@article{LaunhardtWoerzLodereretal., author = {Launhardt, M. and W{\"o}rz, A. and Loderer, A. and Laumer, Tobias and Drummer, Dietmar and Hausotte, Tino and Schmidt, Michael}, title = {Detecting surface roughness on SLS parts with various measuring techniques}, series = {Polymer Testing}, volume = {53}, journal = {Polymer Testing}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, isbn = {0142-9418}, issn = {1873-2348}, doi = {10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.05.022}, pages = {217 -- 226}, abstract = {Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) is an additive manufacturing technique whereby a laser melts polymer powder layer by layer to generate three-dimensional parts. It enables the fabrication of parts with high degrees of complexity, nearly no geometrical restrictions, and without the necessity of a tool or a mold. Due to the orientation in the building space, the processing parameters, and the powder properties, the resulting parts possess an increased surface roughness. In comparison to other manufacturing techniques, e.g. injection molding, the surface roughness of SLS parts results from partially melted powder particles on the surface layer. The actual surface roughness must thus be characterized with respect to the part's eventual application. At the moment, there is no knowledge regarding which measuring technique is most suitable for detecting and quantifying SLS parts' surface roughness. The scope of this paper is to compare tactile profile measurement methods, as established in industry, to optical measurement techniques such as Focus Variation, Fringe Projection Technique (FPT), and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope (CLSM). The advantages and disadvantages of each method are presented and, additionally, the effect of tactile measurement on a part's surface is investigated.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{LaumerStichelAmendetal., author = {Laumer, Tobias and Stichel, Thomas and Amend, Philipp and Schmidt, Michael and Gachot, A.}, title = {Simultaneous Energy Deposition for Laser Beam Melting of Polymers}, series = {Proceedings of the Polymer Processing Society 29th Annual Meeting, N{\"u}rnberg, 2013}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Polymer Processing Society 29th Annual Meeting, N{\"u}rnberg, 2013}, publisher = {American Institute of Physics}, address = {New York}, language = {en} } @article{MetschSchmidtSindersbergeretal., author = {Metsch, P. and Schmidt, Henrik and Sindersberger, Dirk and Kalina, K. A. and Brummund, J. and Auernhammer, G{\"u}nter and Monkman, Gareth J. and K{\"a}stner, Markus}, title = {Field-Induced Interactions in Magneto-Active Elastomers}, series = {Smart Materials and Structures}, volume = {29}, journal = {Smart Materials and Structures}, number = {8}, publisher = {IOPscience}, doi = {10.1088/1361-665X/ab92dc}, pages = {1 -- 10}, abstract = {In this contribution, field-induced interactions of magnetizable particles embedded into a soft elastomer matrix are analyzed with regard to the resulting mechanical deformations. By comparing experiments for two-, three- and four-particle systems with the results of finite element simulations, a fully coupled continuum model for magneto-active elastomers is validated with the help of real data for the first time. The model under consideration permits the investigation of magneto-active elastomers with arbitrary particle distances, shapes and volume fractions as well as magnetic and mechanical properties of the individual constituents. It thus represents a basis for future studies on more complex, realistic systems. Our results show a very good agreement between experiments and numerical simulations—the deformation behavior of all systems is captured by the model qualitatively as well as quantitatively. Within a sensitivity analysis, the influence of the initial particle positions on the systems' response is examined. Furthermore, a comparison of the full three-dimensional model with the often used, simplified two-dimensional approach shows the typical overestimation of resulting interactions in magneto-active elastomers.