Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (55)
- Editorship book (27)
- Part of a Book (14)
- Book (11)
- Part of Periodical (2)
- Working Paper (2)
Keywords
- Jugend (4)
- Soziologie (4)
- Adolescent (3)
- Federal Republic of Germany (3)
- HBSC (3)
- Rente (3)
- Youth research (3)
- Adolescence (2)
- Bildungsungleichheit (2)
- Education (2)
- Germany (2)
- Health inequalities (2)
- Multilevel analysis (2)
- Research results (2)
- Socialization (2)
- Sozialisation (2)
- Subjective health (2)
- Survey (2)
- Value-orientation (2)
- Zwei-Wege-Modell (2)
- - (1)
- Adolescents (1)
- Age groups (1)
- Altersvorsorge, Jugend, Finanzen (1)
- Aufsatzsammlung (1)
- Bezugswissenschaften (1)
- Bildungsforschung (1)
- Bildungsniveau (1)
- Bildungspolitik (1)
- Biography (1)
- Care (1)
- Child well-being (1)
- Child well-being in Germany (1)
- Childhood Studies (1)
- Compliance (1)
- Coping (1)
- Deutschland (1)
- Development (1)
- Developmental tasks (1)
- Doctor visits (1)
- Economic inequalities (1)
- Educational differentiation (1)
- Einstellung (1)
- Elternbildung (1)
- Empirical social research (1)
- Entwicklungsaufgaben (1)
- Familien- und Schulforschung (1)
- Family (1)
- Forschung (1)
- Freedom (1)
- Future perspective (1)
- Förderung salutogener Potenziale (1)
- Gebundene Gesundheitsförderung (1)
- Gender gap (1)
- Gender-Mainstreaming (1)
- General population (1)
- Gesamtschule (1)
- Geschlecht (1)
- Geschlechterunterschied (1)
- Gesundheit (1)
- Gesundheit | Bildung | Erziehungswissenschaft | Soziologie | Schulentwicklung (1)
- Gesundheit, Fehltage, Wohlbefinden, Schule, Klassenklima, Nationales Bildungspanel (NEPS), self-rated health, school absence, wellbeing, school, class climate, National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) (1)
- Gesundheitliche Ungleichheit (1)
- Gesundheits- und Krankheitsforschung (1)
- Gesundheitsbildung (1)
- Gesundheitskompetenz - Nationaler Aktionsplan - Health Literacy - Deutschland (1)
- Gesundheitswissenschaften (1)
- Gymnasium (1)
- HLS-EU-Q (1)
- Health Literacy (1)
- Health inequality (1)
- Health literacy (1)
- Health sciences (1)
- Health-sensitive public policy (1)
- Inclusion; Life satisfaction; Multilevel modeling; NEPS; Self-rated health; Special educational needs (1)
- Individualism (1)
- Integrierte Sekundarschule (1)
- Jugendforschung (1)
- Jugendliche (1)
- Kindheits- und Jugendforschung (1)
- Kindheitsforschung (1)
- Kombination von Bildungs- und Sozialpolitik (1)
- Krankheit (1)
- Lebenswelt (1)
- Leisure time behavior (1)
- Life course (1)
- Living conditions (1)
- Macro-level determinants (1)
- Media (1)
- Modell der produktiven Realitätsverarbeitung (1)
- Motivation (1)
- PISA (1)
- Patient education (1)
- Persönlichkeitsentwicklung (1)
- Physiotherapie (1)
- Physiotherapy (1)
- Political activity (1)
- Political attitude (1)
- Pragmatics (1)
- Protest (1)
- Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung (1)
- Psychologie der Kindheit (1)
- Reality orientation (1)
- Recession (1)
- Reference sciences (1)
- Respect (1)
- Scandinavian paradox (1)
- Schulsystem (1)
- Skandinavisches Gesundheitsparadoxon (1)
- Social background (1)
- Social determinants of health (1)
- Social relations (1)
- Socialization research (1)
- Socio-economic factors (1)
- Socioeconomic inequality (1)
- Socioeconomic status (1)
- Sociology (1)
- Soziale Herkunft (1)
- Soziale Stratifikationsmuster (1)
- Sozialisationstheorie (1)
- Status inconsistency (1)
- Status insecurity (1)
- Subjektive Gesundheit (1)
- Theory (1)
- Time-use (1)
- Tobacco smoking (1)
- Utilization (1)
- Versorgung (1)
- Welfare state (1)
- Wohlfahrtspolitik (1)
- Wohlfahrtsregimes (1)
- Wohlfahrtsstaatregime (1)
- Youth unemployment (1)
- collaborative approach (1)
- coronaspezifische Gesundheitskompetenz; Covid-19; Gesundheitskompetenz; HLS-Covid-Q22; Trendstudie (1)
- diffusion (1)
- dissemination (1)
