TY - CHAP A1 - Dasgupta, Purnamita A1 - Edenhofer, Ottmar A1 - Amezquita, Adriana Mercedes Avendano A1 - Bento, Antonio M. A1 - Caney, Simon A1 - De la Croix, David A1 - Fosu, Augustin Kwasi A1 - Jakob, Michael A1 - Saam, Marianne A1 - Shrader-Frechette, Kristin A1 - Flachsland, Christian A1 - Weyant, John A1 - You, Liangzhi A1 - Delgado-Ramos, Gian A1 - Dorsch, Marcel J. A1 - Klenert, David A1 - Lempert, Robert A1 - Leroux, Justin A1 - Lessmann, Kai A1 - Liu, Junguo A1 - Mattauch, Linus A1 - Perrings, Charles A1 - Schwerhoff, Gregor A1 - Seyboth, Kristin A1 - Streckel, Jan T1 - Economic Growth, Human Development, and Welfare T2 - Rethinking Society for the 21st Century Report of the International Panel on Social Progress N2 - Economic Growth, Human Development, and Welfare" of the 2018 Report of the International Panel on Social Progress (IPSP). Mission of the IPSP: The International Panel on Social Progress (IPSP) will harness the competence of hundreds of experts about social issues and will deliver a report addressed to all social actors, movements, organizations, politicians and decision-makers, in order to provide them with the best expertise on questions that bear on social change. The Panel will seek consensus whenever possible but will not hide controversies and will honestly present up-to-date arguments and analyses, and debates about them, in an accessible way. The Panel will have no partisan political agenda, but will aim at restoring hope in social progress and stimulating intellectual and public debates. Different political and philosophical views may conceive of social progress in different ways, emphasizing values such as freedom, dignity, or equality. The Panel will retain full independence from political parties, governments, and organizations with a partisan agenda. While the Panel will primarily work for the dissemination of knowledge to all relevant actors in society, it will also foster research on the topics it will study and help to revive interest for research in social long-term prospective analysis Y1 - 2018 SN - 9781108399661 U6 - https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108399661 SP - 139 EP - 184 PB - Cambridge University Press ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Fabre, Adrien A1 - Douenne, Thomas A1 - Mattauch, Linus T1 - International Attitudes Toward Global Policies T2 - Berlin School of Economics Discussion Papers N2 - We document majority support for policies entailing global redistribution and climate mitigation. Recent surveys on 40,680 respondents in 20 countries covering 72% of global carbon emissions show strong support for an effective and progressive way to combat climate change and poverty: a global carbon price funding a global basic income, called the “Global Climate Scheme” (GCS). Using complementary surveys on 8,000 respondents in the U.S., France, Germany, Spain, and the UK, we test several hypotheses that could reconcile strong stated support with a lack of salience in policy circles. A list experiment shows no evidence of social desirability bias, majorities are willing to sign a real-stake petition, and global redistribution ranks high in the prioritization of policies. Conjoint analyses reveal that a platform is more likely to be preferred if it contains the GCS or a global tax on millionaires. Universalistic attitudes are confirmed by an incentivized donation. In sum, our findings indicate that global policies are genuinely supported by a majority of the population. Public opinion is therefore not the reason that they do not prominently enter political debates. T3 - Berlin School of Economics Discussion Papers - 22 Y1 - 2023 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-50240 UR - https://berlinschoolofeconomics.de/insights/bse-discussion-papers ET - No. 22 ER - TY - RPRT A1 - Funke, Franziska A1 - Mattauch, Linus A1 - Douenne, Thomas A1 - Fabre, Adrien A1 - Stiglitz, Joseph E. T1 - Supporting carbon pricing when interest rates are higher T2 - Berlin School of Economics Discussion Papers N2 - To accept carbon pricing, citizens desire viable alternatives to fossil-fuel based options. As inflation and higher interest rates have exacerbated access barriers for capital-intensive green substitutes, the political success of carbon pricing will be measured by how well policy design enables consumers to switch. T3 - Berlin School of Economics Discussion Papers - 38 Y1 - 2024 UR - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:kobv:b1570-opus4-53889 UR - https://berlinschoolofeconomics.de/insights/discussion-papers ET - No. 38 ER -