @article{WeberLoiChristenetal., author = {Weber, Karsten and Loi, Michele and Christen, Markus and Kleine, Nadine}, title = {Digital Medicine, Cybersecurity, and Ethics}, series = {American Journal of Bioethics}, volume = {18}, journal = {American Journal of Bioethics}, number = {9}, publisher = {Taylor\&Francis}, doi = {10.1080/15265161.2018.1498935}, pages = {52 -- 53}, language = {en} } @article{ChristenGordijnWeberetal., author = {Christen, Markus and Gordijn, Bert and Weber, Karsten and van de Poel, Ibo and Yaghmaei, Emad}, title = {A Review of Value-Conflicts in Cybersecurity}, series = {Orbit Journal - An Online Journal for Responsible Research and Innovation in ICT}, volume = {1}, journal = {Orbit Journal - An Online Journal for Responsible Research and Innovation in ICT}, number = {1}, doi = {10.29297/orbit.v1i1.28}, pages = {1 -- 19}, abstract = {Cybersecurity is of capital importance in a world where economic and social processes increasingly rely on digital technology. Although the primary ethical motivation of cybersecurity is prevention of informational or physical harm, its enforcement can also entail conflicts with other moral values. This contribution provides an outline of value conflicts in cybersecurity based on a quantitative literature analysis and qualitative case studies. The aim is to demonstrate that the security-privacy-dichotomy—that still seems to dominate the ethics discourse based on our bibliometric analysis—is insufficient when discussing the ethical challenges of cybersecurity. Furthermore, we want to sketch how the notion of contextual integrity could help to better understand and mitigate such value conflicts.}, language = {en} } @article{WeberChristenHerrmann, author = {Weber, Karsten and Christen, Markus and Herrmann, Dominik}, title = {Bedrohung, Verwundbarkeit, Werte und Schaden : Cyberattacken und Cybersicherheit als Thema der Technikfolgenabsch{\"a}tzung}, series = {TATuP - Journal for Technology Assessment in Theory and Practice}, volume = {29}, journal = {TATuP - Journal for Technology Assessment in Theory and Practice}, number = {1}, publisher = {oekom-verlag}, issn = {2567-8833}, doi = {10.14512/tatup.29.1.10}, pages = {10 -- 43}, abstract = {The annual monetary costs incurred worldwide by cyberattacks are growing steadily and are on a scale comparable to the budgets of entire countries. Cyberattacks affect individuals, businesses, public institutions, authorities, and governments; they affect an infrastructure without which modern societies can hardly function. But ensuring cybersecurity can lead to conflicts of interest. Technologies used to ensure the security and resilience of this infrastructure should therefore be a subject of technology assessment.}, language = {de} } @article{WeberMerleNawabietal., author = {Weber, Markus and Merle, Christian and Nawabi, Danyal H. and Dendorfer, Sebastian and Grifka, Joachim and Renkawitz, Tobias}, title = {Inaccurate offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty results in reduced range of motion}, series = {Scientific Reports}, volume = {10}, journal = {Scientific Reports}, number = {13208}, publisher = {Nature}, doi = {10.1038/s41598-020-70059-1}, pages = {9}, abstract = {Offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with postoperative range of motion (ROM) and gait kinematics. We aimed to research into the impact of high offset (HO) and standard stems on postoperative ROM. 121 patients received cementless THA through a minimally-invasive anterolateral approach. A 360° hip ROM analysis software calculated impingement-free hip movement based on postoperative 3D-CTs compared to ROM values necessary for activities of daily living (ADL). The same model was then run a second time after changing the stem geometry between standard and HO configuration with the implants in the same position. HO stems showed higher ROM for all directions between 4.6 and 8.9° (p < 0.001) compared with standard stems but with high interindividual variability. In the subgroup with HO stems for intraoperative offset restoration, the increase in ROM was even higher for all ROM directions with values between 6.1 and 14.4° (p < 0.001) compared to offset underrestoration with standard stems. Avoiding offset underrestoration resulted in a higher amount of patients of over 20\% for each ROM direction that fulfilled the criteria for ADL (p < 0.001). In contrast, in patients with standard stems for offset restoration ROM did increase but not clinically relevant by offset overcorrection for all directions between 3.1 and 6.1° (p < 0.001). Offset overcorrection by replacing standard with HO stems improved ROM for ADL in a low number of patients below 10\% (p > 0.03). Patient-individual restoration of offset is crucial for free ROM in THA. Both over and underrestoration of offset should be avoided.