@article{ReinkerBlaesingBierletal., author = {Reinker, Lukas and Bl{\"a}sing, Dominic and Bierl, Rudolf and Ulbricht, Sabina and Dendorfer, Sebastian}, title = {Correlation of Acceleration Curves in Gravitational Direction for Different Body Segments during High-Impact Jumping Exercises}, series = {sensors}, volume = {23}, journal = {sensors}, number = {4}, publisher = {MDPI}, address = {Basel}, doi = {10.3390/s23042276}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-58217}, abstract = {Osteoporosis is a common disease of old age. However, in many cases, it can be very well prevented and counteracted with physical activity, especially high-impact exercises. Wearables have the potential to provide data that can help with continuous monitoring of patients during therapy phases or preventive exercise programs in everyday life. This study aimed to determine the accuracy and reliability of measured acceleration data at different body positions compared to accelerations at the pelvis during different jumping exercises. Accelerations at the hips have been investigated in previous studies with regard to osteoporosis prevention. Data were collected using an IMU-based motion capture system (Xsens) consisting of 17 sensors. Forty-nine subjects were included in this study. The analysis shows the correlation between impacts and the corresponding drop height, which are dependent on the respective exercise. Very high correlations (0.83-0.94) were found between accelerations at the pelvis and the other measured segments at the upper body. The foot sensors provided very weak correlations (0.20-0.27). Accelerations measured at the pelvis during jumping exercises can be tracked very well on the upper body and upper extremities, including locations where smart devices are typically worn, which gives possibilities for remote and continuous monitoring of programs.}, language = {en} } @article{AuerSchieblIversenetal., author = {Auer, Simon and Schiebl, Jonas and Iversen, Kristoffer and Subhash Chander, Divyaksh and Damsgaard, Michael and Dendorfer, Sebastian}, title = {Biomechanical assessment of the design and efficiency of occupational exoskeletons with the AnyBody Modeling System}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Arbeitswissenschaften}, volume = {76}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Arbeitswissenschaften}, number = {4}, publisher = {Springer Nature}, doi = {10.1007/s41449-022-00336-4}, pages = {440 -- 449}, abstract = {Exoskeletons were invented over 100 years ago but have only become popular in the last two decades, especially in the working industry as they can decrease work-related loads significantly. The most often used exoskeletons are for the lower back and shoulder since these are commonly affected body regions. All devices have in common that their purpose is to reduce internal loads of vulnerable body regions. Nevertheless, there is still little understanding on how biomechanical loading in the human body changes when exoskeletons are used. Therefore, further analyses are needed. A promising candidate for these are musculoskeletal models, which are based on an inverse dynamics approach and can calculate external parameters such as ground reaction forces or other interaction forces as well as internal parameters such as joint reaction forces or muscle activities. The various examples in the literature show that these models are increasingly used for assessing the biomechanical effects of exoskeletons on the human body. Furthermore, musculoskeletal models can calculate biomechanical loadings of humans with and without exoskeletons for all kinds of applications and allow an evaluation of their purpose. Practical Relevance: This article highlights the possibilities of musculoskeletal models for assessing the design and efficiency of occupational exoskeletons. Several practical use cases are described along with distinct descriptions of common implications of musculoskeletal and exoskeleton modeling.}, language = {en} } @article{MelznerPfeifferSuessetal., author = {Melzner, Maximilian and Pfeiffer, Christian and Suess, Franz and Dendorfer, Sebastian}, title = {Musculoskeletal simulation of elbow stability for common injury patterns}, series = {Journal of Orthopaedic Research}, volume = {41}, journal = {Journal of Orthopaedic Research}, number = {6}, publisher = {Wiley}, issn = {1554-527X}, doi = {10.1002/jor.25460}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-54819}, pages = {1356 -- 1364}, abstract = {Elbow stability is derived from a combination of muscular, ligamentous, and bony structures. After an elbow trauma the stability of the joint is an important decision criterion for the subsequent treatment. The decision regarding non-operative/operative care depends mostly on subjective assessments of medical experts. Therefore, the aim of this study is to use musculoskeletal simulations as an objective assessment tool to investigate the extent to which failure of different stabilizers affects the elbow stability and how these observations correspond to the assessment from clinical practice. A musculoskeletal elbow simulation model was developed for this aim. To investigate the stability of the elbow, varus/valgus moments were applied under 0°, 45°and 90° flexion while the respective cubital angle was analyzed. This was performed for nine different injury scenarios, which were also evaluated for stability by clinical experts. With the results, it can be determined by which injury pattern and under which flexion angle the elbow stability is impaired regarding varus/valgus moments. The scenario with a complete failure of the medial and lateral ligaments and a fracture of the radial head was identified as having the greatest instability. The study presented a numerical determination of elbow stability against varus/valgus moments regarding clinical injury patterns, as well as a comparison of the numerical outcome with experience gained in clinical practice. The numerical predictions agree well with the assessments of the clinical specialists. Thus, the results from musculoskeletal simulation can make an important contribution to a more objective assessment of the elbow stability.}, language = {en} }