Refine
Year of publication
- 2013 (187) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (75)
- Part of a Book (42)
- Working Paper (24)
- Editorship book (17)
- Contribution to a Periodical (9)
- Book (6)
- Master's Thesis (5)
- Conference Proceeding (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
- Studentpaper (2)
Keywords
- China (3)
- Corruption (2)
- Education (2)
- Policy implementation (2)
- Variable renewables (2)
- Zwei-Wege-Modell (2)
- Accountability (1)
- Administrative Networks (1)
- Adolescent (1)
- Agency (1)
Analyse der verschiedenen Arten von Stiftungen und ihre Bedeutung für die Kinder- und Jugendhilfe
(2013)
Few would doubt that the conditions of governance have changed-and continue to change-as the early 21st century seems to enter a period of profound uncertainty. Yet, at the same time, the world seems alive with a cacophony of approaches-old and new-on how to improve governance and, ultimately, policy outcomes. This collection-the first in a series of annual editions-seeks to address the implications of the current state of the world in terms of "good governance", i.e. the effective, efficient, and reliable set of legitimate institutions and actors dedicated to dealing with matters of public concern, be it in the field of financial markets (the focus of this edition), health care, security, or migration, and across local, national and international levels. Researchers at The Hertie School of Governance (Berlin, Germany) and other experts examine the current state of governance challenges and innovations from a variety of inter-disciplinary perspectives. This edition features a special set of chapters on the challenges of financial and fiscal governance, the tradeoffs faced by governance actors, and the new arrangements that have emerged or are required to not only address the ongoing crisis but also ensure greater stability into the future. This special section is complemented by chapters introducing basic concepts and models; exploring other global challenges and the reasons behind seemingly lackluster responses to them and highlighting the need for responsible sovereignty; conceptualizing governance innovation and introducing key examples; and assessing existing indicators of governance, while proposing a new framework for collecting, interpreting and applying governance-related information.
The Governance Report 2013
(2013)
his Report is about the state of governance. Few would doubt that the conditions of governance have changed — and continue to change — as the early 21st century seems to enter a period of profound uncertainty. Yet, at the same time, the world seems alive with a cacophony of approaches — old and new — on how to improve governance and, ultimately, policy outcomes. This Report — the first in a series of annual editions produced by the Hertie School of Governance — seeks to address the implications of the current state of the world in terms of "good governance", that is, the effective, efficient, and reliable set of legitimate institutions and actors dedicated to dealing with matters of public concern, be it in the field of financial markets, health care, security, or migration, and across local, national, and international levels. Following an introduction that offers a framework of basic concepts and models, The Governance Report 2013 then goes on to explore a number of global challenges and the reasons behind seemingly lacklustre responses and highlight the need for responsible sovereignty; examine in depth the challenges of financial and fiscal governance with a focus on the trade-offs and ways to address them; analyse key governance innovations and their potential for success; and assess existing indicators of governance, while proposing a new framework for collecting, interpreting, and applying governance-related information. The findings lead to a set of concrete proposals on the way ahead.
Few would doubt that the conditions of governance have changed-and continue to change-as the early 21st century seems to enter a period of profound uncertainty. Yet, at the same time, the world seems alive with a cacophony of approaches-old and new-on how to improve governance and, ultimately, policy outcomes. This collection-the first in a series of annual editions-seeks to address the implications of the current state of the world in terms of "good governance", i.e. the effective, efficient, and reliable set of legitimate institutions and actors dedicated to dealing with matters of public concern, be it in the field of financial markets (the focus of this edition), health care, security, or migration, and across local, national and international levels. Researchers at The Hertie School of Governance (Berlin, Germany) and other experts examine the current state of governance challenges and innovations from a variety of inter-disciplinary perspectives. This edition features a special set of chapters on the challenges of financial and fiscal governance, the tradeoffs faced by governance actors, and the new arrangements that have emerged or are required to not only address the ongoing crisis but also ensure greater stability into the future. This special section is complemented by chapters introducing basic concepts and models; exploring other global challenges and the reasons behind seemingly lackluster responses to them and highlighting the need for responsible sovereignty; conceptualizing governance innovation and introducing key examples; and assessing existing indicators of governance, while proposing a new framework for collecting, interpreting and applying governance-related information
The environment of national agencies has changed considerably in recent years as they increasingly become engaged in European Union networks. This article contributes to a growing body of literature on those networks and their effect on executive politics at the national level by asking whether and how the EU involvement of national agencies affects the agencies' autonomy in policy formulation. We develop an analytical model for explaining the effect of EU involvement on agency autonomy. Analyzing data from a comprehensive survey of federal agencies in Germany, we find that EU involvement has a positive effect on national agencies' policy autonomy. Moreover, we find a somewhat stronger effect of agency involvement in sectoral networks on autonomy than in intergovernmental networks, which is attributed to information asymmetries between ministries and agencies. Yet this effect is weaker than initially expected, which can be explained by a considerable degree of overlap between different types of EU involvement.