- dreigliedriges Schulsystem (1)
- gesundheitliche Ungleichheit (1)
- health literacy (1)
- implementation (1)
- integrierte Sekundarschule (1)
- internationale Schulleistungsvergleiche (1)
- makro-strukturelle Determinanten (1)
- multiple Beschwerden (1)
- national action plan (1)
- school performance; social comparison; life satisfaction; “big-fish-little-pond”-effect; multilevel analysis; National Educational Panel Study; Germany (1)
- sozioökonomischer Status (1)
- ökonomische Ungleichheit (1)
There is an “infodemic” associated with the COVID-19 pandemic—an overabundance of valid and invalid information. Health literacy is the ability to access, understand, appraise, and apply health information, making it crucial for navigating coronavirus and COVID-19 information environments. A cross-sectional representative study of participants ≥ 16 years in Germany was conducted using an online survey. A coronavirus-related health literacy measure was developed (HLS-COVID-Q22). Internal consistency was very high (α = 0.940; ρ = 0.891) and construct validity suggests a sufficient model fit, making HLS-COVID-Q22 a feasible tool for assessing coronavirus-related health literacy in population surveys. While 49.9% of our sample had sufficient levels of coronavirus-related health literacy, 50.1% had “problematic” (15.2%) or “inadequate” (34.9%) levels. Although the overall level of health literacy is high, a vast number of participants report difficulties dealing with coronavirus and COVID-19 information. The participants felt well informed about coronavirus, but 47.8% reported having difficulties judging whether they could trust media information on COVID-19. Confusion about coronavirus information was significantly higher among those who had lower health literacy. This calls for targeted public information campaigns and promotion of population-based health literacy for better navigation of information environments during the infodemic, identification of disinformation, and decision-making based on reliable and trustworthy information.
Background
The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the lives of children and adolescents worldwide. The German COPSY study is among the first population-based longitudinal studies to examine the mental health impact of the pandemic. The objective of the study was to assess changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and mental health in children and adolescents and to identify the associated risk and resource factors during the pandemic.
Methods
A nationwide longitudinal survey was conducted with two waves during the pandemic (May/June 2020 and December 2020/January 2021). In total, n = 1923 children and adolescents aged 7 to 17 years and their parents participated (retention rate from wave 1 to wave 2: 85%). The self-report and parent-proxy surveys assessed HRQoL (KIDSCREEN-10), mental health problems (SDQ with the subscales emotional problems, conduct problems, hyperactivity, and peer problems), anxiety (SCARED), depressive symptoms (CES-DC, PHQ-2) and psychosomatic complaints (HBSC-SCL). Mixed model panel regression analyses were conducted to examine longitudinal changes in mental health and to identify risk and resource factors.
Results
The HRQoL of children and adolescents decreased during the pandemic, and emotional problems, peer-related mental health problems, anxiety, depressive and psychosomatic symptoms increased over time, however the change in global mental health problems from wave 1 to wave 2 was not significant, and some changes were negligible. Socially disadvantaged children and children of mentally burdened parents were at particular risk of impaired mental health, while female gender and older age were associated with fewer mental health problems. A positive family climate and social support supported the mental health of children and adolescents during the pandemic.
