Refine
Year of publication
- 2010 (124) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (47)
- Part of a Book (34)
- Editorship book (12)
- Working Paper (10)
- Book (7)
- Contribution to a Periodical (6)
- Review (4)
- Case Study (1)
- Course Material (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Keywords
- Social Entrepreneurship (3)
- Fertility (2)
- Germany (2)
- Regulierung (2)
- Adolescent (1)
- Auctions (1)
- Balkan states, South-Eastern Europe (1)
- Belief management (1)
- Bildungsungleichheit (1)
- Birth order (1)
- Budgetary procedures (1)
- Business Strategy/Leadership (1)
- COP-16 (1)
- Civil society, transformation (1)
- Climate negotiations (1)
- Climate regimes (1)
- Climate targets (1)
- Compliance (1)
- Conditional cooperation (1)
- Control (1)
- Coordination (1)
- Eastern and Western Germany (1)
- Economics, general (1)
- Education (1)
- Empirical social research (1)
- Entrepreneurship (1)
- Entwicklungsaufgaben (1)
- European Council (1)
- European Court of Human Rights (1)
- Europäische Union (1)
- Family (1)
- Federal Republic of Germany (1)
- Female labour force participation (1)
- Finanzkrise (1)
- Finanzpolitik (1)
- Fiscal rules (1)
- Future perspective (1)
- Föderalismus (1)
- German Unification (1)
- Geschlecht (1)
- Government reform (1)
- Human rights (1)
- Innere Sicherheit (1)
- International cooperation (1)
- Kontinentale Wohlfahrtsstaaten (1)
- Labor Market Policy (1)
- Labor Relations (1)
- Law reform (1)
- Leisure time behavior (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Male breadwinner model (1)
- Media (1)
- Mehrebenensystem (1)
- Microcensus (1)
- Minority policies in Turkey and Greece (1)
- Motivation (1)
- Multilateralism (1)
- Multiple equilibria (1)
- Nutzung von Wissen (1)
- Observability (1)
- Online games (1)
- Optimal linear income taxation (1)
- Organization (1)
- Patient education (1)
- Perinatal Statistics (1)
- Political activity (1)
- Politikberatung (1)
- Politikzyklus (1)
- Post-Copenhagen (1)
- Public finances (1)
- Reference dependence (1)
- Reform (1)
- Regulierungsdiskurse (1)
- Regulierungskonzepte (1)
- Research results (1)
- Reserve prices (1)
- Romania, development, state intervention (1)
- Scaling (1)
- Small Business (1)
- Social Policy (1)
- Social law (1)
- Social norms (1)
- Social relations (1)
- Soziale Herkunft (1)
- Soziale Stratifikationsmuster (1)
- Sozialisation (1)
- Staatlichkeit (1)
- Staatstheorie (1)
- Steuerpolitik (1)
- Survey (1)
- Sustainability (1)
- Tax enforcement (1)
- Tax evasion (1)
- Terrorism (1)
- Torture (1)
- Utilization (1)
- Value-orientation (1)
- Verstaatlichung (1)
- Western Germany (1)
- Wohlfahrtsstaatsfinanzierung (1)
- Youth research (1)
- bessere Rechtsetzung (1)
- deutsche Begriffsrezeption (1)
- gemischte Wirtschaft (1)
- politische Ökonomie (1)
- praktische und analytische Verwendung (1)
2010 feiert Hartz IV seinen fünften Geburtstag. Die fast täglichen Debatten zeigen, dass das "Herzstück" der Agenda 2010 die Bundesrepublik grundlegender verändert hat als jede andere Reform der letzten Jahrzehnte. Basierend auf Gesprächen mit damaligen Akteuren untersuchen Anke Hassel und Christof Schiller die Hintergründe der Hartz-Reformen: Wer waren die zentralen Entscheidungsträger? Wurde der Reformstau überwunden und ist das deutsche Regierungssystem heute besser in der Lage, auf die derzeitigen Herausforderungen zu reagieren? Dieses Buch liefert erstmals eine lückenlose Analyse der Entscheidungsprozesse, die zu Hartz IV geführt haben, und gibt einen Ausblick auf die aktuellen Herausforderungen der Arbeitsmarktpolitik. Die Autoren räumen mit gängigen Vorurteilen über die rot-grünen Reformen auf und zeichnen ein kenntnisreiches Bild der wirtschaftlichen und politischen Zusammenhänge in der deutschen Politik. Sie kommen zu dem Schluss, dass die Hartz-IV-Reform, obgleich extrem, durchaus typisch für Reformpolitik in Deutschland ist und dass durch das Zusammenspiel von Föderalismus, Parteienwettbewerb und Sozialpartnern auch in Zukunft ähnliche Maßnahmen zu erwarten sind.
How does trade liberalization that raises a country’s import competition affect the innovative activity of its firms? We exploit the strong growth of Chinese exports resulting from China’s entry into the World Trade Organization in 2001 as a competitive shock to, specifically, Mexican manufacturing firms. Innovation is captured through information on the adoption of specific production techniques such as just in time inventory methods, quality control, and job rotation. Our results indicate that China’s rise in global trade did not affect by much Mexico’s rate of innovation, which contrasts with the substantial gains that others have found in the case of bilateral liberalization. At the same time, there is a striking heterogeneity in the responses across firms: productive firms innovate more while less productive firms innovate less. This leads to positive selection in that initial differences in firm performance are sharpened by the advent of new competition. We discuss the implications of these findings for theories of trade and innovation.
