• search hit 8 of 79
Back to Result List

The European Parliament’s AI Regulation: Should We Call It Progress?

  • The European Union (EU) has been leading the world with its influential digital regulation. However, the EU’s legislative process is sufficiently complex and careful that some national legislation clearly influenced by the EU’s AI Regulation is already in place in other countries, before the law has even been finalized in the EU. Meanwhile, other states and regions are just beginning to develop AI policy. For both the EU and such others, we here describe the outcomes of the first round of legislative action by one of the EU’s two legislative bodies, the European Parliament, in terms of modifying the Artificial Intelligence Act. The Parliament has introduced a number of changes we consider to be enormously important, some in a very good way, and some in a very bad way. At stake is whether the AI Act really brings the power and strength of product law to continuously scale improved practice on products in the EU with intelligent components, or whether the law becomes window-dressing aimed only at attacking a few elite actors post hoc. We describe here the EU process, the changes and our recommendations.

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Author(s):Joanna BrysonORCiD, Meeri Haataja
Parent Title (English):Amicus Curiae
Publication year:2023
Publishing Institution:Hertie School
First Page:707
Last Page:718
Related URL:https://journals.sas.ac.uk/amicus/article/view/5612
DOI:https://doi.org/10.14296/ac.v4i3.5612
Release Date:2023/06/20
Volume:4, Series 2
Issue:3
Hertie School Research:Centre for Digital Governance
AY 22/23:AY 22/23
Licence of document (German):Metadaten / metadata
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.