Discussion
Health promotion, prevention and intervention strategies could support children and adolescents in coping with the pandemic and protect and maintain their mental health
Purpose
The German population-based longitudinal COVID-19 and Psychological Health study monitors changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and mental health of children and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic and identifies vulnerable groups.
Methods
A nationwide, population-based survey was conducted in May 2020 to June 2020 (Wave 1), December 2020 to January 2021 (Wave 2), and September 2021 to October 2021 (Wave 3). In total, n = 2,097 children and adolescents aged 7–17 years were investigated using measures to assess HRQoL (KIDSCREEN-10), mental health problems (SDQ), anxiety (SCARED), depressive symptoms(PHQ-2), and psychosomatic complaints(HBSC-SCL).
Results
The prevalence of low HRQoL increased from 15% prepandemic to 40% and 48% in Waves 1 and 2 and improved slightly to 35% in Wave 3 (all differences significant). Similarly, overall mental health problems increased from 18% prepandemic to 29% in Wave 1 and 31% in Wave 2 to 28% in Wave 3 (all differences significant, except Wave 3 vs. 2), anxiety increased from 15% prepandemic to 24% and 30% in Waves 1 and 2 and was still 27% in Wave 3. Depressive symptoms increased from 10% prepandemic to 11% and 15% in Waves 1 and 2 and were 11% in Wave 3. A group with low parental education, restricted living conditions, migration background, and parental mental health problems was at significantly increased risk of HRQoL and mental health impairments.
Discussion
The prevalence of low HRQoL, mental health problems, and anxiety has been elevated throughout the pandemic. Thus, mental health promotion, prevention, and intervention strategies need to be implemented to support adolescents–particularly those at risk.
Die coronaspezifische Gesundheitskompetenz der Bevölkerung in Deutschland lag im Jahr 2020 zwischen 34,8% und 50,1%, wobei sie sich im Jahresverlauf signifikant verbessert hatte. Einem großen Teil der Bevölkerung fällt es nicht immer leicht, mit Gesundheitsinformationen zu Covid-19 umzugehen, so wie es die hier beschriebene HLS-Covid-19 Studie zur coronaspezifischen Gesundheitskompetenz aufzeigt. Die größte Herausforderung stellt das Beurteilen von Informationen dar. Die Ergebnisse deuten zudem auf einen sozialen Gradienten für niedrige coronaspezifische Gesundheitskompetenz hin.
Die MetallRente Jugendstudie ist die umfassendste repräsentative Untersuchung zum Finanz- und Vorsorgeverhalten junger Menschen in Deutschland. Die fünfte Studie analysiert auch Einflüsse der Corona-Pandemie auf die Bereitschaft junger Menschen zur Zukunftsplanung und ihr Vorsorgeverhalten. Trauen 17- bis 27-Jährige dem Staat eine zukunftsfeste Alterssicherung für ihre Generation zu? Wie stehen sie zu immer neuen politischen Vorschlägen? Wie schauen sie auf Sicherheit und Rendite? Angesichts Niedrigzinsen, Überalterung und mangelnden Reformen orientiert sich eine ganze Generation neu.
Im Oktober 2019 erscheint – erstmals in der Verlagsgruppe Beltz – die nächste Shell Jugendstudie. Unter dem Titel »Jugend 2019 – 18. Shell Jugendstudie« zeichnet sie ein aktuelles Porträt der jungen Generation in Deutschland. Das Standardwerk wird vom Autorenteam Prof. Dr. Mathias Albert, Prof. Dr. Klaus Hurrelmann, Prof. Dr. Gudrun Quenzel und Kantar Public, München, verfasst. Seit 1953 zeichnet die Shell Jugendstudie nach, wie junge Menschen in Deutschland ihr Leben und seine Herausforderungen meistern und welche Einstellungen sie dabei bilden. Die neue Studie porträtiert eine Generation, die die Zukunft als Thema für sich entdeckt – Jugendliche sorgen sich nicht etwa nur um ihre individuelle berufliche Entwicklung, sondern um Umweltverschmutzung und Klimawandel. Sie formulieren Ansprüche an Politik und Gesellschaft, wollen mitgestalten und sich Gehör verschaffen.