@article{RueckertRueckertPalm, author = {R{\"u}ckert, Tobias and R{\"u}ckert, Daniel and Palm, Christoph}, title = {Methods and datasets for segmentation of minimally invasive surgical instruments in endoscopic images and videos: A review of the state of the art}, series = {Computers in Biology and Medicine}, volume = {169}, journal = {Computers in Biology and Medicine}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, doi = {10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.107929}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-69830}, pages = {24}, abstract = {In the field of computer- and robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery, enormous progress has been made in recent years based on the recognition of surgical instruments in endoscopic images and videos. In particular, the determination of the position and type of instruments is of great interest. Current work involves both spatial and temporal information, with the idea that predicting the movement of surgical tools over time may improve the quality of the final segmentations. The provision of publicly available datasets has recently encouraged the development of new methods, mainly based on deep learning. In this review, we identify and characterize datasets used for method development and evaluation and quantify their frequency of use in the literature. We further present an overview of the current state of research regarding the segmentation and tracking of minimally invasive surgical instruments in endoscopic images and videos. The paper focuses on methods that work purely visually, without markers of any kind attached to the instruments, considering both single-frame semantic and instance segmentation approaches, as well as those that incorporate temporal information. The publications analyzed were identified through the platforms Google Scholar, Web of Science, and PubMed. The search terms used were "instrument segmentation", "instrument tracking", "surgical tool segmentation", and "surgical tool tracking", resulting in a total of 741 articles published between 01/2015 and 07/2023, of which 123 were included using systematic selection criteria. A discussion of the reviewed literature is provided, highlighting existing shortcomings and emphasizing the available potential for future developments.}, subject = {Deep Learning}, language = {en} } @article{HartwigBerletCzempieletal., author = {Hartwig, Regine and Berlet, Maximilian and Czempiel, Tobias and Fuchtmann, Jonas and R{\"u}ckert, Tobias and Feussner, Hubertus and Wilhelm, Dirk}, title = {Bildbasierte Unterst{\"u}tzungsmethoden f{\"u}r die zuk{\"u}nftige Anwendung in der Chirurgie}, series = {Die Chirurgie}, volume = {93}, journal = {Die Chirurgie}, publisher = {Springer}, doi = {10.1007/s00104-022-01668-x}, pages = {956 -- 965}, abstract = {Hintergrund: Die Entwicklung assistiver Technologien wird in den kommenden Jahren nicht nur in der Chirurgie von zunehmender Bedeutung sein. Die Wahrnehmung der Istsituation stellt hierbei die Grundlage jeder autonomen Handlung dar. Hierf{\"u}r k{\"o}nnen unterschiedliche Sensorsysteme genutzt werden, wobei videobasierte Systeme ein besonderes Potenzial aufweisen. Methode: Anhand von Literaturangaben und auf Basis eigener Forschungsarbeiten werden zentrale Aspekte bildbasierter Unterst{\"u}tzungssysteme f{\"u}r die Chirurgie dargestellt. Hierbei wird deren Potenzial, aber auch die Limitationen der Methoden erl{\"a}utert. Ergebnisse: Eine etablierte Anwendung stellt die Phasendetektion chirurgischer Eingriffe dar, f{\"u}r die Operationsvideos mittels neuronaler Netzwerke analysiert werden. Durch eine zeitlich gest{\"u}tzte und transformative Analyse konnten die Ergebnisse der Pr{\"a}diktion j{\"u}ngst deutlich verbessert werden. Aber auch robotische Kameraf{\"u}hrungssysteme nutzen Bilddaten, um das Laparoskop zuk{\"u}nftig autonom zu navigieren. Um die Zuverl{\"a}ssigkeit an die hohen Anforderungen in der Chirurgie anzugleichen, m{\"u}ssen diese jedoch durch zus{\"a}tzliche Informationen erg{\"a}nzt werden. Ein vergleichbarer multimodaler Ansatz wurde bereits f{\"u}r die Navigation und Lokalisation bei laparoskopischen Eingriffen umgesetzt. Hierzu werden Videodaten mittels verschiedener Methoden analysiert und diese Ergebnisse mit anderen Sensormodalit{\"a}ten fusioniert. Diskussion: Bildbasierte Unterst{\"u}tzungsmethoden sind bereits f{\"u}r diverse Aufgaben verf{\"u}gbar und stellen einen wichtigen Aspekt f{\"u}r die Chirurgie der Zukunft dar. Um hier jedoch zuverl{\"a}ssig und f{\"u}r autonome Funktionen eingesetzt werden zu k{\"o}nnen, m{\"u}ssen sie zuk{\"u}nftig in multimodale Ans{\"a}tze eingebettet werden, um die erforderliche Sicherheit bieten zu k{\"o}nnen.