Prediction of MEA degradation in fuel cells for heavy-duty vehicle applications based on driving cycle analysis and component-specific accelerated stress testing

  • To estimate the lifetime of polymer-electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) in heavy-duty vehicles (HDVs), a deep understanding of degradation mechanisms under realistic operating conditions is essential. We developed two different accelerated stress tests (AST) for HDVs: (1) The “All Component Aging Test” (ACAT) is based on a synthetic voltage, temperature and humidity profile to equally stress all components of the membrane electrode assembly (MEA). (2) The “Truck Driving Cycle Test” (TDCT) is based on real HDV driving data and applies moderate voltage, temperature, and humidity conditions as well as elevated differential pressure. Additionally, standardized U.S. Department of Energy (DoE) component-specific aging tests were performed for comparison. A commercial HDV MEA was subjected to all aging protocols. As a result, the MEA’s end-of-life (EoL) was reached in the ACAT after 2100 h due to catalyst layer degradation. In contrast, the lifetime determining factor in the TDCT (EoL after 1500 h) was membrane degradation.To estimate the lifetime of polymer-electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) in heavy-duty vehicles (HDVs), a deep understanding of degradation mechanisms under realistic operating conditions is essential. We developed two different accelerated stress tests (AST) for HDVs: (1) The “All Component Aging Test” (ACAT) is based on a synthetic voltage, temperature and humidity profile to equally stress all components of the membrane electrode assembly (MEA). (2) The “Truck Driving Cycle Test” (TDCT) is based on real HDV driving data and applies moderate voltage, temperature, and humidity conditions as well as elevated differential pressure. Additionally, standardized U.S. Department of Energy (DoE) component-specific aging tests were performed for comparison. A commercial HDV MEA was subjected to all aging protocols. As a result, the MEA’s end-of-life (EoL) was reached in the ACAT after 2100 h due to catalyst layer degradation. In contrast, the lifetime determining factor in the TDCT (EoL after 1500 h) was membrane degradation. Interestingly, the DoE tests predicted the aging of the catalyst layer as lifetime-limiting, but did not identify the membrane as critical component. These findings demonstrate that standardized test protocols alone are no adequate substitution of application-specific ASTs to estimate the real-world durability of PEMFC MEA components.…show moreshow less

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Author:Lena BirknerORCiD, Paula AnderleORCiD, Lisa BüttnerORCiD, Sarah LoyORCiD, Florian SchmalzlORCiD, Cheng SunORCiD, Michael ForetaORCiD, Marc-Georg WillingerORCiD, Maik EichelbaumORCiD
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2026.240357
ISSN:0378-7753
Parent Title (English):Journal of Power Sources
Publisher:Elsevier BV
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Reviewed:Begutachtet/Reviewed
Release Date:2026/06/18
Tag:Accelerated stress test; Degradation; Heavy-duty vehicles; Life-time prediction; Polymer-electrolyte membrane fuel cell
Volume:684
Article Number:240357
institutes:Institut für Angewandte Wasserstoffforschung, Elektro- und Thermochemische Energiesysteme (H2Ohm)
Fakultät für Angewandte Chemie
Research Themes:Energie & Ressourcen
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.