@article{RogersDoraTsolakisetal.2024, author = {Rogers, Helen and Dora, Manoj and Tsolakis, Naoum and Kumar, Mukesh}, title = {Plant-based Food Supply Chains : Recognising Market Opportunities and Industry Challenges of Pea Protein}, series = {Applied Food Research}, volume = {4}, journal = {Applied Food Research}, number = {2}, issn = {2772-5022}, doi = {10.1016/j.afres.2024.100440}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Plant-based protein food products are considered healthier, more nutritious, and substantially 'greener' than meat-based dietary offerings. For reasons such as these plant protein sources including peas/legumes, soy and algae are experiencing unpre-cedented market popularity. Amidst the multitude of alternative protein-based foods on offer, peas are the most promising plant-protein source as they contain all the essential amino acids and have a well-balanced nutritional profile in terms of fat and fibre. However, understanding the extent of the market feasibility of the respective pea protein supply chains (SCs), based on practical expertise, is of utmost importance for policymakers and industrialists alike to evaluate the growth potential of peas as a protein source. To this end, a survey was conducted among pea SC stakeholders to create an understanding of the level of market feasibility of pea protein-based products. A SWOT analysis consolidated the different views and resulted in the identification of specific strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats within the industry. By focusing on understanding the challenges and prospects within peaprotein product SCs, this research provides a springboard for further research investigations into related plant protein-based products. The resulting blueprint of recommended initiatives can help inform the further development of pea protein SCs.}, language = {en} } @article{BielHahnBilgrametal.2025, author = {Biel, Stefan and Hahn, Alexander and Bilgram, Volker and Rogers, Helen}, title = {From Hybrid to AI-First Innovation Management}, series = {IEEE Engineering Management Review}, journal = {IEEE Engineering Management Review}, publisher = {Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)}, issn = {0360-8581}, doi = {10.1109/EMR.2025.3527744}, pages = {1 -- 11}, year = {2025}, abstract = {The rise of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in traditionally human domains of creativity signifies a profound development in product innovation management. In this article, we investigate the evolving role of innovation managers, emphasizing a transition from problem-solving to sense-making and decision-making. Additionally, we delve into organizational strategies for effective AI integration, advocating for systematic experimentation, comprehensive training, and the development of AI-first innovation frameworks for new product development (NPD). Ultimately, we propose a paradigm shift to AI-first creative processes, where AI is not merely an extension but the foundational mechanism of the innovation workflow.}, language = {en} } @article{YadlapalliRahmanRogers2019, author = {Yadlapalli, Aswini and Rahman, Shams and Rogers, Helen}, title = {Key Factors of Social Responsible Governance Mechanisms in the Global Apparel Industry}, series = {International Journal of Physical Distribution \& Logistics Management}, volume = {49}, journal = {International Journal of Physical Distribution \& Logistics Management}, number = {3}, publisher = {Emerald}, issn = {0960-0035}, doi = {10.1108/IJPDLM-03-2018-0154}, pages = {242 -- 266}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify and prioritise social responsible mechanisms in apparel supply chains to extend social responsibility from large retailers in developed countries to producers in developing nations. Design/methodology/approach A framework that consists of supplier qualification and supplier relational mechanisms as two socially responsible mechanisms, with five factors and 18 dimensions is proposed. To prioritise the dimensions, analytic hierarchy process is employed by using a case study methodology of a major Australian retailer sourcing from Bangladesh manufacturers. Findings Results indicate that at the mechanism level, both retailer and manufacturers perceive qualification of manufacturer as by far the most critical element compared to the relational mechanism. However, substantial differences exist at the factor level; namely, that the social factor is critical for the retailer, whereas the economic factor is critical for the manufacturer. Within the relational mechanism, evaluation helps retailers to enforce social responsibility, while manufacturers believe collaboration helps. Research limitations/implications The major limitation of this study is the generalisation of the findings. The results obtained by focusing on a particular context in the Australian retail sector importing from Bangladesh, may not be applicable to other nations. Practical implications By highlighting the difference of opinion, this study assists managers in developing guidelines to better understand the socially responsible mechanisms in the retailer-manufacturer dyadic relationship and to propose strategies to address the differences. Originality/value This study advances the literature on inter-organisational relationship to retailer-manufacturer dyad for the implementation of social responsibility by including supplier qualification along with supplier relational mechanism.