@misc{BeimlerLeisslEbneretal., author = {Beimler, Josef and Leißl, Caroline and Ebner, Lena and Elsner, Michael and M{\"u}hlbauer, Gerhard and Kohlert, Dieter and Schubert, Martin J. W. and Weiß, Andreas P. and Sterner, Michael and Raith, Thomas and Afranseder, Martin and Krapf, Tobias and Mottok, J{\"u}rgen and Siemers, Christian and Großmann, Benjamin and H{\"o}cherl, Johannes and Schlegl, Thomas and Schneider, Ralph and Milaev, Johannes and Rampelt, Christina and Roduner, Christian and Glowa, Christoph and Bachl, Christoph and Schliekmann, Claus and Gnan, Alfons and Grill, Martin and Ruhland, Karl and Piehler, Thomas and Friers, Daniel and Wels, Harald and Pflug, Kenny and Kucera, Markus and Waas, Thomas and Schlachetzki, Felix and Boy, Sandra and Pemmerl, Josef and Leis, Alexander and Welsch, Andreas F.X. and Graf, Franz and Zenger, Gerhard and Volbert, Klaus and Waas, Thomas and Scherzinger, Stefanie and Klettke, Meike and St{\"o}rl, Uta and Heyl, C. and Boldenko, A. and Monkman, Gareth J. and Kujat, Richard and Briem, Ulrich and Hierl, Stefan and Talbot, Sebastian and Schmailzl, Anton and Ławrowski, Robert Damian and Prommesberger, Christian and Langer, Christoph and Dams, Florian and Schreiner, Rupert and Valentino, Piergiorgio and Romano, Marco and Ehrlich, Ingo and Furgiuele, Franco and Gebbeken, Norbert and Eisenried, Michael and Jungbauer, Bastian and Hutterer, Albert and Bauhuber, Michael and Mikrievskij, Andreas and Argauer, Monika and Hummel, Helmut and Lechner, Alfred and Liebetruth, Thomas and Schumm, Michael and Joseph, Saskia and Reschke, Michael and Soska, Alexander and Schroll-Decker, Irmgard and Putzer, Michael and Rasmussen, John and Dendorfer, Sebastian and Weber, Tim and Al-Munajjed, Amir Andreas and Verkerke, Gijsbertus Jacob and Renkawitz, Tobias and Haug, Sonja and Rudolph, Clarissa and Zeitler, Annika and Schaubeck, Simon and Steffens, Oliver and Rechenauer, Christian and Schulz-Brize, Thekla and Fleischmann, Florian and Kusterle, Wolfgang and Beer, Anne and Wagner, Bernd and Neidhart, Thomas}, title = {Forschungsbericht 2013}, editor = {Baier, Wolfgang}, address = {Regensburg}, organization = {Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg}, doi = {10.35096/othr/pub-799}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-7990}, pages = {80}, language = {de} } @article{MuehlbauerKeinerGerhardsetal., author = {M{\"u}hlbauer, Andreas and Keiner, Dominik and Gerhards, Christoph and Caldera, Upeksha and Sterner, Michael and Breyer, Christian}, title = {Assessment of technologies and economics for carbon dioxide removal from a portfolio perspective}, series = {International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control}, volume = {141}, journal = {International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control}, publisher = {Elsevier}, doi = {10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104297}, pages = {25}, abstract = {Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is essential to achieve ambitious climate goals limiting global warming to less than 1.5◦C, and likely for achieving the 1.5◦C target. This study addresses the need for diverse CDR portfolios and introduces the LUT-CDR tool, which assesses CDR technology portfolios aligned with hypothetical societal preferences. Six scenarios are described, considering global deployment limitations, techno-economic factors, area requirements, technology readiness, and storage security for various CDR options. The results suggest the feasibility of large-scale CDR, potentially removing 500-1750 GtCO2 by 2100 to meet the set climate targets. For a 1.0◦C climate goal, CDR portfolios necessitate 12.0-37.5\% more primary energy compared to a scenario without CDR. Remarkably, funding a 1.0◦C target requires only 0.42-0.65\% of the projected global gross domestic product. Bioenergy carbon capture and sequestration and rainfall-based afforestation play limited roles, while secure sequestration of captured CO2 via direct air capture, electricity-based carbon sequestration, and desalination-based afforestation emerge as more promising options. The study offers crucial techno-economic parameters for implementing CDR options in future energy-industry-CDR system analyses and demonstrates the tool's flexibility through alternative assumptions. It also discusses limitations, sensitivities, potential tradeoffs, and outlines options for future research in the area of large-scale CDR.}, language = {en} }