@inproceedings{PutzerPenzkoferEhrlichetal., author = {Putzer, Michael and Penzkofer, Rainer and Ehrlich, Ingo and Rasmussen, John and Gebbeken, Norbert and Dendorfer, Sebastian}, title = {Musculoskeletal simulations to investigate the influence of vertebral geometrical parameters on lumbar spine loading}, series = {7th World Congress of Biomechanics, Boston, United States, 04/07/14 -11/07/14}, booktitle = {7th World Congress of Biomechanics, Boston, United States, 04/07/14 -11/07/14}, language = {de} } @inproceedings{GalibarovAlMunajjedDendorferetal., author = {Galibarov, Pavel E. and Al-Munajjed, Amir Andreas and Dendorfer, Sebastian and Christensen, Soeren Toerholm and Rasmussen, John}, title = {The effect of varying the stiffness of spinal fusion devices on the adjacent levels using multibody dynamics simulation}, series = {Orthopaedic Proceedings}, volume = {94-B}, booktitle = {Orthopaedic Proceedings}, number = {SUPP_XL01 Sep 2012}, pages = {2}, abstract = {INTRODUCTION Several clinical studies demonstrated long-term adjacent-level effects after implantation of spinal fusion devices[1]. These effects have been reported as adjacent joint degeneration and the development of new symptoms correlating with adjacent segment degeneration[2] and the trend has therefore gone to motion preservation devices; however, these effects have not been understood very well and have not been investigated thoroughly[3]. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of varying the stiffness of spinal fusion devices on the adjacent vertebral levels. Disc forces, moments and facet joint forces were analyzed. METHODS The AnyBody Modeling System was used to compute the in-vivo muscle and joint reaction forces of a musculoskeletal model. The full body model used in this study consists of 188 muscle fascicles in the lumbar spine and more than 1000 individual muscle branches in total. The model has been proposed by de Zee et al.[3], validated by Rasmussen et al.[4] and by Galibarov et al.[5]. The new model[5] determines the individual motions between vertebrae based on the equilibrium between forces acting on the vertebrae from muscles and joints and the passive stiffness in disks and ligaments, figure 1a. An adult of 1.75 m and 75 kg with a spinal implant in L4L5 was modeled. This model was subjected to a flexion-extension motion using different elastic moduli to analyze and compare to a non-implanted scenario. The analyzed variables were vertebral motion, the disc reaction forces and moments, as well as facet joint forces in the treated and the adjacent levels: L2L3, L3L4, L4L5 and L5-Sacrum. RESULTS When introducing a spinal fusion device in the L4L5 joint the reaction forces and moments decreased in this joint with stiffer devices leading to lower joint loads. However, in the adjacent joints, L3L4 and L5Sacrum, an increase was observed when implanting stiffer devices. Similar trends could be found for the L2L3 joint. The loads in the facet joints showed the same trends. While introducing a spinal fusion device reduced the facet joint forces in the treated joint, the loads in the adjacent facet joints were increased according to the stiffness of the implanted device, figure 1b. DISCUSSION While the treated disc joint showed reduced motion and loads, the adjacent levels demonstrated a significant increase. In particular, the increased facet joint forces in the adjacent levels can lead to adjacent level facet pain or accelerated facet joint degeneration. Introducing a device resulted in preventing facet contact and therefore facet joint loads, even using the device with the lowest stiffness. CONCLUSION The presented model shows that clinical complications such as facet joint degeneration in adjacent levels after implantation of spinal fusion device are consistent with the change in the mechanical-stimulus distribution in the system.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{RasmussenBichlerChristensenetal., author = {Rasmussen, John and Bichler, R. and Christensen, Soeren Toerholm and Wirix-Speetjens, Roel and Dendorfer, Sebastian and Renkawitz, Tobias}, title = {Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Simulation of Hip Dislocation Risk in Activities of Daily Living}, series = {Proceedings of the 2011 ORS Annual Meeting, Long Beach, CA.}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2011 ORS Annual Meeting, Long Beach, CA.}, number = {Paper No. 306}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{RobieDendorferRasmussenetal., author = {Robie, Bruce and Dendorfer, Sebastian and Rasmussen, John and Christensen, Soeren Toerholm}, title = {Axial Rotation Requires Greatest Load in Multifidus Muscle - Potential Association with Low Back Pain?