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{BugdahnRogersPawar2019, author = {Bugdahn, Matthias and Rogers, Helen and Pawar, Kulwant}, title = {A Business Model Strategy Analysis of the Additive Manufacturing Consulting Sector}, publisher = {IEEE}, doi = {10.1109/ICE.2019.8792615}, pages = {1 -- 7}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Additive Manufacturing (AM) is an important aspect of Industry 4.0 but many manufacturing companies are still uncertain of how to make the most of this new technology. As a result, there is a growing trend towards provision of AM consulting services. This paper gives an overview of the current state of this sector, proposes strategic requirements and describes challenges and opportunities within the AM consulting service industry.}, language = {en} } @article{RogersSrivastavaTsakouetal.2024, author = {Rogers, Helen and Srivastava, Mohit and Tsakou, Miriam and Prashad, Anisha}, title = {Sustainable supply chain models for 3D printed houses}, series = {Supply Chain Forum}, journal = {Supply Chain Forum}, doi = {10.1080/16258312.2023.2298186}, pages = {1-16}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Although steps have been taken to improve sustainable practices in the construction industry, progress to date has been slow. Advances in 3D printing technology provide a significant opportunity to reconfigure construction industry supply chains to improve its sustainability credentials. This study investigates the adoption of 3D construction printing (3DCP) as a sustainable alternative and/or to augment traditional construction industry supply chains. By analysing six 3DCP organisations and feeding six critical insights into the Business Model Navigator, this study proposes three supply chain models i.e. generative construction service, hybrid service, and emergency service. A generative supply chain model can be used as an on-demand service for customers with limited knowledge of 3DCP. The hybrid model can integrate 3DCP with a traditional construction supply chain to construct part of the building. Finally, the emergency services model can be used to rapidly construct cost-effective housing (e.g for refugees). The adoption of 3D Printing using these supply chain models in housing construction supply chains has the potential to offer considerable benefits both for construction companies and end-users, while at the same time improving sustainability, affordability and productivity.}, language = {en} } @article{WagnerRogersLe2024, author = {Wagner, Andreas and Rogers, Helen and Le, Alina}, title = {Exploring New Frontiers in Multi-Material Additive Manufacturing}, series = {IEEE Engineering Management Review}, journal = {IEEE Engineering Management Review}, issn = {0360-8581}, doi = {10.1109/EMR.2024.3412403}, pages = {1 -- 9}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Multi-Material Additive Manufacturing (MMAM) introduces a new dimension to production technologies by seamlessly integrating multiple materials into a single object, enabling unparalleled design possibilities. This paper explores MMAM value chains and methods and showcases real-world applications in the aerospace, biomedical and industrial sectors. While MMAM holds promise for application in high-tech industries, its widespread adoption is contingent on quantity, utilization and technical requirements. Continued research into developing material properties and reducing unit costs is needed. Only once these two key challenges have been addressed is mainstream adoption likely.}, language = {en} } @article{RogersDora2024, author = {Rogers, Helen and Dora, Manoj}, title = {Guest editorial: The interplay between new innovations, sustainability and food supply chains}, series = {Supply Chain Management}, volume = {29}, journal = {Supply Chain Management}, number = {3}, issn = {1359-8546}, doi = {10.1108/SCM-05-2024-644}, pages = {409-413}, year = {2024}, language = {en} } @article{O'ReillyKalverkampRogers2024, author = {O'Reilly, Seamus and Kalverkamp, Matthias and Rogers, Helen}, title = {Editorial: Journey to sustainable supply chains}, series = {The International Journal of Logistics Management}, volume = {35}, journal = {The International Journal of Logistics Management}, number = {5}, publisher = {Emerald}, issn = {0957-4093}, doi = {10.1108/IJLM-09-2024-608}, pages = {1369 -- 1372}, year = {2024}, language = {en} } @incollection{RogersBraziotis2020, author = {Rogers, Helen and Braziotis, Christos}, title = {Operationalisation of 3D Printing Service Provision}, series = {Managing 3D Printing: Operations Management for Additive Manufacturing}, booktitle = {Managing 3D Printing: Operations Management for Additive Manufacturing}, editor = {Eyers, Daniel}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Cham}, isbn = {978-3-030-23323-5}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-23323-5_10}, pages = {161-178}, year = {2020}, abstract = {3D printing offers opportunities to reduce Supply Chain (SC) complexity by manufacturing parts closer to the points of assembly and/or maintenance (Holmstr{\"o}m and Partanen, 2014), and can also lead to the development of entrepreneurial businesses (Holzmann et al., 2017). Overall, 3D printing is having a major effect on business models, SC configurations and service provisions (Despeisse et al., 2017; Gebler et al., 2014; Hopkinson et al., 2006; Lipson and Kurman, 2013; Rayna et al., 2015). However, notwithstanding technological advances and standardization of the 3D printing technologies, wider adoption needs to overcome current hurdles such as high machine acquisition and raw materials costs, limited pool of skilled workforce, limited range of raw materials and slow manufacturing speed.