@article{BeyerWeigertQuicketal., author = {Beyer, Thomas and Weigert, Markus and Quick, Harald H. and Pietrzyk, Uwe and Vogt, Florian and Palm, Christoph and Antoch, Gerald and M{\"u}ller, Stefan P. and Bockisch, Andreas}, title = {MR-based attenuation correction for torso-PET/MR imaging}, series = {European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging}, volume = {35}, journal = {European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging}, number = {6}, doi = {10.1007/s00259-008-0734-0}, pages = {1142 -- 1146}, abstract = {Purpose MR-based attenuation correction (AC) will become an integral part of combined PET/MR systems. Here, we propose a toolbox to validate MR-AC of clinical PET/MRI data sets. Methods Torso scans of ten patients were acquired on a combined PET/CT and on a 1.5-T MRI system. MR-based attenuation data were derived from the CT following MR-CT image co-registration and subsequent histogram matching. PET images were reconstructed after CT- (PET/CT) and MR-based AC (PET/MRI). Lesion-to-background (L/B) ratios were estimated on PET/CT and PET/MRI. Results MR-CT histogram matching leads to a mean voxel intensity difference in the CT- and MR-based attenuation images of 12\% (max). Mean differences between PET/MRI and PET/CT were 19\% (max). L/B ratios were similar except for the lung where local misregistration and intensity transformation leads to a biased PET/MRI. Conclusion Our toolbox can be used to study pitfalls in MR-AC. We found that co-registration accuracy and pixel value transformation determine the accuracy of PET/MRI.}, subject = {Kernspintomografie}, language = {en} }