@phdthesis{Gebhardt2011, author = {Gebhardt, Christian}, title = {An institution theory approach to the relationship between organization and society [cumulative dissertation]}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:824-opus-991}, school = {Katholische Universit{\"a}t Eichst{\"a}tt-Ingolstadt}, year = {2011}, abstract = {Using sociological institutionalism the three articles constituting this dissertation scrutinize the relationship between organizations and their (social) environment at different levels of analysis and in the context of specific research questions. Drawing on qualitative research conducted in the hydropower sector the first article offers a conceptual framework for the analysis of intersections between social movements and corporations. It does so by introducing, firstly, a model that captures organizational challenges to an accurate perception and adequate evaluation of social movements and, secondly, a taxonomy that differentiates types of social movements according to corporate perception patterns. By stressing institutional structures and dynamics within the targeted corporation this framework facilitates a theoretically informed explanation of why corporations "choose" to react to anti-corporate activism in certain ways. Examples are intentional or unintentional ignorance, constructive dialog, fixation on legal procedures, or, in the extreme case, aggressive or even militant repression. The study contributes to the literatures on social movements and institutional theory. The second study explores how external institutions related to ethical business conduct play out at the micro-level and how the corresponding translation process into the organizational context is utilized by organizational actors to further individual or group interests. Based on rich interview and documentary data as well as on thirty month of participant observation of three corporate social responsibility projects I develop an everyday-life perspective on how organizational actors utilize external institutions to prevail in games of micro-politics and power struggles. Results suggest that knowledge about external institutions substitutes formal power as it provides less powerful actors with the possibility to manipulate the meaning macro-institutions assume during the process of micro-translation. Combining the literatures of institutional theory and upward influence behavior I contribute to the micro-foundation of institutional theory by showing how political behavior affects institutional change. Original abstract of the third article: In our phenomenon-driven study we address mutual influences between a focal organization and its organizational environment. We draw on concepts and insights of new institutional theory as well as on the results of an extensive ethnographic field study of the 2006 to 2008 Siemens corruption scandal. We find that this event did not only result in considerable consequences for Siemens, but also culminated in a reevaluation of the phenomenon of corporate corruption with regard to its regulative, normative, and cultural-cognitive dimensions. It is therefore particularly suitable to analyze the various effects of institutional change on a focal organization like Siemens. Due to the momentum this scandal generated as well as due to the importance of Siemens our case makes it furthermore possible to analyze action patterns through which the focal company attempts to shape institutional change processes in its organizational environment subsequently to the scandal. According to our comprehension that change can only be assessed meaningfully from a process perspective we reconstruct the development of the institutional context of the phenomenon corruption as well as its effects on the focal company as a sequence of events. We do so by proposing a model which conceptualizes events as nexus between organizations and their organizational environment.}, subject = {Neoinstitutionalismus}, language = {mul} }