}, language = {en} } @article{BraziotisRogersJimo2019, author = {Braziotis, Christos and Rogers, Helen and Jimo, Ajeseun}, title = {Strategic Deployment of 3D Printing: The Supply Chain Perspective}, series = {Supply Chain Management}, volume = {24}, journal = {Supply Chain Management}, number = {3}, publisher = {Emerald}, issn = {1758-6852}, doi = {doi.org/10.1108/SCM-09-2017-0305}, pages = {397 -- 404}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Purpose The emergence and application of 3D Printing (3DP) is changing the way products are developed and reach the customer, allowing for unprecedented customisation options. Past research has focussed on the modus operandi of the technology, providing indications for wider future adoption. 3DP is predicted to complement current production processes and is anticipated to have a profound effect on the value chain and, therefore, on supply chain (SC) management. Management-related 3DP research has, however, been largely fragmented in terms of analysing the strategic deployment of 3DP and the corresponding effects on performance objectives. The aim of this paper is to identify, define and exemplify typical 3DP deployment strategies pursued. Design/methodology/approach The approach taken is a critical literature review, synthesising and interpreting past research on cross-industry deployment of 3DP, including illustrative examples. This enabled the development of a framework of current stage knowledge. Findings Building on past research, the authors propose a conceptual framework to be used as a classification system for 3DP operations, based on process and SC level configurations across different industries. They discuss the potential impact on operations performance objectives and then highlight research gaps, proposing specific research avenues to enhance understanding of the effects of 3DP adoption on SCs. Practical implications The proposed framework outlines strategic guidelines for 3DP and provides practitioners with the range of strategic options available for 3DP deployment and anticipated impacts on performance. Originality/value The framework can be used to map 3DP deployment at an operational level and identify the likely impact on performance objectives. Relevant implications and a future research agenda are explored.}, language = {en} } @article{ChaudhuriRogersSobergetal.2019, author = {Chaudhuri, Atanu and Rogers, Helen and Soberg, Peter and Pawar, Kulwant}, title = {The role of service providers in 3D printing adoption}, series = {Industrial Management \& Data Systems}, volume = {119}, journal = {Industrial Management \& Data Systems}, number = {6}, issn = {0263-5577}, doi = {10.1108/IMDS-08-2018-0339}, pages = {1189 -- 1205}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify challenges faced by industrial firms at different phases of adoption of 3D printing (3DP), and outline how 3DP service providers can help address these challenges. Design/methodology/approach Separate interview questionnaires for 3DP users and 3DP service providers were used to conduct semi-structured interviews. Findings The key 3DP adoption challenges are as follows: creating a business case; difficulty in using different materials; optimising the process for specific parts; lack of "plug and play" solutions offered by equipment manufacturers; limited availability of training and educational support; poor end product quality; machine breakdowns; and high cost of maintenance and spare components. Using the theoretical lens of the technology acceptance model, results show a lack of ease of use and technological turbulence impact companies' decisions to adopt 3DP. 3DP service providers can indeed attempt to alleviate the above challenges faced by customers through providing multiple 3DP services across different stages of adoption. Research limitations/implications Future research should examine the role of 3DP equipment manufacturers and design and modeling software solutions providers in improving adoption and how 3DP equipment manufacturers could develop into more integrated service providers as the technology advances. Practical implications Service providers can help customers transition to 3DP and should develop a portfolio of services that fits different phases of adoption. Originality/value The paper outlines how 3DP service providers can help address customer challenges in adoption of 3DP across different stages of adoption.