}, language = {en} } @misc{BroserFalterŁawrowskietal., author = {Broser, Christian and Falter, Thomas and Ławrowski, Robert Damian and Altenbuchner, Amelie and V{\"o}gele, Daniel and Koss, Claus and Schlamp, Matthias and Dunnweber, Jan and Steffens, Oliver and Heckner, Markus and Jaritz, Sabine and Schiegl, Thomas and Corsten, Sabine and Lauer, Norina and Guertler, Katherine and Koenig, Eric and Haug, Sonja and Huber, Dominik and Birkenmaier, Clemens and Krenkel, Lars and Wagner, Thomas and Justus, Xenia and Saßmannshausen, Sean Patrick and Kleine, Nadine and Weber, Karsten and Braun, Carina N. and Giacoppo, Giuliano and Heinrich, Michael and Just, Tobias and Schreck, Thomas and Schnabl, Andreas and Gilmore, Amador T{\´e}ran and Roeslin, Samuel and Schmid, Sandra and Wellnitz, Felix and Malz, Sebastian and Maurial, Andreas and Hauser, Florian and Mottok, J{\"u}rgen and Klettke, Meike and Scherzinger, Stefanie and St{\"o}rl, Uta and Heckner, Markus and Bazo, Alexander and Wolff, Christian and Kopper, Andreas and Westner, Markus and Pongratz, Christian and Ehrlich, Ingo and Briem, Ulrich and Hederer, Sebastian and Wagner, Marcus and Schillinger, Moritz and G{\"o}rlach, Julien and Hierl, Stefan and Siegl, Marco and Langer, Christoph and Hausladen, Matthias and Schreiner, Rupert and Haslbeck, Matthias and Kreuzer, Reinhard and Br{\"u}ckl, Oliver and Dawoud, Belal and Rabl, Hans-Peter and Gamisch, Bernd and Schmidt, Ottfried and Heberl, Michael and G{\"a}nsbauer, Bianca and Bick, Werner and Ellermeier, Andreas and Monkman, Gareth J. and Prem, Nina and Sindersberger, Dirk and Tschurtschenthaler, Karl and Aurbach, Maximilian and Dendorfer, Sebastian and Betz, Michael A. and Szecsey, Tamara and Mauerer, Wolfgang and Murr, Florian}, title = {Forschung 2018}, editor = {Baier, Wolfgang}, address = {Regensburg}, organization = {Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule Regensburg}, isbn = {978-3-9818209-5-9}, doi = {10.35096/othr/pub-1382}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:898-opus4-13826}, pages = {98}, subject = {Forschung}, language = {de} } @article{KleinNabbefeldHattabetal., author = {Klein, C. and Nabbefeld, T. and Hattab, H. and Meyer, D. and Jnawali, G. and Kammler, Martin and Meyer zu Heringdorf, Frank-Joachim and Golla-Franz, A. and M{\"u}ller, B. H. and Schmidt, Thomas and Henzler, M. and Horn-von Hoegen, Michael}, title = {Lost in reciprocal space? Determination of the scattering condition in spot profile analysis low-energy electron diffraction}, series = {Review of scientific instruments}, volume = {82}, journal = {Review of scientific instruments}, number = {3}, publisher = {American Institute of Physics}, doi = {10.1063/1.3554305}, abstract = {The precise knowledge of the diffraction condition, i.e., the angle of incidence and electron energy, is crucial for the study of surface morphology through spot profile analysis low-energy electron diffraction (LEED). We demonstrate four different procedures to determine the diffraction condition: employing the distortion of the LEED pattern under large angles of incidence, the layer-by-layer growth oscillations during homoepitaxial growth, a G(S) analysis of a rough surface, and the intersection of facet rods with 3D Bragg conditions.}, language = {en} } @misc{SchmidtWeiserHeyartzetal., author = {Schmidt, S. and Weiser, A. and Heyartz, M. and Fernsimer, K. and Osterried, S. and Schedel, Valentin and Pfingsten, Andrea}, title = {Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) - Anwendungsbereitschaft deutscher Physiotherapeut*innen}, series = {physioscience}, volume = {21}, journal = {physioscience}, number = {S 01}, publisher = {Thieme}, doi = {10.1055/s-0045-1808215}, pages = {79}, abstract = {Deutsche Physiotherapeut*innen scheinen in ihrem Arbeitsalltag von einer Implementierung des PNE- Konzepts tendenziell Abstand zu nehmen. Parallel zu dieser Vermutung offenbarte sich eine mehrheitliche Unsicherheit bei der Behandlung von chronischen Schmerzpatient*innen. Vor allem Therapeut*innen, welche sich weniger unsicher im Umgang mit chronischen Schmerzpatient*innen f{\"u}hlen, neigen zur Verwendung der „Why-you-Hurt?" - Karten. In diesem Falle w{\"a}re zu diskutieren, ob der Grund hierf{\"u}r in der Tatsache liegt, dass diese Therapeut*innen eine geeignete und gut erg{\"a}nzende Methode in dem Edukations-Tool sehen oder, ob ein sicherer Umgang mit chronischen Patient*innen die Voraussetzung f{\"u}r eine erfolgreiche Implementierung ist. Umfangreichere Erhebungen m{\"u}ssen durchgef{\"u}hrt werden, um diese Erkenntnisse zu festigen.}, language = {de} }