Refine
Document Type
- Doctoral thesis (3)
Institute
- Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaftliche Fakultät (3) (remove)
Language
- English (3) (remove)
Keywords
- Englisch (2)
- Sprachvariante (2)
- World Englishes (2)
- Afrika (1)
- Conceptual metaphor (1)
- Cultural variation (1)
- Konzeptuelle Metapher (1)
- Kulturelle Variation (1)
- Logopädie (1)
- Political discourse (1)
Exposure to more than one language influences children's language development (Kehoe & Kannathasan, 2021). It has been shown that particularly the relative amount of language input bilingual children receive influences their language development. Bilingual children can never dedicate the same amount of time to either one of their languages as their monolingual peers because their everyday linguistic environment is divided between two languages. This may ultimately lead to typically developing bilingual children with linguistic profiles similar to monolingual children with a language developmental disorder (DLD) if they have reduced contact to one of their languages (Paradis, 2010). For this reason, it is particularly difficult for clinicians (i.e., Speech-Language Pathologists, SLPs) to distinguish between actual language impairment and typical deviations from the (monolingual) norm due to limited language exposure. In Germany, almost half of all children in speech therapy have a bilingual or multilingual language background (Lüke & Ritterfeld, 2011). Despite the high proportion of bilingual children in speech therapy, the assessment and treatment of DLD in this population is still predominantly monoculturally and monolingually oriented (Scharff Rethfeldt, 2016). Previous studies have identified nonword repetition tasks (NWRTs) as promising tools for the clinical differentiation between bilingual typically developing children and children with DLD because they are arguably relatively free from the influence of children's prior language experience (Schwob et al., 2021). However, some researchers have raised the question of whether bilingual children might still be disadvantaged by language-specific characteristics of nonwords (e.g., Chiat, 2015).
In three separate studies, this dissertation will (1) demonstrate the influence of bilingual language exposure on speech sound processing, an essential building block of language development, (2) evaluate how DLD is diagnosed in bilingual children in Germany and which factors contribute to positive attitudes towards bilingualism in SLPs, and (3) investigate whether bilingual children's nonword repetition performance of language-specific versus unspecific (i.e., more language-neutral) nonwords is subject to the influence of their individual language exposure.
In the first study (see chapter 2), the perception and production of Voice Onset Time (VOT) in bilingual Italian-German, monolingual German, and monolingual Italian children was investigated using a combination of neurophysiological and behavioral methods. Forty five-year-old children (16 monolingual German, 24 bilingual Italian-German) participated in the electroencephalographic (EEG) study, in which automatic speech sound processing of Italian- and German-specific VOT contrasts was investigated. To compare the participants language-specific VOT production, in addition to the 16 monolingual German and 24 bilingual Italian-German children, a control group of five monolingual Italian-speaking children were tested with a picture naming task in which the production of language-specific word-initial VOT was recorded based on ten words per target sound. Acoustic measurements were taken in Praat (Boersma & Weenink, 2013). Children's language background was assessed using a parental language background questionnaire. In the second study (see Chapter 3), 66 SLPs from Germany participated in an online survey investigating their attitudes towards bilingualism and their approaches in their daily clinical practice. Finally, in the third study (see Chapter 4), a new NWRT was developed that included Italian- and German-specific as well as language-unspecific nonwords. The NWRT was implemented in an online platform and administered to a group of 26 bilingual Italian-German TD children. Children's repetition performance in the different nonword subcategories was analyzed in the context of their linguistic background (recorded using the same questionnaire as in Study 1).
Study 1 showed that Italian-German bilingual five-year-old children and the monolingual German control group behaved similarly in processing language-specific VOT stimuli. However, differences between the two groups likely related to language exposure were evident in the processing of a German "long lag" stimulus. Surprisingly, the bilingual group had no advantage in processing the Italian "voicing lead" stimuli. This suggests that the bilingual five-year-olds do not (yet) process the Italian contrasts automatically (Yu et al. 2019). Acoustic measures of productive VOT for Italian and German words were consistent with this interpretation. Specifically, bilingual children showed mastery of the German but variability with respect to the Italian VOT contrast. Evidence for crosslinguistic influence (cf. Paradis & Genesee, 1996) was observed. Study 2 showed that there seems to be an imbalance between SLPs' knowledge of the specific requirements for providing their services to bilingual children and their actual application in clinical practice, indicating sufficient awareness but still a relatively high presence of monolingual approaches in the context of speech therapy. Presumably, this is due to a lack of available materials and/or resources. Finally, Study 3 showed that Italian-German bilingual children performed equally well on Italian-specific, German-specific, and language-unspecific nonwords, regardless of their individual language exposure and language dominance patterns, supporting the view that even language-specific NWRTs can be used to clinically assess the language performance of bilingual children with relatively little exposure to either of their languages. However, this result has yet to be replicated and thus confirmed with a group of children with DLD.