}, language = {en} } @article{YaghmaeivandePoelChristenetal., author = {Yaghmaei, Emad and van de Poel, Ibo and Christen, Markus and Gordijn, Bert and Kleine, Nadine and Loi, Michele and Morgan, Gwenyth and Weber, Karsten}, title = {Canvas White Paper 1 Cybersecurity and Ethics}, series = {SSRN Electronic Journal}, volume = {18}, journal = {SSRN Electronic Journal}, number = {4}, publisher = {SSRN}, doi = {10.2139/ssrn.3091909}, pages = {1431}, abstract = {This White Paper outlines how the ethical discourse on cybersecurity has developed in the scientific literature, which ethical issues gained interest, which value conflicts are discussed, and where the "blind spots" in the current ethical discourse on cybersecurity are located. The White Paper is based on an extensive literature with a focus on three reference domains with unique types of value conflicts: health, business/finance and national security. For each domain, a systematic literature search has been performed and the identified papers have been analysed using qualitative and quantitative methods. An important observation is that the ethics of cybersecurity not an established subject. In all domains, cybersecurity is recognized as being an instrumental value, not an end in itself, which opens up the possibility of trade-offs with different values in different spheres. The most prominent common theme is the existence of trade-offs and even conflicts between reasonable goals, for example between usability and security, accessibility and security, privacy and convenience. Other prominent common themes are the importance of cybersecurity to sustain trust (in institutions), and the harmful effect of any loss of control over data.}, language = {en} } @article{LenkDuttgeFlatauetal., author = {Lenk, Christian and Duttge, Gunnar and Flatau, Laura and Frommeld, Debora and Poser, Wolfgang and Reitt, Markus and Schulze, Thomas and Weber, Alexandra and Zoll, Barbara}, title = {A look into the future? Patients' and health care staff's perception and evaluation of genetic information and the right not to know}, series = {American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics}, volume = {180}, journal = {American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics}, number = {8}, publisher = {Wiley}, doi = {10.1002/ajmg.b.32751}, pages = {576 -- 588}, abstract = {The progress of medical genetics leads to a significant increase in genetic knowledge and a vast expansion of genetic diagnostics. However, it is still unknown how these changes will be integrated into medical practice and how they will change patients' and healthy persons' perception and evaluation of genetic diagnoses and genetic knowledge. Therefore, we carried out a comprehensive questionnaire survey with more than 500 patients, clients seeking genetic counseling, health care staff, and healthy persons (N = 523). The questionnaire survey covered detailed questions on the value of genetic diagnoses for the different groups of study participants, the right to know or not to know genetic diagnoses, possible differences between genetic and other medical diagnoses, and the practical use and implications of genetic knowledge with a special focus on hereditary neuropsychiatric diseases. A huge majority of the participants (90.7\%) stated to have a right to learn every aspect of her or his genetic make-up. Similarly, study participants showed high interest (81.8\%) in incidental health care findings-independent of whether the diseases are treatable or not. One can derive from the data outcome that study participants did not follow the implications of a "genetic exceptionalism" and often considered genetic findings as equivalent in relation to other medical diagnoses.