}, language = {de} } @misc{RueckertRiederRauberetal., author = {R{\"u}ckert, Tobias and Rieder, Maximilian and Rauber, David and Xiao, Michel and Humolli, Eg and Feussner, Hubertus and Wilhelm, Dirk and Palm, Christoph}, title = {Augmenting instrument segmentation in video sequences of minimally invasive surgery by synthetic smoky frames}, series = {International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery}, volume = {18}, journal = {International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery}, number = {Suppl 1}, publisher = {Springer Nature}, doi = {10.1007/s11548-023-02878-2}, pages = {S54 -- S56}, language = {en} } @misc{RoserMeinikheimMendeletal., author = {Roser, D. A. and Meinikheim, Michael and Mendel, Robert and Palm, Christoph and Probst, Andreas and Muzalyova, A. and Scheppach, Markus W. and Nagl, S. and Schnoy, Elisabeth and R{\"o}mmele, Christoph and Schulz, D. and Schlottmann, Jakob and Prinz, Friederike and Rauber, David and R{\"u}ckert, Tobias and Matsumura, T. and Fernandez-Esparrach, G. and Parsa, N. and Byrne, M. and Messmann, Helmut and Ebigbo, Alanna}, title = {Human-Computer Interaction: Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the diagnostic confidence of endoscopists assessing videos of Barrett's esophagus}, series = {Endoscopy}, volume = {56}, journal = {Endoscopy}, number = {S 02}, publisher = {Georg Thieme Verlag}, issn = {1438-8812}, doi = {10.1055/s-0044-1782859}, pages = {79}, abstract = {Aims Human-computer interactions (HCI) may have a relevant impact on the performance of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Studies show that although endoscopists assessing Barrett's esophagus (BE) with AI improve their performance significantly, they do not achieve the level of the stand-alone performance of AI. One aspect of HCI is the impact of AI on the degree of certainty and confidence displayed by the endoscopist. Indirectly, diagnostic confidence when using AI may be linked to trust and acceptance of AI. In a BE video study, we aimed to understand the impact of AI on the diagnostic confidence of endoscopists and the possible correlation with diagnostic performance. Methods 22 endoscopists from 12 centers with varying levels of BE experience reviewed ninety-six standardized endoscopy videos. Endoscopists were categorized into experts and non-experts and randomly assigned to assess the videos with and without AI. Participants were randomized in two arms: Arm A assessed videos first without AI and then with AI, while Arm B assessed videos in the opposite order. Evaluators were tasked with identifying BE-related neoplasia and rating their confidence with and without AI on a scale from 0 to 9. Results The utilization of AI in Arm A (without AI first, with AI second) significantly elevated confidence levels for experts and non-experts (7.1 to 8.0 and 6.1 to 6.6, respectively). Only non-experts benefitted from AI with a significant increase in accuracy (68.6\% to 75.5\%). Interestingly, while the confidence levels of experts without AI were higher than those of non-experts with AI, there was no significant difference in accuracy between these two groups (71.3\% vs. 75.5\%). In Arm B (with AI first, without AI second), experts and non-experts experienced a significant reduction in confidence (7.6 to 7.1 and 6.4 to 6.2, respectively), while maintaining consistent accuracy levels (71.8\% to 71.8\% and 67.5\% to 67.1\%, respectively). Conclusions AI significantly enhanced confidence levels for both expert and non-expert endoscopists. Endoscopists felt significantly more uncertain in their assessments without AI. Furthermore, experts with or without AI consistently displayed higher confidence levels than non-experts with AI, irrespective of comparable outcomes. These findings underscore the possible role of AI in improving diagnostic confidence during endoscopic assessment.}, language = {en} } @article{MeinikheimMendelPalmetal.2024, author = {Meinikheim, Michael and Mendel, Robert and Palm, Christoph and Probst, Andreas and Muzalyova, Anna and Scheppach, Markus Wolfgang and Nagl, Sandra and Schnoy, Elisabeth and R{\"o}mmele, Christoph and Schulz, Dominik Andreas Helmut Otto and Schlottmann, Jakob and Prinz, Friederike and Rauber, David and R{\"u}ckert, Tobias and Matsumura, Tomoaki and Fern{\´a}ndez-Esparrach, Gl{\`o}ria and Parsa, Nasim and Byrne, Michael F and Messmann, Helmut and Ebigbo, Alanna}, title = {Effect of AI on performance of endoscopists to detect Barrett neoplasia: A Randomized Tandem Trial}, series = {Endoscopy}, journal = {Endoscopy}, publisher = {Georg Thieme Verlag}, issn = {0013-726X}, doi = {10.1055/a-2296-5696}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Background and study aims To evaluate the effect of an AI-based clinical decision support system (AI) on the performance and diagnostic confidence of endoscopists during the assessment of Barrett's esophagus (BE). Patients and Methods Ninety-six standardized endoscopy videos were assessed by 22 endoscopists from 12 different centers with varying degrees of BE experience. The assessment was randomized into two video sets: Group A (review first without AI and second with AI) and group B (review first with AI and second without AI). Endoscopists were required to evaluate each video for the presence of Barrett's esophagus-related neoplasia (BERN) and then decide on a spot for a targeted biopsy. After the second assessment, they were allowed to change their