}, series = {Annual Meeting of the AANS/CNS Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, 2011, Phoenix, Arizona}, booktitle = {Annual Meeting of the AANS/CNS Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, 2011, Phoenix, Arizona}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{GalibarovDendorferRasmussen, author = {Galibarov, Pavel E. and Dendorfer, Sebastian and Rasmussen, John}, title = {Two Computational Models of the Lumbar Spine:}, series = {Proceedings of the 2011 ORS Annual Meeting, Long Beach, CA, vol. Marie Curie Initial Training Network "SpineFX"}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2011 ORS Annual Meeting, Long Beach, CA, vol. Marie Curie Initial Training Network "SpineFX"}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{AlMunajjedNolteRasmussenetal., author = {Al-Munajjed, Amir Andreas and Nolte, Daniel and Rasmussen, John and Dendorfer, Sebastian}, title = {Force distribution in the foot during braking - a musculoskeletal approach}, series = {Human Modeling Symposium 2014, Munich, Germany}, booktitle = {Human Modeling Symposium 2014, Munich, Germany}, abstract = {High loads can appear in the individual joints of the human foot while the driver uses the pedals, in particular, during breaking. Measuring these internal forces is very difficult or almost impossible; therefore, advanced models are necessary to perform musculoskeletal simulations. The objective of this investigation was to see what loads are acting in the individual foot joints from the phalanges to calcaneus and talus during different brake scenarios. The Glasgow-Maastricht AnyBody Foot Model with 26 separate segments, connected by joints, ligaments and muscles was used inside the AnyBody Modeling System to compute individual mid foot joint loads. The amount, the direction of the force and additionally also the load insertion point was varied for several simulations. Figure 1: Seated musculoskeletal body model with applied brake force and forces for the lateral, intermediate and medial cuneiform-navicular joint for two different brake forces. The simulation showed that for the different brake scenarios, different muscles will be activated in the human and therefore different loads are apply in the fore-and mid-foot, respectively. The torso of the subject was assumed to be fixed in the seat. Further studies are ongoing to simulate the seat as an elastic element that allows different H-point locations according to the different loadings in the foot from the brake pedal using a new inverse dynamics analysis method called force-dependent kinematics.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{SuessKubowitschRasmussenetal., author = {S{\"u}ß, Franz and Kubowitsch, Simone and Rasmussen, John and Verkerke, Gijsbertus Jacob and Dendorfer, Sebastian}, title = {The influence of cognitive stress on muscle activation and spinal disc load}, series = {European Society of Biomechanics meeting 2019, Vienna, Austria}, booktitle = {European Society of Biomechanics meeting 2019, Vienna, Austria}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{AndersendeZeeDendorferetal., author = {Andersen, Michael Skipper and de Zee, Mark and Dendorfer, Sebastian and MacWilliams, Bruce and Rasmussen, John}, title = {Validation of a detailed lower extremity model based on the Klein Horsman data set}, series = {Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Computer Simulation in Biomechanics (ISB 2009), July 2nd - 4th 2009, Cape Town, South Africa}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Computer Simulation in Biomechanics (ISB 2009), July 2nd - 4th 2009, Cape Town, South Africa}, pages = {27 -- 28}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{DendorferRasmussenChristensenetal., author = {Dendorfer, Sebastian and Rasmussen, John and Christensen, Soeren Toerholm and Robie, Bruce}, title = {The Effect of Spinal Disc Herniation on Multifidus Muscles}, series = {56th Orthopaedic Research Society Meeting, New Orleans, USA, 2010}, booktitle = {56th Orthopaedic Research Society Meeting, New Orleans, USA, 2010}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{RobieRasmussenChristensenetal., author = {Robie, Bruce and Rasmussen, John and Christensen, Soeren Toerholm and Dendorfer, Sebastian}, title = {Herniation Induces 55\% Increase in Load of Key Stabilizing Muscle - Impact on Herniation Treatment Devices?}, series = {Spine Arthoplasty Society Meeting, New Orleans, 2010}, booktitle = {Spine Arthoplasty Society Meeting, New Orleans, 2010}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{DendorferCarbesRasmussen, author = {Dendorfer, Sebastian and Carbes, S. and Rasmussen, John}, title = {The influence of muscle forces on biomechanical fracture fixation simulations - from in-vivo forces to tissue strains}, series = {World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, 7 - 12, 2009, Munich}, booktitle = {World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, 7 - 12, 2009, Munich}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{DendorferRasmussen, author = {Dendorfer, Sebastian and Rasmussen, John}, title = {The influence of in-vivo muscle forces on the stress distribution in a vertebral body during activities of daily living}, series = {Eurospine Warsaw, Poland 2009}, booktitle = {Eurospine Warsaw, Poland 2009}, language = {en} }