}, language = {en} } @incollection{DuttgeEngelZolletal., author = {Duttge, Gunnar and Engel, Wolfgang and Zoll, Barbara and Schulze, Thomas and Poser, Wolfgang and Lenk, Christian and Weber, Alexandra K. and Flatau, Laura and Frommeld, Debora and Houri, Leila and Reitt, Markus and Smogavec, Mateja and Tukuser, Xenia}, title = {Empfehlungen zum anwendungspraktischen Umgang mit dem »Recht auf Nichtwissen« : Ergebnisse einer rechtsethischen Grundlagenanalyse auf erfahrungswissenschaftlicher Basis in den Anwendungsfeldern von Humangenetik und Psychiatrie}, series = {Das sogenannte Recht auf Nichtwissen : Normatives Fundament und anwendungspraktische Geltungskraft}, booktitle = {Das sogenannte Recht auf Nichtwissen : Normatives Fundament und anwendungspraktische Geltungskraft}, editor = {Duttge, Gunnar and Lenk, Christian}, publisher = {mentis Verlag GmbH}, address = {Paderborn}, isbn = {9783957437792}, doi = {10.30965/9783957437792_018}, pages = {253 -- 269}, abstract = {BMBF-Projektgruppe »Recht auf Nichtwissen": Projektleitung: Prof. Dr. iur. Gunnar Duttge; Co-Projektbeteiligte: Prof. Dr. med. Dr. h. c. Wolf-gang Engel und Prof. Dr. Barbara Zoll (Humangenetik); Prof. Dr. med. Thomas Schulze (Psych-iatrische Genetik); Prof. Dr. med. Wolfgang Poser (Psychiatrie); Prof. Dr. phil. Christian Lenk(Medizinethik); Koordinatorin: Dipl.-Jur. Alexandra K. Weber, MLE. Projektmitarbeiter: LauraFlatau, M.Sc, Debora Frommeld, M.A., Dipl.-Jur. Laila Houri, Dr. rer. nat. Dipl.-Psych. MarkusReitt, Mateja Smogavec, Dipl.-Jur. Xenia Tukuser. Projekthomepage: http://www . recht - auf -nichtwissen.uni-goettingen.de/}, language = {de} } @article{WeberSuessJerabeketal., author = {Weber, Markus and Suess, Franz and Jerabek, Seth and Meyer, Matthias and Grifka, Joachim and Renkawitz, Tobias and Dendorfer, Sebastian}, title = {Kinematic pelvic tilt during gait alters functional cup position in total hip arthroplasty}, series = {Journal of Orthopaedic Research}, volume = {40}, journal = {Journal of Orthopaedic Research}, number = {4}, publisher = {Wiley}, issn = {1554-527X}, doi = {10.1002/jor.25106}, pages = {846 -- 853}, abstract = {Static pelvic tilt impacts functional cup position in total hip arthroplasty (THA). In the current study we investigated the effect of kinematic pelvic changes on cup position. In the course of a prospective controlled trial postoperative 3D-computed tomography (CT) and gait analysis before and 6 and 12 months after THA were obtained in 60 patients. Kinematic pelvic motion during gait was measured using Anybody Modeling System. By fusion with 3D-CT, the impact of kinematic pelvic tilt alterations on cup anteversion and inclination was calculated. Furthermore, risk factors correlating with high pelvic mobility were evaluated. During gait a high pelvic range of motion up to 15.6° exceeding 5° in 61.7\% (37/60) of patients before THA was found. After surgery, the pelvis tilted posteriorly by a mean of 4.0 ± 6.6° (p < .001). The pelvic anteflexion led to a mean decrease of -1.9 ± 2.2° (p < .001) for cup inclination and -15.1 ± 6.1° (p < .001) for anteversion in relation to the anterior pelvic plane (APP). Kinematic pelvic changes resulted in a further change up to 2.3° for inclination and up to 12.3° for anteversion. In relation to the preoperative situation differences in postoperative cup position ranged from -4.4 to 4.6° for inclination and from -7.8 to 17.9° for anteversion, respectively. Female sex (p < .001) and normal body weight (p < .001) correlated with high alterations in pelvic tilt. Kinematic pelvic changes highly impact cup anteversion in THA. Surgeons using the APP as reference should aim for a higher anteversion of about 15° due to the functional anteflexion of the pelvis during gait.}, subject = {H{\"u}ftgelenkprothese}, language = {en} } @article{LoiChristenKleineetal., author = {Loi, Michele and Christen, Markus and Kleine, Nadine and Weber, Karsten}, title = {Cybersecurity in health}, series = {Journal of Information, Communication \& Ethics in Society}, volume = {17}, journal = {Journal of Information, Communication \& Ethics in Society}, number = {2}, doi = {10.1108/JICES-12-2018-0095}, pages = {229 -- 245}, abstract = {Purpose Cybersecurity in healthcare has become an urgent matter in recent years due to various malicious attacks on hospitals and other parts of the healthcare infrastructure. The purpose of this paper is to provide an outline of how core values of the health systems, such as the principles of biomedical ethics, are in a supportive or conflicting relation to cybersecurity. Design/methodology/approach This paper claims that it is possible to map the desiderata relevant to cybersecurity onto the four principles of medical ethics, i.e. beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy and justice, and explore value conflicts in that way. Findings With