Predicting the Decline of Ethnic Conflict: Was Gurr Right and For the Right Reasons?

  • Many scholars have detected a decrease of political violence, but the causes of this decline remain unclear. As a contribution to this debate, we revisit the controversy over trends in conflict after the end of the Cold War. While many made ominous predictions of surging ethnic warfare, Gurr presented evidence of a pacifying trend since the mid-1990s and predicted a further decline in ethnic conflict in an article on ‘the waning of ethnic war’. Leveraging more recent data on ethnic groups and their participation in ethnic civil wars, this study evaluates if Gurr was right about the decline of ethnic conflict, and if he was right for the right reasons. We assess whether an increase in governments’ accommodative policies toward ethnic groups can plausibly account for a decline in ethnic civil war. Our findings lend considerable support to an account of the pacifying trend that stresses the granting of group rights, regional autonomy, and inclusion in power-sharing, as well as democratization and peacekeeping.

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar
Metadaten
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Author(s):Lars-Erik Cederman, Kristian Skrede Gleditsch, Julian WucherpfennigORCiD
Parent Title (English):Journal of Peace Research
ISSN:0022-3433
Publication year:2017
Publishing Institution:Hertie School
First Page:262
Last Page:274
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343316684191
Release Date:2018/10/01
Tag:civil war, decline of war, ethnic conflict, ethnic inclusion, group rights, power sharing
Volume:52
Issue:2
Licence of document (German):Metadaten / metadata
Verstanden ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.