In this article, we study how firm heterogeneity influences productivity catching up using plant-level data from Mexico. The article addresses three issues: first, it evaluates the process of convergence towards the global versus the local technological frontier in a middle-income country such as Mexico. Second, it systematically evaluates the role of technological efforts in determining the speed of convergence towards each of these technological frontiers. Third, it assesses the role of openness and trade integration in determining the speed of convergence and presents a horse race between integration and technological effort in explaining the determinants of heterogeneity in influencing the process of convergence toward both the domestic and the global technological frontier. Our results suggest that building firm-level technological capabilities is important for catching up with the global frontier. A policy focused on trade alone will facilitate convergence towards the best technological practices available locally, but it will fall short of encouraging convergence with the global frontier.
The decision to establish direct elections to the European Parliament was intended by many to establish a direct link between the individual citizen and decision making at the European level. Elections were meant to help to establish a common identity among the peoples of Europe, to legitimise policy through the normal electoral processes and provide a public space within which Europeans could exert a more direct control over their collective future. Critics disagreed, arguing that direct elections to the European Parliament would further undermine the sovereignty of member states, and may not deliver on the promise that so many were making on behalf of that process. In particular, some wondered whether elections alone could mobilise European publics to take a much greater interest in European matters, with the possibility of European elections being contested simply on national matters. Evaluating these divergent views, the subject of this article is to review the literature on direct elections to the European Parliament in the context of the role these elections play in governance of the European Union. The seminal work by Reif and Schmitt serves as the starting point of our review. These authors were the first to discuss elections to the European Parliament as second-order national elections. Results of second-order elections are influenced not only by second-order factors, but also by the situation in the first-order arena at the time of the second-order election. In the 30 years and six more sets of European Parliament elections since the publication of their work, the concept has become the dominant one in any academic discussion of European elections. In this article we review that work in order to assess the continuing value of the second-order national election concept today, and to consider some of the more fruitful areas for research which might build on the advance made by Reif and Schmitt. While the concept has proven useful in studies of a range of elections beyond just those for the European Parliament, including those for regional and local assemblies as well as referendums, this review will concentrate solely on EP elections. Concluding that Reif and Schmitt’s characterisation remains broadly valid today, the article allows that while this does not mean there is necessarily a democratic deficit within the EU, there may be changes that could be made to encourage a more effective electoral process.
Negotiated “policy-arrangements” and their institutionalization are at the heart of global governance. This chapter focuses on the European Union (EU) as one particular arena that produces binding decisions beyond the nation state. For scholars of global governance, the EU constitutes an interesting but idiosyncratic case: the EU’s system of decision-making and enforcement is highly institutionalized; the EU covers a broad policy-remit, touching upon core areas of national sovereignty such as monetary policy or border control; and the EU is exceptionally intrusive and effective, producing binding laws that are widely complied with in its member states. At the same time, the nature of supranational governance – famously described as “less than a federation, more than a regime” (Wallace 1983) – remains open and undefined. For scholars of argumentation, deliberation and persuasion, the European Union is an equally fruitful object of study: the EU’s deliberative decision-style is used to explain compliance with European law (Neyer 2004); the EU is conceptualized as an actor that projects “normative” rather than military power (Manners 2002) and the supranational decision-process serves as testing ground for theories of deliberation (Eriksen and Fossum 2000; Joerges and Neyer 1997a, 1997b), argumentation (Naurin 2010), problem-solving (Elgström and Jönsson 2000), rhetorical action (Schimmelfennig 2001) and judgment (Kornprobst 2008).
Economic Policy
(2010)
Written by four recognized experts with senior experience in research and government, this text is the first comprehensive survival kit for students and practitioners of economic policy. It is set to become an indispensable resource for everyone involved or interested in modern economic policy. Academic scholars willing to engage in policy discussions and students at graduate or advanced undergraduate levels will find it an essential bridge to the policy world.
What makes the book unique is that it combines like no other, facts-based analysis, state-of-the art theories and models, and insights from first-hand policy experience at national and international levels. The book has grown out of ten years of experience teaching economic policy at the graduate level. It provides an intellectually coherent framework to understand the potentialities and limits of economic policy. It addresses positive dimensions (how do policies impact on modern economies?), normative dimensions (what should policymakers aim to achieve and against what should their action be judged?) and political-economy constraints (which are the limits and obstacles to public intervention?). It fills an important gap by reconciling in each major policy area stylized facts of recent economic history, key questions faced by contemporary policymakers, and essential lessons from theory which are captured and explained in a clear, concise, and self-contained way.
All major areas of domestic and international policymaking are covered: fiscal policy, monetary policy, international finance and exchange-rate policy, tax policy, and long-term growth policies. The book concludes with a special chapter on the lessons of the financial crisis.
The authors are intellectually non-partisan and they draw examples from various countries and experiences; from emerging markets to developing economies, shedding light when necessary on local specificities such as European Union rules and instruments. Economic Policy: Theory and Practice is the essential guide to economic policy in the new post-crisis context.