@inproceedings{KlausmannRueckertRauberetal., author = {Klausmann, Leonard and Rueckert, Tobias and Rauber, David and Maerkl, Raphaela and Yildiran, Suemeyye R. and Gutbrod, Max and Palm, Christoph}, title = {DIY challenge blueprint: from organization to technical realization in biomedical image analysis}, series = {Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2025 ; Proceedings Part XI}, booktitle = {Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2025 ; Proceedings Part XI}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Cham}, isbn = {978-3-032-05141-7}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-032-05141-7_9}, pages = {85 -- 95}, abstract = {Biomedical image analysis challenges have become the de facto standard for publishing new datasets and benchmarking different state-of-the-art algorithms. Most challenges use commercial cloud-based platforms, which can limit custom options and involve disadvantages such as reduced data control and increased costs for extended functionalities. In contrast, Do-It-Yourself (DIY) approaches have the capability to emphasize reliability, compliance, and custom features, providing a solid basis for low-cost, custom designs in self-hosted systems. Our approach emphasizes cost efficiency, improved data sovereignty, and strong compliance with regulatory frameworks, such as the GDPR. This paper presents a blueprint for DIY biomedical imaging challenges, designed to provide institutions with greater autonomy over their challenge infrastructure. Our approach comprehensively addresses both organizational and technical dimensions, including key user roles, data management strategies, and secure, efficient workflows. Key technical contributions include a modular, containerized infrastructure based on Docker, integration of open-source identity management, and automated solution evaluation workflows. Practical deployment guidelines are provided to facilitate implementation and operational stability. The feasibility and adaptability of the proposed framework are demonstrated through the MICCAI 2024 PhaKIR challenge with multiple international teams submitting and validating their solutions through our self-hosted platform. This work can be used as a baseline for future self-hosted DIY implementations and our results encourage further studies in the area of biomedical image analysis challenges.}, language = {en} } @unpublished{GutbrodRauberWeberNunesetal., author = {Gutbrod, Max and Rauber, David and Weber Nunes, Danilo and Palm, Christoph}, title = {OpenMIBOOD: Open Medical Imaging Benchmarks for Out-Of-Distribution Detection}, doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2503.16247}, pages = {18}, abstract = {The growing reliance on Artificial Intelligence (AI) in critical domains such as healthcare demands robust mechanisms to ensure the trustworthiness of these systems, especially when faced with unexpected or anomalous inputs. This paper introduces the Open Medical Imaging Benchmarks for Out-Of-Distribution Detection (OpenMIBOOD), a comprehensive framework for evaluating out-of-distribution (OOD) detection methods specifically in medical imaging contexts. OpenMIBOOD includes three benchmarks from diverse medical domains, encompassing 14 datasets divided into covariate-shifted in-distribution, near-OOD, and far-OOD categories. We evaluate 24 post-hoc methods across these benchmarks, providing a standardized reference to advance the development and fair comparison of OOD detection methods. Results reveal that findings from broad-scale OOD benchmarks in natural image domains do not translate to medical applications, underscoring the critical need for such benchmarks in the medical field. By mitigating the risk of exposing AI models to inputs outside their training distribution, OpenMIBOOD aims to support the advancement of reliable and trustworthy AI systems in healthcare. The repository is available at this https URL.}, language = {en} }