@article{FoerstlSuessEnglertetal., author = {F{\"o}rstl, Nikolas and S{\"u}ß, Franz and Englert, Carsten and Dendorfer, Sebastian}, title = {Design of a reverse shoulder implant to measure shoulder stiffness during implant component positioning}, series = {Medical Engineering \& Physics}, volume = {121}, journal = {Medical Engineering \& Physics}, edition = {Journal Pre-proof}, publisher = {Elsevier}, doi = {10.1016/j.medengphy.2023.104059}, pages = {22}, abstract = {To avoid dislocation of the shoulder joint after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, it is important to achieve sufficient shoulder stability when placing the implant components during surgery. One parameter for assessing shoulder stability can be shoulder stiffness. The aim of this research was to develop a temporary reverse shoulder implant prototype that would allow intraoperative measurement of shoulder stiffness while varying the position of the implant components. Joint angle and torque measurement techniques were developed to determine shoulder stiffness. Hall sensors were used to measure the joint angles by converting the magnetic flux densities into angles. The accuracy of the joint angle measurements was tested using a test bench. Torques were determined by using thin-film pressure sensors. Various mechanical mechanisms for variable positioning of the implant components were integrated into the prototype. The results of the joint angle measurements showed measurement errors of less than 5° in a deflection range of ±15° adduction/abduction combined with ±45° flexion/extension. The proposed design provides a first approach for intra-operative assessment of shoulder stiffness. The findings can be used as a technological basis for further developments.}, language = {en} } @misc{FoerstlSuessEnglertetal., author = {F{\"o}rstl, Nikolas and S{\"u}ß, Franz and Englert, Carsten and Dendorfer, Sebastian}, title = {Design of a reverse shoulder implant to measure shoulder stiffness during implant component positioning}, series = {Book of abstracts / ESB 2023, 28th Congress of the European Society of Biomechanics, 9-12 July 2023, Maastricht, The Netherlands.}, journal = {Book of abstracts / ESB 2023, 28th Congress of the European Society of Biomechanics, 9-12 July 2023, Maastricht, The Netherlands.}, abstract = {Introduction Dislocation of the shoulder joint is one of the more common complications after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty [1], which is often associated with malposition of the prosthetic components [2]. Therefore, achieving sufficient shoulder stability should not be neglected when positioning the implant components. One parameter for assessing shoulder stability can be shoulder stiffness. The aim of this work is to develop a reverse shoulder implant prototype that allows intraoperative measurement of shoulder stiffness while varying the position of the implant components. The measured stiffness could provide a quantitative statement regarding the optimal positioning of the implant components, which can be adjusted accordingly in the final reverse shoulder prosthesis. Methods To measure the stiffness of the shoulder joint, it is necessary to record the joint angles and the torques generated during movement. The changes in the rotation angles were measured using 3D hall sensors and magnets. The magnets were placed under the humerosocket, and the hall sensors were integrated into the glenosphere. The strength of the magnetic field was used to determine the position of the humerosocket in relation to the glenosphere. The accuracies of the angle measurements were tested using a test bench. Three thin film pressure sensors were used to record forces at different points under the humerosocket. To obtain a force value from the sensor signal, the sensors were calibrated using a load cell. The variation of the implant components positions was integrated into the prototype implant through different constructive mechanisms to adjust the stiffness of the shoulder joint. Results In the range of ±45° flexion/extension combined with ±15° adduction/abduction, the joint position could be determined with sufficient accuracy (error e ≤ 5°). The areas near the combined maximum deflections of ±45° flexion/extension and ±45° adduction/abduction indicate the greatest deviation from the target angle. The force values of the thin film sensors enable the calculation of moments around two axes. As variable component position parameters, the tray offset, the neck-shaft angle and the humerus version were integrated into the implant prototype. Discussion Ideally, the accuracy of the angle measurements should only depend on the amount of deflection and not on the direction of deflection. The asymmetric behavior indicates a deviation from the correct positioning of the hall sensors. The application of a calibration matrix could compensate for the measurement errors and could demonstrate the potential of the new method for joint angle measurements. The accuracy of the torque measurements and the functionality of the mechanical arresting mechanisms must be investigated in further studies. Overall, the developed measurement method can help to avoid malpositioning of the implant components in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. References 1. Clark et al, J Shoulder and elbow surgery, 21:36-41 2012. 