@incollection{KleineUlbrichtWeberetal., author = {Kleine, Nadine and Ulbricht, Max-R. and Weber, Karsten and Pallas, Frank}, title = {Participatory Sensing und Wearable Technologies als partizipative Formen der Datengenerierung im Internet of Things}, series = {'Grand Challenges' meistern - der Beitrag der Technikfolgenabsch{\"a}tzung}, booktitle = {'Grand Challenges' meistern - der Beitrag der Technikfolgenabsch{\"a}tzung}, editor = {Decker, Michael and Lindner, Ralf and Lingner, Stephan and Scherz, Constanze and Sotoudeh, Mahshid}, publisher = {Nomos}, address = {Baden-Baden}, doi = {10.5771/9783845283562-245}, pages = {245 -- 257}, subject = {Wearable Computer}, language = {de} } @article{WeberPallasUlbricht, author = {Weber, Karsten and Pallas, Frank and Ulbricht, Max-R.}, title = {Challenges of Citizen Science: Commons, Incentives, Organizations, and Regulations}, series = {American Journal of Bioethics}, volume = {19}, journal = {American Journal of Bioethics}, number = {8}, doi = {10.1080/15265161.2019.1619862}, pages = {52 -- 54}, language = {en} } @article{WeberPallasUlbricht, author = {Weber, Karsten and Pallas, Frank and Ulbricht, Max-R.}, title = {Quantified Self, Participatory Sensing und die Grenzen der Regulierung}, series = {Jahrbuch f{\"u}r Recht und Ethik}, journal = {Jahrbuch f{\"u}r Recht und Ethik}, number = {23}, pages = {75 -- 94}, abstract = {One of the aims of technology assessment is to inform policy makers about possible future developments of technology, about their likelihood, and about the most probable impacts on individuals as well as on the fabric of society. Such information could be used to plan and create adequate regulations to minimize negative and maximize positive effects of the corresponding technology. However, certain innovations, which we call bottom up-innovations in this paper, make it quite difficult if not almost impossible to provide information of the kind technology assessment shall produce. After introducing the dichotomy of top down-and bottom up-innovations and bringing these types of innovation in the context of more established notions of innovation on a theoretical level we will use the examples of the quantified self-movement and the idea of participatory sensing to describe bottom up-innovations as they take place in real life. By depicting these examples we will try to identify some of the social consequences of the technology that is used in each of the contexts mentioned above. Finally, we will try to draw some more general conclusions concerning bottom up-innovations and technology assessment and its ability to provide reliable information with regard to possible futures. We shall argue that regulation of technology resulting from bottom up-innovations must go " beyond markets and state ".}, language = {de} } @article{WeberKleinePallasetal., author = {Weber, Karsten and Kleine, Nadine and Pallas, Frank and Ulbricht, Max-R.}, title = {Technik zur Unterst{\"u}tzung von Citizen Science und Open Science}, series = {TATuP - Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Technikfolgenabsch{\"a}tzung in Theorie und Praxis}, volume = {26}, journal = {TATuP - Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Technikfolgenabsch{\"a}tzung in Theorie und Praxis}, number = {1/2}, doi = {10.14512/tatup.26.1-2.25}, pages = {25 -- 30}, abstract = {If citizens actively participate in the process of collecting empirical data, as a key element of empirically oriented scientific projects, this can be seen as a contribution to an open and citizen-oriented science. Such participation can be supported by providing technical tools. The paper therefore presents examples of participatory sensing as the provision of affordable sensors for measuring environmental parameters as well as wearable technologies for recording quantified vital data and physiological states. Conceptually, the provision of data collected with these tools can be understood as a commons - with all opportunities and risks associated with such goods. After describing examples of participatory sensing and wearable technologies, the authors identify potential challenges and outline technical and organizational approaches to solve them.}, language = {de} } @article{OrwatRaabeBuchmannetal., author = {Orwat, Carsten and Raabe, Oliver and Buchmann, Erik and Anandasivam, Arun and Freytag, Johan-Christoph and Helberger, Natali and Ishii, Kei and Lutterbeck, Bernd and Neumann, Dirk and Otter, Thomas and Pallas, Frank and Reussner, Ralf and Sester, Peter and Weber, Karsten and Werle, Raymund}, title = {Software als Institution und ihre Gestaltbarkeit}, series = {Informatik-Spektrum}, volume = {33}, journal = {Informatik-Spektrum}, number = {6}, doi = {10.1007/s00287-009-0404-z}, pages = {626 -- 633}, abstract = {Software regelt immer mehr zwischenmenschliche Interaktionen. {\"U}blicherweise werden die Funktionsmechanismen, Wirkungen und Gestaltungsoptionen von Regeln in der Institutionenforschung behandelt. In diesem Artikel soll beleuchtet werden, inwieweit sich Ans{\"a}tze der Institutionenforschung auf Software anwenden lassen und was sich aus dieser Forschungsperspektive zu den Regelungswirkungen und Gestaltungsoptionen von Software ableiten l{\"a}sst.}, language = {de} }