Polygyny or Misogyny? Reexamining the "First Law of Intergroup Conflict"

  • Kanazawa (2009) proposes a “first law of intergroup conflict,” suggesting that polygyny and its impact on access to reproductive women provides “the ultimate cause” for civil war. This controversial claim is supported by an empirical analysis at odds with most existing studies of civil wars. We reconsider the influence of polygyny in a more conventional statistical model. We fail to find evidence that ethnic groups with polygyny engage more frequently in civil wars, although it is possible to find results indicating that civil wars may be more common in states with legal polygamy. We detail how these findings seem at odds with Kanazawa’s theory and argue that misogyny seems a more plausible source of insights into the context for civil war and peace. We then show that civil wars are less common when women’s rights are better established and that legal polygamy has no discernable residual effect once women’s rights are considered.

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Author(s):Kristian Skrede Gleditsch, Julian WucherpfennigORCiD, Simon Hug, Karina Garnes Reigstad
Parent Title (English):The Journal of Politics
ISSN:0022-3816
Publication year:2011
Publishing Institution:Hertie School
First Page:265
Last Page:270
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381610001003
Release Date:2018/10/01
Volume:73
Issue:1
Licence of document (German):Metadaten / metadata
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.