2. Randelli et al, J Musculoskeletal surgery, 98:15-18, 2014.}, language = {en} } @article{MoragKieningerEissnertetal., author = {Morag, Sarah and Kieninger, Martin and Eissnert, Christoph and Auer, Simon and Dendorfer, Sebastian and Popp, Daniel and Hoffmann, Johannes and Kieninger, B{\"a}rbel}, title = {Comparison of different techniques for prehospital cervical spine immobilization: Biomechanical measurements with a wireless motion capture system}, series = {PLOS ONE}, volume = {18}, journal = {PLOS ONE}, number = {11}, publisher = {PLOS}, address = {San Francisco, California}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0292300}, pages = {1 -- 14}, language = {en} } @article{ReinkerBlaesingBierletal., author = {Reinker, Lukas and Bl{\"a}sing, Dominic and Bierl, Rudolf and Ulbricht, Sabina and Dendorfer, Sebastian}, title = {Correlation of Acceleration Curves in Gravitational Direction for Different Body Segments during High-Impact Jumping Exercises}, series = {sensors}, volume = {23}, journal = {sensors}, number = {4}, publisher = {MDPI}, address = {Basel}, doi = {10.3390/s23042276}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-58217}, abstract = {Osteoporosis is a common disease of old age. However, in many cases, it can be very well prevented and counteracted with physical activity, especially high-impact exercises. Wearables have the potential to provide data that can help with continuous monitoring of patients during therapy phases or preventive exercise programs in everyday life. This study aimed to determine the accuracy and reliability of measured acceleration data at different body positions compared to accelerations at the pelvis during different jumping exercises. Accelerations at the hips have been investigated in previous studies with regard to osteoporosis prevention. Data were collected using an IMU-based motion capture system (Xsens) consisting of 17 sensors. Forty-nine subjects were included in this study. The analysis shows the correlation between impacts and the corresponding drop height, which are dependent on the respective exercise. Very high correlations (0.83-0.94) were found between accelerations at the pelvis and the other measured segments at the upper body. The foot sensors provided very weak correlations (0.20-0.27). Accelerations measured at the pelvis during jumping exercises can be tracked very well on the upper body and upper extremities, including locations where smart devices are typically worn, which gives possibilities for remote and continuous monitoring of programs.}, language = {en} } @article{ReinkerDendorfer, author = {Reinker, Lukas and Dendorfer, Sebastian}, title = {Evaluation of acceleration patterns during high-impact jumping exercises}, series = {Gait \& Posture}, volume = {100}, journal = {Gait \& Posture}, number = {Supplement 1, March}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]}, doi = {10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.11.051}, pages = {93 -- 94}, language = {en} } @article{SchaefferHerrmannSchratzenstalleretal., author = {Schaeffer, Leon and Herrmann, David and Schratzenstaller, Thomas and Dendorfer, Sebastian and B{\"o}hm, Valter}, title = {Preliminary theoretical considerations on the stiffness characteristics of a tensegrity joint for the use in dynamic orthoses}, series = {Journal of Medical Robotics Research}, journal = {Journal of Medical Robotics Research}, publisher = {World Scientific}, doi = {10.1142/S2424905X23400081}, abstract = {Early motion therapy plays an important role for effective long-term healing of joint injuries. In many cases, conventional dynamic orthoses fail to address the intricate movement possibilities of the underlying joints, limited by their simplistic joint representations, often represented by revolute joints, enabling rotations by only one axis. In this paper, a two-dimensional compliant tensegrity joint for use in biomedical applications is investigated. It consists of two compressed members and five compliant tensioned members. Relative movement possibilities are realized by the intrinsic compliance of the structure. In the development of these systems, the first step is the determination of the static stable equilibrium. This analysis is conducted in this paper by considering the potential energy approach or by using the geometric nonlinear finite element method. The mechanical behavior of the structure is assessed with a specific emphasis on its mechanical compliance. The primary objective of this study is the investigation of the influence of structural parameters on the overall stiffness and movability of the structure. The results underscore the significant effect of member parameters on the stiffness and movability of the compliant tensegrity joint, particularly under varying load magnitudes. These findings provide insights for optimizing the joint's performance, contributing to its potential application in advanced orthotic and exoskeleton devices.}, language = {en} }