respect to the question of how these principles should be balanced, there are reasons to think that the priority of autonomy relative to beneficence and non-maleficence in contemporary medical ethics could be extended to value conflicts in health-related cybersecurity. Research limitations/implications However, the tension between autonomy and justice, which relates to the desideratum of usability of information and communication technology systems, cannot be ignored even if one assumes that respect for autonomy should take priority over other moral concerns. Originality/value In terms of value conflicts, most discussions in healthcare deal with the conflict of balancing efficiency and privacy given the sensible nature of health information. In this paper, the authors provide a broader and more detailed outline.}, language = {en} } @misc{BeimlerLeisslEbneretal., author = {Beimler, Josef and Leißl, Caroline and Ebner, Lena and Elsner, Michael and M{\"u}hlbauer, Gerhard and Kohlert, Dieter and Schubert, Martin J. W. and Weiß, Andreas P. and Sterner, Michael and Raith, Thomas and Afranseder, Martin and Krapf, Tobias and Mottok, J{\"u}rgen and Siemers, Christian and Großmann, Benjamin and H{\"o}cherl, Johannes and Schlegl, Thomas and Schneider, Ralph and Milaev, Johannes and Rampelt, Christina and Roduner, Christian and Glowa, Christoph and Bachl, Christoph and Schliekmann, Claus and Gnan, Alfons and Grill, Martin and Ruhland, Karl and Piehler, Thomas and Friers, Daniel and Wels, Harald and Pflug, Kenny and Kucera, Markus and Waas, Thomas and Schlachetzki, Felix and Boy, Sandra and Pemmerl, Josef and Leis, Alexander and Welsch, Andreas F.X. and Graf, Franz and Zenger, Gerhard and Volbert, Klaus and Waas, Thomas and Scherzinger, Stefanie and Klettke, Meike and St{\"o}rl, Uta and Heyl, C. and Boldenko, A. and Monkman, Gareth J. and Kujat, Richard and Briem, Ulrich and Hierl, Stefan and Talbot, Sebastian and Schmailzl, Anton and Ławrowski, Robert Damian and Prommesberger, Christian and Langer, Christoph and Dams, Florian and Schreiner, Rupert and Valentino, Piergiorgio and Romano, Marco and Ehrlich, Ingo and Furgiuele, Franco and Gebbeken, Norbert and Eisenried, Michael and Jungbauer, Bastian and Hutterer, Albert and Bauhuber, Michael and Mikrievskij, Andreas and Argauer, Monika and Hummel, Helmut and Lechner, Alfred and Liebetruth, Thomas and Schumm, Michael and Joseph, Saskia and Reschke, Michael and Soska, Alexander and Schroll-Decker, Irmgard and Putzer, Michael and Rasmussen, John and Dendorfer, Sebastian and Weber, Tim and Al-Munajjed, Amir Andreas and Verkerke, Gijsbertus Jacob and Renkawitz, Tobias and Haug, Sonja and Rudolph, Clarissa and Zeitler, Annika and Schaubeck, Simon and Steffens, Oliver and Rechenauer, Christian and Schulz-Brize, Thekla and Fleischmann, Florian and Kusterle, Wolfgang and Beer, Anne and Wagner, Bernd and Neidhart, Thomas}, title = {Forschungsbericht 2013}, editor = {Baier, Wolfgang}, address = {Regensburg}, organization = {Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg}, doi = {10.35096/othr/pub-799}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-7990}, pages = {80}, language = {de} } @misc{WeberDendorferSuessetal., author = {Weber, Karsten and Dendorfer, Sebastian and S{\"u}ß, Franz and Kubowitsch, Simone and Schratzenstaller, Thomas and Haug, Sonja and Mohr, Christa and Kiesl, Hans and Drechsler, J{\"o}rg and Westner, Markus and Kobus, J{\"o}rn and Schubert, Martin J. W. and Zenger, Stefan and Pietsch, Alexander and Weiß, Josef and Hinterseer, Sebastian and Schieck, Roland and Scherzinger, Stefanie and Klettke, Meike and Ringlstetter, Andreas and St{\"o}rl, Uta and Bissyand{\´e}, Tegawend{\´e} F. and Seeburger, Achim and Schindler, Timo and Ramsauer, Ralf and Kiszka, Jan and K{\"o}lbl, Andreas and Lohmann, Daniel and Mauerer, Wolfgang and Maier, Johannes and Scorna, Ulrike and Palm, Christoph and Soska, Alexander and Mottok, J{\"u}rgen and Ellermeier, Andreas and V{\"o}gele, Daniel and Hierl, Stefan and Briem, Ulrich and Buschmann, Knut and Ehrlich, Ingo and Pongratz, Christian and Pielmeier, Benjamin and Tyroller, Quirin and Monkman, Gareth J. and Gut, Franz and Roth, Carina and Hausler, Peter and Bierl, Rudolf and Prommesberger, Christian and Ławrowski, Robert Damian and Langer, Christoph and Schreiner, Rupert and Huang, Yifeng and She, Juncong and Ottl, Andreas and Rieger, Walter and Kraml, Agnes and Poxleitner, Thomas and Hofer, Simon and Heisterkamp, Benjamin and