Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (55)
- Editorship book (27)
- Part of a Book (14)
- Book (11)
- Part of Periodical (2)
- Working Paper (2)
Keywords
- Jugend (4)
- Soziologie (4)
- Adolescent (3)
- Federal Republic of Germany (3)
- HBSC (3)
- Rente (3)
- Youth research (3)
- Adolescence (2)
- Bildungsungleichheit (2)
- Education (2)
Jugend, Vorsorge, Finanzen
(2019)
Die vorliegende MetallRente Studie untersucht, welchen Einfluss sozialer Hintergrund, Geschlecht und Bildung auf Einstellungen und Handlungen junger Menschen haben, wenn es um die wichtigen Themen Finanzen und Vorsorge geht. Nach bisher drei Erhebungswellen in den Jahren 2010, 2013 und 2016 ist dies die vierte Auflage der bundesweit repräsentativen Jugendstudie „Jugend, Vorsorge, Finanzen“. 2 500 Jugendliche und junge Erwachsene im Alter von 17 bis 27 Jahren wurden befragt. Erneut wurden auch Gastautorinnen und Gaustautoren aus Wissenschaft, Institutionen und Wirtschaft eingeladen, die Befragungsergebnisse mit ihren Analysen und Kommentaren zu ergänzen. Wie bewältigen junge Menschen das Spannungsfeld von eigener Verantwortung und staatlicher Regulierung? Welche Veränderungen werden gebraucht für eine zukunftsfeste Alterssicherung, die zur Lebenswirklichkeit der jungen Menschen passt? Auch die vierte MetallRente Studie geht mit dem Anspruch ans Werk, nicht nur zu analysieren, sondern Schlussfolgerungen zu formulieren sowie Forderungen und Vorschläge zu adressieren.
Understanding Public Health
(2019)
This book develops a new model of the genesis of health, on the basis of the interplay between genetic and environmental factors. Hurrelmann and Richter build upon the basic theories of health and the popular model of salutogenesis to offer a comprehensive interdisciplinary theory of health genesis and success: Productive Processing of Reality (PPR).
The authors show that health is the lifelong dynamic process of dealing with the internal reality of physical and psychological impulses and the external reality of social and material impulses. To demonstrate this, the book is split into three interconnected parts. Part A analyses the determinants of health, providing an overview of the insights of current research and the impact of socioeconomic influences and gender on health. Part B covers public health, social, learning and coping theories, all of which understand health as an interaction between people and their environment. Part C draws on these four theories to outline PPR, stressing the interrelation between physical and mental constitution and the demands of the social and mental environment, and suggesting strategies for coping with these demands during the life course.
Understanding Public Health: Productive Processing of Internal and External Reality will be valuable reading for students and researchers in psychology, sociology, educational science, public health and medical science, and for policymakers in public health.
Im Oktober 2019 erscheint – erstmals in der Verlagsgruppe Beltz – die nächste Shell Jugendstudie. Unter dem Titel »Jugend 2019 – 18. Shell Jugendstudie« zeichnet sie ein aktuelles Porträt der jungen Generation in Deutschland. Das Standardwerk wird vom Autorenteam Prof. Dr. Mathias Albert, Prof. Dr. Klaus Hurrelmann, Prof. Dr. Gudrun Quenzel und Kantar Public, München, verfasst. Seit 1953 zeichnet die Shell Jugendstudie nach, wie junge Menschen in Deutschland ihr Leben und seine Herausforderungen meistern und welche Einstellungen sie dabei bilden. Die neue Studie porträtiert eine Generation, die die Zukunft als Thema für sich entdeckt – Jugendliche sorgen sich nicht etwa nur um ihre individuelle berufliche Entwicklung, sondern um Umweltverschmutzung und Klimawandel. Sie formulieren Ansprüche an Politik und Gesellschaft, wollen mitgestalten und sich Gehör verschaffen.