clinical decision and confidence level. Results AI had a standalone sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 92.2\%, 68.9\%, and 81.6\%, respectively. Without AI, BE experts had an overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 83.3\%, 58.1 and 71.5\%, respectively. With AI, BE nonexperts showed a significant improvement in sensitivity and specificity when videos were assessed a second time with AI (sensitivity 69.7\% (95\% CI, 65.2\% - 74.2\%) to 78.0\% (95\% CI, 74.0\% - 82.0\%); specificity 67.3\% (95\% CI, 62.5\% - 72.2\%) to 72.7\% (95 CI, 68.2\% - 77.3\%). In addition, the diagnostic confidence of BE nonexperts improved significantly with AI. Conclusion BE nonexperts benefitted significantly from the additional AI. BE experts and nonexperts remained below the standalone performance of AI, suggesting that there may be other factors influencing endoscopists to follow or discard AI advice.}, language = {en} } @article{RoemmeleMendelBarrettetal., author = {R{\"o}mmele, Christoph and Mendel, Robert and Barrett, Caroline and Kiesl, Hans and Rauber, David and R{\"u}ckert, Tobias and Kraus, Lisa and Heinkele, Jakob and Dhillon, Christine and Grosser, Bianca and Prinz, Friederike and Wanzl, Julia and Fleischmann, Carola and Nagl, Sandra and Schnoy, Elisabeth and Schlottmann, Jakob and Dellon, Evan S. and Messmann, Helmut and Palm, Christoph and Ebigbo, Alanna}, title = {An artificial intelligence algorithm is highly accurate for detecting endoscopic features of eosinophilic esophagitis}, series = {Scientific Reports}, volume = {12}, journal = {Scientific Reports}, publisher = {Nature Portfolio}, address = {London}, doi = {10.1038/s41598-022-14605-z}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-46928}, pages = {10}, abstract = {The endoscopic features associated with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) may be missed during routine endoscopy. We aimed to develop and evaluate an Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithm for detecting and quantifying the endoscopic features of EoE in white light images, supplemented by the EoE Endoscopic Reference Score (EREFS). An AI algorithm (AI-EoE) was constructed and trained to differentiate between EoE and normal esophagus using endoscopic white light images extracted from the database of the University Hospital Augsburg. In addition to binary classification, a second algorithm was trained with specific auxiliary branches for each EREFS feature (AI-EoE-EREFS). The AI algorithms were evaluated on an external data set from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (UNC), and compared with the performance of human endoscopists with varying levels of experience. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of AI-EoE were 0.93 for all measures, while the AUC was 0.986. With additional auxiliary branches for the EREFS categories, the AI algorithm (AI-EoEEREFS) performance improved to 0.96, 0.94, 0.95, and 0.992 for sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC, respectively. AI-EoE and AI-EoE-EREFS performed significantly better than endoscopy beginners and senior fellows on the same set of images. An AI algorithm can be trained to detect and quantify endoscopic features of EoE with excellent performance scores. The addition of the EREFS criteria improved the performance of the AI algorithm, which performed significantly better than endoscopists with a lower or medium experience level.}, language = {en} } @article{EbigboMendelScheppachetal., author = {Ebigbo, Alanna and Mendel, Robert and Scheppach, Markus W. and Probst, Andreas and Shahidi, Neal and Prinz, Friederike and Fleischmann, Carola and R{\"o}mmele, Christoph and G{\"o}lder, Stefan Karl and Braun, Georg and Rauber, David and R{\"u}ckert, Tobias and De Souza Jr., Luis Antonio and Papa, Jo{\~a}o Paulo and Byrne, Michael F. and Palm, Christoph and Messmann, Helmut}, title = {Vessel and tissue recognition during third-space endoscopy using a deep learning algorithm}, series = {Gut}, volume = {71}, journal = {Gut}, number = {12}, publisher = {BMJ}, address = {London}, doi = {10.1136/gutjnl-2021-326470}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-54293}, pages = {2388 -- 2390}, abstract = {In this study, we aimed to develop an artificial intelligence clinical decision support solution to mitigate operator-dependent limitations during complex endoscopic procedures such as endoscopic submucosal dissection and peroral endoscopic myotomy, for example, bleeding and perforation. A DeepLabv3-based model was trained to delineate vessels, tissue structures and instruments on endoscopic still images from such procedures. The mean cross-validated Intersection over Union and Dice Score were 63\% and 76\%, respectively. Applied to standardised video clips from third-space endoscopic procedures, the algorithm showed a mean vessel detection rate of 85\% with a false-positive rate of 0.75/min. These performance statistics suggest a potential clinical benefit for procedure safety, time and also training.