Lerch, Maximilian and Sammer, Nike and Golde, Olivia and Wellnitz, Felix and Schmid, Sandra and Muntschick, Claudia and Kusterle, Wolfgang and Paric, Ivan and Br{\"u}ckl, Oliver and Haslbeck, Matthias and Schmidt, Ottfried and Schwanzer, Peter and Rabl, Hans-Peter and Sterner, Michael and Bauer, Franz and Steinmann, Sven and Eckert, Fabian and Hofrichter, Andreas}, title = {Forschungsbericht 2017}, editor = {Baier, Wolfgang}, address = {Regensburg}, organization = {Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg}, isbn = {978-3-9818209-3-5}, doi = {10.35096/othr/pub-1383}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-13835}, subject = {Forschung}, language = {de} } @misc{LautenschlaegerLeisDendorferetal., author = {Lautenschl{\"a}ger, Toni and Leis, Alexander and Dendorfer, Sebastian and Palm, Christoph and Schreiner, Rupert and Langer, Christoph and Prommesberger, Christian and Ławrowski, Robert Damian and Dams, Florian and Bornmann, Benjamin and Navitski, Aliaksandr and Serbun, Pavel and M{\"u}ller, G{\"u}nter and Liebetruth, Thomas and Kohlert, Dieter and Pernsteiner, Jochen and Schreier, Franz and Heerklotz, Sabrina and Heerklotz, Allwin and Boos, Alexander and Herwald, Dominik and Monkman, Gareth J. and Treiber, Daniel and Mayer, Matthias and H{\"o}rner, Eva and Bentz, Alexander and Shamonin (Chamonine), Mikhail and Johansen, S{\o}ren Peter and Reichel, Marco and Stoll, Andrea and Briem, Ulrich and Dullien, Silvia and Renkawitz, Tobias and Weber, Tim and Dendorfer, Sebastian and Grifka, Joachim and Penzkofer, Rainer and Barnsteiner, K. and Jovanovik, M. and Wernecke, P. and V{\"o}gele, A. and Bachmann, T. and Pl{\"o}tz, Martin and Schliekmann, Claus and Wels, Harald and Helmberger, Paul and Kaspar, M. and H{\"o}nicka, M. and Schrammel, Siegfried and Enser, Markus and Schmidmeier, Monika and Schroll-Decker, Irmgard and Haug, Sonja and Gelfert, Verena and Vernim, Matthias}, title = {Forschungsbericht 2012}, editor = {Baier, Wolfgang}, address = {Regensburg}, organization = {Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg}, doi = {10.35096/othr/pub-783}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-7834}, pages = {64}, language = {de} } @misc{ScheppachWeberNunesArizietal., author = {Scheppach, Markus W. and Weber Nunes, Danilo and Arizi, X. and Rauber, David and Probst, Andreas and Nagl, Sandra and R{\"o}mmele, Christoph and Meinikheim, Michael and Palm, Christoph and Messmann, Helmut and Ebigbo, Alanna}, title = {Procedural phase recognition in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) using artificial intelligence (AI)}, series = {Endoscopy}, volume = {56}, journal = {Endoscopy}, number = {S 02}, publisher = {Thieme}, address = {Stuttgart}, doi = {10.1055/s-0044-1783804}, pages = {S439}, abstract = {Aims Recent evidence suggests the possibility of intraprocedural phase recognition in surgical operations as well as endoscopic interventions such as peroral endoscopic myotomy and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) by AI-algorithms. The intricate measurement of intraprocedural phase distribution may deepen the understanding of the procedure. Furthermore, real-time quality assessment as well as automation of reporting may become possible. Therefore, we aimed to develop an AI-algorithm for intraprocedural phase recognition during ESD. Methods A training dataset of 364385 single images from 9 full-length ESD videos was compiled. Each frame was classified into one procedural phase. Phases included scope manipulation, marking, injection, application of electrical current and bleeding. Allocation of each frame was only possible to one category. This training dataset was used to train a Video Swin transformer to recognize the phases. Temporal information was included via logarithmic frame sampling. Validation was performed using two separate ESD videos with 29801 single frames. Results The validation yielded sensitivities of 97.81\%, 97.83\%, 95.53\%, 85.01\% and 87.55\% for scope manipulation, marking, injection, electric application and bleeding, respectively. Specificities of 77.78\%, 90.91\%, 95.91\%, 93.65\% and 84.76\% were measured for the same parameters. Conclusions The developed algorithm was able to classify full-length ESD videos on a frame-by-frame basis into the predefined classes with high sensitivities and specificities. Future research will aim at the development of quality metrics based on single-operator phase distribution.}, language = {en} }