The aim of this study is to examine the impact of class-level class climate on school-aged children’s life satisfaction. Data was derived from the German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) using sixth grade school-aged children (n = 4,764, 483 classes). Class climate includes indicators of teachers' care and monitoring, demands, interaction, autonomy, as well as school-aged children's attitudes towards schoolwork at the class- and individual-level. Results showed that individual perceived class climate in terms of teachers' care and monitoring and autonomy was positively related to life satisfaction, whereas school-related demands were related to lower life satisfaction. Besides teachers' care and monitoring at class-level, indicators of class climate were not associated with school-aged children’s life satisfaction, while the individual perceived class climate is more important for life satisfaction.
BACKGROUND:
Studies among students with special educational needs (SEN) in separate special schools (SSS) and mainstream schools (MS) are particularly applicable to educational attainment and social participation. However, indicators of health and wellbeing have rarely been considered.
AIMS:
This study investigates two related topics: first, health and wellbeing differences between students with SEN in special schools (SSS) and students without SEN in regular schools, and second, the rarely considered question whether health and wellbeing among students with SEN differ between school settings (i.e. MS vs. SSS).
METHODS AND PROCEDURES:
Bivariate and multilevel analyses are applied with data from the German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) with 5267 students (grade 7).
OUTCOMES AND RESULTS:
After having controlled for background characteristics, students in SSS report higher likelihoods of poor self-rated health compared to students in higher track schools. Self-rated health of students with SEN does not significantly differ between MS vs. SSS. For life satisfaction, students with SEN show higher likelihoods of low life satisfaction when attending MS.
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS:
Teachers in inclusive settings are encouraged to establish class work and teaching that support a real change from class placement to inclusive culture in order to suitably support students with SEN.
Background
Features of schools and classes are closely related to students´ health and wellbeing. However, class composition (e.g. in terms of school performance) has rarely been examined in relation to students´ health and wellbeing. This study focuses on the so called Big-Fish-Little-Pond-Effect (BFLPE), by investigating whether the level of high-performing students in classroom is negatively associated with psychosomatic complaints of students who perceive themselves as poor performers.
Methods
Data were derived from the German sample of the WHO-Collaborative “Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC)” study 2013/2014. The sample included 5226 11-, 13- and 15-year-old students. Individual perceived school performance (PSP) was included (very good/good vs. average/below average PSP) at the individual student-level. At the class-level, school performance in class was generated by aggregating the share (in percentage) of students who report a very good/good PSP to the class-level, indicating the percentage of students with good/very good PSP in classroom. Using multilevel regression models, the association between class-level school performance (in percentage of students with very good/good PSP) and individual psychosomatic complaints were analyzed, stratified by students´ individual PSP.
Results
Students who report average/below average PSP showed higher likelihoods of psychosomatic complaints (Odds Ratio: 1.75; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.52–2.03) compared to counterparts with very good/good PSP. The aggregated class-level PSP was not significantly associated with psychosomatic complaints. However, in line with the BFLPE, results further revealed that students with average/below average PSP, who attend classes with a higher percentage of students who report very good/good PSP, had higher likelihoods of psychosomatic complaints (Odds Ratio: 1.91; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.01–4.01) compared to classmates with very good/good PSP.
Conclusions
This study revealed that class composition in terms of PSP was differentially associated with students´ psychosomatic complaints, depending on their individual PSP. Findings highlight the vulnerability of students with poor PSP placed in classes with a higher percentage of students with good PSP. Results of this study therefore indicate a need for initiatives for low performing students from teachers and school staff in class.
Immer mehr Schulen stehen vor der Herausforderung, inklusive Strukturen zu etablieren, also Schülerinnen und Schüler mit besonderem pädagogischen Förderbedarf in den Regelbetrieb einzugliedern. Aus einer interdisziplinären Perspektive beleuchtet der Band nicht nur leistungsbezogene Aspekte der schulischen Inklusion von heterogenen und vulnerablen Schülergruppen, sondern erweitert die Debatte um Aspekte des Wohlbefindens, die eng mit der schulischen Leistung korrespondieren. Ein Schwerpunkt liegt außerdem auf der Belastung und dem Wohlbefinden von Lehrkräften sowie den Herausforderungen mit schulischer Heterogenität und Inklusion.