Countries in Northwestern Europe, including Belgium, report cohort fertility levels of close to two children per woman; whereas Central European countries, such as Germany, have levels of around 1.6 children. In seeking to explain these differences, some scholars have stressed the role of the social policy context, while others have pointed to variation in fertility-related social norms. But because these influences are interdependent, it is difficult to isolate their effects on fertility trends. This study attempts to disentangle these two factors by drawing on a quasi-natural experiment. After World War I Germany was compelled to cede the Eupen–Malmedy territory to Belgium. The population of this region has retained its German linguistic identity, but has been subject to Belgian social policies. We examine whether the fertility trends in this German-speaking region of Belgium follow the Belgian or the German pattern. Our findings indicate that they generally resemble the Belgian pattern. This suggests that institutional factors are important for understanding the current fertility differences in Western Europe.
In Partnerschaft mit dem Bundesministerium des Innern (BMI) und weiteren Partnern veranstaltete Wegweiser im Juni 2013 erstmals den Zukunftskongress Staat & Verwaltung. Im Vorfeld wurde die Studie Zukunftspanel 2013 zum Zukunftskongress Staat & Verwaltung durchgeführt, eine Weiterentwicklung des jährlichen Monitoring E-Government & Verwaltungsmodernisierung Deutschland, das seit mittlerweile mehr als zehn Jahren als einzige kontinuierliche Befragung den Fortschritt sowie die Trends, Perspektiven und Herausforderungen der Verwaltungsmodernisierung in Deutschland erhebt.
- Das Zukunftspanel analysiert bei nahezu allen Verwaltungen in Bund, Ländern und Kommunen den Status quo, erzielte Erfolge und zukünftige Herausforderungen der Verwaltungsreform und Digitalisierung der Verwaltung
- Es erfasst – im Vorfeld des Zukunftskongresses Staat & Verwaltung 2013 – konkrete Fortschritte bei der Verwaltungsmodernisierung
- Es identifiziert Erfolgsprojekte, die zur Übertragung und Nachahmung anregen sollen
- Es beschleunigt die Diskussion um drängende Modernisierungs- und Sanierungsmaßnahmen in Staat und Verwaltung
Das Zukunftspanel Staat & Verwaltung wird von der Wegweiser GmbH Berlin Research & Strategy in Zusammenarbeit mit der Hertie School of Governance durchgeführt.(Quelle: Wegweiser.de)
Stetig neue Anforderungen an die Leistungsfähigkeit und gleichzeitig steigender Kostendruck sind bereits seit Jahrzehnten die zentralen Herausforderungen öffentlicher Verwaltungen und Auslöser von Veränderungen. Im Hinblick auf Erfolg versprechende Lösungen und Maßnahmen zeichnet sich dabei in den letzten Jahren allerdings eine interessante Schwerpunktverschiebung ab: bei den derzeitigen Reformdiskussionen in Europa stehen vor allem die Verbesserung sowie neue Formen der Zusammenarbeit und Koordination im Vordergrund. Zwei aktuelle Studien bestätigen hierbei einen klaren Handlungsbedarf in Deutschland.
Recent decades have seen a range of public sector reforms, focusing on diverse aspects. Some of these reforms have had a structural dimension and include privatisation, downsizing and outsourcing, while others have focused on aspects such as improving access and transparency, collaboration, and innovation. This contribution explores how public sector executives rate administrative reforms in their country on a number of dimensions. It presents preliminary findings from an academic survey among 3,173 top public sector executives in 10 European countries.