}, language = {en} } @article{JimoBraziotisPawaretal.2019, author = {Jimo, Ajeseun and Braziotis, Christos and Pawar, Kulwant and Rogers, Helen}, title = {Traditional Vs Additive Manufacturing Supply Chain Configurations: A Comparative Case Study}, volume = {39}, publisher = {Elsevier}, doi = {10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.432}, pages = {765 -- 774}, year = {2019}, abstract = {With the recent emergence of Additive Manufacturing (AM) for end-use production applications, contemporary AM management literature suggests radical structural transformations to Supply Chain (SC) structures with corresponding performance benefits, relative to Traditional Manufacturing (TM). However understanding is lacking about the nature of these changes. This paper analyzes the potential impacts of AM processes on traditional SC structures. Configuration theory, postulated by Alfred Chandler and widely applied in studies of TM and service SCs, serves as a basis to analyze the potential impacts of AM on the structural dimensions of SCs, with respect to a set of performance objectives. A framework is developed to capture these impacts with corresponding implications for the operations of part suppliers, module suppliers and final assemblers, deploying AM in different modes and levels in the product hierarchy. By highlighting the differences in characteristics of SCs from TM and AM production scenarios, the framework aids to conceptualize and explain the potential impacts of AM on SC configurations. This differentiation is necessary to understand the relative capabilities of TM and AM SC configurations and implications for different SC entities.}, language = {en} } @article{BagSarkarSarkaretal.2024, author = {Bag, Surajit and Sarkar, Abhigyan and Sarkar, Juhi Gahlot and Rogers, Helen and Srivastava, Gautam}, title = {Exploring the nexus of industry dynamism, climate risk exposure and mental health and well-being of owners of small and micro-sized suppliers: implications for sustainable supply chain management}, series = {The International Journal of Logistics Management}, journal = {The International Journal of Logistics Management}, publisher = {Emerald}, issn = {0957-4093}, doi = {10.1108/IJLM-12-2023-0557}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Although climate change-related risks affect all stakeholders along the supply chain, the potential impact on small and micro-sized suppliers is incredibly excessive. The corresponding toll of these climate risk threats on the mental health and well-being of owners of small and micro-sized suppliers can adversely affect their participation in sustainability efforts, ultimately impacting the firm's performance. This often overlooked dynamic forms the core of our research. We probe into two pivotal aspects: how industry dynamism and climate risk affect the mental health and well-being of owners of small and micro-sized suppliers and how, in turn, dictate involvement and, consequently, supply chain sustainability performance. This is further nuanced by the moderating role of the abusive behavior of buyers. Our study is built on resource dependency theory and the supporting empirical evidence is fortified by a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design. This study comprises three phases. In the first phase, our experiment examines the effect of industry dynamism and climate risk exposure on sustainable supply chain management performance. Hypotheses H1a and H1b are tested in the first phase. The second phase involves using a survey and structural equation modeling to test the comprehensiveness of the model. Here, the relationship between industry dynamism, climate risk exposure, mental health and well-being of owners of small and micro-sized supplier firms, supplier involvement and sustainable supply chain management (H2-H7) is tested in the second phase. In the third phase, we adopt a qualitative approach to verify and provide descriptive explanations of phase two findings. Our findings underscore the significance of small and micro-sized suppliers in sustainability, offering invaluable insights for both theoretical understanding and practical implementation. Our study highlights that buyers must allocate sufficient resources to support small and micro-sized supplier firms and collaborate closely to address climate change and its impacts. The key takeaway from this study is that buyer firms should consider SDG 3, which focuses on the good health and well-being of their employees and the mental health and well-being of owners of small and micro-sized suppliers in their upstream supply chain. This approach enhances sustainability performance in supply chains. This is one of the first studies that shows that industry dynamism and climate risk exposure can negatively impact small and micro-sized suppliers in the presence of a contextual element, i.e. abusive behavior of buyers, and ultimately, it negatively impacts sustainable supply chain performance dimensions.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{AuerRogers2022, author = {Auer, Kathrin and Rogers, Helen}, title = {A research agenda for circular food waste management in Bavaria}, series = {Transportation Research Procedia}, volume = {67}, booktitle = {Transportation Research Procedia}, doi = {10.1016/j.trpro.2022.12.043}, pages = {131 -- 136}, year = {2022}, abstract = {It is no exaggeration to say that food waste along the supply chain is becoming a significant problem for humanity. Food waste is expensive and damaging to the en-vironment and climate e.g. Accorsi and Manzini (2019), Dani (2019), Dora et al. (2020). In Germany alone, food waste generates about 4 percent of the country's total annual greenhouse gas emissions (BMEL, 2022). Entrepreneurs are often perceived as the world's problem solvers. By offering innovative new products and services they are providing pathways to overcome some of the pressing global issues, including