Refine
Document Type
- Doctoral thesis (4)
Institute
Language
- English (4) (remove)
Keywords
- Corporate Social Responsibility (4) (remove)
This cumulative dissertation aims to provide novel and holistic ideas on how companies can solve different challenges in the implementation of responsible business conduct (RBC).
The dissertation entails three individual scientific papers:
1. Baier, C., Göttsche, M., Hellmann, A., and Schiemann, F. (2021), “Too good to be true: Influencing credibility perceptions with signaling reference explicitness and assurance depth”, published online in the Journal of Business Ethics (VHB-JQ3: B), doi: 10.1007/s10551-020-04719-7.
2. Baier, C., Beckmann, M., and Heidingsfelder, J. (2020), “Hidden allies for value chain responsibility? A system theory perspective on aligning sustainable supply chain management and trade compliance”, published in the International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management (VHB-JQ3: B), Vol. 50 No. 4, pp. 439-456, doi: 10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2019-0037.
3. Baier, C. (2020), “Strengere Sorgfaltspflichten für verantwortungsvolle Lieferketten?”, published in DER BETRIEB (VHB-JQ3: D), Vol. 35, pp. 1801-1805.
The three papers of this dissertation concentrate on specific facets of RBC and aim to find new insights and solutions for different challenges in the implementation of RBC. The first paper investigates ethical sustainability reporting and assurance practices. The second paper emphasizes that corporations are responsible to manage both the upstream and downstream sustainability impacts on the value chain and thus concentrates on the RBC aspect of value chain responsibility. The third paper focuses on the concept of supply chain due diligence to identify, prevent, mitigate, and account for adverse human rights and environmental impacts as an elementary part of RBC.
“While each of our individual companies serves its own corporate purpose, we share a fundamental commitment to all of our stakeholders” (Business Roundtable, 2019). With this statement, 181 managers of the Business Roundtable renewed their fundamental view about the purpose of business. This symbolic statement generated a vivid discussion and proved the importance and actuality of addressing organisational purpose as a research topic.
From an academic perspective the discussion about organizational purpose is not new but diverse (Bartlett & Ghoshal, 1994; Basu, 1999; Canals, 2010; George, 1999; Henderson & Steen, 2015; Hollensbe, Wookey, Hickey, George, & Nichols, 2014; Koslowski, 2001; Loza Adaui & Mion, 2016; Porter & Kramer, 2011; Quinn & Thakor, 2018; Sisodia, Wolfe, & Sheth, 2006). There are many overlapping points between the discussion on the organisational purpose and the study of corporate sustainability. Because from a sustainability management perspective, companies are administrated and valued, taking into consideration not only their economic performance but also the ecological and social impact that they generate (Elkington, 1994).
This cumulative dissertation addresses in a broad perspective the overlapping points of the discussion on organizational purpose and sustainability and entails four modules:
Module I: Matthias S. Fifka, Anna-Lena Kühn, Cristian R. Loza Adaui & Markus Stiglbauer (2016) Promoting Development in Weak Institutional Environments: The Understanding and Transmission of Sustainability by NGOs in Latin America. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(3), 1091-1122.
Module II: Giorgio Mion & Cristian R. Loza Adaui (2020) Understanding the Purpose of Benefit Corporations: An Empirical Study on the Italian Case. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 5(4), 1-15.
Module III: Giorgio Mion & Cristian R. Loza Adaui (2019) Mandatory Nonfinancial Disclosure and Its Consequences on the Sustainability Reporting Quality of Italian and German Companies. Sustainability, 11(17), 4612.
Module IV: Cristian R. Loza Adaui (2020) Sustainability Reporting Quality of Peruvian Listed Companies and the Impact of Regulatory Requirements of Sustainability Disclosures. Sustainability, 2020, 12(3), 1135.
This dissertation comprises three empirical essays on corporate social responsibility (CSR). The first essay critically assesses an empirical quasi-experiment based on the Russell 1000/2000 index assignments. The second essay investigates the effects of institutional investors on CSR. The third essay finds that ESG risks are associated with negative long-run stock returns. Collectively, the three essays provide evidence that CSR increases shareholder value if CSR prevents incidents.
This dissertation comprises three empirical studies on corporate social responsibility (CSR). The first study examines how an exogenous increase in agency problems affects CSR investment decisions. The second study examines whether the value relevance of CSR reporting is affected by customer profile differences. The third study examines how national culture shapes several fundamental corporate decisions determining the credibility of CSR reports. Collectively, the three studies provide novel and holistic evidence on why managers pursue CSR.
1. Steindl, T., Hellmann, A. and Goettsche M. 2017. Building a social empire? Managerial preferences, shareholder litigation, and corporate social responsibility. Working Paper.
2. Goettsche, M., Steindl T. and Gietl S. 2016. Do customers affect the value relevance of corporate social responsibility reporting? Empirical evidence on stakeholder interdependence. Business Strategy and the Environment 25(3): 149-164.
3. Steindl, T. 2017. Cultural rule orientation, legal institutions, and the credibility of corporate social responsibility reports. Working Paper.