}, language = {en} } @misc{RoemmeleMendelRauberetal., author = {R{\"o}mmele, Christoph and Mendel, Robert and Rauber, David and R{\"u}ckert, Tobias and Byrne, Michael F. and Palm, Christoph and Messmann, Helmut and Ebigbo, Alanna}, title = {Endoscopic Diagnosis of Eosinophilic Esophagitis Using a deep Learning Algorithm}, series = {Endoscopy}, volume = {53}, journal = {Endoscopy}, number = {S 01}, publisher = {Georg Thieme Verlag}, address = {Stuttgart}, doi = {10.1055/s-0041-1724274}, abstract = {Aims Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is easily missed during endoscopy, either because physicians are not familiar with its endoscopic features or the morphologic changes are too subtle. In this preliminary paper, we present the first attempt to detect EoE in endoscopic white light (WL) images using a deep learning network (EoE-AI). Methods 401 WL images of eosinophilic esophagitis and 871 WL images of normal esophageal mucosa were evaluated. All images were assessed for the Endoscopic Reference score (EREFS) (edema, rings, exudates, furrows, strictures). Images with strictures were excluded. EoE was defined as the presence of at least 15 eosinophils per high power field on biopsy. A convolutional neural network based on the ResNet architecture with several five-fold cross-validation runs was used. Adding auxiliary EREFS-classification branches to the neural network allowed the inclusion of the scores as optimization criteria during training. EoE-AI was evaluated for sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score. In addition, two human endoscopists evaluated the images. Results EoE-AI showed a mean sensitivity, specificity, and F1 of 0.759, 0.976, and 0.834 respectively, averaged over the five distinct cross-validation runs. With the EREFS-augmented architecture, a mean sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score of 0.848, 0.945, and 0.861 could be demonstrated respectively. In comparison, the two human endoscopists had an average sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score of 0.718, 0.958, and 0.793. Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, this is the first application of deep learning to endoscopic images of EoE which were also assessed after augmentation with the EREFS-score. The next step is the evaluation of EoE-AI using an external dataset. We then plan to assess the EoE-AI tool on endoscopic videos, and also in real-time. This preliminary work is encouraging regarding the ability for AI to enhance physician detection of EoE, and potentially to do a true "optical biopsy" but more work is needed.}, language = {en} } @article{EbigboMendelRueckertetal., author = {Ebigbo, Alanna and Mendel, Robert and R{\"u}ckert, Tobias and Schuster, Laurin and Probst, Andreas and Manzeneder, Johannes and Prinz, Friederike and Mende, Matthias and Steinbr{\"u}ck, Ingo and Faiss, Siegbert and Rauber, David and De Souza Jr., Luis Antonio and Papa, Jo{\~a}o Paulo and Deprez, Pierre and Oyama, Tsuneo and Takahashi, Akiko and Seewald, Stefan and Sharma, Prateek and Byrne, Michael F. and Palm, Christoph and Messmann, Helmut}, title = {Endoscopic prediction of submucosal invasion in Barrett's cancer with the use of Artificial Intelligence: A pilot Study}, series = {Endoscopy}, volume = {53}, journal = {Endoscopy}, number = {09}, publisher = {Thieme}, address = {Stuttgart}, doi = {10.1055/a-1311-8570}, pages = {878 -- 883}, abstract = {Background and aims: The accurate differentiation between T1a and T1b Barrett's cancer has both therapeutic and prognostic implications but is challenging even for experienced physicians. We trained an Artificial Intelligence (AI) system on the basis of deep artificial neural networks (deep learning) to differentiate between T1a and T1b Barrett's cancer white-light images. Methods: Endoscopic images from three tertiary care centres in Germany were collected retrospectively. A deep learning system was trained and tested using the principles of cross-validation. A total of 230 white-light endoscopic images (108 T1a and 122 T1b) was evaluated with the AI-system. For comparison, the images were also classified by experts specialized in endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of Barrett's cancer. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, F1 and accuracy of the AI-system in the differentiation between T1a and T1b cancer lesions was 0.77, 0.64, 0.73 and 0.71, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the performance of the AI-system and that of human experts with sensitivity, specificity, F1 and accuracy of 0.63, 0.78, 0.67 and 0.70 respectively. Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrates the first multicenter application of an AI-based system in the prediction of submucosal invasion in endoscopic images of Barrett's cancer. AI scored equal to international experts in the field, but more work is necessary to improve the system and apply it to video sequences and in a real-life setting. Nevertheless, the correct prediction of submucosal invasion in Barret´s cancer remains challenging for both experts and AI.}, subject = {Maschinelles Lernen}, language = {en} }