In summary, these three studies highlight the gap between scientific research and clinical practice and demonstrate the relevance of clinicians' participation in research projects to (1) improve knowledge transfer between the two fields and (2) promote evidence-based practices in the context of Speech-Language Pathology.
Employing a two-pronged approach to analyzing language, this study uses evidence obtained from a large-scale corpus study and psycholinguistic experiments to investigate the Comparative Correlative (CC) construction (e.g. The more we get together, the happier we’ll be) across twenty varieties of English. More than 10,000 tokens from three of the largest corpora of English (COCA, BNC, GloWbE) and experimental data from almost 600 participants from four locations (Texas, South Africa, Singapore, and Kenya) are analyzed using advanced statistical methods, providing striking evidence for a high degree of parataxis between the subclauses of the construction and massive redundancy regarding cross-clausal associations which, it is argued, are best explained with a Usage-based Construction Grammar (CxG) approach that posits the existence of an elaborate network of interconnected mesoconstructions.
Addressing more general questions about the nature of human language, it is argued that this ‘bottom-up’ approach to language can account for one of the most fundamental riddles that the discipline of linguistics is striving to solve: Accounting for the potential of infinite creativity of language based on a finite set of rules. Furthermore, it is claimed that as an inclusive approach to language, CxG is better at accounting for construction-specific features that Mainstream Generative Grammar (MGG)-based approaches have struggled with. As it turns out, the evidence suggests that the English CC construction is anything but ‘peripheral’.
Additionally, this study examines the CC construction from a World Englishes perspective, addressing a significant gap in research: Schneider, for example, has noted that “[o]nly rarely have New Englishes been employed as test cases for general questions of language theory” (2003: 237), and Hundt writes of the challenge of “bring[ing] intricate, quantitative modelling of usage data to bear on theoretical modelling” (2021: 298). Accordingly, this study provides evidence for the predictive power of Schneider’s Dynamic Model (DM) (2003, 2007), which posits that there is a correlation between evolutionary stages of World Englishes and linguistic features. In this context, it is also shown how principles of cognitive approaches to language can explain both generalizations across varieties as well as variety- and DM stage-specific effects. Furthermore, this study provides strong evidence to support Kortmann’s claim of a continuum ranging from Pidgins and Creoles as “deleters” to L1 varieties as “preservers” (2014: 9) of grammatical formatives, contra Mesthrie and Bhatt’s claim of a geographical dichotomy between African and Asian varieties.
This study explores the distinctive patterns of language use in political discourse across selected outer circle (Cameroon and Ghana) and inner circle (US and South Africa) varieties, using a corpus-based approach. More specifically, the research sets out to investigate the use of two types of linguistic features, namely, personal pronouns and kinship metaphors. In a first analysis, I adopt an alternative approach to investigating the use of personal pronouns in political discourse. The approach essentially draws from the cognitive linguistic concept of ‘frames’ as articulated by the theory of frame semantics (Fillmore, 1976, 1977a, 1982, 1985, 2008; Fillmore & Baker, 2010). I use an automatic frame semantic parsing tool, the SEMAFOR parser (Das et al, 2014), to identify the different types of (semantic) frames and frame roles with which specific personal pronouns are instantiated across the four varieties. I then compare the findings to illustrate instances of universality and variation.
In a second analysis, I examine the types of metaphorical conceptualizations which are made using kinship terms across the varieties. Working top-down from conceptual schemas to linguistic instantiation, I identify and compare the frequencies of metaphors from the kinship field and also describe the types of cross-domain mappings typically involved in each of the varieties. My analysis is mostly informed by mainstream cognitive approaches to the study of metaphors, more especially cultural variations in the use of conceptual metaphors (Kövecses, 2002, 2005). I demonstrate that although there is empirical evidence for the use of a kinship conceptual schema across all four varieties, there are however significant variances in the specific metaphorical mappings used to instantiate this high-level conceptual structure.
Both analyses make a case for the fact that in the field of political discourse especially, language use may be structured and constrained by conceptual schemas which themselves are culturally determined.