climate change. And more specifically innovative entrepreneurs, startups as well as established companies are actively seeking to tackle the problem of food waste using innovative business models and linking agile supply chains and production systems to these busi-ness models (Dora et al., 2020, Rogers and Srivastava, 2021). In Germany, for example, companies such as "Rettergut", Kn{\"o}delkult", "Etepete" or "TooGoodToGo", approach the problem of food waste with completely different business models. This ranges from saving "ugly" fruit and vegetables, to redistributing production surplus, as well as up-cycling food and creating (digital) platforms, to ensure surplus meets demand (Deutsche Umwelthilfe, 2021, Janssen, 2018). Other innovative business models (Baierl and Behrens, 2019), whereby imperfect produce, by-products of agriculture, waste and overproduction are efficiently used are part of this exploratory research. The authors create an overview of the status quo of the markets using the example of Germany's B2B food supply chain, covering market players, their transport-, sourcing and production strategies and business model applications. Many questions still need to be addressed, including the following: Can innovative business models from different industries be applied to food? Is the platform business model suitable for the reduction of food waste? Is it necessary for retailers - as the final (downstream) tier in the supply chain before the customer - to become more flexible regarding a varying supply of products? How can the sharing economy and regional or local sourcing add to a sustainable food supply chain/network? These and other pertinent questions will the addressed in this exploratory research, for which the answers will be sought by con-ducting interviews with key stakeholders within our network and examining use cases}, language = {en} } @article{RogersSrivastava2021, author = {Rogers, Helen and Srivastava, Mohit}, title = {Emerging Sustainable Supply Chain Models for 3D Food Printing}, series = {Sustainability}, volume = {13}, journal = {Sustainability}, doi = {doi.org/10.3390/su132112085}, year = {2021}, abstract = {3D printing technology is rapidly transforming supply chains across diverse manu-facturing sectors, enabling personalisation of consumer goods ranging from car parts, medical devices, toys, houses, and even clothing. Food production is also included in the breadth of applications of this expanding technology. Increasing consumer awareness about sustainability, including the problem of food waste, as well as growing interest in customised nutrition have led to the emergence of food industry research focused on aspects, such as packaging, portion size, and healthy sustainable ingredients, to satisfy consumer demands. The growing market for personalised food options in particular, requires increased flexibility and agility to tailor ingredients to an individual's specific requirements. Such specificity is not easily fulfilled using traditional mass production methods; however, the emerging technology of 3D food printing (3DFP) may be one solution. This paper evaluates the opportunities, risks, and challenges associated with 3DFP, with a focus on developing sustainable supply chains for future growth. Drawing on 12 semi-structured interviews with 3DFP industry managers and current literature in the domain, we propose three supply chain models for 3DFP services, as well as an overview of the key business drivers.}, language = {en} } @article{JimoBraziotisRogersetal.2022, author = {Jimo, Ajeseun and Braziotis, Christos and Rogers, Helen and Pawar, Kulwant}, title = {Additive manufacturing}, series = {International Journal of Production Economics}, volume = {253}, journal = {International Journal of Production Economics}, doi = {10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108592}, pages = {14}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Using Resource Dependence Theory (RDT), this paper explores the changing state of Supply Chain (SC) complexities and dependencies resulting from Additive Manufacturing (AM) adoption, analysing implications for competitiveness. We utilised an adapted SC configuration framework to develop embedded case studies across the Aerospace, Automotive and Power Generation industries. The sample included fifteen companies deploying metal AM across three SC tiers. Using an abductive logic, our findings reveal that the complexity and dependency-reduction potential of AM depends on economic, industry, geographical, organisational and technological factors. We developed a conceptual framework for AM SC configuration and four propositions, which provide further insights into the interplay between SC complexities, dependencies and competitiveness. By utilising RDT, we contribute to the AM SC configuration literature by highlighting the mediating role that dependencies play in achieving competitiveness, as well as strategies adopted by firms to mitigate uncertainty. We also highlight the interplay between 'relationship and governance' and three other SC configuration dimensions in relation to competitiveness. Insights into the changing state of complexities and dependencies identified in this study could also support managerial decisions in AM SC design.}, language = {en} } @article{SrivastavaRogers2021, author = {Srivastava, Mohit and Rogers, Helen}, title = {Managing Global Supply Chain Risks: Effects of the Industry Sector}, series = {International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications}, volume = {25}, journal = {International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications}, number = {7}, doi = {10.1080/13675567.2021.1873925}, pages = {1091-1114}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Despite the abundance of articles addressing global supply chain risks and their mitigation strategies, there are surprisingly few insights into how different industries manage global supply chain risks while internationalising abroad. There are conflicting results from previous researches that specific global supply chain risk management practices work in one industry but not in others. We believe that in each industry sector, the global supply chain risks and their mitigation strategies differ. We used profile deviation and ideal profile methodology to identify top performers in three industry sectors (Audit, Finance and Consulting, Automotive, and IT and Software) and evaluated their best practices towards managing global supply chain risks. This study used an online survey to gather information on how Indian executives across these industries manage global supply chain risks during their internationalisation process and found the 'ideal' risk mitigation profiles for all three industries. These findings provide new insights to practitioners as they will serve as a useful reference tool for Indian executives planning to internationalise.}, language = {en} } @article{RogersBrem2025, author = {Rogers, Helen and Brem, Alexander}, title = {Tariff Uncertainty and the Engineering Manager's Dilemma}, series = {IEEE Engineering Management Review}, volume = {53}, journal = {IEEE Engineering Management Review}, number = {4}, publisher = {IEEE}, issn = {1937-4178}, doi = {10.1109/EMR.2025.3609416}, pages = {3}, year = {2025}, abstract = {For engineering managers working in global organisations, tariffs have become an unpredictable force shaping all aspects of project delivery, sourcing, and design. Once treated as an issue reserved for finance or executive teams, trade-related taxes now directly influence engineering decisions on a daily basis. The challenge is not just that tariffs are higher but that they are volatile, shifting with political agendas that are difficult to predict.}, language = {en} } @article{FonsecaRogersTsolakisetal.2025, author = {Fonseca, Mariel Alem and Rogers, Helen and Tsolakis, Naoum and Kumar, Mukesh}, title = {Quorn Foods: the road to supply chain resilience}, series = {Ivey Business School Cases}, journal = {Ivey Business School Cases}, publisher = {Ivey Publishing}, address = {Toronto, Canada}, pages = {17}, year = {2025}, abstract = {In 2025, Quorn Foods faced a pivotal strategic decision as the United Kingdom's government called for greater national food resilience amid ongoing global disruptions. As a global pioneer in sustainable meat-free mycoprotein produced through fermentation, Quorn Foods possessed the technology and capacity to advance the UK's self-sufficiency agenda. Yet financial constraints demanded caution. With rising raw material costs, weakening consumer demand, and growing geopolitical uncertainty, the company's leaders confronted the tension between short-term cost control and long-term investment in innovation. Weighing the opportunities to supply public institutions with homegrown protein, they examined how biotechnology and operational efficiency might together redefine food security and resilience for a nation seeking stability in an increasingly volatile world.}, language = {en} } @article{WagnerRogers2025, author = {Wagner, Andreas and Rogers, Helen}, title = {Applications in Multi-Material Additive Manufacturing}, series = {IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Society Leadership Brief}, journal = {IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Society Leadership Brief}, publisher = {IEEE}, address = {USA}, year = {2025}, language = {en} } @incollection{RogersBugdahnPrashad2023, author = {Rogers, Helen and Bugdahn, Matthias and Prashad, Anisha}, title = {Business Models for Additive Manufacturing: A Consulting Services Perspective}, series = {Advances in Digital Manufacturing Systems}, booktitle = {Advances in Digital Manufacturing Systems}, editor = {Amit, RK}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Singapore}, isbn = {978-981-19-7071-9}, doi = {10.1007/978-981-19-7071-9}, pages = {81-97}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Additive Manufacturing (AM) is a key change driver for digital transformation. Although some manufacturing companies have deployed AM for selected customised and (mainly) low volume or niche parts (e.g. in the automobile and aerospace industries), uncertainty remains in terms of what business models are needed to integrate AM into their overall digital business strategy. This chapter provides an overview of what types of business models are emerging, using the example of the AM consulting services industry. This was chosen because consulting services firms have positioned themselves as a catalyst to enable companies to ensure they are on the right track in terms of digital transformation. The chapter concludes by describing current challenges and emerging future directions for the AM consulting services industry.}, language = {en} }